Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

German campaign of 1813

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected fromGerman Campaign of 1813)
Conflict between France and an alliance
German campaign
Part of theWar of the Sixth Coalition

Click an image to load the battle.
Left to right, top to bottom:
Battles of
Lutzen,Katzbach,Dresden,Kulm,Leipzig,Hanau
DateJanuary–October 1813
Location
ResultCoalition victory
Territorial
changes
Belligerents
 Russia
 United Kingdom
NetherlandsNetherlands
 Sweden
German states:
 Austria
 Prussia
Grand Duchy of Mecklenburg-SchwerinMecklenburg-Schwerin
 Hanover
 Bavaria
Kingdom of SaxonySaxony
 Württemberg

 France

Commanders and leaders
Russian EmpireAlexander I
SwedenCrown Prince Karl Johan
Austrian EmpireFrancis I
Austrian EmpireKarl von Schwarzenberg
Kingdom of PrussiaFrederick William III
Kingdom of PrussiaLudwig Yorck von Wartenburg
Kingdom of PrussiaGebhard Leberecht von Blücher
Kingdom of PrussiaFriedrich Wilhelm von Bülow
Kingdom of BavariaMaximilian I Joseph
Grand Duchy of Mecklenburg-SchwerinFrederick Francis I
Kingdom of SaxonyFrederick Augustus
Kingdom of WürttembergFrederick I
Russian EmpireBarclay de Tolly
Russian EmpireLevin August von Bennigsen
Russian EmpireMatvei Platov
Russian EmpirePeter Wittgenstein
NetherlandsWilliam I of Orange-Nassau
United Kingdom of Great Britain and IrelandElectorate of Brunswick-LüneburgGeorge III
United Kingdom of Great Britain and IrelandRobert Jenkinson
First French EmpireNapoleon I
First French EmpirePierre Augereau
First French EmpireJean-Baptiste Bessières 
First French EmpireLouis-Nicolas Davout
First French EmpireJacques MacDonald
First French EmpireAuguste de Marmont
First French EmpireÉdouard Mortier
First French EmpireMichel Ney
First French EmpireNicolas Oudinot
First French EmpireLaurent de Gouvion Saint-Cyr
First French EmpireJean-de-Dieu Soult
First French EmpireClaude Victor-Perrin
First French EmpireJacques Lauriston (POW)
Józef Poniatowski 
Kingdom of Italy (Napoleonic)Eugène de Beauharnais
Kingdom of NaplesJoachim Murat
Strength

16 August 1813:
Total: 860,000 men[2]

Field army:
512,113 men[2]
1,380 guns[2]

16 August 1813:
Total: 700,000 men[3]

Field army:
442,810 men[4]
1,284 guns[4]
Casualties and losses
360,000[5][b]
  • 275,000 killed and wounded
  • 85,000 captured and missing
460,000[5][c]
  • 270,000 killed and wounded
  • 190,000 captured and missing
Casualty statistics are the total losses of 1813.
German campaign
Campaign in north-east France
Campaign in south-west France
Adriatic campaign
Italian campaign
Low Countries campaign [de]
Other battles

TheGerman campaign (German:Befreiungskriege,lit.'Wars of Liberation') was fought in 1813. Members of theSixth Coalition, including the German states of Austria and Prussia, plus Russia and Sweden, fought a series of battles in Germany against the French EmperorNapoleon, his marshals, and the armies of theConfederation of the Rhine – an alliance of most of the other German states –, which ended the domination of theFirst French Empire.[d]

After the devastating defeat of Napoleon'sGrande Armée in theRussian campaign of 1812,Johann Yorck – the general in command of theGrande Armée's German auxiliaries (Hilfskorps) – declared a ceasefire with the Russians on 30 December 1812 via theConvention of Tauroggen. This was the decisive factor in the outbreak of the German campaign the following year.

The spring campaign between France and the Sixth Coalition ended inconclusively with a summer truce (Truce of Pläswitz). Via theTrachenberg Plan, developed during a period of ceasefire in the summer of 1813, the ministers of Prussia, Russia, and Sweden agreed to pursue a single allied strategy against Napoleon. Following the end of the ceasefire, Austria eventually sided with the coalition, thwarting Napoleon's hopes of reaching separate agreements with Austria and Russia. The coalition now had a clear numerical superiority, which they eventually brought to bear on Napoleon's main forces, despite earlier setbacks such as theBattle of Dresden. The high point of allied strategy was theBattle of Leipzig in October 1813, which ended in a decisive defeat for Napoleon. The Confederation of the Rhine was dissolved following the battle with many of its former member states joining the Coalition, breaking Napoleon's hold over Germany.

