Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Oregon land fraud scandal

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
1900s public corruption case
Congressman John N. Williamson (left), Senator John H. Mitchell (middle), U.S. attorney John Hicklin Hall (top right), and Congressman Binger Hermann (bottom right).

TheOregon land fraud scandal of the early 20th century involved U.S. government land grants in theU.S. state ofOregon being illegally obtained with the assistance of public officials. Most of Oregon's U.S. congressional delegation received indictments in the case: U.S. SenatorJohn H. Mitchell and U.S. RepresentativesJohn N. Williamson andBinger Hermann, with SenatorCharles William Fulton singularly uninvolved.

Background

[edit]

In 1870, the Oregon and United States governments granted theOregon and California Railroad 3.7 million acres (15,000 km2) of land to build a line, from Portland south toCalifornia. The land, which was granted in acheckerboard pattern along both sides of the railroad's right of way, was thensold to settlers in parcels of 160 acres (64.7 ha) at the extremely low price of $2.50 an acre ($100 in 2024[1]) to encourage people to settle along the line, in order to foster development.[2] In 1915, 2.4 million acres (9,700 km2) of the original lands were reclaimed by the federal government and are today managed by theUnited States Bureau of Land Management.[2]

“Had Sen. Mitchell held his peace, his name should never have been mentioned by me,” Puter raged to a former business partner afterward. “But since he has seen fit to denounce me publicly, through the columns of the daily press, discountenancing me in most scathing terms, I see no reason why I should protect him further.” The business that Puter had made his career in was one that had been going on in Oregon since the very dawn of Oregon statehood. By the time Roosevelt’s administration decided to put a stop to it, the wealthy and well-connected had been stealing land from the state and federal governments for four decades.[3]

Fraud

[edit]

Since much of the land was unfit for development, it did not attract many settlers. However, the land was very rich in timber, which meant that timber companies would pay much more than $2.50 an acre.[4] To circumvent the requirements of the land grant,Edward Harriman, president of theSouthern Pacific Railroad — which then owned the O&C — hired former surveyorStephen A. Douglas Puter to round up people from saloons inPortland's waterfront district, escort them to the land office, have them register for anO&C parcel as a settler, and then transfer it to Puter's men. The accumulated parcels were then sold in large blocks to the highest bidder for timber harvest.[5][6]

Exposure

[edit]

Harriman eventually had a dispute with Puter and fired him. Later, when a lumber company bookkeeper exposed the scheme to anOregonian reporter, Puter turned on his former boss, testified against him, and wrote a scathing exposé about the scheme, while imprisoned. The exposé would become chapters one through 25 ofLooters of the Public Domain, (with an additional six chapters written by journalist Horace Stevens, a formerGeneral Land Office clerk).[5][7][8][9]

These looters of the public domain—working with crooked federal and state officials—through rascality and fraud, gained title to thousands of acres of valuable, publicly-owned timber lands, and at minimum prices.

—GovernorOswald West.[10]

Indictments

[edit]

Initially, more than 1,000 indictments were issued in the case. U.S. District AttorneyFrancis J. Heney narrowed down the list to the 35 most egregious offenders, including U.S. SenatorJohn H. Mitchell, and U.S. RepresentativesJohn N. Williamson andBinger Hermann.[5]

Mitchell

[edit]

Heney charged that Mitchell had illegally used his position to aid a client in the acquisition of patents to fraudulent land claims. Mitchell's law partner and personal secretary both testified against him and, on July 3, 1905, the jury found him guilty. He was sentenced to six months in prison and a $1,000 fine. Mitchell appealed, but before the appeal could be heard, he died from complications associated with a tooth extraction.[11]

Mitchell was convicted under Rev. Stat. §1782 (enacted 1864) which prohibited Senators and other officials from engaging in compensated representation in matters in which the United States was interested.[12] The year before, in anunrelated case, under the same statute, SenatorJoseph R. Burton of Kansas had become the first U.S. Senator convicted of a crime.[13]

Williamson

[edit]

Williamson's trial also resulted in conviction forsubornation of perjury in 1905. The prosecution argued that the three defendants had attempted to illegally obtain land claims under theTimber and Stone Act. Williamson appealed his case to theU.S. Supreme Court, which overturned the verdict, in 1908, because of apparent jury tampering and witness intimidation.[14]

Hermann

[edit]

In 1907, Hermann was found not guilty of destroying public documents. His second trial for collusion with the actual land fraud was postponed until 1910, and ended in ahung jury; Heney declined to refile charges.[15]

Hall

[edit]

Heney also prosecutedJohn Hicklin Hall, who was the U.S. Attorney originally charged with investigating the case, but who had been fired, in 1905, by PresidentTheodore Roosevelt for not aggressively pursuing the investigation. Heney charged Hall with failure to prosecute fraudulent land companies and for using knowledge of the fraudulent activities for his own political advantage; a jury convicted Hall in 1908.[16] Hall was later pardoned by PresidentWilliam Howard Taft.[17]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^1634–1699:McCusker, J. J. (1997).How Much Is That in Real Money? A Historical Price Index for Use as a Deflator of Money Values in the Economy of the United States: Addenda et Corrigenda(PDF).American Antiquarian Society. 1700–1799:McCusker, J. J. (1992).How Much Is That in Real Money? A Historical Price Index for Use as a Deflator of Money Values in the Economy of the United States(PDF).American Antiquarian Society. 1800–present:Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis."Consumer Price Index (estimate) 1800–". RetrievedFebruary 29, 2024.
  2. ^ab"Oregon and California Railroad".Oregon History Project.Oregon Historical Society. RetrievedJune 17, 2016.
  3. ^John, Finn J. D. (10 January 2023)."Offbeat Oregon: Frontier land-fraud swingers plunder Oregon".Redmond Spokesman. Archived fromthe original on 10 Jan 2023. Retrieved8 November 2024.
  4. ^Tallmadge, Alice (Summer 2007)."In the Red".Forest Magazine. Archived fromthe original on April 14, 2013. RetrievedMarch 6, 2012.
  5. ^abcTerry, John (October 14, 2007). "Rail scam tainted lots of officials".The Oregonian. Portland, Oregon.
  6. ^Miller, Joseph S (2006).Saving Oregon's Golden Goose: Political Drama on the O&C Lands. Portland, Oregon: Inkwater Press.ISBN 978-1-59299-212-6. partially read into theCongressional Record byGordon Smith, 2007-02-12; see110th Cong., vol. 153, no. 1, 2007, pp. S1837-S1838.
  7. ^Engeman, Richard H. (2009).The Oregon Companion: An Historical Gazetteer of The Useful, The Curious, and The Arcane.Portland,Oregon:Timber Press. pp. 280, 318.ISBN 978-0-88192-899-0.
  8. ^Cain, Allen (2006)."Land Claims in T.11S R.7E".Oregon Historical Society. RetrievedApril 5, 2018.
  9. ^"Oregon History: The Oregon System".Oregon Blue Book (online).Oregon Secretary of State. Archived fromthe original on 2018-10-24. Retrieved2011-01-23.
  10. ^"Oregon History: The Oregon System".Oregon Blue Book.Oregon Secretary of State. RetrievedJuly 6, 2009.
  11. ^"Land Fraud Trial of Senator John Mitchell".Oregon History Project. Oregon Historical Society. RetrievedJune 17, 2016.
  12. ^"Verdict of Guilty a Blow to Mitchell"(PDF).The New York Times. July 5, 1905. RetrievedMay 22, 2014.
  13. ^United States Senate Historical OfficeAbout Expulsion.
  14. ^"Williamson-Gesner Fraud".Oregon History Project. Oregon Historical Society. RetrievedJune 17, 2016.
  15. ^"Shadows in Public Life".Oregon History Project. Oregon Historical Society. RetrievedJune 17, 2016.
  16. ^Greenberg, Gerald S. (2000).Historical Encyclopedia of U.S. Independent Counsel Investigations. Greenwood Press. pp. 164–166.ISBN 978-0-313-30735-5.
  17. ^"List of Politicians Who Were Pardoned". The Political Graveyard. RetrievedJune 27, 2007.

External links

[edit]
Modernhistory of Oregon (1890–present)
Topics
Oregon State Seal
Events
Places
Politicians
Other
Oregonians
Statutes
Precedents
Convictions
Investigations
Scandals
Topics
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Oregon_land_fraud_scandal&oldid=1256243483"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp