Hello, Gianluigi02, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you foryour contributions, especially your edits toList of terrorist incidents in August 2016. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction andGetting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page andHow to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take theWikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visitThe Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember tosign your messages ontalk pages by typing fourtildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check outWikipedia:Questions, ask me onmy talk page, orask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!Vítor (talk)21:48, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing todisambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

List of terrorist incidents in October 2016

added links pointing toIraqi Civil War andIslamic State

List of terrorist incidents in September 2016

added a link pointing toIslamic State

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)11:03, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'mParsley Man. I wanted to let you know that one or more ofyour recent contributions toList of terrorist incidents in July 2016 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use thesandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message onmy talk page. Thanks.Parsley Man (talk)00:33, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did atList of terrorist incidents in October 2016, without citing areliable source. Please review the guidelines atWikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article.No sources for these being terrorist attacks, and we would need official sources, not just newspapersDoug Wellertalk16:12, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did atList of terrorist incidents in July 2016. Your edits appear to constitutevandalism and have beenreverted. If you would like to experiment, please use thesandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in theloss of editing privileges. Thank you.Parsley Man (talk)00:46, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop addingunsourced content, as you did toGerman consulate in Mazar-i-Sharif attack. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy onverifiability. If you continue to do so, you may beblocked from editing Wikipedia.
Your edit[1] made the infobox & text contradictory. If the deaths change, please provide a reliable source.220of^Borg12:47, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you foryour contributions toWikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

I noticed your recent edit toGerman consulate in Mazar-i-Sharif attack does not have anedit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by settingPreferences →Editing →Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.Thanks!220of^Borg12:49, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gianluigi02. Voting in the2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please reviewthe candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may beblocked from editing without further warning the next time you addunsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did atList of terrorist incidents in December 2016.Psychonaut (talk)20:50, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is youronly warning; if you violate Wikipedia'sbiographies of living persons policy by insertingunsourced orpoorly sourceddefamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at2016 Berlin attack, you may beblocked from editing without further notice. -MrX21:27, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'mReferenceBot. I haveautomatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the2016 Grand-Bassam shootings page,your edit caused anunsupported parameter error(help). (Fix |Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is afalse positive, you canreport it to my operator.Thanks,ReferenceBot (talk)00:21, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are fluent in the Italian language for that in my opinion, be amended2017 Istanbul nightclub attack page in Italian because there are some errors in the numbers of victims.Yazan Kanbar (talk)12:44, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, now I modify the Italian Page.Gianluigi02

I notice you are doing some edits on the January 2017 article recently, but are not using the proper referencing. Please see the talk page discussion on that article, which includes an easy and short template that you can use for the references. I personally fixed all of them yesterday, and now I see new incidents are being added without the right referencing, so please take a moment to read the talk section, and use the proper tags in the future. Thanks!Skycycle (talk)00:26, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am posting this again - you continue to use poor English, poor referencing, and poor attribution while editing the article. Please respond to this, because the next step will be to either up the protection of the article, or request a block for your account.Skycycle (talk)15:20, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article2017 Marseille melee attack is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/2017 Marseille melee attack until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.st170e14:54, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'mReferenceBot. I haveautomatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On theInsurgency in the Maghreb (2002–present) page,your edit caused abroken reference name(help). (Fix |Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is afalse positive, you canreport it to my operator.Thanks,ReferenceBot (talk)00:19, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you foryour contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from2016 Ouagadougou attacks intoInsurgency in the Maghreb (2002–present). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere,Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in anedit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying andlinking to the copied page, e.g.,copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted{{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons atWikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. —Diannaa 🍁 (talk)21:38, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Gianluigi02, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) toOperation Ghazi have been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without evidence ofpermission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

• You can only copy/translate asmall amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with doublequotation marks (") and cite the source using aninline citation. You can read about this atWikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See alsoHelp:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all informationin your own words and structure, in properparaphrase. Following the source's words too closely can createcopyright problems, so it is not permitted here; seeWikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples,hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources toverify information and to demonstrate that the content is notoriginal research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content isWikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to reviewWikipedia:Copy-paste.
• Ifyou own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, youmay be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. SeeWikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Invery rare cases (that is, for sources that arepublic domain orcompatibly licensed), itmay be possible to include greater portions of a source text.However, please seek help at thehelp desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sourcesmay not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If youdo confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; seeWikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps inWikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must beblocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. sami  ^talk18:33, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may beblocked from editing without further warning the next time you addunsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did atList of terrorist incidents in March 2017. Please add proper references, and do not add incidents that involve civilians (for example Israel/Palestine stabbing attack), or incidents that are part of a military operation.Skycycle (talk)15:18, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:Alleged al-Qaeda recruits requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and it is not presently under discussion atCategories for discussion, or atdisambiguation categories.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpb^T14:03, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.EvergreenFir(talk)18:05, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm leaving you one final warning before a block. Each terrorist incident you addmust be accompanied byreliable sources whichexplicitly labels the event as terrorism. --NeilN^{talk to me}19:58, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@NeilN: the edits continue.[2][3]EvergreenFir(talk)05:35, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedList of terrorist incidents in April 2017, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageBorno. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)09:54, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have beenblocked from editing for a period of72 hours for persistently makingdisruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome tomake useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you mayrequest an unblock by first reading theguide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NeilN^{talk to me}06:38, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may beblocked from editing without further warning the next time you addunsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did atList of terrorist incidents in June 2017.Uncle Roy (talk)16:52, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your edits as the source states: "German prosecutors" said that he had "likely" ties to Islamic terrorism. The same source says though... "Investigators have however not found any indications suggesting that he was a member of jihadist groups like the Islamic State organisation." In other words it is not confirmed or proven yet. -Knowledgekid87 (talk)14:51, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creatingList of terrorist incidents in September 2017, Gianluigi02!

Wikipedia editorMenaechmi just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Hopefully this list stays sparse.

To reply, leave a comment on Menaechmi'stalk page.

Learn more aboutpage curation.

menaechmi (talk)15:44, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.EvergreenFir(talk)07:06, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You need to respond to this or you may be blocked. Also, please never use the Daily Mail as a source, we no longer consider it reliable.Doug Wellertalk12:14, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have beenblocked from editing for a period of72 hours for persistently addingunsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome tomake useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read theguide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Doug Wellertalk14:54, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleJanuary 2017 Baghdad bombings is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/January 2017 Baghdad bombings until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.The Ninja5 Empire (Talk)03:21, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gianluigi02. Voting in the2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gianluigi02, Happy new year! I just looked at the source. It actually says the bombing took place on Sunday - that makes it a December 2017 event. It was just reported on 1 Jan._pseudonymJake Brockman^talk09:48, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, when adding persons to theDeaths in 2018 page, they should be added in alphabetical order for each day. --Marbe166 (talk)13:52, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Again, deceased persons should be added in alphabetical order! --Marbe166 (talk)19:03, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The articleDario Moccia has beenproposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. UnderWikipedia policy, thisbiography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to areliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, seeReferencing for beginners, or ask at thehelp desk. Once you have provided at least onereliable source, you may remove the{{prod blp/dated}} tag.Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you canrequest that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one.Anaxial (talk)21:03, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onDario Moccia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does notcredibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under thecriteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more aboutwhat is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact thedeleting administrator.Nick Moyes (talk)13:04, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onAnthony Cruz (singer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguouscopyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy fromhttps://www.allmusic.com/artist/anthony-cruz-mn0000580016/biography. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source ofinformation, but not as a source ofsentences. This part is crucial:say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violatorswill beblocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then youmust verify that externally by one of the processes explained atWikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, seeWikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look atWikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a questionhere.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines.reddogsix (talk)23:18, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gianluigi02. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia.I'm sorry, but  Anthony Cruz (singer) has been deleted as meetingWP:CSD#G12. Wikipedia is the world's largestfree content encyclopedia. As such, it cannot contain content copyrighted elsewhere. Such content must be completely rewritten and reformatted from scratch. Content published elsewhere copied into Wikipedia must state that it ispublic domain, licensed under theGFDL, or acreative commons license. Cheers, and happy editing.

 --Dlohcierekim  (talk)23:43, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creatingGiuliano Cenci, Gianluigi02!

Wikipedia editorCwmhiraeth just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

This appears to be a translation of the Italian Wikipedia article, and you should provide attribution. Seethis page.

To reply, leave a comment on Cwmhiraeth'stalk page.

Learn more aboutpage curation.

Cwmhiraeth (talk)12:28, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onMartin Lolia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does notcredibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under thecriteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more aboutwhat is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact thedeleting administrator.Razer(talk)16:28, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creatingAlessandro Leogrande, Gianluigi02!

Wikipedia editorGlane23 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

You've made a good start - can you add more references? I found several books and many articles about Sgr. Leogrande in a Google search, most of which are in Italian. Perhaps you can find suitable references among those or elsewhere. Good luck and thank you for the article.

To reply, leave a comment on Glane23'stalk page.

Learn more aboutpage curation.

Geoff |^{Who, me?}21:52, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gianluigi02,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether 2018 Ivory Coast floods should be deleted. Your comments are welcome atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/2018 Ivory Coast floods.

If you're new to the process,articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide onhow to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Dom from Paris (talk)14:45, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Present-tenses in opening sentences:

• Ten peoplewere injured in a car crash in Wadiya.N
• Ten peopleare injured in a car crash in Wadiya.Y

Use words instead of numbers when the number is in the beginning of the sentence:

• 30 people have gone missing after Hurricane Aladeen makes landfall in Wadiya.N
• Thirty people have gone missing after Hurricane Aladeen makes landfall in Wadiya.Y

Common exceptions:

• Describing a past event as the opening sentence will not require present-tenses, but past-tenses.
• If the number at the beginning of a sentence is exceedingly high (i.e. over 100), attempt to paraphrase it and include it some where else in the sentence so it can be written as its numerical value.

CentreLeftRight✉17:42, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,List of terrorist incidents in October 2018, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations fromreliable,independent sources.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is ofcentral importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft todraftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia'sgeneral notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Nick Moyes (talk)15:04, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you find time for it please take a look at the article aboutImelda Marcos. Any help is appreciated. Thanks.BabbaQ (talk)16:44, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited2018 California wildfires, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageMalibu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links areusually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles.(Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)09:53, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gianluigi02. Voting in the2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did atYusif Abubakar, without citing areliable source. Please review the guidelines atWikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.GiantSnowman17:02, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creatingAa Jimmy.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of ourpage curation process and note that:-

Error: No text given for quotation (or equals sign used in the actual argument to an unnamed parameter)

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with{{Re|Abishe}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with~~~~ .

Message delivered via thePage Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

A small question, are you MrRevinsky or Kyruer from twitter?Cleverguy122 (talk)23:26, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, my nickname on twitter is @GianluigiBatti0

Oh ok sorry for bothering.Cleverguy122 (talk)05:08, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

On 26 January 2019,In the news was updated with an item that involved the article2019 South Sulawesi floods, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on thecandidates page. — Martin(MSGJ · talk)22:09, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't cite theIMDb in abiography of a living person, as you did inthis edit. The IMDb isuser-generated, so it should never be cited in abiography of a living person, where the sourcing requirements are even more stringent than usual.NinjaRobotPirate (talk)07:22, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,Francesco Amendolagine, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations fromreliable,independent sources.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is ofcentral importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft todraftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia'sgeneral notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Snickers2686 (talk)16:37, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Another reminder, when you add persons to the Deaths page, they should be inalphabetical order under each day. --Marbe166 (talk)11:30, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yet another reminder... --Marbe166 (talk)16:38, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And another reminder. --Marbe166 (talk)18:41, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I know about that, it was a mistake. Sorry!Gianluigi02 (talk)20:03, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion atTalk:2019 Sri Lanka Easter bombings#Urgent: Tell Twitter and YouTube to remove these accounts that belong to the perpetrators of the attacks.2600:1700:BBD0:8050:796A:F7DB:EFDF:F2A6 (talk)05:35, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,Enrique Álvarez Conde, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations fromreliable,independent sources.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is ofcentral importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft todraftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia'sgeneral notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.SSSB (talk)11:33, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The articleIsaac Kappy has beenproposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. UnderWikipedia policy, thisbiography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to areliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, seeReferencing for beginners, or ask at thehelp desk. Once you have provided at least onereliable source, you may remove the{{prod blp/dated}} tag.Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one.DreamyJazz 🎷^{talk to me |my contributions}18:32, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gianluigi02,

Thanks for creatingRenzo Patria! I edit here too, under the usernameEagleash and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know thatI have taggedthe page as having some issues to fix, as a part of ourpage curation process and note that:-

Page does not show that he complies withWP:NPOL (no indication of any elected position) orWP:GNG. See those pages for more information

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with{{Re|Eagleash}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit theTeahouse.

Delivered via thePage Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Eagleash (talk)14:05, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed onJorge Brovetto requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please seeWikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be onnotable subjects and should provide references toreliable sources thatverify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact thedeleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a requesthere.99.53.112.186 (talk)15:19, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently editedList of people with major depressive disorder, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageYang Yang (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links areusually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles.(Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)14:44, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Yasuhiro Takemoto (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing toLucky Star

Yoshiji Kigami (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing toJapanese

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)08:41, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I've had to revert your good faith edits regarding the disappearance of some of theKyoto Animation employees because you have been listing unreliable sources or sources that do not mention the disappearance of specific staff members. Please wait until official reports are released to avoid misinformation. Thanks!lullabying (talk)17:44, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I did a check on your recent articleEisaku Kawanami and noticed that the list of works (from your edit athttps://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Eisaku_Kawanami&oldid=907404658) is directly copied fromAnime News Network:https://www.animenewsnetwork.com/encyclopedia/people.php?id=37653

Please do not do this. This is copyright violation. Please also checkWP:WikiProject Anime and manga/Online reliable sources, as MyAnimeList is not considered a reliable source. Thanks.lullabying (talk)18:15, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,Eisaku Kawanami, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations fromreliable,independent sources.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is ofcentral importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft todraftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia'sgeneral notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk)06:34, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission toArticles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported byreliable sources.Reliable sources are required so that information can beverified. If you need help with referencing, please seeReferencing for beginners andCiting sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subjectqualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not showsignificant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject inpublished,reliable,secondary sources that areindependent of the subject (see theguidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (seetechnical help and learn aboutmistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Copying the entry from ANN does not establish notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmitwhen they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go toDraft:Eisaku Kawanami and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go toDraft:Eisaku Kawanami, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned andmay be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at theArticles for creation help desk, on thereviewer's talk page or useWikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark •sniff)14:44, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,Gianluigi02!Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at theArticles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at theTeahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!AngusWOOF (bark •sniff)14:44, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I just checkedYoshiji Kigami, an article you created, and noticed that you have copied his filmography fromAnime News Network again:https://www.animenewsnetwork.com/encyclopedia/people.php?id=13294 Please do not do this; this is a copyright violation.

There is currentlyno rush to make articles for any animators that have disappeared, especially when the articles you have created are lacking in citations.lullabying (talk)15:50, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is not good in thearticle:Gianluigi02 atIMDb. That's right in the article:Gianluigi02 atIMDb.Apród (talk)12:26, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleMikiko Watanabe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mikiko Watanabe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.HurricaneGeek2002 (talk)11:02, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop addingunsourced content, as you did onMaxwell Atoms. This violatesWikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may beblocked from editing Wikipedia.NinjaRobotPirate (talk)04:10, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.It doesnot imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules calleddiscretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may imposesanctions on editors who do not strictly followWikipedia's policies, or thepage-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see theguidance on discretionary sanctions and theArbitration Committee's decisionhere. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

NinjaRobotPirate (talk)04:11, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedList of terrorist incidents in September 2019, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageKomsilga (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)07:29, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gianluigi02. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission ordraft page you started,Draft:Francesco Amendolagine.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions atthis link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C)03:07, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Please note that after arecent RfC inclusion criteria were added to articles likeList of terrorist incidents in October 2019. Among them is the criterion that the incident is notable (has a stand-alone article), and as far as I can see the incidents you added were not notable.Sjö (talk)17:26, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gianluigi02

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the usernameKingsif and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’veproposed an article that you started,6 November 2019 Islamist attacks, for deletion because it meets one of therelevant criterion. The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now visible at the top ofthe article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this:{{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click thePublish changes button.

But, please remember toexplain why you think the article should be kept onthe article's talk page andimprove the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later byother means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with{{Re|Kingsif}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via thePage Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Kingsif (talk)20:28, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've now nominated this article for deletion after the proposed deletion tag was removed. The discussion is atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/6 November 2019 Islamist attacks. I'm sorry I forgot to notify you earlier, when I was creating the discussion. Thanks,ansh.66608:15, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:November 2019 crimes in Asia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines.UnitedStatesian (talk)05:38, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedJohan Wahjudi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageIndonesian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)07:43, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article2019 The Hague stabbing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/2019 The Hague stabbing until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.WWGB (talk)00:44, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'mHasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know thatDraft:Eisaku Kawanami, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may requestUserfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available atWP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention.HasteurBot (talk)01:29, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

On the first of January 2020 at around 13:00 o'clock, a Bulgarian mathematician, named Hristo Lesov( Христо Лесов in bulgarian), passed away due to an illness. He was a Maths teacher in Kazanlak at PPMG "Nikola Obreshkov". Please, if you can, add him to the list of people that have died in the year 2020.Toonbk201 (talk)22:13, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! The person must be notable to be added to the list.Gianluigi02 (talk)23:18, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onVittorio Fusari requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguouscopyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy fromhttp://www.identitagolose.com/sito/en/6/4598/chef/vittorio.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source ofinformation, but not as a source ofsentences. This part is crucial:say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violatorswill beblocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then youmust verify that externally by one of the processes explained atWikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, seeWikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look atWikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a questionhere.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines.ミラP02:40, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gianluigi02

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the usernameTheLongTone and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created,Villejuif stabbing, should be deleted. Your comments are welcome atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Villejuif stabbing.

