Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Talk:WLOX

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale.
It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:
WikiProject iconTelevision:Stations
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles abouttelevision programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you canjoin the discussion.To improve this article, please refer to thestyle guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
???This article has not yet received a rating on theproject's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported bythe Television stations task force.

Question

[edit]
News media people think they are special and worthy of Wikipedia notation apparently.— Precedingunsigned comment added by96.19.150.110 (talk)01:31, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Adding unreferenced entries of former employees to lists containing BLP material

[edit]

Hello, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to the list of former employees in articles. Including this type of material in articles does not abide by current consensus and its inclusion is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:

  1. WP:NOT tells us, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information." As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.
  2. As perWP:V, we cannot include information in Wikipedia that is not verifiable and sourced.
  3. WP:Source list tells us that lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article.
  4. PerWP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.

If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable. Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). If a preexisting article is already in the encyclopedia for the person you want to add to a list, it's generally regarded as sufficient to support their inclusion in list material in another article. cheersDeconstructhis (talk)22:46, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

CBS sub-channel is standard definition

[edit]

and looks TERRIBLE! And they even have it set like this during football games! It makes my eyes bleed. The Fox station has HD on BOTH channels, what gives???— Precedingunsigned comment added by96.19.150.110 (talk)01:30, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:WLOX&oldid=1200878562"
Categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp