Hi Kelob2678! I noticedyour contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, thecontributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing!Mellk (talk)22:47, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, can you explain why youdeleted the table you added yourself? --Altenmann>talk20:58, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Kelob2678! I noticed that you recently made an edit atBelarusian Orthodox Church and marked it as "minor", but it may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia: it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such astypo corrections or reverting obviousvandalism. Any edit that changes themeaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you.fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk)11:56, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just a small thank you for your work on Belarus and the elections. I know a lot of the most important articles for Belarus are sparsely covered and poor, especially politics in a lot of cases, even if they are notable, and it doesn't help with the WikiProject being (very) inactive. Keep up what you are doing with the work on here - it is of high quality. • Apollo468• 03:17, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you foryour contributions. It seems that you may have addedpublic domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such asList of United States cities by crime rate. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipediaguideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described atWikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of anattribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. —Diannaa 🍁 (talk)21:39, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I saw you recently improved the Vladimir Putin article. I thought you might be interested in improving the article so it has a bigger audience.
I did some preliminary research and come up with this:
Refined query:
I hope you found the information helpful. And I hope you lead the charge to improve the article. I would do it myself, but off wiki activities prevent me from doing so.
Was the information helpful? If you are not able to improve the article, do you know others who would be interested?Knox490 (talk)07:28, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Kelob2678. Thank you for your work onFerdinand Feldbrugge. Another editor,Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part ofnew pages patrol and left the following comment:
Nice start! Since this article falls underWP:BLP, please add in-line citations to the few claims that do not already have footnotes. Thanks and have a great day!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with{{Re|Mariamnei}}.(Message delivered via thePage Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Mariamnei (talk)09:02, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Your contribution here, was well researched, essential and, in my opinion, might just help finally bring to an end the far too early and often totally unnecessary creation of these pages. While some supercentenarian pages are obviously needed and are, to a certain degree, interesting, the vast majority are mundane beyond belief and completely unencyclopedic. Sincere regards,MattSucci (talk)14:57, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, for your information, as you were involved in the previous discussion atWikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Airport destination lists or theRfC on consensus of WP:DESTNOT atWT:NOT, I wanted to let you know that the discussed broader RfC has been opened atWP:VPP#RfC - The inclusion of destination lists in Airport articles. If you wish to contribute, please feel free. Many thanks!Danners430tweaks made21:08, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
InWikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of World Heritage Sites in the Soviet Union, you stated "tentative list. The 1989 list for the SU contained 28 elements, of which 25 were later inscribed". As I want to get this article toWP:Featured list candidates, do you have any sources for the 1989 tentative list of the Soviet Union? If you could provide a link to them, I would be able to expand it enough to meet the length and completeness requirements that theWP:Featured list criteria require. Thank you,User:Easternsaharareview this05:40, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It comprised 28 properties, of which only twelve matched or varied slightly from the properties listed earlier.It cites UNESCO archives as a source, but I wasn't able to access them online. On page 228, there is another list by the Soviet Union, it is complete, but not final.Kelob2678 (talk)12:01, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]