Regulatory macrophages (Mregs) represent a subset of anti-inflammatorymacrophages. In general,macrophages are a very dynamic and plastic cell type and can be divided into two main groups: classically activated macrophages (M1) and alternatively activated macrophages (M2).[1] M2 group can further be divided into sub-groups M2a, M2b, M2c, and M2d.[2] Typically the M2 cells have anti-inflammatory and regulatory properties and produce many different anti-inflammatorycytokines such asIL-4,IL-33,IL-10,IL-1RA, andTGF-β.[3][4] M2 cells can also secreteangiogenic and chemotactic factors.[5] These cells can be distinguished based on the different expression levels of various surface proteins and the secretion of different effector molecules.[4]
Many cell types includingmonocytes, M1, and M2 can in a specific microenvironment differentiate to Mregs.[7] Induction of Mregs is strongly linked with the interaction ofFc receptors located on the surface of Mregs withFc fragments ofantibodies.[14] It has been shown that anti-TNF monoclonal antibodies interacting withFcγ receptor of Mregs induce differentiation of Mregs through activation ofSTAT3 signaling pathway.[15][16] Some pathogens can promote the transformation ofcells into Mregs as animmune evasion mechanism.[7][17] Two signals are needed for Mregs inducement. The first signal is stimulation byM-CSF,GM-CSF,PGE2,adenosine,glucocorticoid, orapoptotic cells.[9][18] The second signal can be stimulation withcytokines ortoll-like receptor ligands. The first signal promotes the differentiation ofmonocytes tomacrophages and the second signal promotesimmunosuppressive functions.[8] In vitro,M-CSF,IFNγ, andLPS are used for the inducement of Mregs.[7]
Surprisingly, Mregs resemble classically activated macrophages more than alternatively activated macrophages, due to higher biochemical similarity.[19] The difference between M1 macrophages and Mregs is, inter alia, that Mregs secrete high levels ofIL-10 and simultaneously low levels ofIL-12. Out of allmacrophages, Mregs show the highest expression ofMHC II molecules andco-stimulatory molecules (CD80/CD86), which differentiates them from the alternatively activated macrophages, which show a very low expression of these molecules. Mregs also differ from alternatively activated macrophages by producing high levels ofnitric oxide and lowarginase activity.[7][16][19] Lastly, they differ in the expression of FIIZ1 (Resistin-like molecule alpha1) and YM1 which are differentiation markers present on alternatively activated macrophages.[4] Mregs are recognized by the expression ofPD-L1,CD206,CD80/CD86,HLA-DR, andDHRS9 (dehydrogenase/reductase 9).[4][20]DHRS9 has been recognized as a stable marker for Mregs in humans.[20]
Biochemical and functional characterization of Mregs
The physiological role of Mregs is to dampen theimmune response andimmunopathology. Unlike classically activated macrophages, Mregs produce low levels ofIL-12, which is important becauseIL-12 induces differentiation ofnaïve helper T cells to Th1 cells which produce high levels ofIFNγ. Mregs do not contribute to the production ofextracellular matrix because they express low levels of arginase.[12][4]
Mregs show up-regulation ofIL-10,TGFβ,PGE2,iNOS,IDO, and down-regulation ofIL-1β,IL-6,IL-12, andTNF-α.[21] By secretingTGF-β they help with the induction ofTregs and by producingIL-10 they contribute to the induction oftolerance and regulatory cell types. Mregs can directly inhibit theproliferation ofactivated T cells. It has been shown that Mregs co-cultured withT cells have a negative effect on the T-cellular ability to secreteIL-2 andIFN-γ.[22] Mregs can also inhibit thearginase activity of alternatively activated macrophages, theproliferation offibroblasts, and can promoteangiogenesis.[23] The use of Mregs is widely studied as a potential cell-based immunosuppressive therapy afterorgan transplantation. Mregs could potentially solve the problems (susceptibility toinfectious diseases andcancer diseases) associated with the current post-transplant therapy. Since Mregs are still producingnitric oxide they may be more suitable than current treatments, when appropriately stimulated.[22]
^Saha S, Shalova IN, Biswas SK (November 2017). "Metabolic regulation of macrophage phenotype and function".Immunological Reviews.280 (1):102–111.doi:10.1111/imr.12603.PMID29027220.S2CID36334334.
^Giacomelli R, Ruscitti P, Alvaro S, Ciccia F, Liakouli V, Di Benedetto P, et al. (August 2016). "IL-1β at the crossroad between rheumatoid arthritis and type 2 diabetes: may we kill two birds with one stone?".Expert Review of Clinical Immunology.12 (8):849–55.doi:10.1586/1744666X.2016.1168293.hdl:10447/207730.PMID26999417.S2CID23523228.
^abcdefDi Benedetto P, Ruscitti P, Vadasz Z, Toubi E, Giacomelli R (October 2019). "Macrophages with regulatory functions, a possible new therapeutic perspective in autoimmune diseases".Autoimmunity Reviews.18 (10): 102369.doi:10.1016/j.autrev.2019.102369.PMID31404701.S2CID199548742.
^abWong SC, Puaux AL, Chittezhath M, Shalova I, Kajiji TS, Wang X, et al. (August 2010). "Macrophage polarization to a unique phenotype driven by B cells".European Journal of Immunology.40 (8):2296–307.doi:10.1002/eji.200940288.PMID20468007.
^Schmidt A, Zhang XM, Joshi RN, Iqbal S, Wahlund C, Gabrielsson S, et al. (September 2016). "Human macrophages induce CD4(+)Foxp3(+) regulatory T cells via binding and re-release of TGF-β".Immunology and Cell Biology.94 (8):747–62.doi:10.1038/icb.2016.34.PMID27075967.S2CID205152075.