Talk:Vermont
Page contents not supported in other languages.
| This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to theVermont article. This isnot a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies |
| Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL |
Archives:1,2,3Auto-archiving period:3 months  |
 | This article iswritten inAmerican English, which has its own spelling conventions (color,defense,traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from othervarieties of English. According to therelevant style guide, this should not be changed withoutbroad consensus. |
 | Vermont received apeer review by Wikipedia editors, which is nowarchived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
 | This level-5 vital article is ratedC-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale.It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
There ought to be some mention of Vermont ranking roughly 5th for cost of rent and 35th for wages. In 2004, cost of rent had apparently fallen to| 22nd. Does standing above refer to a wage adjusted rent (affordability)? Need reference. |
 Archives | |||
| |||
This page has archives. Sections older than100 days may be automatically archived byLowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
take a look at section "Area" which has been f**ked up around 13Januari, then repaired/reverted and again F*edUp the next minute or so, left as such and not corrected since - result: more square km 'Land' listed than square km 'Total' - square miles 'Land' also incorrect listing (approximately one third of 'Total')Sintermerte (talk)13:48, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