After a delay in which a new strategy was agreed upon, in early 1814 the coalitioninvaded France, coinciding with the march ofDuke of Wellington's British army northward from Spain into southern France. Napoleon was forced to abdicate andLouis XVIII assumed the French throne. The war came to a formal end with theTreaty of Paris in May 1814.

‹ Thetemplate below (Campaignbox Russo–German conflicts) is being considered for deletion. Seetemplates for discussion to help reach a consensus. ›
Russo-German wars
Medieval
Teutonic and Livonian
German States of the HRE and Prussia
Rhin Confederation and Helvetic Republic
German Confederation
2nd German Empire and Austro-Hungarian Empire
Soviet Union
Tsarist Russia
Soviet Union
Modern Russia
Map
About OpenStreetMaps
Maps: terms of use
180km
112miles
19
19 Siege of Hamburg from 24 December 1813 to 12 May 1814
19 Siege of Hamburg from 24 December 1813 to 12 May 1814
18
18 Battle of Sehested from 10 December 1813
18 Battle of Sehested from 10 December 1813
17
17 Battle of Hanau from 30 to 31 October 1813
17 Battle of Hanau from 30 to 31 October 1813
16
Leipzig
16 Battle of Leipzig from 16 to 19 October 1813
16 Battle of Leipzig from 16 to 19 October 1813
15
15 Battle of Wartenburg on 3 October 1813
15 Battle of Wartenburg on 3 October 1813
14
14 Combat of Roßlau on 29 September 1813
14 Combat of Roßlau on 29 September 1813
13
13 Battle of Altenburg on 28 September 1813
13 Battle of Altenburg on 28 September 1813
12
12 Battle of the Göhrde on 16 September 1813
12 Battle of the Göhrde on 16 September 1813
11
11 Battle of Dennewitz on 6 September 1813
11 Battle of Dennewitz on 6 September 1813
10
10 Battle of Kulm from 29 to 30 August 1813
10 Battle of Kulm from 29 to 30 August 1813
9
9 Battle of Dresden from 26 to 27 August 1813
9 Battle of Dresden from 26 to 27 August 1813
8
8 Battle of the Katzbach on 26 August 1813
8 Battle of the Katzbach on 26 August 1813
7
7 Battle of Großbeeren on 23 August 1813
7 Battle of Großbeeren on 23 August 1813
6
6 Battle of Luckau on 4 June 1813
6 Battle of Luckau on 4 June 1813
5
5 Battle of Haynau on 26 May 1813
5 Battle of Haynau on 26 May 1813
4
4 Battle of Bautzen (1813) from 20 to 21 May 1813
4 Battle of Bautzen (1813) from 20 to 21 May 1813
3
3 Battle of Lützen (1813) on 2 May 1813
3 Battle of Lützen (1813) on 2 May 1813
2
2 Battle of Möckern on 5 April 1813
2 Battle of Möckern on 5 April 1813
1
1 Siege of Danzig (1813) from 16 January to 29 November 1813
1 Siege of Danzig (1813) from 16 January to 29 November 1813
  Napoleon in command
  Napoleon not in command
Battles of the German campaign inscribed on a medal
TheLützow Free Corps in action

Background

[edit]

Since 1806 writers and intellectuals such asJohann Philipp Palm,Johann Gottlieb Fichte,Ernst Moritz Arndt,Friedrich Ludwig Jahn, andTheodor Körner had been criticising the French occupation of much of Germany. They advocated limitations to the dynastic princes of Germany and a joint effort by all Germans, including Prussians and Austrians, to eject the French. From 1810, Arndt and Jahn repeatedly asked high-ranking figures in Prussian society to prepare such an uprising. Jahn himself organised the German League and made a major contribution to the founding of theLützow Free Corps. These forerunners took part in the outbreak of hostilities in Germany, both by serving in the armed forces and by backing the coalition through their writings.[citation needed]

Even before the German campaign, there had been uprisings against French troops occupying Germany – these had broken out from 1806 onwards inHesse and in 1809 during theTyrolean Rebellion. These uprisings intensified in the same year underWilhelm von Dörnberg, the initiator and commander-in-chief of the Hessian uprising, and MajorFerdinand von Schill.[citation needed]

Course

[edit]

Following the near-destruction ofNapoleon'sGrande Armée in Russia in 1812,Johann Yorck – the general in command of theGrande Armée's German auxiliaries (Hilfskorps) from the Confederation of the Rhine – declared a ceasefire with the Russians on 30 December 1812 via theConvention of Tauroggen. This was the decisive factor in the outbreak of the German campaign the following year.[citation needed]

On 17 March 1813 – the day EmperorAlexander I of Russia arrived in the Hoflager of KingFrederick William III – Prussia declared war on France. On 20 March 1813, theSchlesische privilegierte Zeitung newspaper published Frederick's speech entitledAn Mein Volk, delivered on 17 March and calling for a war of liberation. In addition to newly formed Prussian units such as theLandwehr andLandsturm, the initial fighting was undertaken by volunteers such as German volunteer troops,Jäger units,Free Corps (such as theLützow Free Corps), and troops from Russia, (from the summer of 1813 onwards) Sweden underCrown Prince Charles John (the former French marshal Jean-Baptiste Bernadotte), andAustria under Field MarshalKarl von Schwarzenberg. Already busy with maintaining naval supremacy and fighting in thePeninsular War, Great Britain did not take any direct part in the German campaign, though it sent subsidies to support it.[citation needed] A single congreave rocket battery commanded by CaptainRichard Bogue took part in the 1813 campaign. He was killed at Leipzig.

The War of Liberation

[edit]

The Convention of Tauroggen became the starting-point ofPrussia's regeneration. As the news of the destruction of theGrande Armée spread, and the appearance of countless stragglers convinced the Prussian people of the reality of the disaster, the spirit generated by years of French domination burst out. For the moment the king and his ministers were placed in a position of the greatest anxiety, for they knew the resources of France and the boundless versatility of their arch-enemy far too well to imagine that the end of their sufferings was yet in sight. To disavow the acts and desires of the army and of the secret societies for defence with which all north Germany was honeycombed would be to imperil the very existence of the monarchy, whilst an attack on the remnants of theGrande Armée meant the certainty of a terrible retribution from the new French armies now rapidly forming on the Rhine.[6]

But the Russians and the soldiers were resolved to continue the campaign, and working in collusion they put pressure on the not unwilling representatives of the civil power to facilitate the supply and equipment of such troops as were still in the field; they could not refuse food and shelter to their starving countrymen or their loyal allies, and thus by degrees the French garrisons scattered about the country either found themselves surrounded or were compelled to retire to avoid that fate. Thus it happened that PrinceEugène de Beauharnais, the viceroy of Italy, felt compelled to retreat from the positions that Napoleon ordered him to hold at al costs to his advanced position atPoznań (German: Posen), where about 14,000 men had gradually rallied around him, and to withdraw step by step toMagdeburg, where he met reinforcements and commanded the whole course of the lowerElbe.[7]

Napoleon's preparations

[edit]
Napoleon in 1812. Painting byJacques-Louis David.

Meanwhile in Paris, Napoleon had been raising and organizing a new army for the reconquest of Prussia. Thanks to his having compelled his allies to fight his battles for him, he had not as yet drawn very heavily on the fighting resources of France, the actual percentage of men taken by the conscriptions during the years since 1806 being actually lower than that in force in continental armies of today.[when?] He had also created in 1811–1812 a newNational Guard, organized in cohorts to distinguish it from the regular army, and for home defence only, and these by a skillful appeal to their patriotism and judicious pressure applied through theprefects, became a useful reservoir of half-trained men for new battalions of the active army. Levies were also made with rigorous severity in the states of the Rhine Confederation, and even Italy was called on for fresh sacrifices. In this manner by the end of March, 200,000 men were moving towards the Elbe,[e] and in the first fortnight of April, they were duly concentrated in the angle formed by the Elbe and Saale, threatening on the one hand Berlin and on the other, Dresden and the east.[7]

