Spammers, friends and critics can't agree -- isUser:A. B.:

A."She (because clearly she's a bitch) is just doing her thing up in New Jersey. No one likes you, mother of three. No one."^[1][2]

B."Worst of all this user is very offensive to females."^[3]

• Same user also edits asTony.dean^[4]

C. A stalker"from birmgingham england."^[5]

D. A"lesbian feminazi."^[6][7] … wearing her"undies in a bunch?"^[8]

E. A"robot."^[9][10][11]

• Oh no!

F. Hiding a pornographic fire-parrot in Wikipedia's sandbox.^[12]

G. Living in Minnesota, USA.^[13]

H. Canadian,eh?^[14] Tamil,no?^[15]

I. A Yankee?^[16] A Tennesseean?^[17] A Yankeeand a "Kerry freak"?^[18]

J. In theAmerican Air Force or maybe theNavy^[19]

K. Just stupid.^[20]

L. A kid sitting on a bean bag chair in Mom's basement eating Cheetos

M. A mom with a kid in the basement living on Cheetos

N. All of the above.

O. None of the above.

P. Somedays one, somedays another.

You decide.

•answer

I hope you plan to come back. I too went inactive in 2014 and came back in 2017. There had been some changes and I needed to relearn some things and I had to redefine how I work on Wikipedia, but I'm glad I came back. best-- Deepfriedokra (talk)02:46, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, @Deepfriedokra. I was away probably a decade and I had to learn about the subtle changes that had occurred. I'd like to be an admin again but I honestly don't think I'd want to go through an 2024 RfA -- they've become ridiculously grueling since myRfA (86/0/0). Also, I doubt many people are active that remember me as an admin.

Anyway, I'm very much back (other than 4 months earlier this year for an emergency) --A. B.^{(talk •contribs •global count)}03:08, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

cool-- Deepfriedokra (talk)03:11, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You should try the admin elections if they have another round.Espresso Addict(talk)03:21, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this! You two are making my day! --A. B.^{(talk •contribs •global count)}03:24, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yo A. B., further to the above, candidate sign up is on9 July and runs a week. Good luck!—Fortuna,imperatrix12:42, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've thought about it but I'm going away on vacation and will be out of touch. I'm flattered, though.

I'll definitely consider it for the next round. —A. B.^{(talk •contribs •global count)} 13:05, 4 July 2025 (UTC)A. B.^{(talk •contribs •global count)}13:05, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Swung by to have a look at your xtools in light of the recent recall discussion, since I know you're one of the inactive admins who returned, butnot to admin activity (the only one I know of actually, are you aware of anyone else?), immediately distracted by this thread. If you're not running this go around, you might want to put yourself up forWP:ORCP to see if anyone digs up any dirt. The five-month break between this election and the next would probably be long enough to convince people you'd taken whatever it was under advisory, if so, so probably better to do it now and get that part of the angst out of the way. --asilvering (talk)16:09, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

SeeWikipedia:Requests for adminship/Optional RfA candidate poll#A. B.: July 4, 2025 --A. B.^{(talk •contribs •global count)}18:59, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, it's been a bit since I've run into you on the project, but I figured now was as good a time as any to reiterate my belief that you would be a good candidate for reacquiring the mop. If you ever are interested in considering admin duties again, I'd love to support you as much as possible. Best, ~Pbritti (talk)21:14, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm flattered -- thanks!A. B.^{(talk •contribs •global count)}15:13, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

SeeWikipedia:Requests for adminship/Optional RfA candidate poll#A. B.: July 4, 2025. --A. B.^{(talk •contribs •global count)}19:01, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Me, too.Liz^Read!Talk!21:26, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library:Books & Bytes
Issue 69, May–June 2025

In this issue we highlight a new partnership, Citation Watchlist and, as always, a roundup of news and community items related to libraries and digital knowledge.

Read the full newsletter

Sent byMediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team –13:10, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, just wanted to share the situation as to why there was a PROD onthis article that you removed... its related to a series of COI editing by the article creator (under discussion here) and follows a pattern of other articles created by them thathave been deleted at AfD. I didn't want to take it to AfD to rehash all the above, but wanted give an you an explanation about why I put the PROD on there, despite there being coverage on this individual.Nayyn (talk)14:54, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I looked at theGilbert Lopez edit history and wondered about a COI since there was a single editor, but normally those involve platitudes, not negative news. I was unaware of the discussion atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Persistent COI editing by Mediascriptor, cross Wiki

Even had I been aware, I wouldn't have factored the COI issue into my consideration. We delete articles based on their suitability for Wikipedia, not the motivations of the article's editor (except forarticles started by previously banned editors).WP:DINC: "Deletion ≠ cleanup. So I evaluated the PROD based on your comment:

• "Psuedo biography, only discusses case or criminal activity not biography of individual themselves."

To me, the question was based on our policy:

• Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons#Subjects notable only for one event
• This non-binding essay on how to interpret this policy
  • Wikipedia:What BLP1E is not
• My experience with AfDs that considered other crimes so huge that they dragged on
• My reading of:
  • Stanford International Bank
  • Stanford Financial Group
• Precedent: we have articles on all sorts of people known only for one big, criminal event:
  • Lee Harvey Oswald
  • Tim Leissner
  • A number of other Ponzi operators known only for big Ponzi crimes, nothing else -- see the blue-linked names atList of Ponzi schemes

So I thought the community should decide the suitability of this article, not just one editor and an admin. Or me. (Typically, admins going through PRODs move fast and just look to see that nominations don't violate policy; they assume the 7-day period means multiple other editors implicitly agree with the PROD.) I thought your reasoning had merit but that others might disagree: that's why I recommended AfD inmy edit summary:

• "Remove PROD. Lots of press coverage. I suggest WP:AFD if you still want to delete."

--A. B.^{(talk •contribs •global count)}16:25, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I actually fully support the statement you removed. This argument ofWP:NEXIST has come up time and time again in athlete AfDs in recent months, people saying there are sources without providing evidence. One editor who was recycling this argument in AfDs has now stopped.LibStar (talk)04:44, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Actually they were stopped after an admin brought the issue to ANI as being disruptive in AfDs.LibStar (talk)04:47, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for telling me this,LibStar. I haven't been involved in many sports AfDs so I didn't know about this problem. I understand where these people are coming from-- you expect there to be some sort of coverage at least in some super-local newspaper but nobody's providing references. It's only when you dig for references yourself that you realize they're not to be found.

Looking back on my childhood days as a rabid sports fan, I recall lots of coverage of the leading players on my favorite team but nothing about the others. If I flew toMadagascar and holed up in theAntananarivo public library, I doubt I'd find anything aboutNicole Rajoharison in the archives other than statistics and some school newspaper articles.--A. B.^{(talk •contribs •global count)}02:34, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note for the record -- this is the aforementioned edit:[21]

--A. B.^{(talk •contribs •global count)}02:18, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I saw the reply you tried to give in the Nicole Rajoharison AfD, and I wanted clarify that it isn't you who I'm taking issue with. Sure, I disagree with you often, but I think you generally engage in good-faith, respectful discussion. I realize I got a little too soapboxy there, and while I stand by what I said, I probably should have taken it to the talk pages of the specific users who I believe are abusing the system. I disagree with your stance on how much time is appropriate to allot to finding sources, but I wanted to make sure I let you know that I don't have beef with you. I find it upsetting that while it took maybe 10 minutes ofWP:BEFORE to nominateKozo Kinomoto for deletion, it took me probably around 3-4 hours to find enough sources to demonstrate that there are enough out there to establish notability, but that's really just the nature of the process I suppose. I do know you agreed with me in that case, and that you aren't just trying to indiscriminately throw everything into the shredder, which is the issue I have with some editors. I'm sorry if my comment offended you. It was not meant to be directed at you, and was probably in the wrong forum. Best Wishes –Ike Lek (talk)06:04, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No offense taken! Thanks for caring so much about our content and readers.--A. B.^{(talk •contribs •global count)}02:20, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note for the record -- this is the aforementioned edit:[22]

