This article is ratedStart-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:

Central AsiaMid‑importance Old Tatar is part ofWikiProject Central Asia, a project to improve allCentral Asia-related articles. This includes but is not limited toAfghanistan,Kazakhstan,Kyrgyzstan,Mongolia,Tajikistan,Tibet,Turkmenistan,Uzbekistan,Xinjiang and Central Asian portions ofIran,Pakistan andRussia, region-specific topics, and anything else related to Central Asia. If you would like to help improve this and other Central Asia-related articles, pleasejoin the project. All interested editors are welcome.Central AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Central AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Central AsiaCentral Asia Mid This article has been rated asMid-importance on theproject's importance scale. LanguagesLow‑importance This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage oflanguages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage Low This article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.

Which are the actual differences, apart form using the Arabic script rather than the Latin one, between old and modern Tatar? Turkish seems to have changed just a little since it was first written, but what about Tatar?--Caesarion 12:22, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)

In modern Tatar language there is a rule of how it is heard and written. In Old Tatar there is no such rule for Tatar and the language is subject to the rules of the Arabic and Tatar languages. This is how it is written in the original. After the 3rd change of graphics. The Soviet Tatar language began to form differently, the Western dialect began to prevail. The endings in the language changed and the language ceased to be independent. But the Old Tatar language remains understandable for the modern Tatar. 28 Jule 2021Qaramalitawdan

"Turki" seems to be a more appropriate name for this literary language, as the term presently used leads to a misunderstanding and erroneous association with the modern (Volga) Tatar language. These two languages do not have much in common, except they belong to the same language family. In literature, "Turki" is used.—Precedingunsigned comment added byBorovi4ok (talk •contribs)08:47, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Turki" is a more general term. There were different versions of the Turki - Chagatai, Ottoman, Old Tatar, etc. All of them were formed on the basis of the Karakhanid language. Old Tatar was formed on the territory of the Golden Horde (or a little earlier than Golden Horde was esteblished, but spread already in the Horde). It would make sense to write this more clearly in the article itself, but I'm not ready.94.140.193.130 (talk)11:00, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Turks is not quite a correct name, since under the Turks many languages are meant, including the Chuvash, the only living "r" dialect of the Turks. Old Tatar was not only spread in the Volga region, but also in Siberia and Khorezm. In Old Tatar, together with Russian, the Word about Igor's regiment is written. 28 Jule 2021 Qaramalitawdan

I ask you to rename the article to the Academic literary Tatar language. Since it has developed independently and sold it is used.28 Jul 2021. Qaramalitawdan

Dear Wikipedia editors. This article was given to vandalism by users of Bashkir nationality. I will write the name of the lies of generating usersUser:Başqurd andUser:Neuvillette about history and language. UsersUser:Başqurd andUser:Neuvillette warn you, your Bashkir people will not be great putting the name of the Tatars for the curtains.7 May 2025. Qaramalitawdan

• Start-Class Central Asia articles
• Mid-importance Central Asia articles
• WikiProject Central Asia articles
• Start-Class language articles
• Low-importance language articles
• WikiProject Languages articles