Spring campaign

[edit]
Map of the spring campaign

The coalition, aware of the gradual strengthening of their enemy's forces but themselves as yet unable to put more than 200,000 in the field, had left a small corps of observation oppositeMagdeburg and along theElbe to give timely notice of an advance towards Berlin; and with the bulk of their forces having taken up position nearDresden, whence they had determined to march down the course of the Elbe and roll up the French from right to left. Both armies were very indifferently supplied with information, as both were without any reliable regular cavalry capable of piercing the screen of outposts with which each endeavoured to conceal his disposition, and Napoleon, operating in mostly unfriendly territory, suffered more in this respect than his adversaries.[7]

On 25 April, Napoleon reachedErfurt and assumed command. That same day, his troops stood in the following positions. Eugène, withMarshal Jacques MacDonald's and GeneralsJacques Lauriston's andJean Reynier's corps on the lower Saale, MarshalMichel Ney in front ofWeimar, holding thedefile ofKösen; theImperial Guard at Erfurt, MarshalAuguste de Marmont atGotha, GeneralHenri Bertrand atSaalfeld, and MarshalNicolas Oudinot atCoburg, and during the next few days the whole were set in motion towards Merseburg and Leipzig, in the now stereotyped Napoleonic order, a strong advanced guard of all arms leading, the remainder—about two-thirds of the whole—following as "masse de manœuvre", this time, owing to the cover afforded by the Elbe on the left, to the right rear of the advanced guard.[7]

Meanwhile, the Prussians and Russians had concentrated all available men and were moving in an almost parallel line, but somewhat to the south of the direction taken by the French. On 1 May, Napoleon and the advance guard enteredLützen. Russian GeneralPeter Wittgenstein, who now commanded the Coalition allies in place of Field MarshalMikhail Kutuzov, hearing of his approach, had decided to attack the French advance guard, which he mistakenly believed to be their whole force, on its right flank, and during the morning had drawn together the bulk of his forces on his right in the vicinity ofGross-Görschen and Kaya.[7]

Battle of Lützen

[edit]
Main article:Battle of Lützen (1813)
The Battle of Lützen

At around 09:00 on 2 May, Wittgenstein began his attack on the French advance guard in Lützen, whilst the remainder of his army was directed against Napoleon's right and rear. Just as the latter were moving off the heads of the French main body suddenly appeared, and at 11:00 Napoleon, then standing near the Gustavus Adolphus Monument on the field of Lützen, heard the roar of a heavy cannonade to his right rear. He realized the situation in a moment, galloped to the scene, and at once grouped his forces for a decisive action—the gift in which he was supreme. Leaving the leading troops to repulse as best they might the furious attack of the Prussians and Russians, and caring little whether they lost ground, he rapidly organized for his own control a battle-reserve. At length when both sides were exhausted by their efforts, he sent forward nearly a hundred guns which tore into the enemy's line with caseshot and marched his reserve right through the gap. Had he possessed an adequate cavalry force, the victory would have been decisive. As it was, the coalition retreated in good order and the French were too exhausted for a pursuit.[7]

In the opinion of the military historian Frederic Maude writing in theEncyclopædia Britannica 11th Edition (1911) perhaps no battle better exemplifies the inherent strength of Napoleon's strategy, and in none was his grasp of the battlefield more brilliantly displayed, for, as he fully recognized, "These Prussians have at last learnt something—they are no longer the wooden toys of Frederick the Great",[7] and, on the other hand, the relative inferiority of his own men as compared with his veterans ofAusterlitz called for far more individual effort than on any previous day. He was everywhere, encouraging and compelling his men—it is a legend in the French army that the persuasion even of the imperial boot was used upon some of his reluctant conscripts, and in the result his system was fully justified, as it triumphed even against a great tactical surprise.[7]

Battle of Bautzen

[edit]
Main article:Battle of Bautzen (1813)
GeneralGebhard Leberecht von Blücher andCossacks in Bautzen, 1813

