 Page from anincunable edition of part II (Peter Schöffer, Mainz 1471) | |
| Author | Thomas Aquinas |
|---|---|
| Language | Latin |
| Subject | Christian theology |
| Publisher | Benziger Brothers Printers to the Holy Apostolic See |
Publication date | Unfinished at his death in 1274 |
Published in English | 1911 |
| 230.2 | |
| LC Class | BX1749 .T5 |
Original text | Summa Theologiae at LatinWikisource |
| Translation | Summa Theologiae at Wikisource |
| Composed 1265–1274 | |
| Part ofa series on |
| Scholasticism |
|---|
 |
Philosophers
|
TheSumma Theologiae orSumma Theologica (transl. 'Summary of Theology'), often referred to simply as theSumma, is the best-known work ofThomas Aquinas (1225–1274), ascholastic theologian andDoctor of the Church. It is acompendium of all of the maintheological teachings of theCatholic Church, intended to be an instructional guide for theology students, includingseminarians and the literatelaity. Presenting the reasoning for almost all points ofChristian theology in the West, topics of theSumma follow the following cycle:God; Creation, Man;Man's purpose;Christ; theSacraments; and back to God.
Although unfinished, it is "one of the classics of the history of philosophy and one of the most influential works of Western literature".[1] It remains Aquinas's "most perfect work, the fruit of his mature years, in which the thought of his whole life is condensed".[2]
Throughout theSumma, Aquinas citesChristian,Muslim,Hebrew, andPagan sources, including, but not limited to:Christian Sacred Scripture,Aristotle,Augustine of Hippo,Avicenna,Averroes,Al-Ghazali,Boethius,John of Damascus,Paul the Apostle,Pseudo-Dionysius,Maimonides,Anselm of Canterbury,Plato,Cicero, andJohn Scotus Eriugena.
TheSumma is a more structured and expanded version of Aquinas's earlierSumma contra Gentiles, though the two were written for different purposes. TheSumma Theologiae intended to explain the Christian faith to beginning theology students, whereas theSumma contra Gentiles, to explain the Christian faith and defend it in hostile situations, with arguments adapted to the intended circumstances of its use, each article refuting a certain belief or a specificheresy.[3]
TheSumma Theologiae was one of the main intellectual inspirations forThomistic philosophy. It also had such a great influence onDante Alighieri'sDivine Comedy that Dante's epic poem has been called "theSumma in verse".[4] TheSumma Theologiae continues to be a major reference in Western and Eastern Catholic Churches, and themainline Protestant denominations (Anglicanism,Lutheranism,Methodism, andReformed Christianity) for those seeking ordination to thediaconate orpriesthood, for professed male or female religious life, or for laypersons studying philosophy and theology at the collegiate level.
It was while teaching at theSanta Sabinastudium provinciale—the forerunner of theSanta Maria sopra Minervastudium generale and College of Saint Thomas, which in the 20th century would become thePontifical University of Saint Thomas Aquinas,Angelicum—that Aquinas began to compose theSumma. He completed thePrima Pars ('first part') in its entirety and circulated it in Italy before departing to take up his second regency as professor at theUniversity of Paris (1269–1272).[5]
Aquinas conceived theSumma specifically as a work suited to beginning students:
Quia Catholicae veritatis doctor non solum provectos debet instruere, sed ad eum pertinet etiam incipientes erudire, secundum illud apostoli I ad Corinth. III, tanquam parvulis in Christo, lac vobis potum dedi, non escam; propositum nostrae intentionis in hoc opere est, ea quae ad Christianam religionem pertinent, eo modo tradere, secundum quod congruit ad eruditionem incipientium | Because a doctor of catholic truth ought not only to teach the proficient, but to him pertains also to instruct beginners. As the Apostle says in 1 Corinthians 3: 1–2, as to infants in Christ, I gave you milk to drink, not meat, our proposed intention in this work is to convey those things that pertain to the Christian religion, in a way that is fitting to the instruction of beginners. |
| —"Prooemium,"Summa theologiae I, 1. |
TheSumma is structured into:
Questions are specific topics of discussion, whereas their correspondingArticles are further-specified facets of the parent question. For example, Part I, Question 2 ("The Existence of God") is divided into three articles: (1) "Whether the existence of God is self-evident?"; (2) "Whether it can be demonstrated that God exists?"; and (3) "Whether God exists?" Additionally, questions on a broader theme are grouped intoTreatises, though the category of treatise is reported differently, depending on the source.
TheSumma's three parts have a few other major subdivisions.
The method of exposition undertaken in the articles of theSumma is derived fromAverroes, to whom Aquinas refers respectfully as "the Commentator".[7] The standard format for articles of theSumma is as follows:
Consider the example ofPart III, Question 40 ("Of Christ's Manner of Life"),[i]Article 3 ("WhetherChrist should have led a life of poverty in this world?"):[ii]
Part II of theSumma is divided into two parts (Prima Secundae andSecunda Secundae, cited respectively as "1a2æ" and "2a2æ"). The first part comprises 114 questions, while the second part comprises 189. The two parts of the second part are usually presented as containing several "treatises". The contents are as follows:[9]
TheSumma makes many references to certain thinkers held in great respect in Aquinas's time. The arguments from authority, orsed contra arguments, are almost entirely based on citations from these authors. Some were called by special names:
St. Thomas's greatest work was theSumma, and it is the fullest presentation of his views. He worked on it from the time ofClement IV (after 1265) until the end of his life. When he died, he had reached Question 90 of Part III (on the subject ofpenance).[9] What was lacking was added afterwards from the fourth book of his commentary on theSentences ofPeter Lombard as asupplementum, which is not found in manuscripts of the 13th and 14th centuries. TheSumma was translated intoGreek (apparently byMaximus Planudes around 1327) andArmenian, manyEuropean languages, andChinese.[9]
The structure of theSumma Theologiae is meant to reflect thecyclic nature of the cosmos, in the sense of the emission and return of the Many from and tothe One inPlatonism, cast in terms of Christian theology: The procession of the material universe fromdivine essence; the culmination of creation inman; and the motion of manback towards God by way ofChrist and theSacraments.[10]
The structure of the work reflects this cyclic arrangement. It begins with God and his existence in Question 2. The entire first part of theSumma deals with God and his creation, which reaches its zenith in man. The First Part, therefore, ends with the treatise on man. The second part of theSumma deals with man's purpose (the meaning of life), which is happiness. The ethics detailed in this part are a summary of the ethics (Aristotelian in nature) that man must follow to reach his intended destiny. Since no man on his own can truly live the perfect ethical life (and therefore reach God), it was necessary that a perfect man bridge the gap between God and man. Thus God became man. The third part of theSumma, therefore, deals with the life of Christ.
In order to follow the way prescribed by this perfect man, in order to live with God's grace (which is necessary for man's salvation), the Sacraments have been provided; the final part of theSumma considers the Sacraments.
The first part of theSumma is summed up in the premise thatGod governs the world as the "universalfirst cause". God sways the intellect; he gives the power to know and impresses thespecies intelligibiles on the mind, and he sways the will in that he holds the good before it as aim, creating thevirtus volendi. "To will is nothing else than a certain inclination toward the object of the volition which is the universal good." God works all in all, but so that things also themselves exert their proper efficiency. Here theAreopagitic ideas of the graduated effects of created things play their part in St. Thomas's thought.[9]
Part I treats of God, who is the "first cause, himself uncaused" (primum movens immobile) and as such existent only in act (actu)—i.e. pure actuality without potentiality, and therefore without corporeality. His essence isactus purus et perfectus. Thisfollows from the fivefold proof for the existence of God; namely, there must be a first mover, unmoved, a first cause in the chain of causes, an absolutely necessary being, an absolutely perfect being, and a rational designer. In this connection the thoughts of the unity,infinity, unchangeability, and goodness of the highest being are deduced.
As God rules in the world, the "plan of the order of things" preexists in him; in other words, hisprovidence and the exercise of it in his government are what condition as cause everything which comes to pass in the world. Hence followspredestination: from eternity some are destined to eternal life, while as concerns others "he permits some to fall short of that end".Reprobation is more than mere foreknowledge; it is the "will of permitting anyone to fall into sin and incur the penalty of condemnation for sin".
The effect of predestination is grace. Since God is the first cause of everything, he is the cause of even the free acts of men through predestination. Determinism is deeply grounded in the system of St. Thomas; things (with their source of becoming in God) are ordered from eternity as means for the realization of his end in himself.
On moral grounds, St. Thomas advocates freedom energetically; but, with his premises, he can have in mind only the psychological form of self-motivation. Nothing in the world is accidental or free, although it may appear so in reference to the proximate cause. From this point of view, miracles become necessary in themselves and are to be considered merely as inexplicable to man. From the point of view of the first cause, all is unchangeable, although from the limited point of view of the secondary cause, miracles may be spoken of.
In his doctrine of theTrinity, Aquinas starts from the Augustinian system. Since God has only the functions of thinking and willing, only twoprocessiones can be asserted from the Father; but these establish definite relations of the persons of the Trinity, one to another. The relations must be conceived as real and not as merely ideal; for, as with creatures relations arise through certain accidents, since in God there is no accident but all is substance, it follows that "the relation really existing in God is the same as the essence according to the thing". From another side, the relations as real must be really distinguished one from another. Therefore, three persons are to be affirmed in God.
Man stands opposite to God; he consists ofsoul and body. The "intellectual soul" consists ofintellect andwill. Furthermore, the soul is the absolutely indivisible form of man; it is immaterial substance, but not one and the same in all men (as theAverroistsassumed). The soul's power of knowing has two sides: a passive (theintellectus possibilis) and an active (theintellectus agens).
It is the capacity to form concepts and to abstract the mind's images (species) from the objects perceived by sense; but since what the intellect abstracts from individual things is universal, the mind knows the universal primarily and directly and knows the singular only indirectly by virtue of a certainreflexio (cf.Scholasticism). As certain principles are immanent in the mind for its speculative activity, so also a "special disposition of works"—or thesynderesis (rudiment of conscience)—is inborn in the "practical reason", affording the idea of the moral law of nature so important in medieval ethics.
The second part of theSumma follows this complex of ideas. Its theme is man's striving for the highest end, which is the blessedness of thevisio beata. Here, St. Thomas develops his system of ethics, which has its root inAristotle.
In a chain of acts of will, man strives for the highest end. They are free acts, insofar as man has in himself the knowledge of their end (and therein the principle of action). In that the will wills the end, it wills also the appropriate means, chooses freely and completes theconsensus. Whether the act is good or evil depends on the end. The "human reason" pronounces judgment concerning the character of the end; it is, therefore, the law for action. Human acts are meritorious insofar as they promote the purpose of God and his honor.
By repeating a good action, man acquires a moral habit or a quality that enables him to do the good gladly and easily. This is true only of the intellectual and moral virtues (which St. Thomas treats after the manner ofAristotle); the theological virtues are imparted by God to man as a "disposition", from which the acts here proceed; while they strengthen, they do not form it. The "disposition" of evil is the opposite alternative.
An act becomes evil through deviation from the reason and from divine moral law. Therefore, sin involves two factors:
Sin has its origin in the will, which decides (against reason) for a "changeable good". Since the will also moves the other powers of man, sin has its seat in these too. By choosing such a lower good as its end, the will is misled by self-love, so that this works as cause in every sin. God is not the cause of sin since, on the contrary, he draws all things to himself; but from another side, God is the cause of all things, so he is efficacious also in sin asactio but not asens. The devil is not directly the cause of sin, but he incites the imagination and the sensuous impulse of man (as men or things may also do).
Sin isoriginal sin. Adam's first sin passes through himself to all the succeeding race; because he is the head of the human race and "by virtue of procreation human nature is transmitted and along with nature its infection." The powers of generation are, therefore, designated especially as "infected". The thought is involved here by the fact that St. Thomas, like other scholastics, believed increationism; he therefore taught that souls are created by God.
Two things, according to St. Thomas, constituted man's righteousness in paradise:
Both are lost through original sin, which, in form, is the "loss of original righteousness". The consequence of this loss is the disorder and maiming of man's nature, which shows itself in "ignorance; malice, moral weakness, and especially inconcupiscentia, which is the material principle of original sin." The course of thought here is as follows: when the first man transgressed the order of his nature appointed by nature and grace, he (and with him the human race) lost this order. This negative state is the essence of original sin. From it follow an impairment and perversion of human nature in which thenceforth lower aims rule, contrary to nature, and release the lower element in man.
Since sin is contrary to the divine order, it is guilt and subject to punishment. Guilt and punishment correspond to each other; and since the "apostasy from the invariable good which is infinite," fulfilled by man, is unending, it merits everlasting punishment.
God works even in sinners to draw them to the end by "instructing through the law and aiding by grace." The law is the "precept of the practical reason". As the moral law of nature, it is the participation of the reason in the all-determining "eternal reason"; but since man falls short in his appropriation of this law of reason, there is need of a "divine law"; and since the law applies to many complicated relations, thepracticae dispositiones of the human law must be laid down.
The divine law consists of an old and a new. Insofar as the old divine law contains the moral law of nature, it is universally valid; what there is in it beyond this is only valid for the Jews. The new law is "primarily grace itself" and so a "law given within"; "a gift superadded to nature by grace", but not a "written law". In this sense, as sacramental grace, the new law justifies. It contains an ordering of external and internal conduct and so regarded is, as a matter of course, identical with both the old law and the law of nature. Theconsilia show how one may attain the end "better and more expediently" by full renunciation of worldly goods.
Since man is sinner and creature, he needs grace to reach the final end. The "first cause" alone is able to reclaim him to the "final end". This is true after the fall, although it was needful before. Grace is, on one side, "the free act of God", and, on the other side, the effect of this act, thegratia infusa orgratia creata, ahabitus infusus that is instilled into the "essence of the soul... a certain gift of disposition, something supernatural proceeding from God into man." Grace is a supernatural ethical character created in man by God, which comprises in itself all good, both faith and love.
Justification bygrace comprises four elements:[9]
Grace is a "transmutation of the human soul" that takes place "instantaneously". A creative act of God enters, which executes itself as a spiritual motive in a psychological form corresponding to the nature of man.Semi-Pelagian tendencies are far removed from St. Thomas. In that man is created anew, he believes and loves, and now, sin is forgiven. Then begins good conduct; grace is the "beginning of meritorious works". Aquinas conceives of merit in the Augustinian sense: God gives the reward for that toward which he himself gives the power. Man can never of himself deserve theprima gratis, normeritum de congruo (by natural ability; cf. R. Seeberg,Lehrbuch der Dogmengeschichte, ii. 105–106, Leipsic, 1898).
After thus stating the principles of morality, in theSecunda Secundae, St. Thomas comes to a minute exposition of his ethics according to the scheme of the virtues. The conceptions of faith and love are of much significance in the complete system of St. Thomas. Man strives toward thehighest good with the will or through love; but since the end must first be "apprehended in the intellect", knowledge of the end to be loved must precede love; "because the will can not strive after God in perfect love unless the intellect have true faith toward him."
Inasmuch as this truth that is to be known is practical, it first incites the will, which then brings the reason to "assent"; but since, furthermore, the good in question is transcendent and inaccessible to man by himself, it requires the infusion of a supernatural "capacity" or "disposition" to make man capable of faith as well as love.
Accordingly, the object of both faith and love is God, involving also the entire complex of truths and commandments that God reveals, insofar as they in fact relate to God and lead to him. Thus, faith becomes recognition of the teachings and precepts of the Scriptures and the Church ("the first subjection of man to God is by faith"). The object of faith is, by its nature, object of love; therefore, faith comes to completion only in love ("by love is the act of faith accomplished and formed").
Law is nothing else than an ordinance of reason for the common good, made by him who has care of the community, and promulgated.
— Summa Theologica, Pt. II-II, Q. 90, Article 4
All law comes from the eternal law of Divine Reason that governs the universe, which is understood and participated in by rational beings (such as men andangels) as thenatural law. The natural law, when codified and promulgated, islex humana ('human law').[viii]
In addition to the human law, dictated by reason, man also has the divine law, which, according to Question 91, is dictated through revelation, that man may be "directed how to perform his proper acts in view of his last end", "that man may know without any doubt what he ought to do and what he ought to avoid", because "human law could not sufficiently curb and direct interior acts", and since "human law cannot punish or forbid all evil deeds: since while aiming at doing away with all evils, it would do away with many good things, and would hinder the advance of the common good, which is necessary for human intercourse." Human law is not all-powerful; it cannot govern a man'sconscience, nor prohibit all vices, nor can it force all men to act according to its letter, rather than its spirit.
Furthermore, it is possible that an edict can be issued without any basis in law as defined in Question 90; in this case, men are under no compulsion to act, save as it helps the common good. This separation between law and acts of force also allows men to deposetyrants, or those who flout thenatural law; while removing an agent of the law is contrary to the common good and the eternal law of God, which orders the powers that be, removing a tyrant is lawful as he has ceded his claim to being a lawful authority by acting contrary to law.
The way which leads to God isChrist, the theme of Part III. It can be asserted that theincarnation was absolutely necessary. TheUnio between theLogos and the human nature is a "relation" between the divine and the human nature, which comes about by both natures being brought together in the one person of the Logos. An incarnation can be spoken of only in the sense that the human nature began to be in the eternal hypostasis of the divine nature. So Christ isunum since his human nature lacks thehypostasis.
The person of the Logos, accordingly, has assumed the impersonal human nature, and in such way that the assumption of the soul became the means for the assumption of the body. This union with the human soul is thegratia unionis, which leads to the impartation of thegratia habitualis from the Logos to the human nature. Thereby, all human potentialities are made perfect in Jesus. Besides the perfections given by the vision of God, which Jesus enjoyed from the beginning, he receives all others by thegratia habitualis. Insofar as it is the limited human nature which receives these perfections, they are finite. This holds both of the knowledge and the will of Christ.
The Logos impresses thespecies intelligibiles of all created things on the soul, but theintellectus agens transforms them gradually into the impressions of sense. On another side, the soul of Christ works miracles only as instrument of the Logos, since omnipotence in no way appertains to this human soul in itself. Concerning redemption, St. Thomas teaches that Christ is to be regarded as redeemer after his human nature but in such way that the human nature produces divine effects as organ of divinity.
The one side of the work of redemption consists herein, that Christ as head of humanity impartsordo,perfectio, andvirtus to his members. He is the teacher and example of humanity; his whole life and suffering as well as his work after he is exalted serve this end. The love wrought hereby in men effects, according to Luke vii. 47, the forgiveness of sins.
This is the first course of thought. Then follows a second complex of thoughts, which has the idea of satisfaction as its center. To be sure, God as the highest being could forgive sins without satisfaction; but because his justice and mercy could be best revealed through satisfaction, he chose this way. As little as satisfaction is necessary in itself, so little does it offer an equivalent, in a correct sense, for guilt; it is rather a "superabundant satisfaction", since on account of the divine subject in Christ in a certain sense his suffering and activity are infinite.
With this thought, the strict logical deduction ofAnselm's theory is given up. Christ's suffering bore personal character in that it proceeded "out of love and obedience". It was an offering brought to God, which as a personal act had the character of merit. Thereby, Christ "merited" salvation for men. As Christ, exalted, still influences men, so does he still work on their behalf continually in heaven through the intercession (interpellatio).
In this way, Christ as head of humanity effects the forgiveness of their sins, their reconciliation with God, their immunity from punishment, deliverance from the devil, and the opening of heaven's gate; but inasmuch as all these benefits are already offered through the inner operation of the love of Christ, Aquinas has combined the theories of Anselm andAbelard by joining the one to the other.
The doctrine of thesacraments follows the Christology; the sacraments "have efficacy from the incarnate Word himself". They are not only signs of sanctification, but also bring it about. It is inevitable that they bring spiritual gifts in sensuous form, because of the sensuous nature of man. Theres sensibiles are the matter, the words of institution the form of the sacraments. Contrary to the Franciscan view that the sacraments are mere symbols whose efficacy God accompanies with a directly following creative act in the soul, St. Thomas holds it not unfit to agree withHugo of St. Victor that "a sacrament contains grace", or to teach that they "cause grace".
St. Thomas attempts to remove the difficulty of a sensuous thing producing a creative effect, by distinguishing between thecausa principalis et instrumentalis. God, as the principal cause, works through the sensuous thing as the means ordained by him for his end. "Just as instrumental power is acquired by the instrument from this, that it is moved by the principal agent, so also the sacrament obtains spiritual power from the benediction of Christ and the application of the minister to the use of the sacrament. There is spiritual power in the sacraments in so far as they have been ordained by God for a spiritual effect." This spiritual power remains in the sensuous thing until it has attained its purpose. At the same time, St. Thomas distinguished thegratia sacramentalis from thegratia virtutum et donorum, in that the former perfects the general essence and the powers of the soul, whilst the latter in particular brings to pass necessary spiritual effects for the Christian life. Later, this distinction was ignored.
In a single statement, the effect of thesacraments is to infuse justifying grace into men. That which Christ effects is achieved through the sacraments. Christ's humanity was the instrument for the operation of his divinity; the sacraments are the instruments through which this operation of Christ's humanity passes over to men. Christ's humanity served his divinity asinstrumentum conjunctum, like the hand; the sacraments areinstrumenta separata, like a staff; the former can use the latter, as the hand can use a staff. (For a more detailed exposition, cf. Seeberg,ut sup., ii. 112 sqq.)
Of St. Thomas'seschatology, according to the commentary on theSentences, this is only a brief account. Everlasting blessedness consists in the vision of God – this vision consists not in an abstraction or in a mental image supernaturally produced, but the divine substance itself is beheld, and in such manner that God himself becomes immediately the form of the beholding intellect. God is the object of the vision and, at the same time, causes the vision.
The perfection of the blessed also demands that the body be restored to the soul as something to be made perfect by it. Since blessedness consists inoperatio, it is made more perfect in that the soul has a definiteoperatio with the body, although the peculiar act of blessedness (in other words, the vision of God) has nothing to do with the body.
 | This sectionpossibly containsoriginal research. Relevant discussion may be found onTalk:Summa Theologica. Pleaseimprove it byverifying the claims made and addinginline citations. Statements consisting only of original research should be removed.(December 2021) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
John XXII (died 1334), the pope who canonized Aquinas, said inLatin about hisSumma Theologiae: "Quot articula, tot miracula" (which means "as many miracles as articles" – implying that every article is a miracle).[12]
Despite its size, the work circulated widely in manuscript form, and with the arrival of printing was printed relatively early, parts from the 1460s.
Incunabula (15th century) partial editions were printed as early as 1463; an edition of the first section of part 2 was printed byPeter Schöffer of Mainz in 1471.[13] A full edition was printed by Michael Wenssler of Basel in 1485.[14]From the 16th century, numerous commentaries on theSumma were published, notably byPeter Crockaert (d. 1514),Francisco de Vitoria and byThomas Cajetan (1570).
The most accessible English translation of the work is that originally published by Benziger Brothers, in five volumes, in 1911 (with a revised edition published in 1920).
The translation is entirely the work of Laurence Shapcote (1864-1947), an English Dominican friar. Wanting to remain anonymous, he attributed the translation to the Fathers of the English Dominican Province. Father Shapcote also translated various of Aquinas's other works.[17]
This article incorporates text from a publication in thepublic domain: Seeburg, Reinhold (1914)."Thomas Aquinas". In Jackson, Samuel Macauley (ed.).New Schaff–Herzog Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge. Vol. XI (third ed.). London and New York: Funk and Wagnalls. pp. 422–427.
Summa Theologica public domain audiobook atLibriVox
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: translators list (link) (Compendium Theologiae, an unfinished Aquinas' synthesis of theSumma Theologiae for thesalvation of commonlay people who were not teachers,novices or university students of theology)_%25C3%2589glise_Saint-M%25C3%25A9en_-_Int%25C3%25A9rieur_-_Baie_100_-_02.jpg)
