This article is ratedStub-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:

Computing:SoftwareLow‑importance This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofcomputers,computing, andinformation technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing Low This article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale. This article is supported byWikiProject Software.

The content ofTake Command (command line interpreter) wasmerged intoTake Command Console on 24 December 2018. The former page'shistory now serves toprovide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see itstalk page.

By the looks of the current jpsoft.com site, it looks like 4NT has been replaced by a new version of Take Command, which includes a console version called Take Command Console. Not sure what should be done here - I'd suspect that this gets "former product" treatment and a new Take Command article gets created?99.243.6.49 (talk)18:37, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Take Command from v 1 to 8, is the product that is gone. 4NT is simply renamed TCC, and the package Take Command 9, 10 is a kind of TCI (tabbed command interface) + 4NT. The new Take Command follows the version numbers of the old one, and like the old TCMD, the version number is stepped to match the 4NT number. --Wendy.krieger (talk)07:06, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I moved the article to Take Command Console (the 4NT page redirects to the new page) and edited it to include the former name and current TCC version information. That seems to me like the most effective way to address the change of product name.Wthrower (talk)18:37, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As written, this is simply yet another product advertisement. Previous searches found no usable third-party sources.TEDickey (talk)08:08, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A subsequent edit added for example a non-useful sourceas an example, which is basically cut/paste from the vendor's FAQ. Ironically, the change comment citedWP:IS 00:53, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

The other page is purely promotional, lacking secondary sources. This page is ... light on sources, not much improvement. No more than one is needed.TEDickey (talk)20:30, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Tedickey: Seems reasonable to me, although the text is so obtuse I find them both hard to follow. Given the abscence of objections I think that it would be reasonable to merge now.Klbrain (talk)20:40, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's not clear to me what's proposed. A merge with4DOS has already been rejected above, and I agree withmatthiaspaul's argument. --Michael Bednarek (talk)02:20, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Michael Bednarek: see the merge template at the topic of the article page, which is to mergeTake Command (command line interpreter) intoTake Command Console (April 2017 proposal).Klbrain (talk)08:07, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for being thick – I should have looked overleaf. I agree that having two articles is unnecessary and to the proposed merge. --Michael Bednarek (talk)11:24, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Stub-Class Computing articles
• Low-importance Computing articles
• Stub-Class software articles
• Unknown-importance software articles
• Stub-Class software articles of Unknown-importance
• All Software articles
• All Computing articles

• Wikipedia pages using copied template
• Wikipedia pages using merged-from template without oldid