User talk:FLWfan
Page contents not supported in other languages.
Please do not make content-less articles likeMinnesota State Highway 54. --SPUI (T -C)02:40, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
SinceSPUI didn't do it:
Welcome!
Hello, FLWfan, andwelcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being aWikipedian! Pleasesign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check outWikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place{{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
Also, if you're interested in helping out with articles about Minnesota state highways, seeWikipedia:WikiProject Minnesota State Highways (orWP:MNSH). I helped to set up some of the highway articles until I got burned out with the entire process. In any case, the instructions on that page help to define what the article should look like.
Note that the current consensus for titles is "Minnesota State Highway x", although there has been a vocal movement to change that convention. That is why I'm no longer on the highway project.
--Elkman -(Elkspeak)01:54, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may beblocked from editing Wikipedia under thethree-revert rule, which states that nobody mayrevert a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If theeffect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you.
Also please explain your edits on the talk page. --SPUI (T -C)19:12, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please use talk pages to explain what you are doing, which, from what I can see, is using names that are not in common use. See alsoWikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Highways#Controversial moves andWikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Highways#Enforcement of moves without consensus. If you continue you may be blocked. --SPUI (T -C)19:20, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand. I'm using names for road articles that seem to be most common. Only a few were not named that way.
The second paragraph of the page you sent me to says: "When choosing a name for a page ask yourself: What word would the average user of the Wikipedia put into the search engine?" If I were going to search for Nevada State Route 123, that's exactly what I would type in. When I created a few dozen articles on Minnesota highways, I used the format "Minnesota State Highway 123" because that was how all the others were named. I think Nevada uses route and Minnesota uses highway. Are you saying all those pages are named wrong?
You've probably noticed thatUser:SPUI has very rigorous standards for highway articles, and that anyone who violates his expectations incurs his wrath. I found that out the hard way with Highway 33. Boy, did I ever find that out the hard way.
As a result of previous warring over highway articles, though, thereis a prohibition against moving (renaming) highway articles to any other name. That's been decided by the Arbitration Committee already, and isn't changeable.
I'd advise editing highway articles very carefully. Better yet, maybe working on articles about historic places would be more rewarding. At least I personally haven't gotten any of those names wrong yet. (Well, except for the Ford Parkway bridge, but that's another story.) --Elkman -(Elkspeak)22:08, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'd like to create more articles for buildings byFrank Lloyd Wright
Why did you revert a bunch of my reference formatting? You should at least provide some sort of edit summary. --Ricky81682 (talk)02:17, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, per[1], road articles should not be moved right now. Please don't move any more until this has been settled. Thanks! --JoanneB17:33, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not add unofficial lyrics to the alma mater. Until the University recognizes such lyrics official, it behooves me to remove such additions. Further edits in this fashion will be reported as vandalism. —ExplorerCDT23:29, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is yourlast warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did toRutgers University, youwill be blocked from editing Wikipedia.ExplorerCDT17:44, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please cease changing the alma mater such that it differs from the cited reference. That's dishonest and not in accordance with Wikipedia's policies regardingverifiablity andcited sources. If the information is outdate or incorrect, please find another source and cite it. Continuing to engage in a revert war without even trying to participate in discussion is nonproductive and noncollegial. --ElKevbo21:54, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I requested and received full protection on the Rutgers University article because of the recent edit warring regarding the alma mater. Please bring discussion to the talk page of the article atTalk:Rutgers University. The protecting admin said:
So please take this to the talk page and hopefully both sides can have a positive discussion. Thanks,Metros23223:05, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
A meetup of Wikipedians in Minnesota is proposed: please stop by thediscussion page if interested.Jonathunder04:53, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I've nominatedMinnesota State Highway 127, an article you created, fordeletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel thatMinnesota State Highway 127 satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and theWikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minnesota State Highway 127 and please be sure tosign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content ofMinnesota State Highway 127 during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.Inkpaduta16:28, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Mnclink has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. --•master_sonLets talk18:26, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Mnclist has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. --•master_sonLets talk18:26, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter | ||||||||||||||
| Volume 1, Issue 2 | 24 February2007 | About the Newsletter | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
 The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter | ||||||||||||||
| Volume 1, Issue 3 | 10 March2007 | About the Newsletter | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Hello, FLWfan. Due to the high number of inactive users atWP:USRD, we are asking that you verify that you are still an active contributor of the project. To do so, please add an asterisk (*) after your name onWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Newsletter/List. Users without one by the next issue in 2 weeks will be removed off the list and off the respective road projects as well. If you have any questions, please contact me on my talk page. Thanks. V60VTalk ·VDemolitions20:17, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You have been declared an inactive user and your name will be removed from the newsletter distribution and the projects you were a member of.If this is in error, please contact me on my talk page. Do not restore your name to the list. Regards,Rschen7754 (talk -contribs)21:03, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the currentArbitration Committee election. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipediaarbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome toreview the candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page. For the Election committee,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)16:10, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minnesota State Highway 91 (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