--A. B.^{(talk •contribs •global count)}02:21, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I think you forgot to add your signature to your comment the other day atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sonsoles Espinosa. I've added it for you, but just wanted to let you know in case you'd rather revert it. No worries either way :)Epsilon.Prota^talk18:04, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

September 2025 Backlog Drive |New pages patrol
On 1 September 2025, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part?Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourselfhere.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk)15:30, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am not going to remove the tags again, but please seeWikipedia:Tagging_pages_for_problems#Too_many_tags. NPOV and Peacock are somewhat similar, so there is no point in having both.Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk)03:33, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the upcomingWikipedia:WikiProject Military history coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is availablehere. If you are interested in running, please sign uphere by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of thecurrent coord team.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:02, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@A. B. Hi there. I saw a tag you placed on an article I created for Exodus saying there may have been undisclosed payments. Please look at my talk page and see that I already worked with senior editors like Caleb Stanford and Pythoncoder and explained that I have no connection with the company - just my interest in cryptocurrency. Then Caleb helped me edit the draft accordingly and he edited himself as well.If there's anything that you think isn't neutral, please guide me on how to fix it, I'll appreciate it big time!Noobx9000 (talk)17:48, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@A. B. There is a similar tag you placed on Kayla's draft. Again, there is zero connection with Kayla - I wish it were true and I got paid lol. Since I'm comparatively new to Wikipedia (about a year), what I do is that I try to find people that are already notable yet don't have a draft. I then create their pages - this helps in adding credibility to my profile (having published pages under my belt). I have only been able to create 2 pages as of yet and would appreciate any help I can get from you. Please understand that I am trying hard to build my profile and then such tags are a bummer :/

I'd love to work under your guidance. Please help me improve the draft!Noobx9000 (talk)17:56, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I suggest you take a look at the Czech article and consider what is has to offer in expanding the one sentence English Wikipedia article. Pay special attention to the reference "V tomto článku byl použit překlad textu z článku Anton Bernolák´s Chapel na anglické Wikipedii.Externí odkazy" which translates to "This article uses a translation of text from the article Anton Bernolák´s Chapel on the English Wikipedia." To avoid an edit war perhaps you can revert your revert of my edit.Gab4gab (talk)15:28, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for catching that,Gab4gab! There must have been a time when the two articles were identical.

I have redirected the article toAnton Bernolák#Legacy as an alternative to deletion.A. B.^{(talk •contribs •global count)}15:51, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a way to change UTC time to MT time and turn it to 12 hour clock? I can read it best like that so I understand when an article is made. Sorry though. ~Rafael (He, him) •talk •guestbook •projects23:56, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rafaelthegreat, go to your account preferences icon in the upper righthand corner of your window, open it, and then select "appearances". You can set your time zone and time display preferences there.

I hope this is helpful. --A. B.^{(talk •contribs •global count)}00:10, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@A. B. I can't find a way to turn it into a 12 hour clock. ~Rafael (He, him) •talk •guestbook •projects00:19, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid I don't know how to do that, either. I suggest you ask atWikipedia:Teahouse, where people are available to answer questions.A. B.^{(talk •contribs •global count)}00:59, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. ~Rafael (He, him) •talk •guestbook •projects01:20, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know that Wikipedia has a way to switch to a 12-hour clock. However, learning how to read a 24-hour clock is fairly simple. If it's before 1 PM, it's basically the same. For example, 1:50 AM is 1:50 on a 24-hour clock; similarly, 12:25 PM is 12:25 on a 24-hour clock. The one difference is that 0:00 is 12:00 AM, so 0:45, for example, is 12:45 AM. Once you get past 12, you'll just subtract 12 from the hour. For example, 13:20 is 1:20 PM, an 22:15 is 10:15 PM. I hope this helps!Significa liberdade(she/her) (talk)03:40, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Significa liberdade I know how 24 hour clock works, it's just i'm more used t 12 hour clocks where I live. ~Rafael (He, him) •talk •guestbook •projects03:43, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Significa liberdade but thanks for your help! ~Rafael (He, him) •talk •guestbook •projects03:43, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi A. B., could you please take another look at the AFD? I believekeeping based on analyst reports andWP:LISTED is correct here. -Indefensible (talk)18:10, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you added a reference to a book in that article. Wouldn't that fit more into the bibliography (because I noticed it wasn't an inline citation)?Ell22Moore (talk)03:22, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Or am I incorrect?Ell22Moore (talk)03:23, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure I know the answer (I should). I'm happy with putting it in either place. I think the article is likely to get deleted so it probably doesn't make much difference. --A. B.^{(talk •contribs •global count)}04:47, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also, it appears that this book is a denominational history written by members of the Cumberland Presbyterian Church. Therefore, I think it’s best to classify it as a primary source rather than an independent secondary source.Ell22Moore (talk)03:32, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This ref came up in my search so I thought it might be helpful to someone if the article is retained. It may or may not be more than three passing mentions. It's published by a non-affiliated, respected publisher, so I consider it independent. I looked at free previews of pages 440 and 463; neither of them was significant in coverage. I couldn't see page 493. --A. B.^{(talk •contribs •global count)}04:50, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleJack Jasinski, to which you havesignificantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should bedeleted.

The discussion will take place atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Jasinski until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visitthe configuration page. Delivered bySDZeroBot (talk)01:10, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for theWikipedia:WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open! A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. Voting closes at 23:59 UTC on 29 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of thecurrent coord team.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:25, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library:Books & Bytes
Issue 70, July–August 2025

• New collections:
  • Times of Malta
  • Africa Intelligence
  • Intelligence Online
  • La Lettre
  • Glitz
• Spotlight: Wikimania

Read the full newsletter

Sent byMediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team –13:15, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(This message was sent toUser:A. B. and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

Regarding your edit summaryhere, the IP is blocked until 2030. Blocks can be layered now, so the IP has the original 10-year block made by Materialscientist in addition to my 2-week partial block from the talk page.--Ponyo^{bons mots}22:22, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks,Ponyo -- this is great. There was a time when it was considered very bad to block a school for more than several months; I took heat for blocking schools for a year. Kids will always be kids, year after year and on every continent.A. B.^{(talk •contribs •global count)}22:26, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That is true, unfortunately.--Ponyo^{bons mots}22:27, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May I ask why my edit was reverted?Was this an accident?I know you already restored it, I just want to ask.169.244.113.129 (talk)18:16, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I got confused and thought you deleted the school tag. Instead, you had added it, for which I am appreciative. When I figured out my mistake, I reverted my edit. I’m sorry for the aggravation.A. B.^{(talk •contribs •global count)}19:45, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't cause any problems, I just wanted to know. Thanks for responding!169.244.113.129 (talk)12:14, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Would you be so kind to help with an uncivilised user (user:Theclassicalmusicwriter) on my talk page? Thank you!Karljoos (talk)21:46, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Youforgot to sign it correctly — it has the date and time but not your username.Daniel Case (talk)18:03, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. I just fixed it.A. B.^{(talk •contribs •global count)}19:19, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

	The Special Barnstar
	Your thoughtful contributions are always highly appreciated.e.ux14:21, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. This is especially meaningful coming from you - you do so much good work with deletions, Eva!A. B.^{(talk •contribs •global count)}18:02, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atWikipedia talk:Speedy deletion on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

(replacingYapperbot)SodiumBot (botop|talk)20:31, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Starting on 1 November, the month-long2025 Article Improvement Drive will target a number of content improvement areas and backlogs. Participating editors will be in line for barnstars and other awards; articles from all aspects of the project will be eligible so there will be something for everybody. Interested editors are encouraged tosign up now!MediaWiki message delivery (talk)20:17, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atWikipedia:Village pump (proposals) on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

(replacingYapperbot)SodiumBot (botop|talk)08:30, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed you removed my request for deletion on a vanity page created for my late father, Dr. Manjur Karim. Apart from being his son, I lived with him in Bangladesh for the entire duration of his teaching career at BRAC University (2006 through 2014). I question, frankly, his notability or why this page concerning him should exist. Do you have any familiarity with him? I noted that the cited sources are not actually very good; if "sources" like those connote notability, I could create pages for any number of my acquaintances. Simply put - my dad and his personal history are not (in my view) valid Wikipedia material.~2025-31795-28 (talk)18:44, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your father might or might not be notable according to our guidelines. I removed your proposed deletion tag since it looked like he was. Take a look at our Articles for Deletion process (WP:AFD) -- it's for articles like this one where multiple editors weigh in, as opposed to just one like myself.

