Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

User talk:Evolution and evolvability

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


THOMAS SHAFEE
Catalytic triad of TEV protease
Make a new post
Archives
Index

THOMAS SHAFEE
Evolution and Evolvability




Inspiration

[edit]

I recently received a "thank you" notice from you for998115350. This led me to look into you and eventually I stumbled upon and was inspired byyour interview withAinali. Perhaps I should become more involved withWJ. —Uzume (talk)22:49, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Uzume: You're definitely welcome to! There are a range of ways to get involved either sporadically or ongoing: from formatting & copyediting (many new articles created are by first-time wikimedians, so references often inserted as plaintext;example) through to submitting an article (created from scratch, or submitted from wikipedia;WP:JAN) through to joining the user group as an ongoing associate/board editor (example). Happy to give more info if you're interested.T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk23:53, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Evolution and evolvability: as a long time Wikimedia editor, I am interested. I also have some concerns.
I have a background in Informatics, Computer and Systems sciences and engineering (applied sciences) so these might play intoWiki.J.Sci. andWiki.J.Pre. I might start off inWP:JAN as that is not so far from editing Wikipedia content but I can also see myself perhaps becoming an editor and/or making submissions (but obviously not on the same submitted materials as that would be a conflict of interest). Making "review" submissions with heavy Wikipedia content is interesting but I think eventually "original research" submissions would prove more interesting to me. I also like bibliographic information sciences content and have been working on Wikidata andSDC.
I read somewhere that submitters and editors might have to divulge legal names and I would likely want my legal name credited with published works authored or edited by me anyway, however, I would prefer to not have my legal name associated with this account (providing some anonymity). I would not mind making another "public" account for such but that probably runs awry with sockpuppety unless I publicly link them and that defeats the purpose of making such to begin with. Can submissions be made without anWP:SUL? How would that work? I envision emailing content to a submission email address or similar. Can someone be an editor without anWP:SUL? I imagine there is no issue with using this account forWP:JAN duties (do copy editors get credited?). —Uzume (talk)00:45, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Uzume: At the moment, we've done almost zero advertising, so probably 50% of submissions come from people with an existing interest from the wikipedia side of things. I suspect that as the journals mature, original research articles will make up an increasing proportion as a fee-free OA publishing option. As well as the mixture of reviews and original research. Really good questions on the universal login question. We've had people send submissions inby email previously, so could easily receive a wikimarkup file (previously ppl have sent in latex and docx files, which we've later had to ask them to convert or convert for them). Conceivably, it's possible that a user could create a valid second account (WP:VALIDALT) and notify a checkuser (WP:ALTACCN) if they were to use that accountonly for the purpose of submission and editing of the article under their real name and keep it fully separate from any activities associated with their existing main pseudonymous account.T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk05:15, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
0597235851 makiy
@@2A02:CB80:40B1:1F5E:1808:AFF:FE9D:CC40 (talk)05:11, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Italic2A02:CB80:40B1:1F5E:1808:AFF:FE9D:CC40 (talk)05:12, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Template error

[edit]

Hi E&e: I see that you've regularly modified the {{Template:Academic peer reviewed}} template. Can you take a look and see if you can fix the error it's now throwing up? It shows on the documentation page too. Thanks!MeegsC (talk)18:54, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Editing news 2021 #1

[edit]

Read this in another languageSubscription list for this newsletter

Reply tool

[edit]
Graph of Reply tool and full-page wikitext edit completion rates
Completion rates for comments made with the Reply tool and full-page wikitext editing. Details and limitations are in thisreport.

TheReply tool is available at most other Wikipedias.

  • The Reply tool has been deployed as an opt-outpreference to all editors at the Arabic, Czech, and Hungarian Wikipedias.
  • It is also available as aBeta Feature at almost all Wikipedias except for the English, Russian, and German-language Wikipedias. If it is not available at your wiki, you can request it by followingthese simple instructions.

Research notes:

  • As of January 2021,more than 3,500 editors have used the Reply tool to post about70,000 comments.
  • There is preliminary data from the Arabic, Czech, and Hungarian Wikipedia on the Reply tool.Junior Contributors who use the Reply tool are more likely to publish the comments that they start writing than those who use full-page wikitext editing.[1]
  • The Editing and Parsing teams have significantly reduced the number of edits that affect other parts of the page. About 0.3% of edits did this during the last month.[2] Some of the remaining changes are automatic corrections forSpecial:LintErrors.
  • A largeA/B test will start soon.[3] This is part ofthe process to offer the Reply tool to everyone. During this test, half of all editors at24 Wikipedias (not including the English Wikipedia) will have the Reply tool automatically enabled, and half will not. Editors at those Wikipeedias can still turn it on or off for their own accounts inSpecial:Preferences.

New discussion tool

[edit]
Screenshot of version 1.0 of theNew Discussion Tool prototype.

The new tool forstarting new discussions (new sections) will join the Discussion tools inSpecial:Preferences#mw-prefsection-betafeatures at the end of January. You can try the tool for yourself.[4] You can leave feedbackin this thread or on the talk page.

Next: Notifications

[edit]

DuringTalk pages consultation 2019, editorssaid that it should be easier to know about new activity in conversations they are interested in. TheNotifications project is just beginning. What would help you become aware of new comments? What's working with the current system? Which pages at your wiki should the team look at? Please post your advice atmw:Talk:Talk pages project/Notifications.

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk)01:02, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

COVID questions

[edit]

Hey Thomas, I just started readingMisinformation related to the COVID-19 pandemic by China, where I see for instance this study[5] listed as an example of misinformation spread by the Chinese government, based on these references[6][7][8][9]. First, does the Biosafety and Health article check out, in your view? And second, are the newspaper / industry critiques sufficient to classify this as misinformation? Sorry, I'm a little out of my depth here. -Darouet (talk)21:12, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Darouet: It's probably worth asking over atWT:WikiProject COVID-19. My initial impression is that it seems facts of the study aren't being particularly questioned, but it's interpretation and subsequent usage in decision-making. In that sense, the usage of those subsequent refs are probably reasonable (several seem to be citing a WHO report on the matter, which TBH would be the better ref). As for the first ref, It'd probably be better to includethis one, which has a whole review section on 'Frozen food and cold chain transportation'. However it looks like there's been a lot of overall debate over content over that last weekat its talkpage that might also be relevant. Hope that helps!T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk03:43, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merchandise Giveaway Nomination – Successful

[edit]
A Wikimeida t-shirt!
A Wikimeida t-shirt!

Hey Evolution and evolvability,

You have been successfully nominated to receive a free t-shirt from the Wikimedia Foundation through ourMerchandise Giveaway program. Congratulations and thank you for your hard work! Please email us at merchandise@wikimedia.org and we will send you full details on how to accept your free shirt. Thanks!

On behalf of the Merchandise Giveaway program,

--Vermont (talk)00:24, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bio-like structures

[edit]

Hi. I strongly apologise to bother you, but if you do not mind, I would like to ask you a favour. Recently, I have created a 'draft' of an article regarding structures described by the Soviet microbiologist V. O. Kalinenko. If you find some time, could you check it, please? Since you are an experienced Wikipedia user as well as an expert in the fields of biochemistry and evolutionary biology, I am really interested in your opinion. Also, please feel free to make some changes, additions and adjustments, if applicable. Thank you very much. --Pinoczet (talk)13:30, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Pinoczet: No problem at all! I've replied over onUser talk:Mrjulesd, since I found an existing discussion there and it's probably sensible to centralise.T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk02:48, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the reply, I appreciate it. Some of the Russian papers are available online, see:Biopodobnyye struktury,— Можно ли сделать амебу?,— Нет, амебу сделать нельзя!. In fact, Kalinenko did not "observe" the structures in distilled water, but rather "obtained" them under the influence of electric current. To my knowledge, these statements were not called into question; the problem was what these structures truly are. As for "caudate rockets", after checking some sources, I am pretty sure it was meant to describea shape resembling a "tailed" comet. I really felt all this information deserves a standalone Wikipedia article (two primary sources and four secondary sources), but now, it seems not to be the case. Therefore, I decided to give up. Anyway, thanks a lot once again. Kind regards, --Pinoczet (talk)11:35, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

about this image

[edit]
The diagram provides a visual of the CYP21A subfamily evolutionary

Hi, Evolution and evolvability!

You have made so many pictures about genetics and genomics, so I would like to ask you to help improve this image.

I drew this picture using the drawing program of windows system. The motivation came from Fig. 1 of that review,[1] which mentioned that human and mouse inactivated CYP21A1 and CYP21A2 into pseudogenes respectively.

A few months later, I added STK19 and TNXB in the upstream and downstream, which doubled in the same tandem repeat event and then inactivated one copy.

I think there are at least two aspect to improve this picture:

  1. Color the genes and pseudogenes respectively.
  2. Add upstream and downstream genes not repeat in the MHC III, to indicate that this event occurred only in these four gene segments (~80kbp).

I have two other concerns:

  1. TNXA and STK19. Are these two pseudogenes inactivated in one event or twice? So I didn't mark inactived on these two pseudogenes.
  2. In NCBI rat gene Cyp21a1,[2] Genomic context, I can't find rat CYP21A2P, C4B or TNXB. Is this a gene loss event or a missing annotation?

In sum, I think this is a good example to explain genetic syntenic analysis.--Htmlzycq (talk)08:15, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^Nebert, DW; Nelson, DR; Adesnik, M; Coon, MJ; Estabrook, RW; Gonzalez, FJ; Guengerich, FP; Gunsalus, IC; Johnson, EF; Kemper, B (January 1989). "The P450 superfamily: updated listing of all genes and recommended nomenclature for the chromosomal loci".DNA (Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.).8 (1):1–13.doi:10.1089/dna.1.1989.8.1.PMID 2651058.
  2. ^"Cyp21a1 cytochrome P450, family 21, subfamily a, polypeptide 1 [Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)] - Gene - NCBI".www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.


@Htmlzycq: Thanks for brining this up! It'd be particularly useful for theSynteny article. A few suggestions:
  • Colour usually helps these sorts of images. I recommend keeping it simple, so:
    • Either, plain green for active genes, grey for inactive ones (emphasises the pseudogenisation aspect)
    • Or, 4-colour for each set of genes (perhaps green, green-blue, blue, blue-purple as an aesthetic spectrum, since we're not trying to emphasise the individual genes, just the order); then a light version of that colour for the pseudogenes (also emphasised the duplication aspect)
  • I'm ambivalent about including the upstream and downstream gene. In a way it could make the duplication clearer, but it also adds additional. If the flanking genes are included, it's probably work keeping them in line with the colour scheme of the in-between genes to emphasise, and maybe including "a" and "b" in the duplicated
  • The vertical arrows should probably go from row 2->3 and row 2->4 (not 3->4) since a) both human and mouse evolved from the common ancestor will the full set of 8, rather than the human evolving from the mouse, and b) it's not clear in what order the pseudogenisation occurred.
  • To know whether TNXA and STK19 were inactivated once or twice would probably need some phylogenetics ofa few other related species (to see in which ancestor the inactivation(s) took place), and to look at what the mutations were that inactivated each of them (e.g. if it's a premature stop codon in the same place, then it's more likely to have been a single event)
  • As for the rat, it's hard to tell. You're right that it could just be missing annotations (I notice inthis table, that there's a lot of variation on whether orthologs of cyp21a have been detected). The best thing would be to download the region's sequence and do some pairwise alignments to check, and maybe doing some more sensitive BLAST searches.
  • It might be worth saving it as a .svg file so that it's more easily editable
So that's my thought process for suggestions. Hopefully these are interesting ideas! I'm happy to look at it again if you update it.T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk08:44, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Thank you for your reply, my mother tongue is not English, so there may be some misunderstanding.

I just uploaded a test version of the gene with color, which adds a line between the ancestral genome and the descendants to reduce misunderstanding. Since I can't edit SVG images, I can't SVG them.

in pig there is only one STK/C4/CYP21/TNX copy flanked by DXO and ATF6B gene.

in cattle there are three C4-like gene and one CYP21-like pseudogene (LOC101904057).

This makes me wonder in which generation of common ancestor this tandem repeats took place,Euarchontoglires?--Htmlzycq (talk)12:07, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

After consulting more Euarchontoglires' CYP21 upstream and downstream genes, I pessimistically found that STK/C4/CYP21/TNX tandem repeats in mouse and human genomes may be two independent events, rather than from a common ancestor.
InRattus rattus (black rat),Peromyscus leucopus (white-footed mouse) andOryctolagus cuniculus (rabbit), there is only one STK/C4/CYP21/TNX copy
InCricetulus griseus (Chinese hamster) there is one TNX copy downstream
In some monkey genomes, there are some related pseudogenes, likeCYP21A1P in green monkey andCYP21A1 in Rhesus monkey, whilewhite-tufted-ear marmoset have one STK/C4/CYP21/TNX copy

It seems that there are two independent evolutionary events, one occurred in the common ancestor of Old World monkeys, and the other is a very recent mouse ancestor, while it's a coincidence that stk19b and tnxa, rather than stk19a and tnxb, became pseudogenes in both human and mouse.--Htmlzycq (talk)09:57, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Hi, Evolution and evolvability!

About the time that this gene duplication (STK/C4/CYP21/TNX) in the mouse genome. There is only one copy was found in the genome ofMus caroli, and two C4 gene (LOC110335909 andLOC115062505) in the genome ofMus pahari, with a gap in genome sequencing assembly between them. If these three genes (CYP21/TNX/STK19) can appear in this gap, can it be explained that this repeated event occurred in the common ancestor ofMus musculus andMus pahari mice, rather than the common ancestor of allMus genus includingMus caroli?

But to my dismay, this conjecture does not match the current taxonomy ofMus,Mus musculus andMus caroli belong to subgenusMus,Mus pahari belong to subgenusCoelomys.--Htmlzycq (talk)04:20, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination ofCategory:WikiJournal of Psychology, Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences

[edit]

A tag has been placed onCategory:WikiJournal of Psychology, Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines.LizRead!Talk!16:14, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz: No worries. It'll start to be filled next month, but I understand if it should only be created once an item is ready to be place in.T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk01:49, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Catalytic triad citation issues

[edit]

Hi there! I have seen some citation needed tags in your well-editedCatalytic triad article added by an editor. Some tags may or may not be trivial but I have seen entire paragraphs get tagged. Because (I assume) you are an expert on the topic, it would be appreciated if you took care of this. I'm well aware that you could be busy, so take your time. Cheers!Wretchskull (talk)21:09, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Wretchskull: Thanks for pinging me - must've missed those on my watchlist. I'll have a go at working through them this week!T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk23:59, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Listeriabot

[edit]

Hi, I saw your post on the Magnus talk page. If I understood correctly, do you want to learn easily and quickly about how to use the Wikidata and Listeriabot list?If so, I've been writing a help page for the Catalan wikipedia (well, I'm still working on it). I had the same problem, because the documentation on the wikidata list is horrible. The only problem ... it's in catalan. You can try reading or requesting translations from Mr Google (pretty good in Catalan-English). Seeca:Ajuda:Llistes_automàtiques and ask me if anything is difficult to understand. I hope you find it useful. Salut ! --Amadalvarez (talk)18:24, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Amadalvarez: Gràcies for the message!Your summary is nicely organised (I particularly appreciate the diagram inArticle on ubiquem la llista automàtica section. Unfortunately, I also need information on how to activate the listeriabot on a new wiki (e.g. if you place{{Wikidata list}} ...{{Wikidata list end}} on wikiversity, nothing happens because the bot isn't active there (example).T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk03:03, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ahhh. Technical set-up !. Sorry it's not my field. It sounds like the bots need to be authorised by an admin to run in a WP (I do not how). May be you'll have better response from a enwiki admin. I'll try to find someone in cawiki. Good luck !. --Amadalvarez (talk)05:09, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, are you admin in wikiversity ?Amadalvarez (talk)05:32, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
NEWS: I changed invoke to Listeriabot, because it changed server a few months ago. See:wikiversity:special:diff/2262433, I also did aminor change in your SPARQL because left the WHERE. Now, ListeriaBot runs. However doesn't give results, as the query was wrong. Itest it in cawiki and it runs well, but no inmy wikiversity sandbox. We're closer to the solution....Amadalvarez (talk)06:59, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Amadalvarez: Thanks for looking at this with me. I've also added a formal bot permission application on Wikiversity (link). I don't know whether the bot is not working on wikiversity due to it not yet having bot permissions, or if there is some file in thebot's code itself that needs to be edited.T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk11:23, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Share your feedback on the OCR improvements!

[edit]

Hello! We (the team responsible for theCommunity Wishlist Survey) have launched the project for OCR improvements. With this project, we aim to improve the experience of using OCR tools on Wikisource. Please refer toour project page, which provides a full summary of the project and the main problem areas that we have identified.

We would love if you couldanswer the questions below. Your feedback is incredibly important to us and it will directly impact the choices we make. Thank you in advance, and we look forward to reading your feedback!SGrabarczuk (WMF) (talk)03:33, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Question about the rating ofDicke model

[edit]

HiUser:Evolution and evolvability,

I was wondering how did you choose to rate theDicke model page as "B" quality and "low" importance?

Best,Moroses (talk)11:43, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Moroses: No problem. Ratings are always tricky, but here was my thinking for the estimate:
  • B-class is the highest quality rating possible without passing through Wikipedia's own internal review process to getGA orFA status. This article is clearly of the highest quality, so this is the effective cap for all PLOS topic pages even though it can seem misleadingly low.
  • Low-importance was much harder to estimate. I checkedWikiproject Physics's guidelines and checked a few related pages. It seems that sub-concepts (e.g.two-state system andsuperradiant phase transition) are usually mid models (JCM andJCHM) are almost always classed as low. That being said, I'm no physicist so I'm happy to add a request atWikipedia_talk:WikiProject Physics to ask for rating by a more informed opinion!
T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk00:07, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Evolution and evolvability: I would appreciate it if you could add a request atWikipedia_talk:WikiProject Physics.

Thanks for the quick and thorough replay,Moroses (talk)11:50, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Structured data across Wikimedia is starting!

[edit]

Hello there, Thomas! I am writing to you because a new WMF project,Structured Data Across Wikimedia (SDAW), is about to start.

SDAW is a grant-funded programme that will explore ways to structure content on wikitext pages in a way that will be machine-recognizable and -relatable, in order to make reading, editing, and searching easier and more accessible across projects and on the Internet.

The reason why I am contacting you is because of your work across the Wikimedia projects, and your opinion would be of great interest for usto kickstart the discussion. We defined aseries of questions we would like to have feedback on. If you want to ask a question on your own, or just want to share with us your ideas or opinions, please feel free to do so!

Also, if you know some other user(s) that can be interested, please let me know or invite them to join the discussion. The more, the better!

Hope to hear from you soon! --Sannita (WMF) (talk)14:43, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiLoop 2020 Year in Review

[edit]
Wikipedia mini globe handheld
Wikipedia mini globe handheld

Dear editors, developers and friends:

Thank you for supporting Project WikiLoop! The year 2020 was an unprecedented one. It was unusual for almost everyone. In spite of this, Project WikiLoop continued the hard work and made some progress that we are proud to share with you. We also wanted to extend a big thank you for your support, advice, contributions and love that make all this possible.

Head over to our project page on Meta Wikimedia to reada brief 2020 Year in Review for WikiLoop.

Thank you for taking the time to review Wikipedia usingWikiLoop DoubleCheck. Your work is important and it matters to everyone. We look forward to continuing our collaboration through 2021!

María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (talk)01:35, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OA in australia

[edit]

Hi Thomas, I've done a few edits of the OA Australia page advocacy section and made some copy edits. The timeline looks good. I was thinking about putting stuff about copyright reform but then thought it might be a bit off topic. Not sure how much more we need.Amanda Lawrence13:27, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@AmandaSLawrence: Thanks! Perhaps a sentence on the OA-relevant aspects of copyright reform could go inOpen access in Australia and then more detail over inCopyright law of Australia?T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk23:49, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@SMFry and @Vboa oz: Any additional ideas for material to go intoOpen access in Australia?T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk23:49, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination ofList of preprint repositories for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleList of preprint repositories is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of preprint repositories until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

ElKevbo (talk)20:07, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Editing news 2021 #2

[edit]

Read this in another languageSubscription list for this newsletter

Junior contributors comment completion rate across all participating Wikipedias
When newcomers had the Reply tool and tried to post on a talk page, they were more successful at posting a comment. (Source)

Earlier this year, the Editing team ran a large study ofthe Reply Tool. The main goal was to find out whether the Reply Tool helpednewer editors communicate on wiki. The second goal was to see whether the comments that newer editors made using the tool needed to be reverted more frequently than comments newer editors made with the existing wikitext page editor.

The key results were:

  • Newer editors who had automatic ("default on") access to the Reply tool weremore likely to post a comment on a talk page.
  • The comments that newer editors made with the Reply Tool were alsoless likely to be reverted than the comments that newer editors made with page editing.

These results give the Editing team confidence that the tool is helpful.

Looking ahead

The team is planning to make the Reply tool available to everyone as an opt-out preference in the coming months. This has already happened at the Arabic, Czech, and Hungarian Wikipedias.

The next step is toresolve a technical challenge. Then, they will deploy the Reply tool first to theWikipedias that participated in the study. After that, they will deploy it, in stages, to the other Wikipedias and all WMF-hosted wikis.

You can turn on "Discussion Tools"in Beta Features now. After you get the Reply tool, you can change your preferences at any time inSpecial:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion.

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk)

00:27, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 30

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedAndrew Jaspan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageThe Fall.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)05:59, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission atArticles for creation:Jamila Gordon (July 17)

[edit]
Your recent article submission toArticles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Goldsztajn was:
Passes the GNG, but article needs further editing and sourcing needs clean up (eg removal of social media sourcing). Also - infobox says she is Sudanese-Australian, but opening sentences says she is Somali-born. Please clarify.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmitwhen they have been resolved.
Goldsztajn (talk)10:35, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Why are you using AFC at all? If you find a notable article in draft space, then just move it to the mainspace and work on it there. Articles get more attention from more editors when they're in the mainspace. That's why the folks who originally proposed and implemented the draftspace now say that it's where articles go to die. If you don't want it to die,WP:MOVE it out of draftspace.WhatamIdoing (talk)21:33, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback: you've got messages!

[edit]
Hello, Evolution and evolvability. You have new messages atRyan Vesey's talk page.
Message added  Ryan Vesey22:09, 25 July 2021 (UTC). You canremove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

You have got an Email

[edit]
Hello, Evolution and evolvability. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You canremove this notice at any time by removing the{{You've got mail}} or{{ygm}} template.

--Michel Bakni (talk)19:56, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination ofCategory:Wikipedia articles published in PLOS ONE

[edit]

A tag has been placed onCategory:Wikipedia articles published in PLOS ONE indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.LizRead!Talk!15:39, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Transposable element

[edit]

Hello. I apologise to bother you, but if you don't mind, I'd like to ask a question regarding the articleTransposable element. I believe it should include some information on the so-called Class III TEs, e.g. Foldback (FB) elements (see: Pierre Capy et al.,Dynamics and Evolution of Transposable Elements, 1998). What are your thoughts? Thank you very much. --Pinoczet (talk)00:30, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Pinoczet: From a quick overview I think you're right. The classification still seems to be uncommonly used recently though, so it may be worth looking into a little further. E.g. Some papers refer toMITEs as Class III (example), whereas others refer to MITEs as Class II (example).T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk05:57, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the reply. Yes, exactly. To my knowledge, the examples include Foldbacks, TU elements, and MITEs. It seems these transposable elements may be and actually are considered Class III TEs, at least by some researchers. However, I am not sure how this information should be properly added to the article. E.g. whether it deserves a separate subsection, or perhaps just a brief side note would be sufficient? Since I am not an expert in this field, I decided to contact you. Kind regards, --Pinoczet (talk)04:45, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Pinoczet: I think it's probably worth noting at the end of theClassification section, especially clarifying what the unifying features are as compared to class I and II and noting that the category is not as frequently used as the others.T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk08:52, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination ofCategory:Wikipedia articles published in PLoS ONE

[edit]

A tag has been placed onCategory:Wikipedia articles published in PLoS ONE indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.LizRead!Talk!16:49, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion ofTemplate:JAN talk

[edit]

Template:JAN talk has beennominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe entry on the Templates for discussion page.WikiCleanerMan (talk)02:27, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regardingDraft:Lauren Gawne

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Evolution and evolvability. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:Lauren Gawne, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit it again orrequest that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)08:01, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

[edit]

THanks for your help on the Carbon article, Thomas <3

Jujublibble (talk)00:15, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission atArticles for creation:Jamila Gordon has been accepted

[edit]
Jamila Gordon, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

TJMSmith (talk)13:52, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion ofTemplate:Menu icon blue

[edit]

Template:Menu icon blue has beennominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe entry on the Templates for discussion page. –Jonesey95 (talk)16:50, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination ofComputational and Statistical Genetics for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleComputational and Statistical Genetics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Computational and Statistical Genetics until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

--Xarm Endris (talk)15:45, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination ofTemplate:Paracopy

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to readthe guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using theArticle Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created,Template:Paracopy, was tagged as a test page undersection G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use thesandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at thewelcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact thedeleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a requesthere. –Jonesey95 (talk)15:39, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination ofCategory:Wikipedia articles published in PLOS ONE

[edit]

A tag has been placed onCategory:Wikipedia articles published in PLOS ONE indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Qwerfjkltalk17:25, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion ofTemplate:Introduction to tables/tabs

[edit]

Template:Introduction to tables/tabs has beennominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe entry on the Templates for discussion page.User:GKFXtalk21:18, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"MOS:caption" listed atRedirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirectMOS:caption and has thus listed itfor discussion. This discussion will occur atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 12#MOS:caption until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.Redrose64 🌹 (talk)16:38, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion ofTemplate:WiR table row

[edit]

Template:WiR table row has beennominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe entry on the Templates for discussion page.Gonnym (talk)11:16, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion ofTemplate:WiR table start

[edit]

Template:WiR table start has beennominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe entry on the Templates for discussion page.Gonnym (talk)11:16, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion ofTemplate:WiR table end

[edit]

Template:WiR table end has beennominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe entry on the Templates for discussion page.Gonnym (talk)11:17, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Tree of Life Newsletter – 018

[edit]
February 2022—Issue 018


Tree of Life


Welcome to the Tree of Life newsletter!
Newly recognized content

Black-and-yellow broadbill byAryKun
Papuan mountain pigeon byAryKun
List of leporids byPresN
Algerian nuthatch by2001:4455:364:A800:C13C:8A64:1CEF:F186, reviewed byAryKun
Jungle bush quail byAryKun, reviewed byJens Lallensack
Lycorma imperialis byEtriusus, reviewed byEaldgyth
Harry Allan byDracophyllum, reviewed byEsculenta
Banded bullfrog byDanCherek, reviewed byGhostRiver

Newly nominated content

Queen angelfish byLittleJerry
Red panda byLittleJerry andBhagyaMani
List of lagomorphs byPresN
Corsican nuthatch by2001:4455:364:A800:39A6:A5D8:C903:5E1D
Firefly byChiswick Chap
Mountain pigeon byAryKun
Bonacynodon byTrilletrollet
Golden eagle byVaco98

News at a glance
February DYKs
Dudleya cymosa subsp. pumila
Dudleya cymosa subsp.pumila

A Golden Retriever retrieving a shot game bird
A Golden Retriever retrieving a shot game bird


Seagrass in La Ciotat, France
Seagrass inLa Ciotat, France

Discuss this issue

You are receiving this because you added your name to thesubscribers list of theWikiProject Tree of Life. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, pleaseremove your name.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk)14:45, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion ofTemplate:Evolution and evolvability/sandbox/styles.css

[edit]

Template:Evolution and evolvability/sandbox/styles.css has beennominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe entry on the Templates for discussion page.Gonnym (talk)11:26, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Tree of Life/Newsletter/019

[edit]
March 2022—Issue 019


Tree of Life


Welcome to the Tree of Life newsletter!
Newly recognized content

Queen angelfish byLittleJerry
Alaska marmot byAn anonymous username, not my real name, reviewed byEaldgyth
Firefly byChiswick Chap, reviewed byEaldgyth
Afrolychas braueri byOnlyFixingProse, reviewed byAn anonymous username, not my real name
Mountain pigeon byAryKun, reviewed byEaldgyth
Dracopristis byFossiladder13, reviewed byEaldgyth
Bonacynodon byTrilletrollet, reviewed byAryKun
Lichexanthone byEsculenta, reviewed bySzmenderowiecki
Yellowtail flounder byEviolite, reviewed byRecycledPixels
Sexual selection byChiswick Chap, reviewed byAryKun

Newly nominated content

White-headed fruit dove byAryKun
Mountain pigeon byAryKun
Florence Merriam Bailey byGhostRiver
Agelenopsis pennsylvanica byKline
Hypericum aegypticum byFritzmann
Guadeloupe woodpecker byOnlyFixingProse

News at a glance
  • Adiscussion is ongoing over whether the pencil icon for editing taxonomy templates should be changed.
March DYKs
Elysia timida
Elysia timida

Humbertium covidum
Humbertium covidum

Door Tree
Door Tree

Discuss this issue

You are receiving this because you added your name to thesubscribers list of theWikiProject Tree of Life. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, pleaseremove your name.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk)13:46, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Tree of Life Newsletter – 020

[edit]
April 2022—Issue 020


Tree of Life


Welcome to the Tree of Life newsletter!
Newly recognized content

Red panda byLittleJerry andBhagyaMani
White-headed fruit dove byAryKun
List of ochotonids byPresN
Guadeloupe woodpecker byOnlyFixingProse, reviewed byEaldgyth
Magnetoreception byChiswick Chap, reviewed byMover of molehills
Macauley Island byJo-Jo Eumerus, reviewed byEaldgyth
Black-breasted buttonquail byCasliber, reviewed byEaldgyth
Florence Merriam Bailey byGhostRiver, reviewed bySquareInARoundHole

Newly nominated content

Black-breasted buttonquail byCasliber
List of birds of Tuvalu byAryKun
List of cingulates byPresN
List of didelphimorphs byPresN
Stegotherium byLarrayal
Resplendent quetzal bySadAttorney613
Electroreception and electrogenesis byChiswick Chap
Muja (alligator) byAmanuensis Balkanicus
Punctelia graminicola byEsculenta
Siegfried Huneck byEsculenta
Abiogenesis byChiswick Chap

News at a glance
April DYKs
Whitehead's broadbill
Whitehead's broadbill


Discuss this issue

You are receiving this because you added your name to thesubscribers list of theWikiProject Tree of Life. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, pleaseremove your name.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk)14:57, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Editing newsletter 2022 – #1

[edit]

Read this in another languageSubscription list for the multilingual newsletterLocal subscription list

New editors were more successful with this new tool.

TheNew topic tool helps editors create new ==Sections== on discussion pages. New editors are more successful with this new tool. You canread the report. Soon, the Editing team will offer this to all editors at most WMF-hosted wikis. You can join the discussion about this tool for the English Wikipedia is atWikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Enabling the New Topic Tool by default. You will be able to turn it off in the tool or atSpecial:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion.

The Editing team plans tochange the appearance of talk pages. These are separate from the changes made by themw:Desktop improvements project and will appear in bothVector 2010 andVector 2022. The goal is to add some information and make discussions look visibly different from encyclopedia articles. You can see some ideas atWikipedia talk:Talk pages project#Prototype Ready for Feedback.

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk)

23:14, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Linus Pauling DNA triple-helix coordinates

[edit]

I am teaching a Molecular Biology undergraduate course and in my first session with the students I describe a little of the classical history of the structure of DNA. For some time I have been using my 3D printer to develop models to better illustrate my classes. This experience has been working extremely well as the students have a chance to hold DNA, RNAs and proteins.I am wondering if you could share with me the pdb file with the structure you built of Linus Pauling's proposed triple-helix of the DNA.That will be of great value to me in my introductory class.Thank you in advance, cordially.Otavio(thiemann@ifsc.usp.br)143.107.180.20 (talk)12:29, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done!T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk12:45, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikijournal nom

[edit]

Hey, Evo and evo, I addedBanded broadbill to theWikijournal article nominations page about a month ago, could you move it to Wikijournal preprints soon?AryKun (talk)06:18, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pinging me - I must have missed that. Thanks for flagging.T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk12:45, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Editing news 2022 #2

[edit]

Read this in another languageSubscription list for this multilingual newsletter

Graph showing 90-minute response time without the new tool and 39-minute response time with the tool
The [subscribe] button shortens response times.

The new [subscribe] buttonnotifies people when someone replies to their comments. It helps newcomers get answers to their questions. People reply sooner. You canread the report. The Editing team is turning this tool on for everyone. You will be able to turn it offin your preferences.

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk)00:35, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regardingDraft:Junk DNA

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Evolution and evolvability. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:Junk DNA, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit it again orrequest that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)06:42, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article,Draft:Junk DNA

[edit]

Hello, Evolution and evolvability. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission orDraft page you started, "Junk DNA".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you canrequest its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.LizRead!Talk!03:05, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please create doppelganger accounts

[edit]

Can you please create an actual account forTShafee,Evolution and Evolvability,Thomas Shafee, andEvo & Evo? The user pages are showing up onWikipedia:Database reports/Ownerless pages in the user space because the pages do not have actual user accounts associated with them. I have adjusted the (somewhat confusing) instructions at{{Doppelganger}} to clarify that before the template is applied, a user account should be created. Alternatively, you could request deletion of those pages by placing{{Db-g7}} on the pages. Thanks. –Jonesey95 (talk)19:11, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Jonesey95 Aha, thank you for the clarification (and patience)! That makes sense now. I'll go through and do that.T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk23:18, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas!

[edit]
~~~ Merry Christmas! ~~~
Joyeux Noël! ~ Buon Natale! ~ Vrolijk Kerstfeest! ~ Frohe Weihnachten!
¡Feliz Navidad! ~ Feliz Natal! ~ Καλά Χριστούγεννα! ~ Hyvää Joulua!
God Jul! ~ Glædelig Jul! ~ Linksmų Kalėdų! ~ Priecīgus Ziemassvētkus!
Häid Jõule! ~ Wesołych Świąt! ~ Boldog Karácsonyt! ~ Veselé Vánoce!
Veselé Vianoce! ~ Crăciun Fericit! ~ Sretan Božić! ~ С Рождеством!
শুভ বড়দিন! ~ 圣诞节快乐!~ メリークリスマス!~ 메리 크리스마스!
สุขสันต์วันคริสต์มาส!
~ Selamat Hari Natal! ~ Giáng sinh an lành!
Весела Коледа!

Hello, Evolution and evolvability! Thank you for your work to maintain and improve Wikipedia! Wishing you aMerry Christmas and aHappy New Year!
Ozzie10aaaa (talk)15:00, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Spread theWikiLove and leave other users this message by adding {{subst:Multi-language Season's Greetings}}

Editing news 2023 #1

[edit]

Read this in another languageSubscription list for this newsletter

This newsletter includes two key updates about theEditing team's work:

  1. The Editing team will finish adding new features to theTalk pages project and deploy it.
  2. They are beginning a new project,Edit check.

Talk pages project

Screenshot showing the talk page design changes that are currently available as beta features at all Wikimedia wikis. These features include information about the number of people and comments within each discussion.
Some of the upcoming changes

The Editing team is nearly finished with this first phase of theTalk pages project. Nearly allnew features are available now in theBeta Feature for Discussion tools.

It will show information about how active a discussion is, such as the date of the most recent comment. There will soon be a new "Add topic" button. You will be able to turn them off atSpecial:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion. Pleasetell them what you think.

Daily edit completion rate by test group: DiscussionTools (test group) and MobileFrontend overlay (control group)

An A/B test forDiscussion tools on the mobile site has finished. Editors weremore successful with Discussion tools. The Editing team is enabling these features for all editors on the mobile site.

New Project: Edit Check

The Editing team is beginninga project to help new editors of Wikipedia. It will help people identify some problems before they click "Publish changes". The first tool will encourage people to add references when they add new content. Pleasewatch that page for more information. You canjoin a conference call on 3 March 2023 to learn more.

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk)18:19, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:PepSeq

[edit]

Hey there,

Thanks for your comment on our draft article! You mentioned thatthis article would make for a stronger case in terms of notability of the method but was not cited when it in fact is (inline citation 2).KaranvirSingh 01 (talk)01:08, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@KaranvirSingh 01: oops - thanks for spotting that! I've updated my comment. If other editors come to consensus it's nottoo soon, then feel free to also check outWP:WikiJournal article nominations if it would be useful to have an additional avenue for feedback.T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk06:18, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

[edit]
Precious
Seven years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk)07:32, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:DE_cycle.png

[edit]

Hello, I would like to notify you thatFile:DE_cycle.png may violate copyright, as it contains the "recycle bin" icon from Windows 7, or a close lookalike. I wanted to let you know about it, because as a newcomer, I don't know what steps should be taken in this situation.Janhrach (talk)15:54, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Janhrach Thank you for contacting me, and well spotted. I can't remember where I got the icon from at the time, but it must've just been a google image search. I've replaced it with an equivalenticon from commons!T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk12:18, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome.Janhrach (talk)12:26, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination ofCategory:Wikipedia articles published in peer-reviewed literature (J2W)

[edit]

A tag has been placed onCategory:Wikipedia articles published in peer-reviewed literature (J2W) indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag.LizRead!Talk!03:04, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Tree of Life Newsletter Issue 21

[edit]
August 2023—Issue 021


Tree of Life


Welcome to the Tree of Life newsletter!
Newly recognized content

Australiformis byMattximus
Rodrigues night heron byFunkMonk
Titanis byAugustios Paleo
List of lorisoids byPresN
List of storks byAryKun
Brontosaurus byAugustios Paleo, reviewed byThe Morrison Man
Eukaryote byChiswick Chap, reviewed byFritzmann2002
Stramenopile byChiswick Chap, reviewed byFritzmann2002
Titanoboa byAugustios Paleo, reviewed bySilverTiger12
Antarctopelta byAugustios Paleo, reviewed byJens Lallensack
Anna Blackburne byKusma, reviewed byEtriusus
Anomochilus leonardi byAryKun, reviewed byAmitchell125
Nyctibatrachus manalari byAryKun, reviewed bySammi Brie
Mimodactylus byFunkMonk, reviewed byJens Lallensack
Nyctibatrachus major byAryKun, reviewed byEtriusus
Anomochilus weberi byAryKun, reviewed byEtriusus
Plant byChiswick Chap, reviewed byCessaune

Newly nominated content

Ohmdenosaurus byJens Lallensack
Polar bear byLittleJerry
Mimodactylus byFunkMonk
List of cercopithecoids byPresN
List of tapaculos byAryKun
Klallamornis byLarrayal
Hypericum perforatum byFritzmann2002
Holozoa bySnoteleks
Teloschistaceae byEsculenta
Carcharodontosaurus byAugustios Paleo
Nyctibatrachus radcliffei byAryKun
Anomochilus byAryKun

New contest!

This month has seen an incredible amount of activity creating high quality content, with 3 FAs, 3 FACs, and a veritable flood of GAs and GANs, not to mention the FLs and FLCs. To help maintain this high level of activity going forward, WikiProject Tree of Life is startinga new monthly rolling contest, inspired bythe contest run by WikiProject Military History. This contest should hopefully help incentivize editors to contribute in ways that are less daunting than writing articles that are GA and FA-quality. Even improving articles from stub to start class, or helping other editors by reviewing their work at GAN, FAC, or FLC, gets you points, with bonus points for articles with especially high page views. Make sure to participate in any way you can, and help improve the 'pedia while having fun and winning Barnstars!


August DYKs
Two salt marsh snakes
Two salt marsh snakes

Blackburnian warbler
Blackburnian warbler

Discuss this issue

You are receiving this because you added your name to thesubscribers list of theWikiProject Tree of Life. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, pleaseremove your name.

Delivered by:MediaWiki message delivery (talk)23:14, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Tree of Life Newsletter Issue 22

[edit]
September 2023—Issue 022


Tree of Life


Welcome to the Tree of Life newsletter!
Newly recognized content

List of cercopithecoids byPresN
List of tapaculos byAryKun
Polar bear byLittle Jerry
Ohmdenosaurus byJens Lallensack
Amargatitanis byAugustios Paleo, reviewed byJens Lallensack
Teloschistaceae byEsculenta, reviewed byChiswick Chap
Holozoa bySnoteleks, reviewed byEsculenta
Ashy flycatcher byAryKun, reviewed byJens Lallensack
Nyctibatrachus radcliffei byAryKun, reviewed byJens Lallensack
Carcharodontosaurus byAugustios Paleo, reviewed bySilverTiger12
Life byChiswick Chap, reviewed byJens Lallensack
Apatosaurinae byAugustios Paleo, reviewed byJens Lallensack
Hypericum perforatum byFritzmann2002, reviewed byFemke

Newly nominated content

Mountain pigeon byAryKun
List of hominoids byPresN
List of cranes byAryKun
List of tarsiiformes byPresN
Lycorma meliae byEtriusus
Aristonectes byAmirani1746
Animal echolocation byChiswick Chap
Hyalospheniidae bySnoteleks
Buellia frigida bySnoteleks

Contest results

The first edition ofour new monthly contest had perhaps a little less participation than I hoped for, but it still resulted in a huge amount of content work, mainly focussed on de-stubbing articles on little-known species, although we did also see two GAs forHolozoa andHypericum perforatum. Overall, over 60 articles were improved, with most going from stubs or redlinks to fully fleshed out articles. The winner this month wasSimongraham, who improved 21 articles about spiders, mainly to B and C class, and racked up 70 points, over twice the next highest. Hopefully, we'll continue to see such great work next month, with even more participants and even more articles improved.
Also anyone who wants to help coordinate the contest can just drop by atthe talk page, I really need help.


September DYKs
Republicopteron douseae fossil
Republicopteron douseae fossil

Male Phallichthys fish
MalePhallichthys fish

Mimodactylus reconstruction
Mimodactylus reconstruction

Adult ashy flycatcher
Adult ashy flycatcher

Discuss this issue

You are receiving this because you added your name to thesubscribers list of theWikiProject Tree of Life. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, pleaseremove your name.

Sent byMediaWiki message delivery (talk)16:23, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination atWikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members

[edit]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atWikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.Qwerfjkltalk09:36, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Tree of Life Newsletter Issue 23

[edit]
October 2023—Issue 023


Tree of Life


Welcome to the Tree of Life newsletter!
Newly recognized content

Mimodactylus byFunkMonk
Mountain pigeon byAryKun
List of tarsiiformes byPresN
List of hominoids byPresN
List of cranes byAryKun
Outline of lichens byMeegsC
Lycorma meliae byEtriusus, reviewed byChiswick Chap
Oak byChiswick Chap, reviewed byEsculenta
Animal echolocation byChiswick Chap, reviewed byPrimium
Elke Mackenzie byEsculenta, reviewed byMoriwen
Dwarf pufferfish byPrimium, reviewed byChiswick Chap
Hyalospheniidae bySnoteleks, reviewed byAn anonymous username, not my real name
Paroedura maingoka byOlmagon, reviewed byJens Lallensack

Newly nominated content

Hypericum sechmenii byFritzmann2002
Teloschistaceae byEsculenta
Nyctibatrachus major byAryKun
List of sunbirds byAryKun
List of platyrrhines byPresN
Handicap principle byChiswick Chap
Slime mold byChiswick Chap
Punctelia byEsculenta
Pulchrocladia retipora byEsculenta
Anaptychia ciliaris byEsculenta
Mocquard's Madagascar ground gecko byOlmagon
Zavodovski Island byJo-Jo Eumerus
Chrysothrix chlorina byEsculenta
Wood-pasture hypothesis byAndersenAnders
Mammalian kidney byD6194c-1cc
Lepas testudinata byEtriusus
Teratoscincus roborowskii byOlmagon

Contest results

The second edition ofour monthly contest was even better than the last month, with 80 articles improved spanning the entire tree of life. The winner this month wasQuetzal1964, who contributed to 47 articles, mainly relating tomarine fish, and racked up 81 points in the process. In second place wassimongraham, who got 60 points from 14 articles on various species ofjumping spiders.simongraham is still at the top of our overall standings, with 130 points, andQuetzal1964's close behind on 108. The November edition of the contest is now open: feel free to drop by and participate if you work on any TOL-related articles this month.


October DYKs
Illustration of swordtail mollies
Illustration of swordtail mollies


Lycorma meliae
Lycorma meliae


Illustrations of the front foot (A) and hind foot (B) of Diplobune quercyi
Illustrations of the front foot (A) and hind foot (B) ofDiplobune quercyi

Discuss this issue

You are receiving this because you added your name to thesubscribers list of theWikiProject Tree of Life. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, pleaseremove your name.

-MediaWiki message delivery (talk)16:30, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Tree of Life Newsletter Issue 24

[edit]
November 2023—Issue 024


Tree of Life


Welcome to the Tree of Life newsletter!
Newly recognized content

Hypericum sechmenii byFritzmann2002
Nyctibatrachus major byAryKun
List of platyrrhines byPresN
List of gymnosperm families byDank
Varroa destructor byKoA, reviewed byChiswick Chap
Lepas testudinata byEtriusus, reviewed byJens Lallensack
Island bronze-naped pigeon byAryKun, reviewed bySilverTiger12
Placidium arboreum byEsculenta, reviewed bySilverTiger12
Orange-billed lorikeet byAryKun, reviewed byJens Lallensack
Spinular night frog byAryKun, reviewed byAn anonymous username, not my real name
Crested cuckoo-dove byAryKun, reviewed byFemke
Aristonectes byAmirani1746, reviewed byJens Lallensack
Mocquard's Madagascar ground gecko byOlmagon, reviewed byEtriusus
Femoral gland byEsculenta, reviewed byJens Lallensack
Ameerega munduruku byAryKun, reviewed byJens Lallensack
Snowy plover byJens Lallensack, reviewed bySilverTiger12
Crested cuckoo-dove byAryKun, reviewed byGrungaloo
Wood-pasture hypothesis byAndersenAnders, reviewed byChiswick Chap
Hypericum bupleuroides byFritzmann2002, reviewed byEtriusus
Teratoscincus roborowskii byOlmagon, reviewed byEsculenta
Pulchrocladia retipora byEsculenta, reviewed byEtriusus
Anaptychia ciliaris byEsculenta, reviewed byJens Lallensack

Newly nominated content

Snowy plover byJens Lallensack
List of birds of Bouvet Island byAryKun
Laomaki byAn anonymous username, not my real name
Nyctibatrachus robinmoorei byAryKun
Nyctibatrachus sabarimalai byAryKun
Nyctibatrachus mewasinghi byAryKun
Eucalyptus gomphocephala byHughesdarren

Contest results

The third edition ofour monthly contest sawQuetzal1964 win for the second month in a row, scoring 68 points from 39 articles about a variety of marine fishes. In second place for the month isOlmagon, who scored 45 points from 10 articles on extinct crustaceans and geckoes. In the overall standings,Quetzal1964 leapfrogged oversimongraham into first place, with 176 points from 109 articles;simongraham is now in second place with 136 points from 37 articles. The December edition of the contest is now open: feel free to drop by and participate if you work on any TOL-related articles this month.

New newsletter!

Now, this newsletter is technically not new, but I have only recently become aware of its existence and am only a month late, so it still counts.Wikiproject Fungi'sLichen task force hasa new newsletter that is very nicely formatted and also features much better writing thanthis newsletter. Anyone interested in receiving the newsletter can add their namehere.

November DYKs
A bacterium that thrives in the deep ocean
A bacterium that thrives in the deep ocean


Georges Cuvier's reconstruction of Anoplotherium commune
Georges Cuvier's reconstruction ofAnoplotherium commune


Paroedura maingoka
Paroedura maingoka


Field of Wyethia amplexicaulis in bloom
Field ofWyethia amplexicaulis in bloom


An adult dwarf pufferfish
An adult dwarf pufferfish


Adult Balkan terrapin
Adult Balkan terrapin


Planocarina marginata, a hyalospheniid amoeba
Planocarina marginata, a hyalospheniid amoeba

Discuss this issue

You are receiving this because you added your name to thesubscribers list of theWikiProject Tree of Life. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, pleaseremove your name.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk)17:45, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WikiJournal nomination

[edit]

Good morningE&E, I recentlysubmitted anarticle to consideration for the WikiJournal of Science. Are there any further steps I need to take in the process or is it all on its own track at this point? Not trying to rush or anything, thank you for your guidance.Fritzmann (message me)13:08, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Fritzmann2002MrMoi38 (talk)14:21, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Tree of Life Newsletter Issue 25

[edit]
December 2023—Issue 025


Tree of Life


Welcome to the Tree of Life newsletter!
Newly recognized content

Snowy plover byJens Lallensack
Teloschistaceae byEsculenta
List of birds of Bouvet Island byAryKun
List of sunbirds byAryKun
Slime mold byChiswick Chap, reviewed byEsculenta
Handicap principle byChiswick Chap, reviewed byEtriusus
Insect byChiswick Chap, reviewed byIztwoz
Wheat byChiswick Chap, reviewed byKoA
Eucalyptus gomphocephala byHughesdarren, reviewed byGrungaloo
Buellia frigida byEsculenta, reviewed byJ Milburn
Nyctibatrachus robinmoorei byAryKun, reviewed byGrungaloo
Nyctibatrachus mewasinghi byAryKun, reviewed byGrungaloo
Nyctibatrachus sabarimalai byAryKun, reviewed byGrungaloo
Great cuckoo-dove byAryKun, reviewed byJens Lallensack
Lake Patzcuaro salamander byEtriusus, reviewed byGrungaloo
Anoplotherium byPrimalMustelid, reviewed by20 upper

Newly nominated content

Alpine ibex byLittleJerry
Pseudastacus byOlmagon
Pachysentis byMattximus
List of primates byPresN
Banded palm civet byCremastra
Perothops byMemer15151
Hypericum hircinum byFritzmann2002
Boquila byEtriusus andVeridicae
Aptostichus barackobamai byEtriusus
Buffy-tufted marmoset byAndré Ribeiro Cardoso
Ant mimicry byChiswick Chap
Mosquito byChiswick Chap
Anopheles byChiswick Chap
Rice byChiswick Chap
Pliosaurus andrewsi byAmirani1746
Triassosculda byAbdullah raji
Flaco (owl) byRhododendrites
Crassispira incrassata byEtriusus
Sei whale by20 upper

Contest results

And so ends the fourth edition of themonthly rolling contest, as well as the 2023 Tree of Life Contest as a whole. This month sawsimongraham win with a very impressive 120 points from 27 articles.Quetzal1964 was second with 74 points from 37 articles. The annual contest was a close race between simongraham and Quetzal1964; simongraham won first place with 256 points from 64 articles, and Quetzal1964 was second with 250 points from 146 articles.Snoteleks was third with 79 points from 33 articles. Congratulations to everyone who won this year and my gratitude to everyone else who helped raise the quality of articles in our little corner of Wikipedia this year. Additionally, a very Happy New Year to everyone in the project and here's looking forward to continuing our good work in 2024!

December DYKs
Snowy plover with chicks
Snowy plover with chicks


Bofedales in the foreground
Bofedales in the foreground


Adult female Varroa mite
Adult female Varroa mite


Dennstaedtia christophelii fossil frond
Dennstaedtia christophelii fossil frond


Discuss this issue

You are receiving this because you added your name to thesubscribers list of theWikiProject Tree of Life. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, pleaseremove your name.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk)10:57, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Tree of Life Newsletter Issue 26

[edit]
January and February 2024—Issue 026


Tree of Life


Welcome to the Tree of Life newsletter!
Newly recognized content

Alpine ibex byLittleJerry
Markham's storm petrel byFunkMonk,Jens Lallensack, andTherapyisgood
List of primates byPresN
List of birds of Alberta bygrungaloo
Rice byChiswick Chap, reviewed byRecycledPixels
Barley byChiswick Chap, reviewed byBruxton
Chicken byChiswick Chap, reviewed byDocZach
Cereal byChiswick Chap, reviewed byBruxton
Ant mimicry byChiswick Chap, reviewed byAryKun
Anopheles byChiswick Chap, reviewed byAryKun
Mosquito byChiswick Chap, reviewed by20 upper
Cherry blossom byReconrabbit, reviewed byChiswick Chap
Sei whale by20 upper, reviewed bygrungaloo
Megaherbivore by20 upper, reviewed byChiswick Chap
Brown bear by20 upper, reviewed byChiswick Chap
Indian rhinoceros by20 upper, reviewed byChiswick Chap
Hypericum hircinum byFritzmann2002, reviewed bygrungaloo
Hypericum foliosum byFritzmann2002, reviewed byChiswick Chap
Hypericum grandifolium byFritzmann2002, reviewed byEsculenta
Boquila byEtriusus, reviewed byChiswick Chap
Aptostichus barackobamai byEtriusus, reviewed byEsculenta
Crassispira incrassata byEtriusus, reviewed by20 upper
Punctelia byEsculenta, reviewed byEaldgyth
Chrysothrix chlorina byEsculenta, reviewed byEaldgyth
Chrysothrix chlorina byEsculenta, reviewed byEaldgyth
Ramalina peruviana byEsculenta, reviewed byEaldgyth
Menemerus animatus bysimongraham, reviewed byEsculenta
Afraflacilla braunsi bysimongraham, reviewed bygrungaloo
Nasutoceratops byFunkMonk, reviewed byJens Lallensack
Pseudastacus byOlmagon, reviewed byFunkMonk
Angustidontus bySuper Dromaeosaurus andIchthyovenator, reviewed byAmitchell125
Pruemopterus bySuper Dromaeosaurus andIchthyovenator, reviewed byEtriusus
Black-billed magpie bygrungaloo, reviewed byJens Lallensack
Black-capped chickadee bygrungaloo, reviewed byJens Lallensack
Horned sungem byJens Lallensack, reviewed bygrungaloo
Flaco (owl) byRhododendrites, reviewed byEtriusus
Telonemia bySnotoleks, reviewed byEsculenta
"Pliosaurus"andrewsi byAmirani1746, reviewed bygrungaloo
Beaver drop byLightburst, reviewed byChiswick Chap

Newly nominated content

Horned sungem byJens Lallensack
Tufted jay bygrungaloo
Nasutoceratops byFunkMonk
Maize byChiswick Chap
Cattle byChiswick Chap
Pig byChiswick Chap
Domestic duck byChiswick Chap
Eusociality byChiswick Chap
Fish byChiswick Chap
Barnacle byChiswick Chap
Ochrophyte bySnotoleks
Parvilucifera bySnotoleks
Thalattoarchon byAmirani1746
Hydropunctaria amphibia byEsculenta
Melanohalea byEsculenta
Spot test (lichen) byEsculenta
Lecideaceae byEsculenta
Hypericum ×inodorum byFritzmann2002
Hypericum sect.Androsaemum byFritzmann2002
Olga Hartman byViriditas
Mixtotherium byPrimalMustelid
Enhydriodon byPrimalMustelid
Lentinus brumalis byЗэгс ус

News at a glance
January DYKs
  • ... thatDacrytherium, literally meaning 'tear beast', was named after its "tear-pit"? (3 January)
  • ... that misidentifications of thecrested cuckoo-dove have led to claims that the extinctChoiseul pigeon is still around? (4 January)
  • ... that thewood-pasture hypothesis posits that semi-open wood pastures and not primeval forests are the natural vegetation of temperate Europe? (5 January)
  • ... that until April 2023, when thegenusTriassosculda was discovered, themantis shrimp fossil record contained a gap of more than a hundred million years? (5 January)
  • ... that althoughOlga Hartman believed that herbasic research on marine worms had no practical value, it was applied to experimental studies of oysters? (6 January)
  • ... thatOxford ivy grows towards the light to bloom and then towards the darkness when going to seed? (17 January)
  • ... thatS. F. Light(pictured) disliked using his full name? (20 January)
  • ... that the fossil turtleAcherontemys was named for a "river of the fabled lower world"? (26 January)
  • ... thata species of spider is named afterBarack Obama? (27 January)
  • ... thatBoquila trifoliolata is the only known plant capable of simultaneously mimicking multiple species? (27 January)
  • ... thatHarpegnathos alperti worker ants have black heads and chocolate-colored mandibles? (28 January)
  • ... that all known populations ofEpipterygium opararense(example pictured) live within a 5-metre (16 ft) radius in New Zealand? (28 January)
  • ... that femaleswamp guppies(pictured) show no preference for orange or red coloration during courtship? (29 January)
  • S. F. Light examining termites
    S. F. Light examining termites
  • Epipterygium opararense
    Epipterygium opararense
  • Gold-morph swamp guppies
    Gold-morph swamp guppies
February DYKs
  • Black-billed magpie eating ticks off the back of a cow
    Black-billed magpie eating ticks off the back of a cow
  • Flaco peeping through a window
    Flaco peeping through a window
  • Horned sungem robbing a flower
    Horned sungem robbing a flower

Discuss this issue

You are receiving this because you added your name to thesubscribers list of theWikiProject Tree of Life. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, pleaseremove your name.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk)12:53, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Need permission to use MT gene figure in presentation

[edit]

Hi Thomas!

My name is Dr. Renee J Dufault. I am doing a presentation on nutritional epigenetics. I will be discussing the MT gene. Can I please have your permission to use the MT gene figure you created?

I can be reached at rdufault@atsu.eduThank you.Dr. D147.81.47.181 (talk)20:10, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

[edit]
You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki.Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on thevoting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, pleasereview the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF)23:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Tree of Life Newsletter Issue 27

[edit]
March and April 2024—Issue 027


Tree of Life


Welcome to the Tree of Life newsletter!
Newly recognized content

Horned sungem byJens Lallensack
Tufted jay bygrungaloo
Pseudastacus byOlmagon
List of erinaceids byPresN
Primates byPresN
Hypericum sect.Androsaemum byFritzmann2002
Thalattoarchon byAmirani1746, reviewed byEsculenta
Lentinus brumalis byЗэгс ус, reviewed byChiswick Chap
Hypericum sect.Androsaemum byFritzmann2002, reviewed byMaxim Masiutin
Hypericum ×inodorum byFritzmann2002, reviewed byAryKun
Barnacle byChiswick Chap, reviewed byLightburst
Maize byChiswick Chap, reviewed byAryKun
Pig byChiswick Chap, reviewed byWolverine XI
Orange (fruit) byChiswick Chap, reviewed by750h+
Fish byChiswick Chap, reviewed byReconrabbit
Organism byChiswick Chap, reviewed byEsculenta
Hydropunctaria amphibia byEsculenta, reviewed byAryKun
Melanohalea byEsculenta, reviewed byAryKun
Lecideaceae byEsculenta, reviewed byWolverine XI
Xylopsora canopeorum byEsculenta, reviewed byAryKun
Spot test (lichen) byEsculenta, reviewed byAryKun
Gustaf Einar Du Rietz byEsculenta, reviewed byChiswick Chap
Allocalicium byEsculenta, reviewed bySimongraham
Multiclavula mucida byEsculenta, reviewed byChiswick Chap
Aphaena submaculata byEtriusus, reviewed byWolverine XI
White-tailed jay byGrungaloo, reviewed byChiswick Chap
Fork-tailed drongo byThe Blue Rider, reviewed byChiswick Chap
Northern green anaconda byChaotic Enby, reviewed byGeardona
Heptamegacanthus byMattximus, reviewed byEsculenta
Mixtotherium byPrimalMustelid, reviewed byFunkMonk
Diplobune byPrimalMustelid, reviewed byWolverine XI
Ochrophyte bySnoteleks, reviewed byEaldgyth
Parvilucifera bySnoteleks, reviewed byFritzmann2002
Urceolus bySnoteleks, reviewed byFritzmann2002
Plexippoides regius bySimongraham, reviewed byGrungaloo
Olga Hartman byViriditas, reviewed byLightburst
Giant panda byWolverine XI, reviewed byThebiguglyalien
Enchylium conglomeratum byXkalponik, reviewed byWolverine XI

Newly nominated content

Great cuckoo-dove byAryKun
Heptamegacanthus byMattximus
List of talpids byPresN
List of birds of New Brunswick byB3251
List of forest-inventory conifers in Canada byDank
Dissoderma odoratum byNotAGenious
Xiphodon byPrimalMustelid
Banana byChiswick Chap
Phintella parva bySimongraham
Evarcha maculata bySimongraham
Asian elephant byWolverine XI
Megafauna byWolverine XI
Fishing cat byWolverine XI
Thistle tortoise beetle byJustinxuje
Enchylium limosum byXkalponik
Enchylium polycarpon byXkalponik
Skeleton panda sea squirt byChaotic Enby
Hypericum aciferum byFritzmann2002
Hypericum russeggeri byFritzmann2002
Hypericum minutum byFritzmann2002
Chrompodellid bySnoteleks
Aquilegia sibirica byPbritti
Carabus japonicus byNHanselman
Charles De Geer byYakikaki
Cheetah reintroduction in India byMagentic Manifestations

News at a glance
  • The newsletter will not be returning to a monthly format (mainly because the author is busy failing every exam imaginable) and is on a bimonthly schedule for the foreseeable future.
  • The second round of the WikiCup was very competitive, requiring the highest points total to advance since 2014. Two TOL editors,AryKun andFritzmann2002, advanced to the third round.
  • The March edition of ourmonthly rolling contest was won bysimongraham, who amassed 118 points from 21 articles on various species of jumping spider; in second place wasQuetzal1964 with 109 points from 53 articles on marine ray-finned fish.
  • Quetzal1964 and simongraham were also the top two in the April edition, although Quetzal was ahead this time, with 68 points to simongraham's 48. In the annual leaderboard, Quetzal and simongraham are in first and second place respectively, with 291 and 246 points; in third place isSnotoleks, with 76 points.
March DYKs
  • Eufriesea purpurata
    Eufriesea purpurata
  • Korowai gecko
    Korowai gecko
  • Paleoallium billgenseli fossil
    Paleoallium billgenseli fossil
  • Male Meratus blue flycatcher
    Male Meratus blue flycatcher
April DYKs
  • Artist's impression of a ray cat
    Artist's impression of a ray cat
  • White-tailed jay
    White-tailed jay
  • Aphaena submaculata
    Aphaena submaculata
  • Calamophyton tree
    Calamophyton tree

Discuss this issue

You are receiving this because you added your name to thesubscribers list of theWikiProject Tree of Life. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, pleaseremove your name.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk)05:21, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Drift draft

[edit]

Hi Thomas, we are trying to get in touch as there is life again in the drift draft - are you still there? Florian & Maya131.111.5.145 (talk)16:03, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

porting an article from a refereed academic journal to Wikipedia?

[edit]

I'm the author of two articles in a refereed academic journal, for which I own the copyright and can release it under CC BY-SA.[1]

Can I port them verbatim to Wikipedia? (or update them as I'm porting them)?

FYI, they both began as articles in Wikiversity. The "Externalities" article was extensively revised before submitting for publication; the "Copyrights" article is nearly identical to the Wikiversity original. ;-)DavidMCEddy (talk)13:22, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^Spencer Graves; Douglas A. Samuelson (March 2022)."Externalities, public goods, and infectious diseases"(PDF).Real-world economics review (99):25–56.ISSN 1755-9472.Wikidata Q111367750.;Spencer Graves (21 March 2023)."Do copyrights and paywalls on academic journals violate the US Constitution?1"(PDF).Real-world economics review (103).ISSN 1755-9472.Wikidata Q126116187.

DavidMCEddy (talk)13:22, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion ofTemplate:Remove numbers

[edit]

Template:Remove numbers has beennominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe entry on the Templates for discussion page.Gonnym (talk)09:31, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Professor Dr Raja Muhammad Mansha Chief Warrant Officer Pakistan Air Force Lecture Islamabad Model College for Boys G-10/4, IslamabadRaja M Mansha (talk)20:23, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment forCatalytic triad

[edit]

Catalytic triad has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to thereassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.Z1720 (talk)17:03, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Inactive peer review volunteer

[edit]

Hi Evolution and evolvability, you're receiving this message because you were previously listed atthe list of volunteers forWikipedia's peer review process, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 1 year.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the volunteers list, so that the list is kept up to date and editors who do need help can better find active editors. If you become active again and would like to add yourself to the volunteers list again, you can do so at any time by visitingthe volunteers list.

Thank you for volunteering to be on the list previously, and all the best on your WikiVoyages!Message delivered to you with love byYapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contactmy bot operator. | Sent at18:00, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination ofTemplate:Lists of sequenced genomes

[edit]

A tag has been placed onTemplate:Lists of sequenced genomes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Unused redirect from template to main space

Under thecriteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact thedeleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a requesthere. —GhostInTheMachinetalk to me11:34, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCite 2025

[edit]

Hi as a former participant of the WikiCite 2020 I would like to inform you that the new2025 edition is finalizing itsprogramme. It will take place in Bern August, 29th to 31st, mostly on line with a on-site part featuring a dozen invited speakers. I am part of the academic committee.

If you are interested, you can submit aproposal for the slots that are taking place online on Saturday afternoon (long presentations and ligthing talks) and on Sunday (do-a-thons). So, if there is anything you would like to discuss to check with the community that status of the project, feel free to do so.

We cannot rule out once the final programme is completed, that some users currentyl active and living in neighboring countries might also be invited to Bern, if we have enough additional funding, but this is just a possibility. The proposals in that page are intended to be presented from remote.Alexmar983 (talk)12:43, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Illinois Long Term Selection Experiment

[edit]

Thepage for this experiment, the longest running directional selection experiment in higher plants, is a stub.

It needs a graphic.This is a striking one. Know how we can add it?

Speaking of images, the leads ongene andchromosome are the same. This is potentially confusing. Genes are found on chromosomes "like beads on a string" (in Morgan's famous phrase) but the two are not synonymous.Charlie Faust (talk)13:31, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

We humans, as Siddhartha Mukherjee notes, are a visual species. The Illinois long term selection experiment is a graphic example of the power of directional selection. A graphic (like theone in Ridley) illustrates this.
And the pages forgene andchromosome should have different lead images.
Through your work, you have greatly improved the quality of graphics on Wikipedia. Thank you.Charlie Faust (talk)00:30, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Evolution_and_evolvability&oldid=1326807462"
Category:
Hidden category:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp