The study ofRoman sculpture is complicated by its relation toGreek sculpture. Many examples of even the most famous Greek sculptures, such as theApollo Belvedere andBarberini Faun, are known only fromRoman Imperial orHellenistic "copies". At one time, this imitation was taken byart historians as indicating a narrowness of the Roman artistic imagination, but, in the late 20th century, Roman art began to be reevaluated on its own terms: some impressions of the nature of Greek sculpture may in fact be based on Roman artistry.
The strengths of Roman sculpture are in portraiture, where they were less concerned with the ideal than the Greeks or Ancient Egyptians, and produced very characterful works, and in narrative relief scenes. Examples of Roman sculpture are abundantly preserved, in total contrast to Roman painting, which was very widely practiced but has almost all been lost.Latin and someGreek authors, particularlyPliny the Elder in Book 34 of hisNatural History, describe statues, and a few of these descriptions match extant works. While a great deal of Roman sculpture, especially in stone, survives more or less intact, it is often damaged or fragmentary; life-sizebronze statues are much more rare as most have been recycled for their metal.[1]
Most statues were actually far more lifelike and often brightly colored when originally created; the raw stone surfaces found today is due to the pigment being lost over the centuries.[2]
Early Roman art was influenced by the art of Greece and that of the neighbouringEtruscans, themselves greatly influenced by their Greektrading partners. An Etruscan speciality was near life size tomb effigies interracotta, usually lying on top of asarcophagus lid propped up on one elbow in the pose of a diner in that period. As the expandingRoman Republic began to conquer Greek territory, at first in Southern Italy and then the entire Hellenistic world except for theParthian far east, official andpatrician sculpture became largely an extension of the Hellenistic style, from which specifically Roman elements are hard to disentangle, especially as so much Greek sculpture survives only in copies of the Roman period.[3] By the 2nd century BCE, "most of the sculptors working at Rome" were Greek,[4] often enslaved in conquests such as that ofCorinth (146 BCE), and sculptors continued to be mostly Greeks, often slaves, whose names are very rarely recorded. Sculpting was not considered a profession by Romans — at most, it was accepted as a hobby.[5] Vast numbers of Greek statues were imported to Rome, whether as booty or the result of extortion or commerce, and temples were often decorated with re-used Greek works.[6]
A native Italian style can be seen in the tomb monuments of prosperous middle-class Romans, which very often featured portrait busts, andportraiture is arguably the main strength of Roman sculpture. There are no survivals from the tradition of masks of ancestors that were worn in processions at the funerals of the great families and otherwise displayed in the home, but many of the busts that survive must represent ancestral figures, perhaps from the large family tombs like theTomb of the Scipios or the latermausolea outside the city. The famous "Capitoline Brutus", a bronze head supposedly ofLucius Junius Brutus is very variously dated, but taken as a very rare survival of Italic style under the Republic, in the preferred medium of bronze.[7] Similarly stern and forceful heads are seen in the coins of the consuls, and in the Imperial period coins as well as busts sent around the Empire to be placed in thebasilicas of provincial cities were the main visual form of imperial propaganda; evenLondinium had a near-colossal statue ofNero, though far smaller than the 30-metre-highColossus of Nero in Rome, now lost.[8] TheTomb of Eurysaces the Baker, a successfulfreedman (c. 50–20 BC) has afrieze that is an unusually large example of the "plebeian" style.[9]
The Romans did not generally attempt to compete with free-standing Greek works of heroic exploits from history or mythology, but from early on produced historical works inrelief, culminating in the greatRoman triumphal columns with continuous narrative reliefs winding around them, of which those commemoratingTrajan (CE 113) andMarcus Aurelius (by 193) survive in Rome, where theAra Pacis ("Altar of Peace", 13 BCE) represents the official Greco-Roman style at its most classical and refined. Among other major examples are the earlier re-used reliefs on theArch of Constantine and the base of theColumn of Antoninus Pius (161),[10]Campana reliefs were cheaperpottery versions of marble reliefs and the taste for relief was from the imperial period expanded to the sarcophagus.
All forms of luxury small sculpture continued to be patronized, and quality could be extremely high, as in the silverWarren Cup, glassLycurgus Cup, and large cameos like theGemma Augustea,Gonzaga Cameo and the "Great Cameo of France".[11] For a much wider section of the population, moulded relief decoration ofpottery vessels and small figurines were produced in great quantity and often considerable quality.[12]
After moving through a late 2nd century "baroque" phase,[13] in the 3rd century, Roman art largely abandoned, or simply became unable to produce, sculpture in the classical tradition, a change whose causes remain much discussed. Even the most important imperial monuments now showed stumpy, large-eyed figures in a harsh frontal style, in simple compositions emphasizing power at the expense of grace. The contrast is famously illustrated in theArch of Constantine of 315 in Rome, which combines sections in the new style withroundels in the earlier full Greco-Roman style taken from elsewhere, and theFour Tetrarchs (c. 305) from the new capital ofConstantinople, now inVenice.Ernst Kitzinger found in both monuments the same "stubby proportions, angular movements, an ordering of parts through symmetry and repetition and a rendering of features and drapery folds through incisions rather than modelling... The hallmark of the style wherever it appears consists of an emphatic hardness, heaviness and angularity — in short, an almost complete rejection of the classical tradition".[14]
This revolution in style shortly preceded the period in whichChristianity was adopted by the Roman state and the great majority of the people, leading to the end of large religious sculpture, with large statues now only used for emperors, as in the famous fragments of a colossalacrolithicstatue of Constantine, and the 4th or 5th centuryColossus of Barletta. However rich Christians continued to commission reliefs for sarcophagi, as in theSarcophagus of Junius Bassus, and very small sculpture, especially in ivory, was continued by Christians, building on the style of theconsular diptych.[15]
Portraiture is a dominant genre of Roman sculpture, growing perhaps from thetraditional Roman emphasis on family and ancestors; the entrance hall(atrium) of aRoman elite house displayed ancestralportrait busts. During theRoman Republic, it was considereda sign of character not to gloss over physical imperfections, and to depict men in particular as rugged and unconcerned with vanity: the portrait was a map of experience. During the Imperial era, more idealized statues ofRoman emperors became ubiquitous, particularly in connection withthe state religion of Rome.Tombstones of even the modestly rich middle class sometimes exhibit portraits of the otherwise unknown deceased carved inrelief.
Among the many museums with examples of Roman portrait sculpture, the collections of theMetropolitan Museum of Art inNew York and theBritish Museum inLondon are especially noteworthy.
Religious art was also a major form of Roman sculpture. A central feature of aRoman temple was the cult statue of the deity, who was regarded as "housed" there (seeaedes). Although images of deities were also displayed in private gardens and parks, the most magnificent of the surviving statues appear to have been cult images.Roman altars were usually rather modest and plain, but some Imperial examples are modeled after Greek practice with elaborate reliefs, most famously theAra Pacis, which has been called "the most representative work ofAugustan art."[24] Small bronze statuettes and ceramic figurines, executed with varying degrees of artistic competence, are plentiful in the archaeological record, particularly in theprovinces, and indicate that these were a continual presence in the lives of Romans, whether forvotives or for private devotional display at home or in neighborhood shrines. These typically show more regional variation in style than large and more official works, and also stylistic preferences between different classes.[25]
Roman marble sarcophagi mostly date from the 2nd to the 4th century CE,[26] after a change inRoman burial customs fromcremation toinhumation, and were mostly made in a few major cities, including Rome andAthens, which exported them to other cities. Elsewhere thestela gravestone remained more common. They were always a very expensive form reserved for the elite, and especially so in the relatively few very elaborately carved examples; most were always relatively plain, with inscriptions, or symbols such as garlands. Sarcophagi divide into a number of styles, by the producing area. "Roman" ones were made to rest against a wall, and one side was left uncarved, while "Attic" and other types were carved on all four sides; but the short sides were generally less elaborately decorated in both types.[27]
The time taken to make them encouraged the use of standard subjects, to which inscriptions might be added to personalize them, and portraits of the deceased were slow to appear. The sarcophagi offer examples of intricate reliefs that depict scenes often based onGreek andRoman mythology ormystery religions that offered personal salvation, andallegorical representations. Romanfunerary art also offers a variety of scenes from everyday life, such as game-playing, hunting, and military endeavors.[28]
Early Christian art quickly adopted the sarcophagus, and they are the most common form of early Christian sculpture, progressing from simple examples with symbols to elaborate fronts, often with small scenes of theLife of Christ in two rows within an architectural framework. TheSarcophagus of Junius Bassus (c. 359) is of this type, and the earlierDogmatic Sarcophagus rather simpler. The hugeporphyrySarcophagi of Helena and Constantina are grand Imperial examples.
Scenes from Roman sarcophagi
A number of well-known large stone vases sculpted in relief from the Imperial period were apparently mostly used as garden ornaments; indeed many statues were also placed in gardens, both public and private. Sculptures recovered from the site of theGardens of Sallust, opened to the public byTiberius, include:
Roman baths were another site for sculpture; among the well-known pieces recovered from theBaths of Caracalla are theFarnese Bull andFarnese Hercules and larger-than-life-sized early 3rd century patriotic figures somewhat reminiscent of SovietSocial Realist works (now in theMuseo di Capodimonte,Naples).
Found in theGardens of Sallust and theGardens of Maecenas:
Scenes shown on reliefs such as that ofTrajan's column and those shown on sarcophogi reveal images of Roman technology now long lost, such asballistae and the use of waterwheel-driven saws for cutting stone. The latter was only recently[when?] discovered atHieropolis and commemorates the miller who used the machine. Other reliefs show harvesting machines, much as they were described byPliny the Elder in hisNaturalis Historia.
Compared to the Greeks, the Romans made less use of stone sculpture on buildings, apparently having fewfriezes with figures. Importantpediments, such as thePantheon for example, originally had sculpture, but hardly any have survived.Terracottarelief panels calledCampana reliefs have survived in good numbers. These were used to decorate interior walls, in strips.
The architectural writerVitruvius is oddly reticent on the architectural use of sculpture, mentioning only a few examples, though he says that an architect should be able to explain the meaning of architectural ornament and gives as an example the use ofcaryatids.[30]