You might like to note that suchdiscussions usually run for seven days and arenot ballot-polls. And,our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with{{Re|TheLongTone}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via thePage Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

TheLongTone (talk)14:06, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,we were born in 2002?(Me too)Are you Italian?VBra02 (talk)19:04, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

YepGianluigi02 (talk)20:21, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Beh,allora..ciao!Vedo che sei ,come me,ateo e politicamente di sinistra.Mi ritengo socialdemocratico, credo fortemente al liberalismo sociale e condivido molte posizoni dei Radicali.VBra02 (talk)19:27, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gianluigi02. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission orDraft page you started, "Eisaku Kawanami".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions atthis link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.kingboyk (talk)22:58, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You should stop reverting my proved edit. You can't simply revert my proven edit without proving your point. Repetitive edit-war will cause to a vandalism report. --A11w1ss3nd (talk)21:53, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The articleVolkmarsen ramming attack has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There is not much information about this event and it doesn't seem notable perWP:NEVENT.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion....discospinster_talk21:33, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gianluigi02

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the usernameTheLongTone and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created,2020 Toronto hammer attack, should be deleted. Your comments are welcome atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/2020 Toronto hammer attack.

You might like to note that suchdiscussions usually run for seven days and arenot ballot-polls. And,our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with{{Re|TheLongTone}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via thePage Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

TheLongTone (talk)13:10, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nice to meet you!

I joined the discussion.Gianluigi02 (talk)13:26, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedHanau shootings, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageKurdish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)09:48, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please make a note that the old icon template e.g. {{it icon}} has now been deleted and will not work in pages such asDeaths in 2020. The template e.g. {{in lang|it}} should now be used instead. Thanks.Ref^(chew)(do)13:35, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. So I wanted to invite you to theCurrent Events WikiProject as you seem to be active on theCurrent Events Portal. Hopefully you will consider joining.Elijahandskip (talk)13:18, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On 24 May 2020,In the news was updated with an item that involved the articleMory Kanté, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on thecandidates page.Spencer^T•C18:29, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You mind telling me why you just straight upinvented some inflammatory BS to throw onto the current news window? I checked the article, at no point did it say this, so you clearly weren't just using a version that was updated.74.90.120.94 (talk)—Precedingundated comment added20:33, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.wave3.com/2020/06/01/man-shot-dead-th-broadway-identified/ according to the victim's sister, he was just a bystander at the time of protests.Gianluigi02 (talk)20:53, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You need to cite sources that actually have the information in them.74.90.120.94 (talk)21:06, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I know, i just forgot to add the source. Sorry for the forgetfulness.Gianluigi02 (talk)21:09, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It happens. Just gotta be careful with this kind of thing. This is a contentious topic and there are definitely a lot more people out there who'd react to this kind of thing far more disproportionately than I74.90.120.94 (talk)06:28, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I know. I'm an active user, I edit every day, and I'm always careful with sources. Thank you for the reportGianluigi02 (talk)09:22, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article2020 shootings of Oakland police officers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/2020 shootings of Oakland police officers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.   Kadzi   (talk)13:14, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:2020s in Oakland, California requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines.Liz^Read!Talk!03:41, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedAldo Bassi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageLatina (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)06:20, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I am just in process of initiating encyclopedic articleDraft:Ex-Muslims. Please do have a look. If topic interests you then do contribute towards expansion of theDraft:Ex-Muslims.

Thanks and regards

Bookku (talk)16:26, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On 23 July 2020,In the news was updated with an item that involved the articleRoy Den Hollander, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on thecandidates page.  — Amakuru (talk)10:06, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I noticed a number of issues (mostly to do with sourcing andWP:BLPCRIME) withthis edit you made toIslamic terrorism in Europe. To wit:

• 2020 Villejuif stabbing: Neither the cited source nor the article confirm that this is Islamic terrorism. Judging by the text, it seems like the investigation is ongoing.
• 2020 Streatham stabbing: That the attacker "expressed Islamic extremist views" is not sufficient for inclusion. We need official sources that call it Islamic terrorism.
• 2020 Romans-sur-Isère knife attack: When a living person has been charged with terrorist crimes but not (yet) been convicted thereof, referring to them as a terrorist is a seriousWP:BLPCRIME violation as well as potentially libellous. For much the same reason, we can't include the attack on this list; Wikipedia's editors must not do the court's job of determining whether the suspect is guilty and of what, and deciding on our own that this was terrorism would be doing precisely that.
• With regardes to the attack in Colombes: same thing as above,WP:BLPCRIME.
• The use ofSputnik (news agency) as a source has beenWP:DEPRECATED by community consensus.
• 2020 Reading stabbing: SimilarWP:BLPCRIME issues as above, except here the suspect has not even been charged with terrorist crimes but strictly murder and attempted murder. Where are we getting "terrorism" (let alone Islamic terrorism) from?
• With regards to the attack in Berlin: that somebody "expressed Islamic extremist views" is not sufficient for inclusion. We need official sources that call it Islamic terrorism.
• You didn't add any source for the attack in Berlin.
• With regards to the attack in Morges: if it is necessary to qualify it as asuspected jihadist attack, it doesn't belong on the list. The cited source also makes it clear that it is not confirmed whether it is a case of terrorism or not.
• The only attack withWP:INTEXT attribution (as mandated byMOS:TERRORIST) is theCharlie Hebdo one, but the cited source in that instance does not actually contain this information.

In the interest of avoiding anWP:Edit war, I figured I'd give you a heads up and a chance to fix these issues (rather than me simply removing your additions wholesale).TompaDompa (talk)22:51, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.It doesnot imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest inArmenia,Azerbaijan, or related conflicts. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules calleddiscretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may imposesanctions on editors who do not strictly followWikipedia's policies, or thepage-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see theguidance on discretionary sanctions and theArbitration Committee's decisionhere. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Cabayi (talk)18:10, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I wanted to invite you to theWikipedia:WikiProject Current events as you have done edits onPortal:Current events. Most editors aren't aware that the project became active again in April 2020. Just wanted to inform you about that and hope you join.Elijahandskip (talk)18:49, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Gianluigi02,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the usernameJohn B123, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started,2020 Quebec City stabbing, for deletion, because there's already a page about that topic atQuebec City stabbing. Please don't be discouraged; we appreciate your effort in creating new articles. To avoid this in the future, consider using the search function to find pages that already cover what you want to write about.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you cancontest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact thedeleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with{{Re|John B123}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via thePage Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk)19:37, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, sorry! I move what I posted on my page to the other Quebec page, thanks!Gianluigi02 (talk)19:59, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)02:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedSchool attacks in China, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageKaiyuan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)06:25, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On 31 December 2020,In the news was updated with an item that involved the articleAmelia Lapeña-Bonifacio, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on thecandidates page.Black Kite (talk)01:37, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On 31 December 2020,In the news was updated with an item that involved the article2020 Aden airport attack, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on thecandidates page. –John M Wolfson (talk •contribs)08:12, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good work! –John M Wolfson (talk •contribs)08:12, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleMuhammad Arif (Indonesian politician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammad Arif (Indonesian politician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

WWGB (talk)01:23, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 2 January 2021,In the news was updated with an item that involved the articleAldo Andretti, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on thecandidates page.The Bushranger_{One ping only}03:08, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 4 January 2021,In the news was updated with an item that involved the articleCarlos do Carmo, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on thecandidates page.Espresso Addict(talk)09:38, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited2020 Reading stabbings, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageTwin Towers.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)06:10, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,Norma (comic artist), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations fromreliable,independent sources.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is ofcentral importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft todraftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia'sgeneral notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969^{TT me}15:42, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedList of structural failures and collapses, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageKep.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)06:05, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:Islamic terrorism in Switzerland requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines.Liz^Read!Talk!15:38, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 23 February 2021,In the news was updated with an item that involved the articleLuca Attanasio, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on thecandidates page.Spencer^T•C03:48, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Gianluigi02, I have changed the total number of casualties to the number reported by the Washington Post, Rudaw is a regional media from Kurdistan/Kurdish language. Wasshinton Post is more Reliable by far in Wikipedia standards. Also there are no more sources backing that "13 wounded" claim.Mr.User200 (talk)18:30, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, regarding your recent additions at2021 Myanmar protests: Which of your inserted sourced do provide the number of 40 protesters being killed or did you just sum up the 3 sources given?! Please take notice ofWP:NPOV.CommanderWaterford (talk)17:09, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There's in the Reuters source.Gianluigi02 (talk)18:32, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gianluigi02, first of all please ping me if you want to read me this. Reuters said that they are referring to a human rights group as already mentioned on the articles talk page. Please do not add further additions without raising consense on the articles talk page, thank you.CommanderWaterford (talk)09:14, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gianluigi02, as noted a couple of hours before please participate the talk page Discussion before adding once again unconfirmed number of deaths. All given sources are WP:RS but these explicitly do NOT confirm the number of deaths.CommanderWaterford (talk)16:11, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:Terrorist incidents in Sweden in the 2020s requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines.UnitedStatesian (talk)02:30, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onRenato Romano requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following adeletion discussion, atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Renato Romano. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact thedeleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a requesthere.CUPIDICAE💕16:01, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited2021 Myanmar protests, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageCBC.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)06:28, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please do not add "confirmed deads" again like here[4] w/o citing aWP:RS and seeking consensus on the talk page. Please take notice ofWP:ADVOCACY, Reuters always do cites witnesses and local media, those are by nature "not confirmed deads". I would also appreciate if you bundle your edits from 8-12 each time to 1 or 2.CommanderWaterford (talk)18:13, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 17 March 2021,In the news was updated with an item that involved the articleThione Seck, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on thecandidates page.Stephen02:22, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,Stanislaw Wolski, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations fromreliable,independent sources.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is ofcentral importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft todraftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia'sgeneral notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969^{TT me}16:35, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 24 March 2021,In the news was updated with an item that involved the articleAdam Zagajewski, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on thecandidates page.Spencer^T•C16:30, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 27 March 2021,In the news was updated with an item that involved the articlePeng Shilu, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on thecandidates page.Spencer^T•C00:57, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 29 March 2021,In the news was updated with an item that involved the articleBattle of Palma, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on thecandidates page.Dumelow (talk)18:46, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Re your edithere, please remember Australia uses the Day/Month/Year (DMY (date)) format. I fixed ithere
Regards,220of^ßorg03:09, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gianluigi, pardon me for not reading the previous day's events this morning. I kept up until the late night but didn't check this morning. Again, pardon me. I am not discrediting your adding of that. It's highly valuable. It was just me not checking. Best regards. --CoryGlee (talk)11:13, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry! It happens to me tooGianluigi02 (talk)11:18, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is a conversation about when it is appropriate to categorize or refer to something as a murder. I noticed that you edited2020 boogaloo killings as a 2020 murders in the United States. This conversation may affect that edit. Seehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:2021_Atlanta_spa_shootings#Category:murder

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article2021 Foutouri attack is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/2021 Foutouri attack until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

SɱαɾƚყPαɳƚʂ22 (Ⓣⓐⓛⓚ)13:09, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'mKepler-1229b. I wanted to let you know that one or more ofyour recent contributions toPortal:Current events/2021 April 13 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use yoursandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at theTeahouse.🪐Kepler-1229b |talk |contribs🪐21:23, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, which contribution?Gianluigi02 (talk)21:49, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This one.🪐Kepler-1229b |talk |contribs🪐17:15, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, could not find diff.🪐Kepler-1229b |talk |contribs🪐17:18, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced orpoorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia aboutliving (or recently deceased) persons, as you did toIda Galli. Thank you.NinjaRobotPirate (talk)04:43, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Any idea why you undo my edites on school bombing page?Marathonmutig (talk)20:12, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.It doesnot imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in theArab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules calleddiscretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may imposesanctions on editors who do not strictly followWikipedia's policies, or thepage-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see theguidance on discretionary sanctions and theArbitration Committee's decisionhere. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Also please pay attention that the whole area is under 1RR --Shrike (talk)08:55, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can we please stop edit warring onOperation Guardian of the Walls. SeeEdit warring on Wikipedia. I did not remove your reference to Al Jazeera even though I disagree why are you removing the refence to Israeli news sources?Nerguy (talk)20:18, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, I'm removing the fact that the children were killed by Palestinian rockets. That is not a confirmed fact. The Israelis and the Palestinians accused each other for the childrens' deaths. You belive that the Palestinians killed them. I belive that the Israelis killed them. But we should not add what belive what is true, but facts. Ten children are dead, and we should add it, without any blaming, because we don't who really carried out it. Or at least, I belive a thing and you belive another, but again, we are not here adding what we belive.Gianluigi02 (talk)20:22, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you foryour contributions toWikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

I noticed your recent edit to2021 Israel–Palestine crisis does not have anedit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. Thesummaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With aWikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by settingPreferences →Editing →Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.Thanks!AllegedlyHuman (talk)22:50, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop yourdisruptive editing. If you continue tovandalize Wikipedia, as you did at2021 Israel–Palestine crisis, you may beblocked from editing. You cannot simply change a sourced detail without an updatedreliable source as you did here:[5] or delete details or a source without explanation as you did here:[6] and[7] and[8]. And leave edit summaries to explain your changes. Thank you --Chefallen (talk)00:58, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You've been applying your conjecture constantly on the article2021 Israel–Palestine crisis. Recently you have added back your conjecture of how many civilians have been killed and what source is false. This is your last warning.LéKashmiriSocialiste (talk)08:45, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.(Prodecural notification, I did not open the discussion)--Asartea^{Talk|Contribs}12:09, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I’m IsraeliSome of the information isn’t true..9 deaths and 500+ wounded And in Gaza 100 of the deaths were actually terrorists It’s important to mention that Hamas sent 1800 rockets to Israel and 300 lended in Gaza, so Israel didn’t kill innocent children. The IDF tells them to leave they just don’t...The rockets I’m getting on a daily basis are war crimes.! Israel hasn’t done any war crimes.!I’m currently sitting in a bomb shelter, in fear. And yes, it’s not Gaza, it’s Israel. Israel is under attack.And the media is only showing one side and people are stupid enough to believe that.Seagull2000 (talk)14:46, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There are 31 children confirmed dead and that's a fact. People who are dying in Israel are innocent victims too, like all the dozens of civilians that are dying in Palestine.Gianluigi02 (talk)18:39, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What you mean for "9 dead and 500+ wounded"?Gianluigi02 (talk)18:40, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the majority of the media are showing just the israeli side, like if Israel is right. No, you in Israel are not in the right position. 125+ people are dead in Palestine, and the majority are civilians. 31 children, several women civilians, farmers at their farm, people in cars in streets. Civilians are dying, and I report that.Gianluigi02 (talk)20:40, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a friendly notice about a proposal to have yearly based WikiProjects. You can find the proposalby clicking here.Elijahandskip (talk)19:03, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• My ApologiesGianluigi02. I "jumped the gun" in the fact that I forgot to actually make the proposal official. I have done that now, so feel free to leave your opinion on the actually proposal. (See:Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/2021).Elijahandskip (talk)19:06, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:2021 in Rome indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!15:56, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:Terrorist incidents in Canada in the 2020s indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!15:05, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:Terrorist incidents in North America in 2021 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!15:06, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,Mohammed Naji (actor), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations fromreliable,independent sources.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is ofcentral importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft todraftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia'sgeneral notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Celestina007 (talk)22:52, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I wonder if you could help out withthese edits? IMO, removing material calling it "excessiv" or "not needed" etecetera is just a variation ofWP:IDONTLIKEIT over at theIslamic terrorism in Europe article. What do you think? Imo the detail is relevant to the topic at hand and comes from reliable sources. I re-added the material but was simply ignored by the deletors.A Thousand Words (talk)14:41, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article2020 Villejuif stabbing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/2020 Villejuif stabbing until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

TheLongTone (talk)12:19, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 9 July 2021,In the news was updated with an item that involved the articleRaffaella Carrà, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on thecandidates page.Stephen00:10, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,Zhan Melnykov, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations fromreliable,independent sources.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is ofcentral importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft todraftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia'sgeneral notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969^{TT me}15:02, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,Fedja Rupel, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations fromreliable,independent sources.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is ofcentral importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft todraftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia'sgeneral notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969^{TT me}15:03, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 24 July 2021,In the news was updated with an item that involved the articleKurt Westergaard, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on thecandidates page.Spencer^T•C21:43, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. InDeaths in 2021, you are repeatedly changing Kazakhstani (the broad demonym covering unconfirmed Kazakh ethnics and those who are not of Kazakh descent but still citizens of the country) to read as though the deceased subject,Yevgeni Pupkov, is a known and confirmed ethnic Kazakh. His article, nor multiple sources, say nothing of the kind. If in doubt he has to be Kazakhstani, to cover the broader mix within the populace. (I've twice asked you to enter a reason in the edit summary box when making that change, and you've not.)Ref^(chew)(do)18:15, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,Sergio Agnoli, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations fromreliable,independent sources.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is ofcentral importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft todraftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia'sgeneral notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Boleyn (talk)21:18, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 31 July 2021,In the news was updated with an item that involved the articleRosine Vieyra Soglo, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on thecandidates page.Spencer^T•C15:17, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 1 August 2021,In the news was updated with an item that involved the articleJanet Banana, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on thecandidates page.Stephen02:13, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedAntonio Pennacchi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageCori.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)06:00, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there - Wikipedia relies onreliable sources toverify information, especially aboutliving people. You didn't provide a source for your changes to theFrancesco Dibenedetto article, but I have found one and added it for you. Please try and remember to include sources yourself with future edits. Please let me know if you have any questions.GiantSnowman11:56, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I always add sources. Sometimes I forgot, like everybody else.Gianluigi02 (talk)12:01, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,Daniele Sasson, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations fromreliable,independent sources.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is ofcentral importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft todraftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia'sgeneral notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969^{TT me}02:40, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedAkhudiat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageKaranganyar.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)06:00, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This edit didn't provide any sources. The current floods in Hubei are mostly unrelated to the 2021 Henan floods, the latter were caused by rainfalls in the last week of July, the former due to rains this week. They are also 500 km apart.[9]Here you are changing the topic of the entire page. You are free to add this content to2021 China floods#Hubei or make a new article2021 Hubei floods.Pieceofmetalwork (talk)10:26, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 16 August 2021,In the news was updated with an item that involved the articleGino Strada, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on thecandidates page.Stephen02:48, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gianluigi02. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:Stanislaw Wolski, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate forarticle space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion underCSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may requestuserfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are availablehere.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)17:02, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. I know we have crossed paths every now and then on thePortal:Current events, so I wanted to invite you to a new WikiProject, theWikiProject of the Twenty-Tens decade. It was proposed near the end of May, but it was officially created today. Not sure if you would be interested, but I thought I would drop you an invite and say hi.Elijahandskip (talk)00:35, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 26 August 2021,In the news was updated with an item that involved the article2021 Kabul airport attacks, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on thecandidates page.PFHLai (talk)20:31, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If there is contradicting information from various sources, don't remove information from one source unilaterally like you did at2021 Kabul airport attack. Instead add it alongside. We don't pick and choose who to trust. I'll be reverting you tomorrow if you don't self-revert.LéKashmiriSocialiste (talk)12:15, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I accidentaly removed the sources. My apologies, it was not intentional.Gianluigi02 (talk)12:17, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You've also inserted wrong information like the people who were killed were inside the vehicle or the death toll was higher because passersby may have been hit in the aftermath of the strike. That's not even in the sources so I edited it and added what the sources actually mean, as it doesn't count as a revert.LéKashmiriSocialiste (talk)12:28, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

1. This is in the CNN source: "Nine members of one family -- including six children -- were killed in a US drone strike targeting a vehicle in a residential neighborhood of Kabul". If it is written in this way, it seems like if they were all in the vehicle.2. Yes, the death toll is suspected to be higher as people near the incident are suspected of being hit too.Gianluigi02 (talk)12:31, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't mean they were inside the vehicle, besides people can be killed from shrapnel and explosions even if outside. Also where does the source state the people nearby are suspected to be hit?LéKashmiriSocialiste (talk)12:35, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not saying that they were necessarly inside the vehicle, but that is what I understood reading the article.

Where does the source state that other died. Here: "there might have been up to 20 people killed in the strike".Gianluigi02 (talk)12:37, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is from the same CNN source:One man told a journalist working with CNN who visited the compound that "a rocket hit and six people were in there who have been killed. There was a car inside." The journalist was not allowed to enter the compound.Another man said that he heard the sound of a rocket and gained access to the scene from a neighbor's house."First we managed to remove a 3- to 4-year old child. The fire and smoke had engulfed the whole area," he said.He added that "three people were inside the car" and three others were outside the car. The injured, who included children, were taken to the hospital, he said."

Also it states "there might have been up to 20 people killed in the strike." But where does it claim "passer-bys were impacted"? Please don't put up your own interpertration.LéKashmiriSocialiste (talk)12:40, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

a tip: when you notice incorrect information, do not lecture. I've corrected a lot of wrong informations over the years, but I've never lectured any user. Mistakes and wrong misunderstandings happen to everyone. Change the informations without taking it too long.Gianluigi02 (talk)12:40, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a lecture, it's against the rule to put up unsourced claims. Also I've provided evidence right above contradicting your claims with statements.LéKashmiriSocialiste (talk)12:42, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And again, I just had a wrong misunderstanding of what was writtenGianluigi02 (talk)12:44, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It was in the CNN article itself that witnesses observed there were victims outside the car.LéKashmiriSocialiste (talk)12:45, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, what I can say more? I missed that part, I had a wrong misunderstanding. Now we want to talk about it for another year?Gianluigi02 (talk)12:48, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 7 September 2021,In the news was updated with an item that involved the articleTunch Ilkin, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on thecandidates page.PFHLai (talk)22:35, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleJens Büchner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jens Büchner until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Rathfelder (talk)19:55, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gianluigi02. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission orDraft page you started, "Stanislaw Wolski".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you canrequest its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.Liz^Read!Talk!16:43, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed too late that I misread your edits regarding the 17 October Revolution in Lebanon, I thought it was a call for a future protest on Oct 17 2021. My bad, sorry for reverting them.Fbergo (talk)15:13, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may beblocked from editing without further warning the next time you addunsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did atHalyna Hutchins.Sundayclose (talk)21:08, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 6 November 2021,In the news was updated with an item that involved the articleAli Fadhul, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on thecandidates page.PFHLai (talk)14:55, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gianluigi02,

My name is Lara Yang, and I am a PhD student in Organizational Behavior at Stanford University. As a part of a research study to better understand work dynamics on Wikipedia, our research team is currently conducting interviews with Wikipedians. Because you are an active editor on Wikipedia, we would love to learn more about your work and hear your perspective on how Wikipedia, and open-source communities in general, function to produce and organize high-quality knowledge. We have done our best to learn about the dynamics of collaboration on Wikipedia from secondary sources, which we are hoping to complement with your invaluable first-hand insights.

The interview will take around 45 minutes and be semi-structured in format. Any identifying information in your responses will be kept strictly confidential, and will not be disclosed in the analysis nor the research paper. If you are interested in participating, please email us via the 'Email this user' tool on my user page and suggest a few time slots in the upcoming weeks that work best for you. We will do our best to accommodate your schedule. Should you have any questions or concerns, please don’t hesitate to let us know. We look forward to hearing from you.

Best,Lara akaWanderingpotato (talk)23:42, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lara. Sure, that's interesting. The interview is written?Gianluigi02 (talk)23:44, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gianluigi02, thanks for your quick response! We prefer to conduct the interview over Zoom to allow for elaborations of questions and answers, but if you prefer, we can also send you a list of interview questions which you can then respond in writing as well. Let me know what works best for you. Thanks!Wanderingpotato (talk)02:02, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi@Gianluigi02:, I've seen you do this a few times so I'm going to pull you up on it. It's very important that we only record information based on what facts are available. If no date of death is specified within a news piece, then please do not add it into a subject's article. Thanks --Jkaharper (talk)11:04, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited2021 Uganda bombings, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageUPF.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)05:59, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:44, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Gianluigi02,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the usernameJoseywales1961, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started,2021 English Channel migrant shipwreck, for deletion, because there's already a page about that topic atNovember 2021 English Channel disaster. Please don't be discouraged; we appreciate your effort in creating new articles. To avoid this in the future, consider using the search function to find pages that already cover what you want to write about.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you cancontest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact thedeleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with{{Re|Joseywales1961}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via thePage Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

JW 1961^Talk19:19, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gianluigi02. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:Mohammed Naji (actor), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit it again orrequest that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)23:01, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gianluigi02. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:Zhan Melnykov, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit it again orrequest that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)16:01, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gianluigi02. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:Fedja Rupel, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit it again orrequest that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)16:01, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gianluigi02. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission orDraft page you started, "Mohammed Naji".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you canrequest its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.Liz^Read!Talk!23:00, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gianluigi02. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:Sergio Agnoli, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit it again orrequest that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)22:01, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleAlibi perfetto is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alibi perfetto until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

–AssumeGoodWraith(talk |contribs)13:12, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 4 January 2022,In the news was updated with an item that involved the articleIgor and Grichka Bogdanoff, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on thecandidates page.Stephen23:04, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gianluigi02. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:Daniele Sasson, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit it again orrequest that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)03:01, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gianluigi02. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission orDraft page you started, "Sergio Agnoli".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you canrequest its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.Liz^Read!Talk!21:19, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.It doesnot imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules calleddiscretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may imposesanctions on editors who do not strictly followWikipedia's policies, or thepage-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see theguidance on discretionary sanctions and theArbitration Committee's decisionhere. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Johnuniq (talk)08:57, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onMagomed Tushayev requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

No (reliable) sources

Under thecriteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact thedeleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a requesthere.WWGB (talk)00:00, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleMagomed Tushayev is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magomed Tushayev until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

—⁠ScottyWong⁠—00:22, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Please be aware ofMOS:OVERLINK which says to not link "names of subjects with which most readers will be at least somewhat familiar", for example countries like Germany, Italy, etc. I have removed a link atChris Pfeiffer. Kind regards,Robby.is.on (talk)09:47, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gianluigi02,

It looks like you have done a lot of editing on this article and I'm hoping you can check out some recent edits to the page and see what you think. Thanks, in advance, for giving this article a quick review.Liz^Read!Talk!17:00, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do not add the new date until midnight in theLINT timezone. --Marbe166 (talk)10:03, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleHeidi Ferrer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heidi Ferrer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

StarMississippi23:17, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Gianluigi02, I've started a discussionhere. Please take a look and add your thoughts. Regards,MattSucci (talk)06:02, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Carter00000 (talk)12:03, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Very impressive edit-count. Thank you for all that you do! Regards,MattSucci (talk)21:37, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!Gianluigi02 (talk)05:57, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,2022 Murcia ramming attack, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations fromreliable,independent sources.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is ofcentral importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft todraftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia'sgeneral notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969^{TT me}12:09, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

The filing isWikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Alsoriano97. Please provide any information on background or specific incidents if you would like to.Carter00000 (talk)14:12, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao, ho notato che sei un italiano, come mai non crei pagine in Wikipedia in italiano ma le crei nella versione inglese ?Roma1997 (talk)11:04, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to2022 Paris shooting, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia'scategorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article'sverifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you.TompaDompa (talk)14:56, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,Alfredo Cerruti, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations fromreliable,independent sources.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is ofcentral importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft todraftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia'sgeneral notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.UtherSRG(talk)01:44, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gianluigi02. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:2022 Murcia ramming attack, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit it again orrequest that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)13:01, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do not add new days until the new day has started in the first timezone. I know that you know this.Marbe166 (talk)10:02, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 18 May 2023,In the news was updated with an item that involved the article2023 Emilia-Romagna floods, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on thecandidates page.Stephen11:00, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gianluigi02. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:Alfredo Cerruti, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit it again orrequest that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)18:01, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gianluigi02. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission orDraft page you started, "Alfredo Cerruti".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you canrequest its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.Liz^Read!Talk!17:42, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article2022 Madrid explosion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/2022 Madrid explosion until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FatCat96 (talk)01:24, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'mAryKun. I noticed that you recentlyremoved content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurateedit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please useyour sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message onmy talk page. Thanks.AryKun (talk)19:31, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Marapi and Merapi are very different in many ways - appreciate your cottoning on and correcting yourself.JarrahTree12:45, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 5 December 2023,In the news was updated with an item that involved the article2023 eruption of Mount Marapi, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on thecandidates page.Black Kite (talk)19:14, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atWikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 13 § Road accidents and incidents on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄)06:36, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]