User talk:NotJamestack
Page contents not supported in other languages.
| This isNotJamestack'stalk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
Article policies |
Archives:1Auto-archiving period:10 days  |
This is a talk page. Please be respectful here.
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at theWikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard regarding dispute the revert of edit. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is "Ekaterina Kotrikadze".
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!
Hi @NotJamestack,
Thank you for the feedback. I'm the closest friend of Du. Out of respect; I'd removed the link that Wikimedia don't like before I revised it. And the fact can be replaced by other sources. And I did my best to give all sources except one paragraph. So, I would appreciate it if you don't remove all the important revisions I made and give me a chance to add another source.Zhanglin73 (talk)21:48, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
At first of all I think isaac newton was not the one who Discovered Any publication at that time there where many scientist who was working for it they are also have concept about the gravity but the one who theft the other theory the Issac Newton just coped out the explanation of gravity whose was found by other Scientist at that timeInternetBaba100 (talk)15:41, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, just wanted to let you know the warning about the TA editing atBilly Porter wasn't necessary given the message I left on their talk page. They just seem unfamiliar with Wikipedia as opposed to malicious, and the warning could be construed as a bit BITE-y given their edit summary in the article.jellyfish ✉23:29, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Per your edit summaryhere, youcan remove block notices from your own talk page. What you aren't allowed to remove isdeclined unblock requests. SeeWP:BLANKING. -The BushrangerOne ping only21:44, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! I'm sorry - would you mind elaborating on your reverts of my edits? I did leave an edit summary explaining my intention to relocate the removed content to its own page, not to delete it entirely. Your edit reverts also removed content I added to the Macedonian grammar page (on plural nouns.)Aviatorilor (talk)20:15, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
HelloUser:NotJamestack: Thank you for approving the last round of edits I requested onChris Hollins (politician) Wikipedia page. I have one outstanding edit left that is on the talk page dated October 30th. I was wondering if you might have a few minutes to review my comments about Isabel Longoria. It is regarding an inaccurate statement. I appreciate your time. Best,Laurenbvc (talk)20:45, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. Please add inline citations to the changes you want to be made.NotJamestack (✉️|📝)21:56, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]Hello @NotJamestack, I saw you undid my recent changes to the pageMetropolitan areas of Italy. I thin it was a mistake, since the previous data was outdated and dishomogeneous (there was a banner about that on the page). I updated the tables with OECD data and removed redundant, outdated tables.~2025-40483-82 (talk)14:34, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Your feedback is requested atTalk:First Chechen War on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.
(replacingYapperbot)SodiumBot (botop|talk)19:32, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Your feedback is requested atTalk:2025 Bondi Beach shooting on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.
(replacingYapperbot)SodiumBot (botop|talk)17:30, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
We cross-corrected a vandal. My apologies,Augmented Seventh (talk)21:58, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I hope we can resolve this issue civilly. Can you identify what sections you believe were made with the use of LLM? Perhaps if I explain my writing/research process for any aspect that raised alarm bells for you, I can show exactly how did it myself. Also, what AI detector did you use? That can also assist us in resolving what habits of mine it considers machine generated, perhaps it is a sourcing issue? I am willing to revise any sources that are deemed insufficient.Nnds1996 (talk)22:30, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]