Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Talk:Jurassic Park

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to theJurassic Park article.
This isnot a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL
Archives:1Auto-archiving period:12 months 
Former good articleJurassic Park was one of thegood articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet thegood article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can berenominated. Editors may also seek areassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 8, 2007Good article nomineeListed
December 5, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
September 7, 2008Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status:Delisted good article
This article is ratedC-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale.
It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:
WikiProject iconFilm:American
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you canjoin the discussion and see lists ofopen tasks andregional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to thedocumentation. To improve this article, please refer to theguidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by theAmerican cinema task force.
WikiProject iconScience FictionLow‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofscience fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction
LowThis article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.
WikiProject iconBooks
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you canjoin the project anddiscuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to thedocumentation. To improve this article, please refer to therelevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook
WikiProject iconMedia franchisesLow‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Media franchises, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related tomedia franchises on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.Media franchisesWikipedia:WikiProject Media franchisesTemplate:WikiProject Media franchisesmedia franchise
LowThis article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.
WikiProject iconDinosaursLow‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofdinosaurs anddinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs
LowThis article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.
WikiProject iconAnimals in media (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Animals in media, a project which is currently considered to beinactive.Animals in mediaWikipedia:WikiProject Animals in mediaTemplate:WikiProject Animals in mediaAnimals in media
WikiProject iconUnited States:CinemaLow‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to theUnited States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
LowThis article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported byWikiProject Film - American cinema task force (assessed asLow-importance).
Jurassic Park IV: The New Approach was nominated fordeletion.The discussion was closed on19 November 2009 with a consensus tomerge. Its contents weremerged intoJurassic Park. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please seeits history; for its talk page, seehere.

Legacy

[edit]

Hi, We need a section about how this film and its sequels have changed forever the perception of dinosaurs for the general public. And this is not just in the Western world. It is worldwide phenomenon. FYIJurassic Park was one of the first American movie to be dubbed in Hindi. There is clearly "Dinosaurs before JP" and after. Everything changed.Yann (talk)21:18, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Did you see thepremise and dinosaurs section? It seems to cover this already. AJFU  (talk)15:31, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jurassic World series naming

[edit]

I don't think it's appropriate to label the Jurassic World series as a "tetratology". The three Jurassic World movies were a unified trilogy whose story clearly ended with Dominion, which the article points out multiple times. The new film is clearly meant to a spin that's separate from the other three. We should change it back to "Jurassic World Trilogy" for the first three films and "Spin off" for the new one2600:4040:A5B1:A800:E4BB:54FF:FEE0:1E47 (talk)01:51, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, the previous trilogy and the new film appear to be separate things. Sources aren't using "tetralogy" to describe the series, so neither should we. However, sources also aren't referring to it as a "spin-off".
At one point, this article'sfilm chart briefly had the new film listed under "Other films", and under "Future films" prior to that. I think one of those could work for the time being. This would also apply totheRebirth section, which is currently alevel-four subsection of "Jurassic World tetralogy". AJFU  (talk)02:10, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Canon

[edit]

I've modifiedthis edit to focus on the films and the two Netflix shows, which are obviously part of the samecanon. The canonicity of everything else seems questionable and is hardly brought up in reliable sources (it's mostly fansites and forum posts). There is something thatTrevorrow calls "soft canon", which might be where some of this stuff falls under, but I couldn't find anything further on this.

The Lego shows are apparently not canon ([1],[2]), and the games are a bit of a mixed bag.According to this,Jurassic Park: The Game was originally canon when it was developed, but I guess it'snow ambiguous as to whether that's still the case. For what it's worth, some elements of the game were referenced in marketing websites for theJurassic World films ([3]), but I don't think that canonizes the whole game, and I don't know if the sites themselves are considered totally canon and meant to be taken seriously, or if they're more just for fun.Jurassic World Aftermath was canon, until it wasn't ([4]). Other games, includingJurassic World Evolution, aren't canon either ([5],[6]). AJFU  (talk)18:43, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Jurassic_Park&oldid=1283461979"
Categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp