This article was nominated fordeletion on 3 July 2009 (UTC). The result ofthe discussion waskeep.

This article is ratedStub-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:

ComputingLow‑importance This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofcomputers,computing, andinformation technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing Low This article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale. This article is supported byComputer hardware task force. This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

With great worry I read an edit summary such as this:"un-cited information doesn't need to be merged; it can be challeneged and removed. This is a normal part of the editing process".This is not true.Unsourced information can be challenged and removed. If there isn't an inline citation for a statement, that doesn't automatically mean the article's sources don't back that sentence up. The least you could do in such cases is use the inlineTemplate:Citation needed. Removing information gratuitously likeUser:Mikeblas seems to be doing, however,is simply wrong, and I really hope it's not a case ofdisrupting Wikipedia just to make a point! If instead, as I hope, the user is makinggood-faith efforts to improve Wikipedia, then I still urge them to keep in mind that it's worthgiving an article a chance, especially when it's still in the form of a stub or little more.--LjL (talk)23:18, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Stub-Class Computing articles
• Low-importance Computing articles
• Stub-Class Computer hardware articles
• Unknown-importance Computer hardware articles
• Stub-Class Computer hardware articles of Unknown-importance
• Computing articles needing attention
• All Computing articles