Thanks for reaching out to me. If you run into any obstacles with AFD, let me know. --A. B.^{(talk •contribs •global count)}18:54, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the prompt reply! :) I appreciate it.~2025-31795-28 (talk)18:58, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atTalk:Primerica on a "Economy, trade, and companies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

(replacingYapperbot)SodiumBot (botop|talk)18:31, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @A. B.. Your wiki edit anniversary is today, marking 20 years of dedicated contributions to English Wikipedia. Your passion for sharing knowledge and your remarkable contributions have not only enriched the project, but also inspired countless others to contribute. Thank you for your amazing contributions. Wishing you many more wonderful years ahead in the Wiki journey. :) -❙❚❚❙❙ GnOeee❚❙❚❙❙✉17:12, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!A. B.^{(talk •contribs •global count)}19:00, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:19, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library:Books & Bytes
Issue 71, September–October 2025

• Spotlight: 1Lib1Ref 2025 in Nigeria
• Frankfurt Book Fair
• Tech tip: Wikipedia Library access template

Read the full newsletter

Sent byMediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team –15:21, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(This message was sent toUser:A. B. and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

Nominations now open for theWikiProject Military Historynewcomer of the year andmilitary historian of the year awards for 2025! The top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Nominations are openhere andhere respectively. The nomination period closes at 23:59 on 30 November 2025 when voting begins. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery viaMediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:42, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Correction: nominations are open until 23:59 (UTC) on 14 December 2025.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)03:20, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atTalk:Quezon on a "Economy, trade, and companies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

(replacingYapperbot)SodiumBot (botop|talk)23:30, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Voting is now open for theWikiProject Military Historynewcomer of the year andmilitary historian of the year awards for 2025! The top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Cast your voteshere andhere respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2025. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery viaMediaWiki message delivery (talk)01:54, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atWikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

(replacingYapperbot)SodiumBot (botop|talk)20:30, 23 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

January–February 2026 Backlog Drive|New pages patrol
New Pages Patrol is hosting a one-time, two-month experimental backlog drive aimed at reducing the backlog. This will be a combo drive: both articles and redirects will earn points. The drive will run from 1 January to 28 February 2026. The drive is divided into two phases. Participants may take part in either phase or across both phases, depending on availability. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled during the drive. Two-month drive-exclusive barnstars will be awarded to eligible participants. Each article review earns 1 point, while each redirect review earns 0.2 points. Streak awards will be granted based on consistently meeting weekly point thresholds. Barnstars will also be awarded forre-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Interested in participating?Sign up here.
You are receiving this message because you are a New Pages Patrol reviewer. To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself fromhere.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk)17:21, 27 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atWikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Destination lists in airport articles on a "Economy, trade, and companies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

(replacingYapperbot)SodiumBot (botop|talk)13:32, 28 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atWikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Airport destination lists 2 on a "Economy, trade, and companies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

(replacingYapperbot)SodiumBot (botop|talk)21:30, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atWikipedia talk:Manual of Style on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

(replacingYapperbot)SodiumBot (botop|talk)13:30, 10 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atTalk:Dangrek genocide on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

(replacingYapperbot)SodiumBot (botop|talk)12:30, 21 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library:Books & Bytes
Issue 72, November–December 2025

• Renewed partnerships
• Spotlight: Strengthening Wikimedia Collaborations with and for Open Science

Read the full newsletter

Sent byMediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team –12:43, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

(This message was sent toUser:A. B. and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

Your feedback is requested atWikipedia:Village pump (proposals) on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

(replacingYapperbot)SodiumBot (botop|talk)23:51, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]