This isKeivan.f'stalk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text.Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome!Learn to edit;get help. Assume good faith Be polite andavoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seekdispute resolution if needed

Archives:1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11Auto-archiving period:31 days

Welcome to Keivan.f's talk page.I will generally respondhere to comments that are posted here, rather than replying via your talk page (or the article's talk page, if you are writing to me here about an article), so you may want towatch this page until you are responded to, or let me know where specifically you'd prefer the reply. I will try toWP:PING you as well. Conversely if you are replying to something I've said on another talk page, reply there and include{{ping|Keivan.f}} to alert me.

Please don't template me! Everybody makes mistakes, and this user findsuser warning templates impersonal and disrespectful. If there's something you'd like to say, please take a moment to write a comment belowin your own words.

It is4:07 AM where this user lives.^(Purge)

I changed the image in the infobox because the photograph previously on it was not of the best resolution, so a portrait of him, or a higher resolution photograph of him would be better. Also, if it contained an image of Queen Victoria at the time of the wedding, or a little bit later, it would be better to put that on the Royal Consort Part than a portrait of Albert, or just add the Victoria image as a second image in the part.Richard the Lionheart MS (talk)19:52, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's understandable. But please bear in mind that a photograph of a historical figure may be preferred in such cases to a portrait painting. Regardless of my personal feelings about this, a change in the infobox image of any article usually requires a consensus on that article's talk page. You can bring this up atTalk:Prince Albert of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha and see if your suggestion garners any support.Keivan.f^Talk20:24, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:34, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not a professional photographer, and I imagine most of us aren’t. How do you go about adding new images to Commons—such as ones found in an e-book, magazine, news site, and so on—when it’s permitted to do so? I’d appreciate your guidance. Cheers.MSincccc (talk)16:07, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Start by reading throughthis page on the Commons, which pretty much says everything that I would also tell you. Pay attention to details onlicensing, and you can seek advice atthe help desk if you have any questions.Keivan.f^Talk03:13, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am thinking of writing and publishing aWiki-graphy (a short account of my time on English Wikipedia) and wanted to get your opinion first.

I am considering mentioning a few editors I have learned from and, only with explicit permission, possibly using brief screenshots of talk-page exchanges or article sections. Usernames or excerpts would be included only if the editor is comfortable with that.

I would appreciate your view on whether this seems reasonable and appropriate. Thank you.MSincccc (talk)08:11, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I would personally be cautious a little bit because not everyone might like to have their conversations shared. Little anecdotes here and there should be fine though. Try using your own words rather than just copy pasting or screenshotting the info.Keivan.f^Talk14:52, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your response. I have decided to publish an on-wiki essay, about my time and experience here, in my own words.MSincccc (talk)09:07, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I was just wondering if it shows on your end that I changed the title of the painting. Over the past few days I've noticed that some edits are being recorded differently than what I actually did. For example, it says I changed the title, but on my end I was editing something completely different. I added her date of birth to the early life section. I'm confused because this has happened a few times now, where the edit I made is showing as something else entirely. My last edit on her page was removing the year she was baptised, since it was shortly after she was born. Could you check who it shows as having changed the title on your end?Also, do you know if there's some kind of glitch that can cause this? Sometimes the system seems to mis‑label edits, and I don't understand why. Thank you.ItsShandog (talk)09:49, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh never mind sorry when I'm looking down the page it shows another editor done it but when I look at your revision it makes it look like I changed the title lol so was confused.ItsShandog (talk)09:50, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No problem.Keivan.f^Talk14:48, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]