This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to thePOV template.

Put new text under old text.Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome!Learn to edit;get help. Assume good faith Be polite andavoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seekdispute resolution if needed

Archives:1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8Auto-archiving period:12 months

This template was nominated fordeletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination: Do not merge, 1 May 2021, seediscussion. Keep, 23 October 2020, seediscussion.

Template:POV ispermanentlyprotected from editing as it is aheavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported byconsensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template'sdocumentation to add usage notes orcategories. Any contributor may edit the template'ssandbox. Functionality of the template can be checked usingtest cases.

The redirectT:POV has been listed atredirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets theredirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 February 13 § T:POV until a consensus is reached.Utopes_{(talk /cont)}14:42, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thisedit request has been answered. Set the|answered= parameter tono to reactivate your request.

Template:POV has been listed at Templates for discussion (nomination), but it was protected, so it could not be tagged. Please add:

<noinclude>{{subst:tfm|help=off|1=POV lead}}</noinclude>

to the top of the page to complete the nomination. Thank you.Thebiguglyalien (talk)🛸20:59, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Donejlwoodwa (talk)02:44, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What is protocol for how many hours or days must pass if no explanation or clear, linked, actionable feedback aboutWP:NPOV is given, before any user may unilaterally remove such a template? --Very Polite Person (talk)03:02, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As a matter of assuming good faith, I'd start a discussion at the article's Talk page prior to removing the tag.DonIago (talk)06:10, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If there's no discussion at all (or even a hint about the nature of the problem in an edit summary)and you have no idea what the alleged problem is, then I'd say you areallowed (but not required) to remove it at any time. After all, itmight have been a mistake.

If the problem appears to have been resolved, then youshould remove the tag.

If there was a discussion in the past, but people stopped talking/trying to fix it more than a month agoand you think that any remaining problems are fairly small, then I think you areallowed (but not required) to remove the tag.

If you skim through the article and can see that there are still POV problems, then pleasedon't remove the tag (unless you fix the problems first).WhatamIdoing (talk)06:36, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If the tag was recently added by a new editor, consider reminding them of the requirements for placing the tag, rather than immediately removing. If you remove a tag that has no rationale and an editor reinstates it, the duty of justifying can usually be assumed pass to that editor. As long as you proceed assuming good faith and don't edit war it shouldn't be a problem.William Avery (talk)07:31, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thisedit request has been answered. Set the|answered= parameter tono to reactivate your request.

Description of suggested change: PerMOS:ALT, the image should have a blank|alt= attribute added to ensure screen readers do not attempt to read it.

Diff:

{{Lemondoge|Talk|Contributions}}15:21, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Completed.P.I. Ellsworth , ed. – welcome! – 15:41, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]