HelloKatzrockso! The thread you created at theTeahouse,Searching for sources, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can stillread the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, pleasecreate a new thread. See also thehelp page about the archival process.The archival was done bylowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered byKiranBOT, bothautomated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing{{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk)03:05, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

	The Citation Barnstar
	Good observations. Keep up the good work!7&6=thirteen (☎)13:20, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Katzrockso. I noticed you contested my proposed deletion ofGhazi Nara a couple days ago. There's nothing wrong with that of course, but I would have appreciated it if you left a message at my talk page. I was wondering if you were still looking for sources for the article, because if you were unable to find any, I plan on nominating it for deletion.Chess enjoyer (talk)09:36, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Katzrockso: pinging you, as its been almost a day and you're currently active.Chess enjoyer (talk)10:36, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, feel free to nominate it for deletion. If I had found sources, I no longer have them in my browser anymore and I can't recall what I ended up finding. @Chess enjoyerKatzrockso (talk)10:38, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:44, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently editedGender-critical feminism by country, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageSterile. Such links areusually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles.(Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk)07:54, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for responding to me on USAir Flight 499, but I think it would make that article notable. I am wondering if you could maybe try to find sources on Vasp Flight 780?Zaptain United (talk)03:33, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Zaptain United

I couldn't find too much on VASP Flight 780. I'm assuming this is in reference toDraft:VASP Flight 780? I'm not an expert in searching in Portuguese, but there are some sources on the Portuguese Wikipedia atpt:Voo VASP Cargo 780, but it looks like that is how the English Wikipedia was started. There is this recent article[1] about the crash in reference to the history of aviation inAcre, Brazil.

I did find this book[2] that covers a number of Brazilian plane accidents, though, but this crash wasn't mentioned.Katzrockso (talk)03:59, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your effort. I appreciate you trying to find sources.Zaptain United (talk)03:35, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate the compliment on ARE. I feel the same way about you. We have worked well together on a number of things where we agree and disagree. And I have enjoyed that, and hope to be a model for others on here. :) ←Metallurgist (talk)04:57, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Katzrockso. Thank you for your work onMoses Ashworth. Another editor,Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part ofnew pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice start!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with{{Re|Mariamnei}}.(Message delivered via thePage Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk)09:38, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's been 8 weeks since you removed the proposed deletion tag. Please add at least one reliable source.Bearian (talk)01:31, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Bearian, I see that there is already a source in the external links section. While it is standard Wikipedia citation practice and required that sources are provided in-line for BLP articles (and indeed that would be the first start for cleaning up this article),WP:BLPPROD requires that there are no external links in the article to delete the article. I added another citation in-line to assuage any concerns, but there were some others I found.Katzrockso (talk)01:50, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.Bearian (talk)01:55, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this is regarding the Third Opinion you provided

The talk-page section was closed before I had a chance to request some further clarification, so I’m posting my previously written message here instead. Apologies for the extra hassle.

• 'From my understanding,Katzrockso suggested that the resolution would be to remove Somali from the lead and include both Somali and Arabic in the footnote, as both languages are closely related to the subject of this page. Whether Arabic must be considered 'native' for inclusion is irrelevant. This would also help avoid 'cluttering' - his words, not mine - which is true. Can you please confirm, Katzrockso? Regarding the nisba, I’ve already said that I will respect whichever opinion is given in the third opinion request and will not object to it. I still believe it is notWP:UNDUE, but I will accept the outcome regardless'

CqHydra (talk)02:18, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

TL;DR - could you clarify whether your third opinion meant that both Somali and Arabic should be included in a footnote, rather than having one, the other, or both appear in the lead section?CqHydra (talk)02:20, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Originally I thought that the Isaaq tribe was significantly associated with both Arabic and Somali languages, which would have warranted transforming the names to a footnote. However, upon reviewing more sources I did not find evidence for substantial association ofIsaaq with the Arabic language, so I object to changes to introduce the Arabic language version into the lead of the artic.Katzrockso (talk)02:23, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related togender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated ascontentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics anddoesnot imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to ascontentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by theArbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipediaadministrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should editcarefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to thepurposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicablepolicies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain fromgaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topicsprocedures, you may ask them at thearbitration clerks' noticeboard or you maylearn more about this contentious topic. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the{{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Valereee (talk)18:13, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Now that Battle for Dream Island is on Wikipedia, I think you should add the list of characters. They do it on TV series and movies all the time, so you should do it for BFDI as well.PowerRanger200 (talk)16:38, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, The current page of2026 Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly election is getting increasinglypromotional tone, especially the recent additions today in "key issues" section have more unnecessary details. They also removed maintenance templates. I request you to edit the page to align with Wikipedia policies, especiallyWP:NPOV. Thank you.Anbarasan1523 (talk)16:32, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings @Katzrockso. I have moved the pageSouthern Kaduna genocide back to its original title. Please initiate a discussion before moving the page if you have a reason why it should be moved to the name you gave it. Thanks.Kambai Akau (talk)16:04, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, @Kambai Akau, I did give a reason for why the page is named: no serious scholars claim that those events are genocide from my research on this topic.Katzrockso (talk)18:49, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I'm seeing this reply late. At the end of the discussion on the talk page, whatever the outcome is, I'm fine with it. But I actually wish it remains with its original title.Kambai Akau (talk)04:19, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am working on trying to make this article a good article. I have a personal connection to this article since it was the one that got me into Wikipedia editing. Could you possibly check if there are anymore sources on this? I am using all the reliable sources that I can find on this accident in this good article attempt.Zaptain United (talk)04:09, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Zaptain UnitedFedEx Express Flight 087 this article?

I found this mention of the incident in the book Country Capitalism[3] discussing the incident in the broader context of the companyFedEx, you could include this information in the background section perhaps discussing the company. There's a video here[4] from the AP.Katzrockso (talk)04:03, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that is the article. But what page in the book does it mention the accident? The video seems to be about a completely unrelated overrun of an Airbus. Thanks for trying to find more sources.Zaptain United (talk)04:14, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's on page 133 near the bottom. At least I believe it is this incident, I would have to check the citation given to verify.

Good catch on that AP news that was from June 1999.Katzrockso (talk)06:24, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Could you check if there are possibly any sources in Filipino since it happened in the Philippines.Zaptain United (talk)02:45, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Could you also check if there are anymore sources on this runway overrun including flight number? I am considering making an article on this. 

PAL plane crashes at Manila airport, all 147 safe - UPI Archives

Memories of Old Manila & Beyond | Do You also remember, another Plane, this time a Philippine Airlines Airbus overshoots the runway up to the West Service Road going to Merville, while... | Facebook

Plane Spotters PH | [Throwback Accident - 1987] | FacebookZaptain United (talk)05:10, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, are going to reply to my request? I am fine if you say no and decline.Zaptain United (talk)03:15, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm sorry I missed those comments somehow or glanced over them too quickly to realize you were asking about another incident. When I get home I can take a look.Katzrockso (talk)03:16, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alright I understandZaptain United (talk)03:21, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Zaptain United I didn't find anything additional about this newspaper crash on newspapers.com. There were 2 short stories, but nothing more substantial than the UPI report [indeed one of the newspaper reports directly cites UPI]. There is one more UPI article here[5].

In the comments there, someone posted a picture of a clipping from The Manila Bulletin [Sept. 20, 1987 Sunday edition]. You might be able to ask atWP:RX for a copy of the full newspaper article. I also saw thisAP news report. I also saw on this Facebook post[6] that someone posted a clipping of The Philippine Daily Inquirer 24 September 1987 report on this incident.

Unfortunately, I do not think that this crash passesWP:NEVENT, as there was no lasting coverage or impact. You might be able to include this plane crash in another article, however. I'm not sure what lists there are, but you might be able to make a list of plane crashes that could include this plane crash in it.Katzrockso (talk)03:29, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Did you check any Filipino sources? Also, this accident happens atNinoy Aquino International Airport. Could you check if this article mentions this accident in any way?

https://www.rappler.com/newsbreak/iq/210041-list-naia-runways-mishaps-accidents/Zaptain United (talk)03:37, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I did find this source about this accident.

https://www.berkshireeagle.com/philippines-airbus-crash-1987/image_694d76b4-17c3-11ec-8baf-139dba21102e.htmlZaptain United (talk)03:40, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That appears to just be an image with a caption. I didn't find any corresponding article. The incident was briefly mentioned in this Congressional report[7].

I found what I believe is a mention of this incident in a 1988 edition of the Far Eastern Economic Review, in a piece titled "PAL's not so friendly skies". The clipping is here[8], but the whole article is not easily viewable. You might be able to ask for it atWP:RX.

I did find that this incident is mentioned atList of Philippine Airlines accidents and incidents already.

@Zaptain UnitedKatzrockso (talk)03:49, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I do not have access to Filipino newspapers and I am not aware of any online newspaper archives for Filipino newspapers. You might be able to ask atWikipedia:Tambayan Philippines for further information on how to access their newspaper archives, as this is a region I have done almost no research on.

The article you linked is available on archive.org[9], but does not mention the September 1987 crash. However, given that Rappler appears to be a reliable source and mentions "NAIA runway mishaps over the years", you might be able to create a list of runway accidents at this airport (it conceivably passesWP:NLIST) or perhaps include a short list at the articleNinoy Aquino International Airport.

@Zaptain UnitedKatzrockso (talk)03:43, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Katzrockso, thanks for the message. I appreciate you pointing out the problems. The text is my own summary of what the sources say, and you were right about the links. I went through all of them, fixed the dead links, and replaced the one that was paywalled. All reference links are now correct. Much appreciation!Vivowrites (talk)05:57, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Vivowrites The Strait Times article still doesn't work and I don't find any article under that title.Katzrockso (talk)01:39, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, @Katzrockso; Are you still willing to provide a TO on theLVCM article? I know the argument was long, so, to simplify, I think all that is being asked of you at this point is to decide between my proffereddiff or having the page remain where it is, currently. Any work beyond that will likely require a separate TO and/ot dispute resolution. I apologize for nudging you like this, but it had been over twenty-four hours; I'm more than happy to post a new TO request if you're not feeling up to it. Regardless, I appreciate your time!MWFwiki (talk)03:13, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I apologize, I thought I had subscribed to that conversation, but I didn't. @MWFwiki I will review the conversation againKatzrockso (talk)03:27, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No worries at all, thanks again!MWFwiki (talk)03:42, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		The Third Opinion Award
		I deeply and sincerely appreciate your assistance and hope to work with you again! Cheers —MWFwiki (talk)08:20, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I appreciate it!Katzrockso (talk)08:23, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atTalk:The Age of Disclosure on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

(replacingYapperbot)SodiumBot (botop|talk)21:31, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

HI, @Katzrockso; I'll keep this brief. The TA is re-adding content that you explicitly removed. Could you please revert the LVCM article to thisdiff — if they revert your reversion I'll take it to dispute. Thanks!MWFwiki (talk)05:46, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This isWP:CAN. MWFwiki has made 27 edits to the article in the past day. I have made a total of FIVE. This user is purely trying to push his pro-police agenda using all methods possible, and has now stopped to trying to recruit others to his position.~2025-37688-98 (talk)06:04, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		For your work on splitting and expandingGender-critical feminism by country. Awarded byCdjp1 (talk)14:59, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,Katzrockso; Apologies for bothering you so soon, again. I have a small favor to ask of you. I answered a request for a third-opinion. One of the editors is in disagreement with my opinion. In order to avoid escalation between the two involved editors, and given that the article is relatively niche, I offered to the editor in disagreement to seek a fourth opinion,to which they agreed. I specified that I had you in-mind as I found your assistance with my content dispute to be fair and balanced and I don't feel that anyone could claim that you are anything but neutral. If you're willing to assist, allow me to lay-out the dispute at its most basic level:

• Media Mender feels that a specific show should be added to theList of programmes broadcast by Sony SAB article. Media Mender prefers the current state of the page.
• CNMall41 disputes the addition, asserting that only "original programming" should be added. CNMall41 prefersthis diff.

I opined that the show should be added. I further opined that the show's addition would bebetter disputed by asserting that its sourcing is not reliable. Additional sources have since been found/added and Media Mender has since claimed consensus and re-added the content. Full discussion may be readhere.MWFwiki (talk)21:09, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify, I did not agree. I just didn't offer an objection. As stated, it will likely be moot as I am going to either propose a merge to the main page or a move to an "original programming" list where inclusion criteria could be discussed. Being that I did not revert the OP's ONUS bludgeon, it would also be moot as their preferred version is there. --CNMall41 (talk)21:14, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @MWFwiki, thanks for asking. Unfortunately, I already saw that discussion when I checked 3O and am not familiar enough with the relevant policies and guidelines to form an opinion. Sorry if that's not helpful, but I reread the discussion and still don't have a strongly formed opinion.Katzrockso (talk)01:07, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Katzrockso No worries; I'll let them settle it between themselves. CheersMWFwiki (talk)01:11, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atTalk:City College of New York on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

(replacingYapperbot)SodiumBot (botop|talk)06:30, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Katzrockso. You tagged this article with{{Close paraphrasing}} but didn't provide an URL. Do you happen to remember what this article is paraphrasing from? — Tenshi! (Talk page)00:17, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I do recall this sentence (The fraternal birth order effect has been observed in places such as Brazil, Canada, Finland, Iran, Italy, The Netherlands, Samoa, Spain, Turkey, the United Kingdom, and the United States) being very close to a source I had found @Tenshi Hinanawi, but it was a broader issue across the article. I was working on rewriting this article, but lost motivation.Katzrockso (talk)00:26, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently made edits related to genetically modified organisms, commercially produced agricultural chemicals and the companies that produce them, broadly construed. This is a standard message to inform you that genetically modified organisms, commercially produced agricultural chemicals and the companies that produce them, broadly construed is a designated contentious topic. Additionally, editors are not allowed to make more than 1 revert on the same page within 24 hours in this topic. This messagedoesnot imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please seeWikipedia:Contentious topics.KoA (talk)17:05, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Katzrockso, like the template says, this isn't implying any wrongdoing. When I see someone new come into the topic area, I just like to make sure people are aware that they're getting into a Contentious Topic so they aren't blindsided by some of the expectations. Most of it is centered aroundWP:1RR and getting consensus for new changes when disputed rather than reinserting them, avoidingWP:ASPERSIONS, etc.

I also want to be clear that I hope none of my comments came across as short towards you. We all just got off of very long contentious content discussion, so most of my comments are moreso addressing the general state the article reached, how we got there, and trying to keep things stable for awhile.KoA (talk)17:06, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, for your information, as you were involved in the previous discussion atWikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Airport destination lists or theRfC on consensus of WP:DESTNOT atWT:NOT, I wanted to let you know that the discussed broader RfC has been opened atWP:VPP#RfC - The inclusion of destination lists in Airport articles. If you wish to contribute, please feel free. Many thanks!Danners430_{tweaks made}21:09, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atCategory talk:Canadian sportspeople by country of descent on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

(replacingYapperbot)SodiumBot (botop|talk)03:30, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Funny given that I was already tagged there.Katzrockso (talk)04:47, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atTalk:Asperger syndrome on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

(replacingYapperbot)SodiumBot (botop|talk)19:30, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I know we often have differences of opinion at AfD but I very much respect your work and skill at finding sources. Thanks for the sockpuppet check there as well.

PARAKANYAA (talk)06:13, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! As I just noted on your talk page, the editor was confirmed as a sockpuppet and blocked. I struck all the comments in the AfD.Katzrockso (talk)06:15, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent editing to this topic area, which has been sorely in need of fresh eyes for some time. You have done an excellent job of making cogent arguments grounded inWP:PAG and appropriate edits to the relevant articles. When others have disagreed and accused you of wrong-doing, you have wisely kept your cool. Kudos! You may find mywelcome toNosferattus--who also recently began editing in this topic area and was met with immediate opposition--to be of some help.

In that advice, I had said, "In my experience, when it feels like non-involved editors would see the problem, a simple neutrally-wordedWP:RfC will end the log-jam. IMHO it is the best way to get fresh eyes on a problem like that you are experiencing." Your choice to bring the sourcing question toWP:RS/N was wise, accomplishing the same goal. Thank you for your perseverance. --David Tornheim (talk)09:19, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered,File:When causes interact.png, has been listed atWikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see thediscussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.ChaoticEnby (talk ·contribs)06:02, 20 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Chaotic Enby I nominated it for speedy deletion, if you can do that and not waste the time at FfD.Katzrockso (talk)06:59, 20 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your previous efforts on my last request. I appreciate you trying. These articles were redirected at AFD. They are both fatal accidents and I want to see if I could restore them with enough sources

1972 Thandwe Burma Airways Douglas C-47 crash

Ethiopian Air Lines Flight 372Zaptain United (talk)16:09, 20 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A contemporary AP news report is all I could find.[10].

For the second one, I found a few contemporary newspaper reports ([11][12]). There was also a court case in 1963[13]. There is a short mention here[14] in "Encyclopedia of African Airlines".

I don't think this coverage is enough to make these events notable.

@Zaptain UnitedKatzrockso (talk)21:37, 20 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Katzrockso: Enjoy theholiday season andwinter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers,Iljhgtn (talk)18:31, 24 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Iljhgtn (talk)18:31, 24 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

story ·music ·places

Thank you for coming to my talk with a question, - I'm sorry that I confused your nomination with another one when I replied there. No, no worries, nothing happened with your nom, it's waiting for someone to promote it to a "prep"! The process is copied to the article talk, - keep an eye on it. -Laughter for Christmas: enjoy the season! --Gerda Arendt (talk)17:25, 25 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

OK, makes sense! I didn't see it on theTemplate talk:Did you know#Nominations page so I was confused it had gotten lost in some limbo or something. Good to know that isn't the case @Gerda Arendt

Happy holidays to you too!Katzrockso (talk)17:42, 25 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's now inTemplate talk:Did you know/Approved. Just leave the nomination on your watchlist, and some day it will be promoted to a prep. --Gerda Arendt (talk)17:45, 25 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atWikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Replace NEWLLM on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

(replacingYapperbot)SodiumBot (botop|talk)13:30, 28 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:2001_MK_Airlines_Boeing_747_crash

I have found 15 sources so far and have linked all of them on the draft's talk page. Could you check if there are anymore? Thanks for giving me sources on the previous questions by the way.Zaptain United (talk)23:18, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, are you going to reply? If you don't want me asking for sources on your talk page anymore, I will leave you alone.Zaptain United (talk)03:45, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, sorry I didn't respond. I think I looked into this at the time you asked, but I didn't find anything and got distracted before I responded. Let me take another look.

@Zaptain UnitedKatzrockso (talk)06:46, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

There was a brief mention of this crash in 2004 when another Boeing-747 crashed[15][16], but nothing particularly substantive.Katzrockso (talk)06:57, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a way to access newspaper.com for free? I got the message "You've reached your 5-article limit."Zaptain United (talk)17:21, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Try in an incognito tab or another browser. You might also be able to archive those urls on archive.is or archive.org/web and then access it that way.

You should also be able to request a newspapers.com membership throughWP:The Wikipedia Library (the form is here[17]). I have been a paying subscriber for a number of years, but I know of a few people who got access there.

@Zaptain UnitedKatzrockso (talk)18:03, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

On3 January 2026,Did you know was updated with a fact from the articleSweet Sulphur Springs, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was... that theSweet Sulphur Springs hotel was famous for the supposed healing powers of its mineral waters? The nomination discussion and review may be seen atTemplate:Did you know nominations/Sweet Sulphur Springs. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page(here's how,Sweet Sulphur Springs), and the hook may be added tothe statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free tonominate it.

♠PMC♠(talk)00:02, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

story ·music ·places

Thank you for the article, and congrats to the DYK!Happy new year! --Gerda Arendt (talk)12:21, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the detective work forMarie Engle! - Look forWind of Change in music, and for vacation in places. The story is abouta unique Bach cantata, a 2013 DYK, and relates toa current DYK nom. --Gerda Arendt (talk)23:36, 31 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atTalk:Ukraine and weapons of mass destruction on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

(replacingYapperbot)SodiumBot (botop|talk)05:31, 6 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I read your comments and also appreciate your contributions onTri Dao. That said, I think it is perfectly reasonable to ask for your opinion. I do not have dozens of pending drafts, and I occasionally create articles from scratch.

You mentioned that the draft has many issues. Would you mind sharing those with me? I would like to understand, objectively, what the specific issues are. I believe the subject is notable, but I want to know if there is anything else in the article that needs attention. For instance, I did not add the authority boxes at the end. That said, I would appreciate clarity on what exactly needs to be fixed here. How am I supposed to know if I do not ask?

I have added the appropriate infobox, and I do not believe the text is promotional or otherwise inappropriate. For reference, here is first page I previously created about an academic,Venus Seunga Jin.WestwoodHights573 (talk)04:59, 8 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Katzrockso I made some more edits to the intro hereTri Dao and would greatly appreciate any suggestions as to what should be included in an article about a professor when you have the time. I have edited someone's else article in the past, and it looks like this now, and this is after my edit, it was not in the best shape.Rita Gunther McGrath. It was not even included she was a director, I added that.WestwoodHights573 (talk)17:43, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. (feel free to delete this once seen)RecardedByzantian (talk)09:41, 8 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Why didn't you try going through the typical dispute resolution procedures @RecardedByzantian? I doubt that AN will do much, this is basically a content issue.Katzrockso (talk)10:47, 8 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please do notattack other editors. Comment oncontent, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Pleasestay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.   ▶ I am Grorp ◀03:14, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing in my comment was directed at a contributor @Grorp. ThanksKatzrockso (talk)03:15, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atTalk:The Old Bar on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

(replacingYapperbot)SodiumBot (botop|talk)03:30, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete well-sourced information, as you didat Murder of Wu Shuoyan]. See the on-goingRSN discussion.Feoffer (talk)13:41, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Feoffer I am well aware of that RSN discussion. The content in question is from a 25 year old article, is of the opinion of one scholar (so should be attributed if included), is not directly relevant to Introvigne (since the publication in question was not a CESNUR publication, but a respectedOxford University Press). We don't add unrelated criticisms of a person to every mention of their work, this is an obvious SYNTH issue.Katzrockso (talk)14:16, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Also the proper place for this discussion is the articles talk page rather than my own talk pageKatzrockso (talk)14:29, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atUser talk:HermanWanggai on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

(replacingYapperbot)SodiumBot (botop|talk)23:32, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atWikipedia talk:Naming conventions (films) on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

(replacingYapperbot)SodiumBot (botop|talk)23:30, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atTalk:Julian Assange on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

(replacingYapperbot)SodiumBot (botop|talk)01:30, 15 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atWikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous) on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

(replacingYapperbot)SodiumBot (botop|talk)19:31, 15 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atWikipedia talk:WikiProject National Football League on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

(replacingYapperbot)SodiumBot (botop|talk)23:31, 17 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Unrelated to the Frankfurt discussion - do you know of a way to get some eyes on an RfC closure? A fellow editor requested the closure of the VPP RfC last year, and it's still extant...Danners430_{tweaks made}17:42, 18 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Danners430

Other thanWP:Closure requests orWP:Administrator's noticeboard, not really. If it's been onWP:CR for a while, you can ask for additional eyes atWP:AN but that's not particularly common.Katzrockso (talk)19:27, 18 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atWikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

(replacingYapperbot)SodiumBot (botop|talk)17:30, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you atWikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of anArbitration Committee decision. The thread isWikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Riposte97. Thank you.TarnishedPath^talk06:25, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I just want to check if I can make an article on the 1989 near crash. There is information about the incident in theWiderøe Flight 839 final report starting on page 30.

https://www.baaa-acro.com/sites/default/files/2020-07/.pdf

https://www.flynytt.no/vaeroy-ulykken-63-sekunder-som-endret-norsk-luftfart/132644Zaptain United (talk)16:18, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

That first link does not work for me.

That there was an entire National Geographic episode on it is very good, as well as this source. I would say that this near crash is very likely notable due to those sources (flyntt.no, NatGeo), but it would help if you could describe what's in the other source.

@Zaptain United.Katzrockso (talk)17:25, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The other source is the final report for Wideroe Flight 839 and it has 2 pages of information on the near crash starting on page 30. You can go on the article for that crash, go check on the final report, and skip to page 30. I am asking you if you can find another source for the incident since I want more than 3 sources.Zaptain United (talk)17:35, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atTalk:Snokhachestvo on a "All RFCs" request for comment, and atTemplate talk:Infobox Australian place on a "Wikipedia style and naming" request for comment, and atTalk:Sanctioned Suicide on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

(replacingYapperbot)SodiumBot (botop|talk)23:42, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedians who opt out of ACE messages