Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Talk:Subcompact car

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page isnot a forum for general discussion aboutSubcompact car. Any such commentsmay be removed orrefactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions aboutSubcompact car at theReference desk.
This article is ratedB-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale.
It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:
WikiProject iconAutomobilesMid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofautomobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile
MidThis article has been rated asMid-importance on theproject's importance scale.

Why is this page called subcompact car? I believed it was close to universal to call it golf-class cars? 2006-11-1681.233.73.177/Håkan

US-centric. Like it says atcompact car, the size class descriptions are by no means universal, and in fact relate principally to the market in the USA.

Charles Matthews 07:26, 7 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Merge

[edit]

Talk:Supermini#Merge_to_SubcompactShadiac (talk)07:51, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support - BUT, with the merge going the other way. A quick bit of research shows that the term supermini is far more widely spread than subcompact, which doesn't seem to permeate outside of the USA.Grunners (talk)15:00, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Subcompact is an American classification which should not be combined with the current European classification, although a European Supermini section has been added to the Subcompact article showing European vehicles. No need to combine as See other section can take a reader to either article.(Vegavairbob (talk)02:04, 19 June 2010 (UTC))[reply]
Oppose - The term "subcompact" is clearly defined in the United States (see the EPA's vehicle size classifications here). On the other hand, the descriptor "supermini" is inherently anoxymoron - similar to "jumbo shrimp" - since most supermini cars are often neither "super" cars nor truly "mini" in size! Moreover, the origin of this term seems to be a "Boastful Superlative" that was cooked up for an automotive publication as a comparison to the originalMini, and not a defined term such as "B-segment small cars". For example, the MSN editorialWhat the Heck Is the B-Segment? does not contain the term "supermini" to describe the reviewed "subcompact" cars. Thanks!CZmarlin (talk)21:47, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - for the same reasons as stated above. Boo-yah!!--71.162.161.175 (talk)15:50, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
support- the new article should be titled b segment cars seeing as that is in wide use inside major auto manufactureres. it is also not an oxymorone and is officialy used by euro ncap.—Precedingunsigned comment added by76.85.180.44 (talk)22:12, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - If americans get an article for subcompact, europeans should get an article on supermini. No double standards.Bookster451 (talk)02:10, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Subcompact_car&oldid=1203252076"
Categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp