Semiaquatic is within the scope ofWikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related toanimals andzoology. For more information, visit theproject page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofplants andbotany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Water, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofWater supply-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.WaterWikipedia:WikiProject WaterTemplate:WikiProject WaterWater
In the first paragraph there is a single word (macroorganism) that someone has made intotwo links: one for "macro" and one for "organism". I don't think this is helpful, because if someone wants to know what amacroorganism is, they won't be able to find out by clicking either of these conjoined links.
I understand there is not currently a Wikipedia article formacroorganism, but I think the present solution is flawed, because learning what "macro" and "organism" mean separately (by clicking on the respective links) willnot lead a reader to an understanding of whatmacroorganism means ("an organism large enough to be seen without a microscope").
Perhaps we can de-link this word, and instead put it in double-brackets, until someone writes an article formacroorganism? Leaving it the way it is now just points readers to two words that are at best tangentially relevant, and at worst, distracting. Thanks and happy editing.Chillowack (talk)20:32, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
