User talk:Silver seren
Page contents not supported in other languages.
User:Silver seren/Userpageheader
Archives |
| Index |
This page has archives. Sections older than14 days may be auto-archived byLowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 2. |
Hello! Voting in the2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:26, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sent byMediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team –15:21, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
(This message was sent toUser:Silver seren and is being posted here due to a redirect.)
Hi,User:Silver seren. Thank you for your contributions in the "Self-published source being used to support unverifiable claims" discussion.
However, further talk is useless - even if me and some other members were generating correct consensus through policy-based arguments.
A group of users is very interested in preventing that source from being deleted, along with its false statements. One of them is gatekeeping those three articles against any changes and he is impossible to talk with or dissuade.
The only way I see to remove that source and the article passages that are violating policy isvia dispute resolution with binding effect, i.e an RfC or an administrator-related procedure. Should you feel the need to seek more information on why this issue has become difficult to solve peacefully, send me an e-mail.
Thank you for your contributions.Deathnotekll2 (talk)00:42, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You are invited to join the discussion atWikipedia:VPP § RfC - The inclusion of destination lists in Airport articles.Danners430tweaks made20:06, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Since the previous discussion, because of my poor judgement at grouping together unrelated sources, was a mess and was archived with no outcome, I've started a fresh, targeted, discussion about FR24. Pinging you because you were in the old discussion :-)Danners430tweaks made14:43, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
