Formally, a unique factorization domain is defined to be anintegral domainR in which every non-zero elementx ofR which is not a unit can be written as a finite product ofirreducible elementspi ofR:
x =p1p2 ⋅⋅⋅pn withn ≥ 1
and this representation is unique in the following sense:Ifq1, ...,qm are irreducible elements ofR such that
x =q1q2 ⋅⋅⋅qm withm ≥ 1,
thenm =n, and there exists abijective mapφ : {1, ...,n} → {1, ...,m} such thatpi isassociated toqφ(i) fori ∈ {1, ...,n}.
Examples
Most rings familiar from elementary mathematics are UFDs:
IfR is a UFD, then so isR[X], thering of polynomials with coefficients inR. UnlessR is a field,R[X] is not a principal ideal domain. By induction, a polynomial ring in any number of variables over any UFD (and in particular over a field or over the integers) is a UFD.
Theformal power series ringK[[X1, ...,Xn]] over a fieldK (or more generally over aregular UFD such as a PID) is a UFD. On the other hand, the formal power series ring over a UFD need not be a UFD, even if the UFD islocal. For example, ifR is the localization ofk[x,y,z]/(x2 +y3 +z7) at theprime ideal(x,y,z) thenR is a local ring that is a UFD, but the formal power series ringR[[X]] overR is not a UFD.
is a UFD for all integers1 ≤n ≤ 22, but not forn = 23.
Mori showed that if the completion of aZariski ring, such as aNoetherian local ring, is a UFD, then the ring is a UFD.[1] The converse of this is not true: there are Noetherian local rings that are UFDs but whose completions are not. The question of when this happens is rather subtle: for example, for thelocalization ofk[x,y,z]/(x2 +y3 +z5) at the prime ideal(x,y,z), both the local ring and its completion are UFDs, but in the apparently similar example of the localization ofk[x,y,z]/(x2 +y3 +z7) at the prime ideal(x,y,z) the local ring is a UFD but its completion is not.
Let be a field of any characteristic other than 2. Klein and Nagata showed that the ringR[X1, ...,Xn]/Q is a UFD wheneverQ is a nonsingular quadratic form in theXs andn is at least 5. Whenn = 4, the ring need not be a UFD. For example,R[X,Y,Z,W]/(XY −ZW) is not a UFD, because the elementXY equals the elementZW so thatXY andZW are two different factorizations of the same element into irreducibles.
The ringQ[x,y]/(x2 + 2y2 + 1) is a UFD, but the ringQ(i)[x,y]/(x2 + 2y2 + 1) is not. On the other hand, The ringQ[x,y]/(x2 +y2 − 1) is not a UFD, but the ringQ(i)[x,y]/(x2 +y2 − 1) is.[2] Similarly thecoordinate ringR[X,Y,Z]/(X2 +Y2 +Z2 − 1) of the 2-dimensionalreal sphere is a UFD, but the coordinate ringC[X,Y,Z]/(X2 +Y2 +Z2 − 1) of the complex sphere is not.
Suppose that the variablesXi are given weightswi, andF(X1, ...,Xn) is ahomogeneous polynomial of weightw. Then ifc is coprime tow andR is a UFD and either everyfinitely generatedprojective module overR isfree orc is 1 modw, the ringR[X1, ...,Xn,Z]/(Zc −F(X1, ...,Xn)) is a UFD.[3]
Non-examples
Thequadratic integer ring of allcomplex numbers of the form, wherea andb are integers, is not a UFD because 6 factors as both 2×3 and as. These truly are different factorizations, because the only units in this ring are 1 and −1; thus, none of 2, 3,, and areassociate. It is not hard to show that all four factors are irreducible as well, though this may not be obvious.[4] See alsoAlgebraic integer.
The ring of formal power series over the complex numbers is a UFD, but thesubring of those that converge everywhere, in other words the ring ofentire functions in a single complex variable, is not a UFD, since there exist entire functions with an infinity of zeros, and thus an infinity of irreducible factors, while a UFD factorization must be finite, e.g.:
Properties
Some concepts defined for integers can be generalized to UFDs:
In UFDs, everyirreducible element isprime. (In any integral domain, every prime element is irreducible, but the converse does not always hold. For instance, the elementz ∈K[x,y,z]/(z2 −xy) is irreducible, but not prime.) Note that this has a partial converse: a domain satisfying theACCP is a UFD if and only if every irreducible element is prime.
Any two elements of a UFD have agreatest common divisor and aleast common multiple. Here, a greatest common divisor ofa andb is an elementd thatdivides botha andb, and such that every other common divisor ofa andb dividesd. All greatest common divisors ofa andb areassociated.
A has adivisor theory in which every divisor is principal.
A is aKrull domain in which everydivisorial ideal is principal (in fact, this is the definition of UFD in Bourbaki.)
A is a Krull domain and every prime ideal of height 1 is principal.[7]
In practice, (2) and (3) are the most useful conditions to check. For example, it follows immediately from (2) that a PID is a UFD, since every prime ideal is generated by a prime element in a PID.
For another example, consider a Noetherian integral domain in which every height one prime ideal is principal. Since every prime ideal has finite height, it contains a height one prime ideal (induction on height) that is principal. By (2), the ring is a UFD.
^A Schreier domain is an integrally closed integral domain where, wheneverx dividesyz,x can be written asx =x1x2 so thatx1 dividesy andx2 dividesz. In particular, a GCD domain is a Schreier domain