"Topological equivalence" redirects here. For the concept in dynamical systems, seeTopological conjugacy.
An often-repeatedmathematical joke is that topologists cannot tell the difference between acoffee mug and adonut,[1] since a sufficiently pliabledonut could be reshaped to the form of acoffee mug by creating a dimple and progressively enlarging it, while preserving the donut hole in the mug's handle. This illustrates that a coffee mug and a donut (torus) are homeomorphic.
Very roughly speaking, a topological space is ageometric object, and a homeomorphism results from a continuous deformation of the object into a new shape. Thus, asquare and acircle are homeomorphic to each other, but asphere and atorus are not. However, this description can be misleading. Some continuous deformations do not result into homeomorphisms, such as the deformation of a line into a point. Some homeomorphisms do not result from continuous deformations, such as the homeomorphism between atrefoil knot and a circle.Homotopy andisotopy are precise definitions for the informal concept ofcontinuous deformation.
A homeomorphism is sometimes called abicontinuous function. If such a function exists, and arehomeomorphic. Aself-homeomorphism is a homeomorphism from a topological space onto itself. Being "homeomorphic" is anequivalence relation on topological spaces. Itsequivalence classes are calledhomeomorphism classes.
The third requirement, that becontinuous, is essential. Consider for instance the function (theunit circle in) defined by This function is bijective and continuous, but not a homeomorphism ( iscompact but is not). The function is not continuous at the point because although maps to anyneighbourhood of this point also includes points that the function maps close to but the points it maps to numbers in between lie outside the neighbourhood.[4]
In some contexts, there are homeomorphic objects that cannot be continuously deformed from one to the other.Homotopy andisotopy are equivalence relations that have been introduced for dealing with such situations.
Similarly, as usual in category theory, given two spaces that are homeomorphic, the space of homeomorphisms between them, is atorsor for the homeomorphism groups and and, given a specific homeomorphism between and all three sets are identified.[clarification needed]
A thickenedtrefoil knot is homeomorphic to a solid torus, but notisotopic in Continuous mappings are not always realizable as deformations.
The openinterval is homeomorphic to thereal numbers for any (In this case, a bicontinuous forward mapping is given by while other such mappings are given by scaled and translated versions of thetan orarg tanh functions).
The unit 2-disc and theunit square in are homeomorphic; since the unit disc can be deformed into the unit square. An example of a bicontinuous mapping from the square to the disc is, inpolar coordinates,
Thestereographic projection is a homeomorphism between the unit sphere in with a single point removed and the set of all points in (a 2-dimensionalplane).
If is atopological group, its inversion map is a homeomorphism. Also, for any the left translation the right translation and the inner automorphism are homeomorphisms.
The Euclideanreal line is not homeomorphic to the unit circle as a subspace of, since the unit circle iscompact as a subspace of Euclidean but the real line is not compact.
The one-dimensional intervals and are not homeomorphic because one is compact while the other is not.
Two homeomorphic spaces share the sametopological properties. For example, if one of them iscompact, then the other is as well; if one of them isconnected, then the other is as well; if one of them isHausdorff, then the other is as well; theirhomotopy andhomology groups will coincide. Note however that this does not extend to properties defined via ametric; there are metric spaces that are homeomorphic even though one of them iscomplete and the other is not.
The intuitive criterion of stretching, bending, cutting and gluing back together takes a certain amount of practice to apply correctly—it may not be obvious from the description above that deforming aline segment to a point is impermissible, for instance. It is thus important to realize that it is the formal definition given above that counts. In this case, for example, the line segment possesses infinitely many points, and therefore cannot be put into a bijection with a set containing only a finite number of points, including a single point.
This characterization of a homeomorphism often leads to a confusion with the concept ofhomotopy, which is actuallydefined as a continuous deformation, but from onefunction to another, rather than one space to another. In the case of a homeomorphism, envisioning a continuous deformation is a mental tool for keeping track of which points on spaceX correspond to which points onY—one just follows them asX deforms. In the case of homotopy, the continuous deformation from one map to the other is of the essence, and it is also less restrictive, since none of the maps involved need to be one-to-one or onto. Homotopy does lead to a relation on spaces:homotopy equivalence.
There is a name for the kind of deformation involved in visualizing a homeomorphism. It is (except when cutting and regluing are required) anisotopy between theidentity map onX and the homeomorphism fromX toY.
Isometric isomorphism – Distance-preserving mathematical transformationPages displaying short descriptions of redirect targets is an isomorphism betweenmetric spaces
^Poincaré, H. (1895).Analysis Situs. Journal de l'Ecole polytechnique. Gauthier-Villars.OCLC715734142. Archived fromthe original on 11 June 2016. Retrieved29 April 2018. Poincaré, Henri (2010).Papers on Topology: Analysis Situs and Its Five Supplements. Translated by Stillwell, John. American Mathematical Society.ISBN978-0-8218-5234-7.