The tendency of the brain to prefer visual input from one eye to the other
Ocular dominance, sometimes calledeye preference oreyedness,[1] is the tendency to prefervisual input from one eye to the other.[2] It is somewhat analogous to thelaterality of right- or left-handedness; however, the side of the dominant eye and the dominant hand do not always match.[3] This is because both hemispheres control both eyes, but each one takes charge of a different half of the field of vision, and therefore a different half of both retinas (SeeOptic Tract for more details). There is thus no direct analogy between "handedness" and "eyedness" as lateral phenomena.[4]
Approximately 70% of the population are right-eye dominant and 29% left-eye dominant.[1][5][6][7] Dominance does appear to change depending upon direction of gaze[2][8] due to image size changes on theretinas.[9] There also appears to be a higher prevalence of left-eye dominance in those withWilliams–Beuren syndrome,[10] and possibly inmigraine sufferers as well.[11] Eye dominance has been categorized as "weak" or "strong";[12] highly profound cases are sometimes caused byamblyopia orstrabismus.
In those withanisometropicmyopia (different amounts of nearsightedness between the two eyes), the dominant eye has typically been found to be the one with more myopia.[13] As far as regards subjects with normalbinocular vision, the widespread notion that the individual's better-sighted eye would tend to be the dominant eye has been challenged as lacking empirical basis.[14]
Dominance can change and may switch between the eyes depending on the task and physical condition of the subject (i.e. fatigue).[citation needed]
In normalbinocular vision there is an effect ofparallax, and therefore the dominant eye is the one that is primarily relied on for precise positional information. This may be extremely important in sports which require aim, such asarchery,darts orshooting sports.
In a 1998 study of professional baseball players, hand–ocular dominance patterns did not show an effect onbatting average orERA.[15] Similarly, in 2005, a South African study found that "cricketers were not more likely to have crossed dominance" than the normal population.[16]
The dominant eye has more neural connections to the brain than the other eye does. According to a sixty-person study in theProceedings of the Royal Society B, in non-dyslexic people, the blue cone-free spot in the dominant eye tends to be round and the same spot in the non-dominant eye tends to be unevenly shaped; indyslexic people both eyes tend to have round areas.[18] The study suggests this difference may be a potential, and possibly treatable, cause of dyslexia; however, further tests are required to confirm this. At least 700 million people worldwide have dyslexia. In response to the study, John Stein of theUniversity of Oxford cautions that while the study is "really interesting", there is no one single cause of dyslexia.[19][20]
It has also been shown that ocular dominance can influence the performance of tasks that require the activation ofexecutive functions, in particular, when performing theStroop test.[21] Moreover, it has been found that in people with different ocular dominance, areas of thevisual cortex are activated differently in such tasks.[21] Also, fMRI data indicate that there are differences in the activity of the cerebral cortex in theperception of faces depending on the dominance of the eyes: in left-dominant people, the rightfusiform gyrus is activated, and in right-dominant people, the left.[22]
A person's dominant eye "is determined by subjective alignment of two objects presented at a stereodisparity far beyondPanum's area".[23] There are a number of ways to do this:
The Miles test. The observer extends both arms, brings both hands together to create a small opening, then with both eyes open views a distant object through the opening. The observer then alternates closing the eyes or slowly draws opening back to the head to determine which eye is viewing the object (i.e. the dominant eye).[24][25][26]
The Porta test. The observer extends one arm, then with both eyes open aligns the thumb or index finger with a distant object. The observer then alternates closing the eyes or slowly draws the thumb/finger back to the head to determine which eye is viewing the object (i.e. the dominant eye).[25][27][28]
The Dolman method, also known as the hole-in-the-card test. The subject is given a card with a small hole in the middle, instructed to hold it with both hands, then instructed to view a distant object through the hole with both eyes open. The observer then alternates closing the eyes or slowly draws the opening back to the head to determine which eye is viewing the object (i.e. the dominant eye).[29]
The convergence near-point test. The subject fixates an object that is moved toward the nose untildivergence of one eye occurs (i.e. the non-dominant eye). It is an objective test of ocular dominance.[29]
Lens fogging technique. The subject fixates a distant object with both eyes open and appropriate correction in place. A +2.00 or +2.50 lens is alternately introduced in front of each eye, which blurs the distant object. The subject is then asked to state in which eye is the blur more noticeable. This is the dominant eye.
A dichoptic motion coherence threshold test yields a quantified indication of ocular dominance.[33]
Forced choice tests of dominance, such as the Dolman method, allow only a right or left eye result.[29]
^Eser I, Durrie DS, Schwendeman F, Stahl JE (September 2008). "Association between ocular dominance and refraction".Journal of Refractive Surgery.24 (7):685–9.doi:10.3928/1081597X-20080901-07.PMID18811110.
^Quartley J, Firth AY (2004). "Binocular sighting ocular dominance changes with different angles of horizontal gaze".Binocular Vision & Strabismus Quarterly.19 (1):25–30.PMID14998366.
^Van Strien JW, Lagers-Van Haselen GC, Van Hagen JM, De Coo IF, Frens MA, Van Der Geest JN (November 2005). "Increased prevalences of left-handedness and left-eye sighting dominance in individuals with Williams-Beuren syndrome".Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology.27 (8):967–76.doi:10.1080/13803390490919119.PMID16207621.S2CID24853662.
^Aygül R, Dane S, Ulvi H (June 2005). "Handedness, eyedness, and crossed hand-eye dominance in male and female patients with migraine with and without aura: a pilot study".Perceptual and Motor Skills.100 (3 Pt 2):1137–42.doi:10.2466/pms.100.3c.1137-1142.PMID16158700.S2CID28551538.
^Handa T, Shimizu K, Mukuno K, Kawamorita T, Uozato H (August 2005). "Effects of ocular dominance on binocular summation after monocular reading adds".Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery.31 (8):1588–92.doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.01.015.PMID16129296.S2CID41767553.
^Laby DM, Kirschen DG, Rosenbaum AL, Mellman MF (May 1998). "The effect of ocular dominance on the performance of professional baseball players".Ophthalmology.105 (5):864–6.doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(98)95027-8.PMID9593388.
^Thomas NG, Harden LM, Rogers GG (September 2005). "Visual evoked potentials, reaction times and eye dominance in cricketers".The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness.45 (3):428–33.PMID16230997.
^Handa T, Mukuno K, Uozato H, Niida T, Shoji N, Minei R, Nitta M, Shimizu K (April 2004). "Ocular dominance and patient satisfaction after monovision induced by intraocular lens implantation".Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery.30 (4):769–74.doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2003.07.013.PMID15093637.S2CID39690729.
^Safra D (July 1989). "[The "Ring Test" for evaluating eye dominance]".Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde (in German).195 (1):35–6.doi:10.1055/s-2008-1046410.PMID2796230.
^Li J, Lam CS, Yu M, Hess RF, Chan LY, Maehara G, Woo GC, Thompson B (December 2010). "Quantifying sensory eye dominance in the normal visual system: a new technique and insights into variation across traditional tests".Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science.51 (12):6875–81.doi:10.1167/iovs.10-5549.PMID20610837.