Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Podocarpaceae

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Family of conifers in the family Podocarpaceae

Podocarpaceae
Temporal range:Middle Jurassic–present
Podocarpus elatus Illawarra Plum
Scientific classificationEdit this classification
Kingdom:Plantae
Clade:Tracheophytes
Clade:Gymnospermae
Division:Pinophyta
Class:Pinopsida
Order:Araucariales
Family:Podocarpaceae
Endl.
Genera

See text

Synonyms
  • AcmopylaceaeMelikian & Bobrov 1997
  • BracteocarpaceaeMelikian & Bobrov 2000
  • DacrycarpaceaeMelikian & Bobrov 2000
  • DacrydiaceaeBobrov & Melikian 2000
  • FalcatifoliaceaeMelikian & Bobrov 2000
  • HalocarpaceaeMelikian & Bobrov 2000
  • LepidothamnaceaeMelikian & Bobrov 2000
  • MicrocachrydaceaeDoweld & Reveal 1999
  • MicrostrobaceaeDoweld & Reveal 2001
  • NageiaceaeFu 1992
  • ParasitaxaceaeMelikian & Bobrov 2000
  • PherosphaeraceaeNakai 1938
  • PhyllocladaceaeBessey 1907
  • PrumnopityaceaeMelikian & Bobrov 2000
  • SaxegothaeaceaeGaussen ex Doweld & Reveal 1999

Podocarpaceae is a largefamily of mainlySouthern Hemisphereconifers, known in English aspodocarps, comprising about 156 species of evergreen trees and shrubs.[1] It contains 20genera ifPhyllocladus is included andManoao andSundacarpus are recognized. The family achieved its maximum diversity in theCenozoic, making thePodocarpaceae family one of the most diverse in thesouthern hemisphere.

The family is a classic member of theAntarctic flora, with its main centres ofdiversity inAustralasia, particularlyNew Caledonia,Tasmania, and New Zealand, and to a slightly lesser extentMalesia and South America (primarily in theAndes Mountains). Several genera extend north of the equator intoIndochina and thePhilippines.Podocarpus reaches as far north as southern Japan and southern China in Asia, and Mexico in the Americas, andNageia into southern China and southern India. Two genera also occur insub-Saharan Africa, the widespreadPodocarpus and the endemicAfrocarpus.

Parasitaxus usta is unique as the only knownparasiticgymnosperm. It occurs on New Caledonia, where it is parasitic on another member of the Podocarpaceae,Falcatifolium taxoides.[2]

The genusPhyllocladus issister to the Podocarpaceaesensu stricto.[2] It is treated by some botanists in its own family, thePhyllocladaceae.[3]

Taxonomy

[edit]

The Podocarpaceae show great diversity, both morphologically and ecologically. Members occur mainly in the Southern Hemisphere, with most genetic variety taking place in New Caledonia, New Zealand, and Tasmania. Species diversity ofPodocarpus is found mainly in South America and theIndonesian islands, the latter also being rich inDacrydium andDacrycarpus species.

Podocarpus (with 82 to 100 species)[1][4] andDacrydium (with 21 species) are the largest genera. A few genera are common to New Zealand and South America, supporting the view that podocarps had an extensive distribution over southernGondwanaland. The breaking up of Gondwanaland led to large-scalespeciation of the Podocarpaceae.

Until 1970, only seven Podocarpaceae genera were recognized:Podocarpus,Dacrydium,Phyllocladus,Acmopyle,Microcachrys,Saxegothaea, andPherosphaera. All four of the African species fell underPodocarpusP. falcatus,P. elongatus,P. henkelii, andP. latifolius. Taxonomists dividedPodocarpus species into eight species groups based on leaf anatomy:Afrocarpus J.Buchholz & N.E.Gray,Dacrycarpus Endl.,Eupodocarpus Endl.,Microcarpus Pilg.,Nageia (Gaertn.)Endl.,PolypodiopsisC.E.Bertrand (nonPolypodiopsis Carriére nom. rej. prop. 6),Stachycarpus Endl. andSundacarpusJ.Buchholz andN.E.Gray.

Studies of embryology, gametophyte development, female cone structure, and cytology led to the belief that the eight categories probably deserved generic status. Researchers agreed on the need to recognize "fairly natural groupings which prove to have good geographic and probably evolutionary cohesion" and took the necessary steps to raise each section to generic status.[5]

In 1990, atreatment of the Podocarpaceae recognized 17 genera, excludingPhyllocladus from the family, while recognizingSundacarpus, but notManoao.[4] In 1995,Manoao wassegregated fromLagarostrobus, based onmorphologicalcharacteristics.[6] In 2002, amolecular phylogenetic study showedSundacarpus isembedded inPrumnopitys and themonophyly ofLagarostrobos is doubtful ifManoao is included within it.[2] More recent treatments of the family have recognizedManoao, but notSundacarpus.[7]

Evolution

[edit]

Molecular evidence supports Podocarpaceae being thesister group to theAraucariaceae, and having diverged from it during the latePermian.[8] While some fossils attributed to the family have been reported from the Late Permian and Triassic, likeRissikia, these cannot be unambiguously assigned to the family. The oldest unambiguous members of the family are known from theJurassic period, found across both hemispheres, such asScarburgia andHarrisiocarpus from the Middle Jurassic of England, as well as unnamed species from the Middle-Late Jurassic of Patagonia. Modern genera of the family first appeared during the Early Cretaceous, with the family probably reaching an apex of diversity during the earlyCenozoic.[9]

Genera

[edit]

Studies based on anatomical, biogeographical, morphological, and DNA evidence suggest these relationships:

Knopf 2012[10]Leslie et al. 2018[11][12]

List of genera

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^abJames E. Eckenwalder. 2009.Conifers of the World. Portland, Oregon: Timber Press.ISBN 978-0-88192-974-4.
  2. ^abcWilliam T. Sinclair, R. R. Mill, M. F. Gardner, P. Woltz, T. Jaffré, J. Preston, M. L. Hollingsworth, A. Ponge, and M. Möller. 2002. "Evolutionary relationships of the New Caledonian heterotrophic conifer,Parasitaxis usta (Podocarpaceae), inferred from chloroplast trnL-F intron/spacer and nuclear rDNA ITS2 sequences".Plant Systematics and Evolution233 (1–2): 79–104.doi:10.1007/s00606-002-0199-8
  3. ^Christopher N. Page. 1990. "Phyllocladaceae" pages 317–319. In: Klaus Kubitzki (general editor); Karl U. Kramer and Peter S. Green (volume editors)The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants volume I. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.ISBN 978-0-387-51794-0
  4. ^abChristopher N. Page. 1990. "Podocarpaceae" pages 332–346. In: Klaus Kubitzki (general editor); Karl U. Kramer and Peter S. Green (volume editors)The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants volume I. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.ISBN 978-0-387-51794-0
  5. ^Barker, N. P.; Muller, E. M.; and Mill, R. R. (2004)."A yellowwood by any other name: molecular systematics and the taxonomy ofPodocarpus and the Podocarpaceae in southern Africa"Archived 2008-04-08 at theWayback Machine.South African Journal of Science, 100: 629–632.
  6. ^Brian P. J. Molloy. 1995. "Manoao (Podocarpaceae), a new monotypic conifer genus endemic to New Zealand".New Zealand Journal of Botany33 (2): 183–201.
  7. ^Aljos Farjon. 2008.A Natural History of Conifers. Portland, Oregon: Timber Press.ISBN 978-0-88192-869-3
  8. ^Stull, Gregory W.; Qu, Xiao-Jian; Parins-Fukuchi, Caroline; Yang, Ying-Ying; Yang, Jun-Bo; Yang, Zhi-Yun; Hu, Yi; Ma, Hong; Soltis, Pamela S.; Soltis, Douglas E.; Li, De-Zhu (July 19, 2021)."Gene duplications and phylogenomic conflict underlie major pulses of phenotypic evolution in gymnosperms".Nature Plants.7 (8):1015–1025.Bibcode:2021NatPl...7.1015S.doi:10.1038/s41477-021-00964-4.ISSN 2055-0278.PMID 34282286.S2CID 236141481.
  9. ^Andruchow-Colombo, Ana; Escapa, Ignacio H; Aagesen, Lone; Matsunaga, Kelly K S (2023-08-04)."In search of lost time: tracing the fossil diversity of Podocarpaceae through the ages".Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society.203 (4):315–336.doi:10.1093/botlinnean/boad027.hdl:11336/227952.ISSN 0024-4074.
  10. ^Knopf; Schulze; Little; Stützel; Stevenson (2012)."Relationships within Podocarpaceae based on DNA sequence, anatomical, morphological, and biogeographical data".Cladistics.28 (3):271–299.doi:10.1111/j.1096-0031.2011.00381.x.PMID 34872191.S2CID 86581015.
  11. ^Leslie, Andrew B.; Beaulieu, Jeremy; Holman, Garth; Campbell, Christopher S.; Mei, Wenbin; Raubeson, Linda R.; Mathews, Sarah; et al. (2018)."An overview of extant conifer evolution from the perspective of the fossil record".American Journal of Botany.105 (9):1531–1544.doi:10.1002/ajb2.1143.PMID 30157290.
  12. ^Leslie, Andrew B.; et al. (2018)."ajb21143-sup-0004-AppendixS4"(PDF).American Journal of Botany.105 (9):1531–1544.doi:10.1002/ajb2.1143.PMID 30157290.S2CID 52120430.

Further reading

[edit]
  • Christopher J. Quinn and Robert A. Price. 2003. "Phylogeny of the Southern Hemisphere Conifers".Proceedings of the Fourth International Conifer Conference: 129–136.doi:10.17660/ActaHortic.2003.615.10

External links

[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related toPodocarpaceae.
Wikispecies has information related toPodocarpaceae.
Podocarpaceae
Authority control databases: NationalEdit this at Wikidata
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Podocarpaceae&oldid=1284907219"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp