Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Syndication exclusivity

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected fromSyndex)
Right of a local TV station over out-of-market TV stations to broadcast the same TV program
For the Canadian equivalent to this practice, seeSimultaneous substitution.

Syndication exclusivity (also known assyndex) is afederal law ( 47  U.S.C. § 76.103) implemented by theFederal Communications Commission (FCC) in the United States that is designed to protect a localtelevision station's rights tosyndicated television programs by granting exclusive broadcast rights to the station for that program in theirlocal market, usually[citation needed][example needed] defined by a station'sNielsen Designated Market Area.

As a result, any airings of the same program oncable networks and, more commonly,superstations must be blocked by the localcable provider upon request from the local station. Broadcast television stations have the option of signing programming deals with or without syndex protection, but they stand to have audiences significantly diluted in markets without protection. Syndex protection is rarely enforced in regards to conventional cable networks, which (particularly since the late 1990s) often concurrently maintain rights to a particular program during the period of a broadcast syndication deal.

History

[edit]

The first syndex rule to be passed by the Federal Communications Commission went into effect on March 31, 1972.[1][2] The regulations at the time were similar to those in the present-day law, except for the fact that they applied to almost all programming, including shows such as theJerry Lewis MDA Telethon.[3]WTCG inAtlanta, the original "superstation" (which at the time was distributed only in the Southeastern United States, five years before it became available nationally viasatellite transmission), had programming blacked out in some areas where duplication existed.

In November 1976, the FCC began to consider making alterations to the syndex rulings.[4] In April 1979, the FCC made a proposal to remove some of the rules. Further debate led the Cable Television Bureau of the FCC to recommend doing away with the rules entirely.[5][6] On July 22, 1980, the Commission revoked the syndex rulings in a 4–3 vote, on the basis that "local stations are not adversely affected when a cable system offers subscribers signals from television stations in other cities."[7] In 1980, the FCC lifted the old syndex law, as a way to bolster the growing cable television industry. This led cable systems to begin carrying other superstations and more regional out-of-marketindependent stations, at a time when the popularity of both was growing.

The current syndex law was tied in part to theSatellite Home Viewer Act of 1988. In the run-up to that legislation's passage on May 18, 1988,[8][9][10]Tom Meek (general manager ofWOFL inOrlando, Florida), with the assistance ofPreston Padden of theAssociation of Independent Television Stations (INTV), presented a study utilizing customNielsen audience data showing significant ratings dilution in the 7:00–8:00 p.m. period that was directly attributable to the carriage of identical programming via Chicago superstationWGN-TV on numerous local cable providers, resulting in an estimated loss in advertising revenue of several hundred thousand dollars. The legislation,H.R. 2848, had been blocked byDemocratic representativeMike Synar, whose district includedTulsa, Oklahoma, where WGN's satellite carrierUnited Video Satellite Group was headquartered. After the study was presented to and subsequently validated by Synar's staff, Synar dropped his opposition under pressure from committee chairmanWashington Democratic Rep.Al Swift. H.R. 2848, sponsored byTexas Democratic Rep.John Bryant, then passed.

The syndex rules went back into effect on January 1, 1990.[11] Before the reimposition of the syndex rules, stations like WGN and WTBS were paying local single market rates for programming acquisitions, even as they were gaining national coverage, and were selling that extended coverage to advertisers. After the syndex law was implemented, in at least some cases, the prices that superstations paid for program content had better[according to whom?] reflected their actual national distribution, depending on arrangements with any given syndicator.

Since 1993, syndex is currently being used to block superstations offered through a programming tier provided by satellite providerDish Network from being picked up in certain markets. In this case, theCW andMyNetworkTV affiliates in given markets can invoke the syndex law to keep the superstations that have the same network affiliations as the local station from coming into the market in any form. CW stations are using the law in order to blockKTLA in Los Angeles,WPIX/New York City andKWGN-TV/Denver, whileWWOR-TV inSecaucus, New Jersey, since 2015, are presently blocked in markets where MyNetworkTV affiliates are invoking the law.

Legal challenges

[edit]

There have been a number of legal cases, most notably inMiami, and efforts in Washington, D.C. by terrestrial broadcasters to keep satellite providers from exploiting a provision in the law whereby satellite providers can offer programming where a broadcast station's signal is not available. In the Miami case, satellite providers were found to have allowed carriage of outside stations in households within a few miles of broadcast transmitters in violation of the law. Syndex is often unpopular[according to whom?] with satellite subscribers and companies who would rather not afford local broadcast stations program rights protection.

Notable examples

[edit]
  • Syndex also applies to programs seen on stations in Canada and Mexico – in theBuffalo, New York television market, whenCTVowned-and-operated stationCFTO-DT orGlobal owned-and-operated stationCIII-DT airs a program that is also seen on an American broadcast network, the Canadian broadcast is blacked out, or replaced with the signal of the American station carrying the same program at that time (this does not apply to most sports on cable, especially if they are different productions from one another, unless the league for that sport requests a blackout;Buffalo Sabres games carried onCBC Television'sHockey Night in Canada and onMSG Network can be seen on both channels).
  • A similar rule,simultaneous substitution, exists in Canada, allowing broadcasters to require that U.S. feeds of shows airing at exactly the same time on a Canadian network to be replaced with the Canadian feed. This is intended to protect domestic advertising revenue that would otherwise go to the U.S. network.
  • Sporting events that air on a national network such asESPN are often blacked out in the markets of the teams that are playing, if a local station orregional sports network also has rights to the game. For example, a weeknight baseball game between theCubs andCardinals carried by ESPN would be blacked out in areas that receive either team's local broadcaster. TheNational Hockey League utilizes a similar policy for non-exclusive national games carried byNBCSN orNHL Network during the regular season and the first round of the playoffs. In another case, ESPN'sACC Wednesday games are blacked out in markets that receive coverage ofAtlantic Coast Conference basketball on local stations viaRaycom Sports. In such instances, the ESPN feed is usually replaced with a simulcast ofESPNEWS. ESPN's most recent contract extension with the league, which went into effect with the2014 season, virtually eliminated local blackouts during the network's Monday and Wednesday night games, allowing ESPN coverage to co-exist in the home markets served by each team's local broadcaster.[12]
  • TheNational Football League utilizes a similar rule for nationally televised games carried exclusively by cable networks (such asESPN andNFL Network) as well as digital subscription streaming services such asAmazon Prime Video,ESPN+, andPeacock. NFL policies require all games to be available on broadcast television in the primary markets of the teams involved, so primary broadcast rights in those local markets are syndicated to local stations in the affected markets, and the telecast on the respective cable network is blacked out to protect the local broadcaster that has syndication rights to these games.

Some effects

[edit]

Throughout the 1970s and 1980s, several independent local stations were uplinked via satellite so that they could be available either nationally or regionally, especially to markets that did not have independent stations, either because the market could not support one due to having lower population densities or because one simply did not exist. Three of those stations,WOR-TV in New York City (later moved to Secaucus, New Jersey and renamed to WWOR), WGN-TV in Chicago andWTCG/WTBS inAtlanta, were available nationally. WTBS aired shows that were generally "syndex proof" (or, in simpler terms, having "full signal rights") due to program contracts that the station was able to negotiate so that it could avoid having any programs blacked out or substituted, save for sports programs.

In 1990, when the syndex law was passed, national versions of WWOR-TV and WGN-TV, which aired different programs from the local signals in their native cities, were launched. These feeds replaced programs that had syndication exclusivity claims in certain markets with syndicated programs to which no station held exclusive rights in any market. WWOR's national feed outside of New York City was branded as the "WWOR EMI Service" (the "EMI" referring to Eastern Microwave, Inc., the superstation feed's satellite uplinker). WGN-TV did not have to cover up as many programs as WWOR, and while WGN was able to carry programming fromThe WB network on its national feed from January 1995 (when its Chicago parent station also affiliated with the network[13]) to October 1999, WWOR was not permitted byUPN to carry that network's programming on the EMI feed. This negatively affected UPN as WGN's carriage of The WB temporarily filled holes where that network did not have a full-time or secondary carrier in some markets until the network found local over-the-air affiliates and later set up acable-only feed in 1998. UPN's decision to deny WWOR permission to carry its programming nationally left open gaps in market coverage for that network in several large and mid-sized cities.

After the national version of WWOR ceased uplinking in January 1997 (afterAdvance Entertainment Corporation sold WWOR's satellite transponder slot toDiscovery Communications to expand national coverage ofAnimal Planet), the New York City-area feed, which included UPN programs and other shows previously covered up on the EMI feed, was uplinked by the National Programming Service for exclusive distribution to satellite providers. That feed was discontinued in 1999 with its transponder space being turned over toPax TV, though Dish Network now carries the New York City feed of WWOR. WTBS was separated from the national feed ofTBS in October 2007, and now airs only Atlanta-cleared programming as WPCH (the Atlanta station remains a superstation in Canada, although some of its programming is instead substituted with a domestic network feed of the same program under simultaneous substitution regulations). WGN's national superstation feed, later branded as "WGN Superstation" and "Superstation WGN", would be renamedWGN America in 2007; by this point, the number of syndicated programs that WGN-TV both gained full signal rights toand aired on both the Chicago broadcast signal and the national feed had substantially decreased, with WGN America mirroring the former WWOR EMI Service in its scheduling. WGN's national feed was also separated from its parent station, except in name, and converted into a basic cable network on December 16, 2014, and, as a result, no longer carries any Chicago-area programming.[14][15]

Syndex-free/full signal rights

[edit]

In any case, national superstations such as WGN were, in later years, still sometimes able to negotiate full signal rights for a syndicated program. Whether or not a particular program could be cleared for full signal rights depends on how it was originally sold to other television stations nationwide. For example, the repackagedAmerican Idol Rewind was allowed to air on WGN's national "Superstation" signal by virtue ofTribune Entertainment (the now-defunct production and distribution unit of the station's owner, theTribune Company) being a majority partner as well as the distributor of the program.

Other studios can also allow full signal rights to superstations for its programming. For example,20th Television allowed WGN full signal rights to the syndicated version of24 as didNBCUniversal Television Distribution with30 Rock, andSony Pictures Television used the same method forSeinfeld for TBS.

However, once one superstation's term of license on a program ends, it can enter into syndex restrictions. For example, for decades TBS had full signal rights toThe Andy Griffith Show untilViacom's cable networks were able to negotiate new full signal rights in the mid-1990s (The Andy Griffith Show at the time was distributed byViacom, then its successor,Paramount Television). Today,TV Land has national rights toThe Andy Griffith Show (now distributed throughCBS Television Distribution), and under this new contract cannot be seen on any other national network or superstation, but it can still be seen on local over-the-air stations, as stations such asWRAL-TV/WRAZ inRaleigh andWVTV inMilwaukee have done for decades (similarly, the broadcast rights to the program held by some local stations have preventedMe-TV from carryingAndy Griffith on many of its affiliates since it began carrying the sitcom in 2014). Broadcasts on these local stations are only restricted to their particular markets.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^"FCC adopts compromise plan on big city cable television".Daily Independent Journal. San Rafael, California. February 3, 1972. p. 1.
  2. ^"FCC adopts rulings on cable TV".El Paso Herald-Post. February 3, 1972. p. A6.
  3. ^dpjohnson1
  4. ^"FCC mulls new rules on cable television".Des Moines Register. November 6, 1976. p. 21.
  5. ^"Spread of cable TV concerns operators".Santa Cruz Sentinel. June 26, 1979. p. 13.
  6. ^"Proposed cable TV access rules generate lively debate".Kokomo Tribune. February 22, 1980. p. 13.
  7. ^"FCC substantially deregulates cable television industry".San Bernardino County Sun. July 23, 1980. p. A-8.A Federal agency Tuesday substantially deregulated the cable television industry, by ruling local stations are not adversely affected when a cable system offers subscribers signals from television stations in other cities.
  8. ^Charles Storch (May 19, 1988)."FCC Reimposes Rule On TV Exclusivity".Chicago Tribune. RetrievedSeptember 3, 2015.
  9. ^"FCC Reinstates Exclusive Rights".Los Angeles Times.Reuters. May 18, 1988. RetrievedSeptember 3, 2015.
  10. ^Louise Sweeney (May 26, 1988)."Same reruns on too many channels? FCC says no more. Panel's ruling considered defeat for cable operators".The Christian Science Monitor. RetrievedSeptember 3, 2015.
  11. ^"FCC ruling may cause TV scheduling problems".The Galveston Daily News. December 27, 1989. p. 15.A Federal Communications Commission ruling that will go into effect Jan. 1 may for a time affect the accuracy of television listings, according to an industry spokesman.
  12. ^"MLB, ESPN extend television contract".CBS News. August 29, 2012.[dead link]
  13. ^"Time Warner Takes Crucial Step Toward New Network Television: A pact with superstation WGN-TV gives it access to 73% of homes. Analysts say that will still leave gaps".Los Angeles Times. December 4, 1993. RetrievedDecember 10, 2010.
  14. ^Robert Feder (December 15, 2014)."WGN America comes home to Chicago".Chicago Tribune. RetrievedJanuary 11, 2015.
  15. ^Kent Gibbons (December 16, 2014)."WGN America Converts to Cable in Five Markets".Broadcasting & Cable. RetrievedJanuary 11, 2015.
Chairs
Statutory
authority
(Title 47 USC)
Regulations
and policies
(Title 47 CFR)
Broadcast
licensing
and facilities
Broadcasting
content and
programming
Telephone and
the Internet
Litigation
Supreme Court
Other
federal cases
Agency
publications
Advisory
committees
Predecessor
agencies
Related
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Syndication_exclusivity&oldid=1266727452"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp