A jointPolitics andEconomics series |
Social choice andelectoral systems |
---|
![]() |
By results of combination By mechanism of combination By ballot type |
![]() |
Anelectoral system (or voting system) is a set of rules that determine howelections andreferendums are conducted and how their results are determined.
Some electoral systems elect a single winner (single candidate or option), while others elect multiple winners, such as members of parliament or boards of directors.
The study of formally defined electoral methods is calledsocial choice theory or voting theory, and this study can take place within the field ofpolitical science,economics, ormathematics, and specifically within the subfields ofgame theory andmechanism design.
Name(s) | Variations | Type of representation | Mixed? | Single/multi-winner | List-based OR candidate-based system | Type of decision rule | Type of ballot | Number of votes / voter | Number of tiers (if mixed) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
First-past-the-post(FPTP/FPP)[1] Single-member plurality (SMP/SMDP) | two-round system with lower than 50% requirement in first round | Winner-take-all | No | single-winner | candidate | plurality | single choice | 1 | — |
General ticket Party-block voting (PBV) | Winner-take-all | No | multi-winner (one slate) | list | plurality | single choice | 1 | — | |
Plurality block voting (BV) plurality-at-large voting (multiple non-transferable vote, MTNV) | limited party block voting | Winner-take-all | No | multi-winner | candidate | plurality | multiple choice | =number of winners | — |
Limited voting (LV) limited block voting partial block voting (multiple non-transferable vote, MNTV) | limited party block voting | semi-proportional | No | multi-winner | candidate | plurality | multiple choice | <number of winners | — |
Single non-transferable vote (SNTV) | semi-proportional | No | multi-winner | candidate | plurality | single choice | 1 | — | |
Single transferable vote (STV) Hare–Clark electoral system[2] (proportional ranked-choice voting)[3] | semi-proportional /proportional | No | multi-winner | candidate | quota | ranked choice (ordinal voting) | 1 (effectively) | — | |
Instant-runoff voting (IRV)[4] (Alternative vote - AV)[5] (Ranked-choice voting - RCV)[6] (Single-transferable vote - STV) (Hare's method)[7] | contingent vote, | Winner-take-all | No | single-winner | candidate | majority | ranked choice (ordinal voting) | 1 (effectively) | — |
Two-round system (TRS)[8] Runoff voting | Non-partisan primary, | Winner-take-all | No | single-winner | candidate | majoritymajoritarian | single choice | 1 (each round) | — |
Two-round block voting (majority block voting)(multiple non-transferable vote, MNTV) | Winner-take-all | No | multi-winner | candidate | majority | multiple choice | =number of winners (each round) | — | |
Multiple transferable vote (MTV) (Preferential block voting) | majoritarian | No | multi-winner | candidate | majority | ranked choice (ordinal voting) | =number of winners, effectively | — | |
Exhaustive ballot | majoritarian | No | single-winner /multi-winner | candidate | majority | single choice | 1 | — | |
Cumulative voting | panachage (certain types) | majoritarian /semi-proportional | No | single-winner /multi-winner | candidate | plurality | cumulative ballot | >1 | — |
Approval voting(AV)[9] | block approval voting | majoritarian | No | single-winner /multi-winner | candidate | plurality | multiple choice | any number (max. one for one candidate) | — |
Score voting Range voting | Approval voting (score voting 0-1) | majoritarian /semi-proportional | No | single-winner /multi-winner | candidate | plurality | score ballot(cardinal voting) | — | |
Borda count | majoritarian /semi-proportional | No | single-winner /multi-winner | candidate | plurality | ranked choice (ordinal voting) | — | ||
Condorcet method | Copeland's method, Dodgson's method,Kemeny–Young method,Minimax,Nanson's method,ranked pairs,Schulze method,Tideman's alternative methods | majoritarian | No | single-winner | candidate | majority against every candidate | ranked choice (ordinal voting) | — | |
Party-list proportional representation list-PR | Largest remainderHighest averagesBinomial voting | semi-proportional /proportional | No | multi-winner | list (+ candidate, ifopen list) | quota ordivisor method | single choice | 1 (effectively) | — |
Superposition - non-compensatory combination of FPTP + List-PR (Supplementary member system) | Two-round system + List-PR | semi-proportional | Yes | multi-winner(+ single-winner in districts) | candidate +list | mixed non-compensatory | single choice | 2 (each tier) | 2 |
Seat-linkage compensatory combination of FPTP + List-PR | mixed single vote versionbest-loser mixed-member proportional | semi-proportional /proportional | Yes | multi-winner(+ single-winner in districts) | candidate +list | mixed compensatory | single choice | 2 (each tier) | 2 |
Vote-linkage compensatory combination of FPTP + List-PR Positive vote transfer system (PVT)[12] (mixed single vote - MSV[13]) (Additional member system - AMS) | negative vote transfer | semi-proportional /proportional | Yes | multi-winner(+ single-winner in districts) | candidate +list | mixed compensatory | single choice | 1 | 2 |
Dual member proportional (DMP)[14] | semi-proportional /proportional | Yes | multi-winner (one elected byFirst-past-the-post voting; the other due to party list PR system | list or candidate | plurality (votes cast outside district have an effect) | single choice | 1 | 1 |
Electoral system | Subtype / combination | Type of representation | Countries and territories that use it to elect primary (lower) chamber of legislature |
---|---|---|---|
First-past-the-post(FPTP/FPP)[1] Single-member plurality (SMP/SMDP) | no | Winner-take-all (single-winner) | Antigua and Barbuda, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belize, Bhutan, Botswana, Canada, Côte d'Ivoire, Dominica, Gambia, Ghana, Grenada, Jamaica, India, Kenya, Liberia, Madagascar, Malawi, Malaysia, Maldives, Micronesia, Myanmar, Nigeria, St. Kitts and Nevis, St. Lucia, Palau, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Trinidad and Tobago, Turkmenistan, Uganda, United Kingdom, St. Vincent and the Grenadines, Zambia |
General ticket Party-list plurality block voting (PBV) | no | Winner-take-all | Singapore |
Plurality block voting (BV) plurality-at-large voting | no | Winner-take-all | Laos, Lebanon, Mauritius, Oman, Syria, Tonga, Tuvalu, Vietnam |
Limited voting (LV) limited block voting | no | Semi-proportional | |
Single non-transferable vote (SNTV) | no | Semi-proportional | |
Single transferable vote (STV) | no | Semi-proportional / Proportional | Ireland, Malta |
Instant-runoff voting (IRV)[4] | no | Semi-proportional | Australia, Papua New Guinea |
Two-round system (TRS)[8] Runoff voting | no | Winner-take-all (single-winner) | France |
Two-round block voting majority block voting | no | Winner-take-all | |
Borda count | no | Semi-proportional | Nauru |
Modifiedcumulative voting | no | Semi-proportional | Norfolk Island |
Party-list proportional representation (list-PR) | Closed list | Proportional | |
Closed list, locally personalized | Proportional | Germany | |
Open list for some parties | Proportional | Colombia | |
Open list | Proportional | Albania, Algeria, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Chile, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Fiji, Finland, Iceland, Indonesia, Jordan, Kosovo, Latvia, Netherlands, Norway, Peru, Poland, Sierra Leone, Slovakia, Slovenia, Sri Lanka, Suriname, Sweden | |
Panachage | Proportional | Ecuador, El Salvador, Honduras, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Switzerland | |
Superposition - non-compensatory combination of FPTP + List-PR Parallel voting,Supplementary member system | FPTP + List-PR (two votes) | Semi-proportional | Cameroon, D.R.Congo, Japan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Nepal, Philippines,[a] Russia, South Korea (de facto),[b][a] Taiwan, Venezuela, Thailand[a] |
FPTP + List-PR (tied votes) | Semi-proportional | Italy | |
FPTP + List-PR (proportional to FPTP) | Winner-take-all / Semi-proportional | Pakistan, Tanzania, Zimbabwe | |
TRS + List-PR | Semi-proportional | Egypt, Lithuania, Tajikistan | |
BV/PBV + List-PR | Semi-proportional | Andorra, Mauritania, Senegal, Monaco | |
Seat-linkage compensatory combination of FPTP + List-PR | FPTP + List-PR | Semi-proportional / Proportional | Bolivia, Lesotho, New Zealand |
FPTP + List-PR (hybrid) | Semi-proportional | South Korea (de jure)[b][a] | |
FPTP + List-PR (limited disproportionality) | Semi-proportional | Mexico | |
Vote-linkage (compensatory) combination of FPTP + List-PR | FPTP + List-PR | Semi-proportional | Hungary |
Majority bonus system | List-PR with plurality bonus | Semi-proportional | Greece |
Majority jackpot system | Majority jackpot | Winner-take-all / Semi-proportional | Djibouti |
Majority/minority jackpot | Semi-proportional | Armenia | |
Two-round majority jackpot | Semi-proportional / Proportional | San Marino |
Electoral system for national legislatures (lower house or unicameral) |
---|
![]() |
Majoritarian representation (winner-take-all) Semi-proportional representation (non-mixed) No election (e.g. Monarchy) |
{{cite journal}}
:Cite journal requires|journal=
(help){{cite journal}}
:Cite journal requires|journal=
(help)