Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Talk:Coal

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to theCoal article.
This isnot a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL
Archives:1,2,3Auto-archiving period:3 months 
Material fromCoal was split toEnvironmental impact of the coal industry on27 February 2008. The former page'shistory now serves toprovide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution.
Material fromCoal was split toCoal gasification on14 June 2009. The former page'shistory now serves toprovide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution.
Material fromCoal was split toCoal liquefaction on3 June 2009. The former page'shistory now serves toprovide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution.
Former featured article candidateCoal is a formerfeatured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check thearchive.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 12, 2006Featured article candidateNot promoted
This level-3 vital article is ratedC-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale.
It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:
WikiProject iconGeologyHigh‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-usegeology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit theproject page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology
HighThis article has been rated asHigh-importance on theproject's importance scale.
WikiProject iconEnergyTop‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofEnergy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy
TopThis article has been rated asTop-importance on theproject's importance scale.
WikiProject iconMiningHigh‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Mining, a collaborativeproject to organize and improve articles related tomining and mineral industries. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, or visit theproject page, where you can see a list of open tasks, join in thediscussion, orjoin the project.MiningWikipedia:WikiProject MiningTemplate:WikiProject MiningMining
HighThis article has been rated asHigh-importance on theproject's importance scale.
WikiProject iconRocks and mineralsHigh‑importance
WikiProject iconCoal is part ofWikiProject Rocks and minerals, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use rocks and minerals resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit theproject page for more information.Rocks and mineralsWikipedia:WikiProject Rocks and mineralsTemplate:WikiProject Rocks and mineralsRocks and minerals
HighThis article has been rated asHigh-importance on theproject's importance scale.
WikiProject iconEnvironmentTop‑importance
WikiProject iconThisenvironment-related article is part of theWikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of theenvironment. The aim is to writeneutral andwell-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properlycategorized.
ReadWikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at theproject talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment
TopThis article has been rated asTop-importance on theproject's importance scale.
WikiProject iconClimate changeHigh‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofClimate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change
HighThis article has been rated asHigh-importance on theproject's importance scale.
If you are looking for ways to improve this article, we recommend checking out ourrecommended sources and ourstyle guide
Tip: Anchors arecase-sensitive in most browsers.

This article containsbroken links to one or more targetanchors:

The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking thepage history of the target pages, or updating the links.

Remove this template after the problem is fixed |Report an error
Archiving icon
Archives
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3


This page has archives. Sections older than90 days may be automatically archived byLowercase sigmabot III.

needs update but I don't have time

[edit]

https://www.iea.org/reports/coal-2019#executive-summary

Split proposal

[edit]
The following discussion is closed.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

This topic is vast and important. The article is too long. I will remove "Transition away from coal" since we have a article focused on that aspect:coal phase-out

Main recommendation: 1) An article about coal, period. What is it? Where did it come from? Many classifications (rank, grade). What is it used for? 2) The rest: mining (and economics), environmental impacts--Smokefoot (talk)14:14, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you be more specific? There are already articles oncoal mining and thehealth and environmental impact of the coal industry. Also I suggest excerpts, for example ofcoal phase-out.Chidgk1 (talk)21:04, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That would make sense. This should be general and more separate more.FairfieldAve (talk)01:17, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Agree with the recommendations. Topics related to coal covered by other articles should only be mentioned briefly with a linkIta140188 (talk)10:28, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree the topic is vast and important. There is potential to reduce duplication within the article and move/remove less-important details that can be covered in sub-articles. I can spend some time on this this week.Clayoquot (talk |contribs)19:50, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Since the "Transition away from coal" section has been removed[1] as proposed, is it OK to remove the "It has been suggested that this article should be split into multiple articles." tag at the top of the article? I think everyone agrees on moving towardsWP:Summary style so it might be time to move more towards execution rather than further discussion.Clayoquot (talk |contribs)21:55, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Smokefoot Can we close this now as it is still showing up on our list of alerts atWikipedia:WikiProject Climate change?Chidgk1 (talk)19:02, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I lost track. Split proposal has been removed.--Smokefoot (talk)19:09, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Coal power plants, pollution, and abatement/mitigation

[edit]

As a heads-up, I'm planning to see if I can improve the sections on air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. In recent years there has been a lot of discussion about whether to phase out coal or "unabated coal". There is also a lot of discussion out there about "clean coal". TheCoal article should help the reader understand the debates. I plan to bring in some relevant content fromCarbon capture and storage andthis Factcheck source. I'll try to do this without lengthening the article.Clayoquot (talk |contribs)22:13, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Clayoquot Great - I think you have improved it enough to nominate it as a good article if you want. I have a couple of other articles in the nomination queue as I almost always find the reviewers make really useful comments which help me improve articlesChidgk1 (talk)19:20, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding a nomination for Good article status, were you referring to theCarbon capture and storage article? TheCoal article still needs quite a bit of work.Clayoquot (talk |contribs)19:38, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Underground fires

[edit]

I've removed the following passages from the "Underground fires" section as I think they're unnecessary detail for an overview article.The examples that have sources are already inCoal seam fire. As for the unsourced example from Tajikstan, I tried to find sourcing and couldn't.

InCentralia, Pennsylvania (aborough located in theCoal Region of the U.S.), an exposed vein of anthracite ignited in 1962 due to a trash fire in the borough landfill, located in an abandonedanthracitestrip mine pit. Attempts to extinguish the fire were unsuccessful, and itcontinues to burn underground to this day. The AustralianBurning Mountain was originally believed to be a volcano, but the smoke and ash come from a coal fire that has been burning for some 6,000 years.[1]

At Kuh i Malik inYagnob Valley,Tajikistan, coal deposits have been burning for thousands of years, creating vast underground labyrinths full of unique minerals, some of them very beautiful.

The reddish siltstone rock that caps many ridges and buttes in thePowder River Basin inWyoming and in westernNorth Dakota is calledporcelanite, which resembles the coal burning waste "clinker" or volcanic "scoria".[2] Clinker is rock that has been fused by the natural burning of coal. In the Powder River Basin approximately 27 to 54 billion tons of coal burned within the past three million years.[3] Wild coal fires in the area were reported by theLewis and Clark Expedition as well as explorers and settlers in the area.[4]

References

  1. ^"Fire in The Hole". Archived fromthe original on 14 October 2009. Retrieved5 June 2011.
  2. ^"North Dakota's Clinker".Archived from the original on 14 September 2005. Retrieved9 September 2005.
  3. ^"BLM-Environmental Education – The High Plains". Archived fromthe original on 12 March 2005. Retrieved9 September 2005.
  4. ^Lyman, Robert M.; Volkmer, John E. (March 2001)."Pyrophoricity (spontaneous combustion) of Powder River Basin coals: Considerations for coalbed methane development"(PDF). Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 12 September 2005. Retrieved9 September 2005.

Clayoquot (talk |contribs)20:10, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 21 November 2024

[edit]
Thisedit request has been answered. Set the|answered= or|ans= parameter tono to reactivate your request.

I would like a citation added for this section "It is also customary and considered lucky in Scotland and the North of England to give coal as a gift on New Year's Day. This occurs as part of first-footing and represents warmth for the year to come."

I see no proof of this online.Magus2758 (talk)10:01, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Citation found and added.DrOrinScrivello (talk)14:32, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

President Trump's reclassification

[edit]

Do we add anything in here about Mr. Trump's reclassification of coal as a mineral?Coppenheimer (talk)20:42, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Coal&oldid=1285122188"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp