Ryholt (1997), followed by Bourriau (2003), in reconstructing theTurin canon, interpreted a list of Thebes-based kings to constituteManetho's Sixteenth Dynasty, although this is one of Ryholt's "most debatable and far-reaching" conclusions.[4] For this reason other scholars do not follow Ryholt and see onlyinsufficient evidence for the interpretation of the Sixteenth Dynasty as Theban.[6]
The continuing war against15th Dynasty dominated the short-lived 16th Dynasty. The armies of the 15th Dynasty, winning town after town from their southern enemies, continually encroached on the 16th Dynasty territory, eventually threatening and then conquering Thebes itself. In his study of the Second Intermediate Period, the Egyptologist Kim Ryholt has suggested that Dedumose I sued for a truce in the latter years of the dynasty,[3] but one of his predecessors,Nebiryraw I, may have been more successful and seems to have enjoyed a period of peace in his reign.[3]
Various chronological orderings and lists of kings have been proposed by scholars for this dynasty. These lists fall broadly in two categories: those assuming that the 16th Dynasty comprised vassals of the Hyksos, as advocated byJürgen von Beckerath andWolfgang Helck; and those assuming that the 16th Dynasty was an independent Theban kingdom, as recently proposed byKim Ryholt.
The traditional list of rulers of the 16th Dynasty regroups kings believed to be vassals of the Hyksos, some of which have semitic names such asSemqen andAnat-her. The list of kings differs from scholar to scholar and it is here given as perJürgen von Beckerath's Dynasty XV/XVI in hisHandbuch der ägyptischen Königsnamen.[7] Wolfgang Helck, who also believes that the 16th Dynasty was an Hyksos vassal state, proposed a slightly different list of kings.[8] Many of the rulers listed here in the 16th Dynasty under the hypothesis that they were vassals of the Hyksos are put in the 14th Dynasty in the hypothesis that the 16th Dynasty was an independent Theban kingdom. The chronological ordering is largely uncertain.
In his 1997 study of the Second Intermediate Period, the Danish EgyptologistKim Ryholt argues that the 16th Dynasty was an independent Theban kingdom. From Ryholt's reconstruction of the Turin canon, 15 kings can be associated to the dynasty, several of whom are attested by contemporary sources.[2] While most likely rulers based in Thebes itself, some may have been local rulers from other important Upper Egyptian towns, includingAbydos,El Kab andEdfu.[2] By the reign of Nebiriau I, the realm controlled by the 16th Dynasty extended at least as far north asHu and south to Edfu.[3][9] Not listed in the Turin canon (after Ryholt) isWepwawetemsaf, who left astele at Abydos and was likely a local kinglet of theAbydos Dynasty.[2]
Ryholt gives the list of kings of the 16th Dynasty as shown in the table below.[10] Others, such as Helck, Vandersleyen, Bennett combine some of these rulers with theSeventeenth Dynasty of Egypt.[11] The list of rulers is given here as perKim Ryholt and is supposedly in chronological order:
Additional kings are classified as belonging to this dynasty per Kim Ryholt but their chronological position is uncertain. They may correspond to the last five lost kings on the Turin canon:[13]
Dynasty XVI as an independent Theban kingdom (uncertain order)
^see for example, Quirke, in Maree:The Second Intermediate Period (Thirteenth - Seventeenth Dynasties, Current Research, Future Prospects, Leuven 2011, Paris — Walpole, MA.ISBN978-9042922280, p. 56, n. 6
^Wolfgang Helck, Eberhard Otto, Wolfhart Westendorf, Stele - Zypresse: Volume 6 of Lexikon der Ägyptologie, Otto Harrassowitz Verlag, 1986, Page 1383
^Darrell D. Baker: The Encyclopedia of the Pharaohs: Volume I - Predynastic to the Twentieth Dynasty 3300–1069 BC, Stacey International,ISBN978-1-905299-37-9, 2008, pp. 256-257
^Chris Bennet, A Genealogical Chronology of the Seventeenth Dynasty, Journal of the American Research Center in Egypt, Vol. 39 (2002), pp. 123-155
^Kim Ryholt:The Political Situation in Egypt during the Second Intermediate Period, c. 1800 - 1550 BC, Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press,ISBN8772894210, 1997.
^Georges Legrain:Statues et statuettes de rois et de particuliers, inCatalogue général des antiquités égyptiennes du Musée du Caire, Le Caire, 1906. I, 171 pp., 79 pls,available copyright-free online, published in 1906, see p. 18 and p. 109