Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2

This user account is no longer active. Past discussions have been archived for reference.

• User talk:AKLKPhilo/Archive_1
• User talk:AKLKPhilo/Archive 2

Please start any new discussions below. Thank you.

You have beenblockedindefinitely from editing for persistently makingdisruptive edits.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia'sguide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  StarMississippi02:48, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by anadministrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see theblocking policy).

AKLKPhilo(block log •active blocks •global blocks •contribs •deleted contribs •filter log •creation log •change block settings •unblock •checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am requesting to be unblocked to return to constructive editing. I understand that my previous editing regarding a specific subject of interest where I have a COI was viewed as disruptive and advocacy-based. I have voluntarily deleted the draft in question and do not intend to pursue that topic further. Regarding my other contributions, I have strived to ensure they are neutral, well-sourced, and free of technical errors or copyright issues with the subjects that I am familiar with and can offer udpates. I understand the importance of avoiding conflicts of interest and will strictly adhere to community guidelines.AKLKPhilo (talk) 10:59 pm, Yesterday (UTC−6)

Decline reason:

Sorry, but I don't believe you for one second. You were unblocked knowing you had a COI and then recreated the article for your company multiple times. IMO, further review of this isnot worth anyone's time.Jauerback^dude?/_dude.14:38, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, pleaseread theguide to appealing blocks first, then use the{{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• I would ask that the reviewing admin consider the following examples of non-COI issues with LLM use and verifiability, which were concerns also raised atthe ANI report and do not appear to be addressed above:[1][2][3], as well as the history (including talk page) of the now-deletedM-1 Studios which wasA7 and G15d.fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk)07:10, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@AKLKPhilo Are you writing your posts using AI, LLM or chatbot tools? I have a very strong suspicion that you didn't write your appeal yourself.Blue Sonnet (talk)10:58, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I acknowledge the concerns raised regarding LLM use and verifiability. I will not use AI tools in the future for any research or writing related to articles of interest. I will obtain and reference sources related to the topic that can be located and read/accessed online and verified to be correct in page numbers and sections to ensure my compliance withWP:VERIFY.

@Blue Sonnet I am writing this myself, in response to the user block on my account, so this matter can be reviewed by administrators regarding the issues raised related to my article submissions.AKLKPhilo (talk)12:06, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your response. Can you please explain why you continued to add fictitious sources from AI after you said you would verify them?

Either you aren't verifying them and lied when you said you would, or you are trying to verify them and don't know how to do it properly. Both of these are worrying.Blue Sonnet (talk)13:35, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Request: Could an admin please createUser talk:AKLKPhilo/Archive_2 so I can archive older threads? I will leave the declined unblock notice on this page.AKLKPhilo (talk)03:17, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've created it. I notice you said "this user account is no longer active"

Please remember the block applies to you the editor, not just this account @AKLKPhiloStarMississippi03:32, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission toArticles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Valereee was:

This draft's references do not show that the subjectqualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meetall four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn aboutmistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmitafter they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go toDraft:Beef House Restaurant and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned andmay be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced anyuntoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at theArticles for creation help desk, on thereviewer's talk page or useWikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Valereee (talk)17:58, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,AKLKPhilo!Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at theArticles for creation help desk. If you have anyother questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at theTeahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!Valereee (talk)17:58, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed atDraft:Bishop's Buffet. Thanks!JSFarman (talk)03:34, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC