 | This articleneeds additional citations forverification. Please helpimprove this article byadding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Racism in Malaysia" – news ·newspapers ·books ·scholar ·JSTOR(May 2019) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Malaysia is a multi-ethnic country, with a predominantlyMuslim population. Racial discrimination is embodied within the social and economic policies of the Malaysian government, favouring the Malays and in principle, the natives of Sabah and Sarawak. However, in practice, the natives of Sabah and Sarawak do not benefit much from these policies, withnatives of Sabah and Sarawak composing the bulk of bottom 40% income cohort of Malaysia. Rather, it is the Malays that obtain heavily subsidised education in local universities and make up the bulk of these universities, including in terms of employment. The resources of Sarawak have been exploited for decades, with theMalaysian government enriching governmental officials and their associates.[1] The concept ofKetuanan Melayu or Malay supremacy is accepted by the Malay-majority political sphere.
While 179 countries have ratified theInternational Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD), Malaysia is not one of them. ThePakatan Harapan government that replacedBarisan Nasional in 2018 had indicated a readiness to ratify ICERD, but has yet to do so due to the convention's conflict with theMalaysian constitution and the race and religious norms in Malaysia established since its independence.[2][3]
Malays make up the majority — according to the 2010 census figures, over 50% of the 28.3 million population (including non-citizens) are Malays. About 22.6% of the population isChinese Malaysians (Malaysians of Chinese descent) andIndian Malaysians (Malaysians of Indian descent) comprise about 6.6% of the population.[4][5] People ofIndians descent are derogatorily calledKeling in Malaysia.[6] There are also a very small minority of Aboriginal People whose ancestors orOrang Asli arrived in what is today Malaysia well over 7,000 years before the Malays arrived from what is today Taiwan roughly 3,000 years ago. These ancient people also split with some heading to Sulawesi and others progressing into Java, and Sumatra. The final migration was to the Malay Peninsula roughly 3,000 years ago. A sub-group from Borneo moved to Champa in Vietnam roughly 4,500 years ago. The Champa group eventually moved to present day Kelantan in Malaysia.[citation needed] There are also traces of the Dong Song and HoaBinh migration from Vietnam and Cambodia. There was also the Southern Thai migration, from what we know as Patani (Narathiwat, Pattani, Yala, South Songkhla) today. All these groups shareDNA and linguistic origins traceable to Taiwan, if not to southern China. Yet the Malay and Chinese (and also Indian) communities in Malaysia today appear at times at odds with each other given the polarisation caused by various policies under theBumiputera policy.[citation needed]
The British, who had colonised what is now the Malaysian Peninsula starting in 1876, had recognized the Malay states, as recorded by numerous literature by Frank Swettenham, Hugh Clifford and many more of their scholars. Historians have noted thatWestern imperialism in Asia, including Malaysia, led to the importation ofracial theories from Europe, contributing to a fundamental shift in the perception ofrace among Asians.[7] During the colonial era, Chinese Malaysians remained mostly isolated in the mining regions where they worked. In addition, some Chinese Malaysians were settled around the major towns while the Malays, had established their own villages. In 2017, former prime ministerMahathir Mohamad insinuated Prime Minister Najib Razak was a robber due to his Buginese racial background.[8] During the lead-up to the 2018 elections in Malaysia, an election Mahathir won, he fanned anti-Chinese sentiments in the country by warning of an influx of foreign Chinese property owners.[9] Such exploitation of race and religion for power has shattered the concept of a "Malaysian Malaysia" proposed byLee Kuan Yew, with talent being lost to foreign countries due to exclusive job opportunities for the Malays.
Presently, Malay is the national language of Malaysia. While it is unique that more than four languages are spoken widely in Malaysia today (English, Malay, Chinese and Tamil), the ethnic languages are mainly used by the ethnic groups respectively. The divide is quite prominent, especially in west Malaysia, since the Malays mostly attend the Malaysian national schools but the Chinese and also the Indians, have created their own vernacular schools, placing importance on their respective languages.
Government policies of positive discrimination favour the Malay majority and theBumiputera status, particularly in areas such as housing, finance, governance and education. Economic policies designed to favourBumiputera, including affirmative action in public education, were implemented in the 1970s in order to defuse inter-ethnic tensions following theMay 13 Incident in 1969.[10] However, these policies have not been fully effective in eradicating poverty among rural Bumiputeras and have further caused a backlash especially from Chinese and Indian minorities. The policies are enshrined in theMalaysian constitution and questioning them is technically illegal.[11][12]
UMNO, the ruling party since Malaysia's independence from Britain - until May 2018 depended on the majority Malay population for votes by using laws that give Malays priority over other races in areas such as employment, education, finance, and housing. Such policies has been cited inArticle 153 of the Constitution of Malaysia.[12]UMNO also promotesketuanan Melayu, which is the idea that the ethnic Malays (Bumiputeras) should get special privileges in Malaysia.
Pro-Bumiputera Malays claim that The Federation of Malaya Agreement signed on 21 January 1948 at King House by the Malay rulers and by Sir Edward Gent as the representative of the British government lets Malays be the leaders among three races. However, others have claimed that the Agreement promises equality to all three races who made up the population of Malaysia. Those were the original terms of The Federation of Malaya Agreement, which Dato' Onn Jaafar - then heading UMNO - had looked to abide by[citation needed]. However, in 1951 the UMNO began enshrining the rights of Malays over all other races in law. Today, Malays dominate in politics at both national and state levels, in the civil service, military and security forces.[13][14] The Chinese have traditionally dominated in the economy and live in large numbers in urban areas of Malaysia.
The Malay-controlled government ensures that all Bumiputeras of Malay origin are given preferential treatment regardless of merit when it comes to the number of student places in Government universities, where 90% of placements are reserved for the Bumiputera,[15] leaving many Chinese and Indians with no choice but to turn to significantly costlier private universities.[16] Government benefits for Malays include discounts for new houses and preferential treatment in public housing, cheaper burial plots, that all key government positions to be held by Malays including most sporting associations, a minimum of a 30% Malay Bumiputera equity to be held in listed companies, full funding for mosques and Islamic places of worship, special high earning interest trust funds for Bumiputera Malays, special share allocation for new share applications for Bumiputera Malays, and making the Malay language a compulsory examination paper.[17][18][19][20]
While the government has given special provisions and rights to the Malays through documented legal texts, they have also allowed certain practices by the Buddhist, Hindu and other religious minorities to be practised according to their religious beliefs, as is enshrined in Article 3 of the Federal Constitution.
The lack of meritocracy in the Malaysian education system is a valid concern, and this creates even more disparity between various groups in Malaysia. In the tertiary education system, one of the options after taking the Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia is the matriculation system. However, matriculation is highly limited for non-Malays, with 90 percent of the available spots going to Malays.[21]
In 1968, Prof. al-Attas, a member of the GERAKAN, engaged in a debate with Lim Kit Siang and the Opposition from the Democratic Action Party (DAP)6 on the subject of Indonesian literature being made as part of the corpus of Malay Language literature, and on the idea of a Malaysian Malaysia. Responding towards Lim Kit Siang's claim that adopting Malay as the national language is racist and chauvinistic, Prof al-Attas argued that Malays cannot be accused as racist because a Chinese who becomes a Muslim and speaks the Malay Language can be considered a Malay; a Malay, however, can never be a Chinese.[22] By this definition, however, a Malay that renounces Islam is no longer a Malay.
In 2010, a Malaysian court sentenced a Malay to just a week in jail and only fined 11 others for a brandishing a cow's head during a protest against the construction of a Hindu temple. Critics said the light sentences would further strain race relations between the majority Malay Muslims and minority Hindu Indians, Chinese as well as Christians of various races who complain of discrimination. The 12 were from a group who had marched in August 2009 with the bloodied head of acow, to protest a plan to build a Hindu temple in their mainly Muslim neighbourhood. Hindus, who consider the cow to be a sacred animal, were offended and angered.[citation needed]
A study by the Centre for Governance and Political Studies (Cent-GPS) made an experimentStudy on 7 fictitious candidates by sending a small sample size of 7 fictitious resumes representing 7 candidates: male and female Malay, Indian and Chinese candidates, 3,829 times in total to over 500 job vacancies across theKlang Valley. No fictitious Sabahan nor Sarawakians were involved in this study. Out of these 7 fictitious candidates, the study concluded that employers in the business sector are actively looking for Chinese candidates.
The study had 3 hypothesis, first ethnic Malay applicants will be discriminated against in Malaysia's business sector compared to their non-bumiputera peers. The study found out that the fictitious Chinese candidates dominated the callbacks by a huge margin. The two male and female Chinese candidates obtained more job callbacks than their Malay and Indian counterparts combined. No details regarding whether it was a Malay management company, an Indian management company or Chinese management company were included in the study, a confound that would likely lead to a skew in the results given the racial tensions and linguistic barriers in Malaysia due to the lack of a communal lingua franca that is neutral and which does not favour any one race.
The second hypothesis wasMandarin is a key factor in helping or boosting a candidate's chance of securing a job interview. The study finds that when companies list “Mandarin required” in their advertisement, it is actually a filter to hire Chinese candidates. Their third hypothesis was the hijab plays a crucial factor in determining a candidate's successfully job application. The study found out that a Malay girl without a hijab gets more callbacks than a Malay girl who wears a hijab.
The study concluded that even as candidates had the same qualifications, education and experience, the ethnicity of a candidate still plays a vital role in the success of a job application for a business graduate. Only business graduates were studied in this study, with other fields of study being suitable for an attempt for replication of this study.
Following COVID-19 outbreaks in 2020,Rohingya people had been accused for spreading the disease. Hateful messages against the ethnic group on social media platforms, such as Twitter and Facebook, were also widespread. Users also demanded forrefoulement of Rohingya people toMyanmar and threatened prominent Rohingya activists and their supporters with physical attacks, murder, and sexual violence.[23] Some comments compared the ethnic group with dogs, parasites, and pigs.[24]
In 2024, a village of Bajau Laut had been demolished by Malaysian authority in the state of Sabah, garnering nation media attention, highlighting the situation Bajau Laut faced. The stateless Bajau Laut people face discrimination and racism due to their stateless status and ethnic stereotype and suspicion offifth column (due to their nomadic status and traveling between Philippines archipelago, and due toNorth Borneo dispute).[25][26]
James Chin,The Malaysian Chinese Dilemma: The Never Ending Policy (NEP), Chinese Southern Studies (2008)
James Chin, Racism towards theChinese Minority in Malaysia: Political Islam and Institutional Barriers, The Political Quarterly (2022)
