 | This articleneeds additional citations forverification. Please helpimprove this article byadding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Roman military engineering" – news ·newspapers ·books ·scholar ·JSTOR(September 2023) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
 |
| Part ofa series on the |
| Military of ancient Rome |
|---|
 Ancient Rome portal |
Romanmilitary engineering was of a scale and frequency far beyond that of its contemporaries. Indeed,military engineering was in many ways endemic in Roman military culture, as demonstrated by eachRoman legionary having as part of his equipment a shovel, alongside hisgladius (sword) andpila (javelins).
Workers, craftsmen, and artisans, known collectively asfabri, served in the Roman military. Descriptions of early Roman army structure (initially by phalanx, later by legion) attributed to king Servius Tullius state that twocenturiae offabri served under an officer, thepraefectus fabrum.[citation needed]
Roman military engineering took both routine and extraordinary forms, the former a part of standard military procedure, and the latter of an extraordinary or reactive nature.
EachRoman legion had a legionary fort as its permanent base. However, when on the march, particularly in enemy territory, the legion would construct a rudimentary fortified camp orcastra, using only earth, turf and timber. Camp construction was the responsibility of engineering units to which specialists of many types belonged, officered byarchitecti (engineers), from a class of troops known asimmunes who were excused from regular duties. These engineers would requisition manual labour from the soldiers at large as required. A legion could throw up a camp under enemy attack in a few hours. The names of the different types of camps apparently represent the amount of investment:tertiacastra,quartacastra: "a camp of three days", "four days", etc.
.jpg)
The engineers built bridges from timber and stone. Some Roman stone bridges survive. Stone bridges were made possible by the innovative use ofkeystonearches. One notable example wasJulius Caesar's Bridge over the Rhine River. This bridge was completed in only ten days and is conservatively estimated to have been more than 100 m (328 feet) long.[1][2] The construction was deliberately over-engineered for Caesar's stated purpose of impressing the Germanic tribes. Caesar writes in hisWar in Gaul that he rejected the idea of simply crossing in boats because it "would not be fitting for my own prestige and that of Rome" (at the time, he did not know that the Germanic tribes, with little knowledge of engineering, had already withdrawn from the area upon his arrival), and because a bridge would emphasize that Rome could travel wherever she wished. Caesar was able to cross over the completed bridge and explore the area uncontested, before crossing back over the subsequently dismantled bridge. Caesar related inWar in Gaul that when he "sent messengers to theSugambri to demand the surrender of those who had made war on me and on Gaul, they replied that the Rhine was the limit of Roman power". The bridge was intended to show otherwise.
.jpg)
Although mostRoman siege engines were adaptations of earlier Greek designs, the Romans were adept at engineering them swiftly and efficiently, as well as innovating variations such as therepeating ballista. The 1st century BC army engineerVitruvius describes in detail many of the Roman siege machines in his manuscriptDe architectura.
When invading enemy territories, the Roman army would often construct roads as it went, to allow swift reinforcement and resupply, or for easy retreat if necessary. Roman road-making skills were such that some survive today.Michael Grant credits the Roman building of theVia Appia with winning them theSecond Samnite War.[3]
When soldiers were not engaged in military campaigns, the legions had little to do, while costing the Roman state large sums of money. Thus, soldiers were involved in building civilian works to keep them well accustomed to hard physical labour and out of mischief, since it was believed that idle armies were a potential source of mutiny.
Soldiers were put to use in the construction of roads, town walls, the digging of canals, drainage projects, aqueducts, harbours, and even in the cultivation of vineyards.
Soldiers were used in mining operations such as building aqueducts needed for prospecting for metal veins, activities such ashydraulic mining, and building reservoirs to hold water at the minehead.
The knowledge and experience learned through routine engineering lent itself readily to extraordinary engineering projects. In such projects, Roman military engineering greatly exceeded that of its contemporaries in imagination and scope.
One notable project was thecircumvallation of the entire city ofAlesia and its Celtic leaderVercingetorix, within a massive double-wall – one inward-facing to prevent escape or offensive sallies, and one outward-facing to prevent attack by Celtic reinforcements. This wall is estimated to have been over 20 km (12 mi) long.
A second example is the massive ramp built using thousands of tons of stones and beaten earth up to the invested city ofMasada during theJewish Revolt. The siege works and the ramp remain in a remarkable state of preservation.