Thank you for your contributions. Unfortunately, many of your attempted copyedits either changed the meaning, or actually introduced grammar or style errors. Please refrain from making copyedits going forward if you are not comfortable with the rules of formal English writing.Remsense 🌈 论21:48, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @Gianni888I hope you're doing well. Actually in the articleKamboj the edit has been restored to to old version which is only hyping muslim Kamboh, which is good but the kamboj is a community of all religions so i request to restore the edit. Which includes the whole religions information of kamboj.Thank you.--Kambojahistory (talk)04:11, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more ofyour recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made toKamboja, did not appear to be constructive and have beenreverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with ourpolicies and guidelines. You can find information about these at ourwelcome page which also provides further information aboutcontributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please useyour sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message onmy talk page. Thank you.Agent 007 (talk)19:23, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.It doesnot imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to imposecontentious topics restrictions—such asediting restrictions,bans, orblocks—on editors who do not strictly followWikipedia's policies, expectedstandards of behaviour, or thepage-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see theguidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Agent 007 (talk)19:26, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the notice. I understand and appreciate the importance of maintaining high standards in topic areas under discretionary sanctions.

Regarding the Kamboj article, I don't view it as incorrect, but rather as a work in progress. I see it as a valuable foundation that can be improved to better reflect the history of the Kamboj/Kamboh community, as well as to highlight notable individuals associated with it throughout history. My intent is to contribute constructively by helping develop the article in line with Wikipedia’s policies and sourcing guidelines.

If there are any specific areas of concern, I’m open to feedback and willing to discuss them further.Gianni888 (talk)00:31, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Gianni888 Please try to use your own words rather than anyGPTs likeChatGPT to reply.Agent 007 (talk)08:34, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Here's some more specific information about the restrictions in this topic. The most relevant one is that "you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days in order to make edits related to ... social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal." You currently have made 126 edits and so are not allowed to edit about this topic on any page, except to makeedit requests on a talk page.

You have recently edited a page related tothe region ofSouth Asia (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), broadly construed, including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups, a topic designated ascontentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics anddoesnot imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to ascontentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by theArbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipediaadministrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should editcarefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to thepurposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicablepolicies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain fromgaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged in, have500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days in order to make edits related to two subtopics: (1) Indian military history, or (2) social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topicsprocedures, you may ask them at thearbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topichere. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the{{Ctopics/aware}} template.

~ Jenson (SilverLocust💬)22:36, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onList of Kamboj Personalities and Families, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of thecriteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• The page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. (Seesection G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If the page you created was a test, please use thesandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.
• It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (Seesection A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please seeWikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be onnotable subjects and should provide references toreliable sources thatverify their content.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company,etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (Seesection A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Pleasesee the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
• It appears to be aboutsomething made up, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (Seesection A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines.Dolphish (talk)03:09, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions toList of Kamboj Personalities and Families. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time becauseit has no sources andit needs more sources to establish notability.I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information atHelp:Unreviewed new page.When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back.Curbon7 (talk)04:17, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have completed the draft review :)Gianni888 (talk)19:08, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you atWikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of anArbitration Committee decision. The thread isGianni888. Thank you.* Pppery *_{it has begun...}15:20, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gianni do you have discord? You can share your information there, if you have please send me your username. ThanksIndianHistorianMan647582 (talk)16:17, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The pageDraft:List of Kamboj Personalities and Families has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done for the following reason:

WP:G5,WP:CT/SA

Under thecriteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact thedeleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a requesthere.asilvering (talk)03:14, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi is there a posibility that i could get the code for the DraftGianni888 (talk)10:08, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently editedMaues, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageKamboja. Such links areusually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles.(Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk)07:55, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedYiwa (tribe), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageBaharlu.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)07:59, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citingverifiable andreliable sources, as you did withthis edit toMaher (surname). Before making any potentially controversialedits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines atWikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article.–LuniZunie ツ_(talk)23:21, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'mJessicapierce. An edit that you recently made toGurdwara Sangat Tola seemed to be a test and has beenreverted. If you want to practice editing, please useyour sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message onmy talk page. Thanks!Jessicapierce (talk)02:21, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedBhai Dayala, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageTarn Taran.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)19:55, 8 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]