As soon as possible the army pressed on in pursuit, Ney being sent across the Elbe to turn the position of the Coalition allies at Dresden. This threat forced the latter to evacuate the town and retire over the Elbe, after blowing up the stone bridge across the river. Napoleon entered the town hard on their heels, but the broken bridge caused a delay of four days, there being no pontoon trains with the army. Ultimately on 18 May the march was renewed, but the Coalition allies had continued their retreat in leisurely fashion, picking up reinforcements by the way. Arrived at the line of the Spree, they took up and fortified a very formidable position aboutBautzen. Here, on 20 May, they were attacked, and after atwo-day battle dislodged by Napoleon; but the weakness of the French cavalry conditioned both the form of the attack, which was less effective than usual, and the results of the victory, which were extremely meagre.[7]

The Coalition allies broke off the action at their own time and retired in such good order that Napoleon failed to capture a single trophy as proof of his victory. The enemy's escape annoyed him greatly, the absence of captured guns and prisoners reminded him too much of his Russian experiences, and he redoubled his demands on his corps commanders for greater vigour in the pursuit. This led the latter to push on without due regard to tactical precautions, and Blücher took advantage of their carelessness when at theBattle of Haynau (26 May), with some twenty squadrons of Landwehr cavalry, he surprised, rode over and almost destroyed GeneralNicolas Maison's division. The material loss inflicted on the French was not very great, but its effect in raising the morale of the raw Prussian cavalry and increasing their confidence in their old commander was enormous.[7]

The occupations of Hamburg

[edit]

Meanwhile, on 19 May 1813, a Swedish corps of 15,000 occupied Hamburg without orders from Bernadotte, following a Danish declaration that they would hold the city for Napoleon, irrevocably binding Denmark to France, an action that would guarantee full Swedish cooperation in North Germany. The Swedish occupation of Hamburg came as welcome news to the Allies, insofar as holding a wealthy center of finance was a blow against Napoleon. However, Bernadotte's initial misgivings at extending his troops so far from the Allied lines were validated when Marshal Davout approached Hamburg with a large French force of 35,000, intent on retaking the city. The Swedes quietly withdrew on 26 May and Davout would occupy the city until after Napoleon's abdication in 1814. It would be the last major action of the spring before the Armistice of Pläswitz.[8]

Summer truce

[edit]

Still, the coalition continued their retreat and the French were unable to force them into battle. In view of the doubtful attitude of Austria, Napoleon became alarmed at the gradual lengthening of his lines of communication and opened negotiations. The enemy, having everything to gain and nothing to lose thereby, agreed finally to a six weeks suspension of arms under the terms of theTruce of Pläswitz. In Maude's opinion, this was perhaps the gravest error of Napoleon's military career.[9]

During the armistice, three Allied sovereigns, Alexander of Russia, Frederick William of Prussia, and Bernadotte of Sweden (by then Regent of the Kingdom due to his adoptive father's illness) met at Trachenberg Castle in Silesia to coordinate the war effort. Allied staffs began creating a plan for the campaign wherein Bernadotte put to use his twenty years of experience as a French general, as well as his familiarity with Napoleon.[10] The result was the Trachenberg Plan, authored primarily by Bernadotte, with contributions from the Austrian Chief of Staff, Field-Marshal Lieutenant Joseph Radetzky, that sought to wear down the French using a Fabian Strategy, avoiding direct combat with Napoleon, engaging and defeating his marshals whenever possible and slowly encircling the French with three independent armies until the French Emperor could be cornered and brought to battle against vastly superior numbers.[11]

Following the conference, the Allies stood up their three armies: The Army of Silesia, with 95,000 Prussians and Russians, commanded by Field Marshal Gebhard von Blücher, the Army of the North, 135,000 Swedes, Russians, Prussians, and German troops from Mecklenburg, the Hanseatic region and North Germany, under the independent command of Sweden's Crown Prince Bernadotte, and the primary Allied force in the field, with which the Allied sovereigns Alexander, Francis and Frederick William oversaw the Campaign, numbering 225,000 Austrians and Russians commanded by Prince Karl von Schwarzenberg.[12][13]

Autumn campaign

[edit]

As soon as a suspension of arms (to 15 August) had been agreed to, Napoleon hastened to withdraw his troops from the dangerous position they occupied with reference to the passes leading over the mountains fromBohemia, for he entertained no doubt now that Austria was also to be considered as an enemy. Finally he decided to group his corps roundGörlitz andBautzen whence they could either meet the enemy advancing fromBreslau or fall on his flank over the mountains if they attempted to force their way intoSaxony by the valley of the Elbe. This latter manoeuvre depended, however, on his maintenance of Dresden, and to this end he sent the I Corps up the Elbe toPirna andKönigstein to cover the fortifications of Dresden itself. His instructions on this point deserve the closest study, for he foresaw the inevitable attraction which a complete entrenched camp would exercise even upon himself, and, therefore, limited his engineers to the construction of a strong bridge head on the right bank and a continuousenceinte, broken only by gaps for counter attack, around the town itself.[14]

Then Napoleon turned his attention to the plan for the coming campaign. Seeing clearly that his want of an efficient cavalry precluded all ideas of a resolute offensive in his old style, he determined to limit himself to a defence of the line of the Elbe, making only dashes of a few days duration at any target the enemy might present.[14]

Reinforcements had been coming up without ceasing and at the beginning of August Napoleon calculated that he would have 300,000 men available about Bautzen and 100,000 along the Elbe fromHamburg via Magdeburg toTorgau. With the latter he determined to strike the first blow, by a concentric advance on Berlin (which he calculated he would reach on the 4th or 5th day), the movement being continued thence to extricate the French garrisons inKüstrin,Stettin and Danzig. The moral effect, he promised himself, would be prodigious, and there was neither room nor food for these 100,000 elsewhere.[14]

Towards the close of the armistice Napoleon learned the general situation of the Coalition allies. The Crown Prince of Sweden, Charles John, formerly MarshalJean Baptiste Jules Bernadotte, with his Swedes, a Russian corps, a North German contingent of 10,000, two Prussian corps, and various Prussian levies, 135,000 in all, lay in and around Berlin and Stettin; and knowing his former marshal well, Napoleon considered Oudinot a match for him. Blücher with about 95,000 Russians and Prussians were about Breslau, and Schwarzenberg, with nearly 180,000 Austrians and Russians, lay in Bohemia. In his position at Bautzen he felt himself equal to all his enemy's combinations.[14]

Battle of Dresden

[edit]
Main article:Battle of Dresden
Napoleon crossing the Elbe byJózef Brodowski (1895)

The advance towards Berlin began punctually with the expiration of the armistice. However Napoleon, in command of the main French army, waited to see more clearly his adversaries' plans. At length becoming impatient he advanced a portion of his army towards Blücher, who fell back to draw him into a trap. Then the news reached Napoleon that Schwarzenberg was pressing down the valley of the Elbe, and, leaving Macdonald to observe Blücher, he hurried back to Bautzen to dispose his troops to cross the Bohemian mountains in the general direction of Königstein, a blow which must have had decisive results. But the news from Dresden was so alarming that at the last moment he changed his mind, and sendingVandamme alone over the mountains, he hurried with his whole army to the threatened point. This march remains one of the most extraordinary in history, for the bulk of his forces moved, mainly in mass and across country, 90 miles (140 km) in 72 hours, entering Dresden on the morning of 27 August, only a few hours before the attack of the Coalition allies commenced.[14]

Dresden was the last great victory of the First Empire. By noon on 27 August the Austrians and Russians were completely beaten and in full retreat, the French pressing hard behind them, but meanwhile Napoleon himself again succumbed to one of his unaccountable attacks of apparent intellectual paralysis. He seemed unaware of the vital importance of the moment, crouched shivering over a bivouac fire, and finally rode back to Dresden, leaving no specific orders for the further pursuit.[15]

French defeats

[edit]
The Battle of the Katzbach, byEduard Kaempffer

The Coalition allies, however, continued to retreat, and unfortunately for the French, Vandamme, with his single corps and unsupported, issued out of the mountains on their flank, threw himself across their line of retreat near Kulm, and was completely overwhelmed by sheer weight of numbers (Battle of Kulm, 29 August). In spite of this misfortune, Napoleon could claim a brilliant success for himself, but almost at the same moment news reached him that Oudinot had been severely defeated at theBattle of Grossbeeren (23 August) near Berlin by Bernadotte as had Macdonald at theBattle of Katzbach (26 August) by Blücher.[16]

Napoleon's movements

[edit]

During the next two days Napoleon examined his situation and dictated a series of notes which have been a puzzle to every strategical thinker ever since. In these he seems suddenly to have cut adrift from every military principle the truth of which the French military so brilliantly demonstrated for decades, in them he considers plans based on hypothesis, not knowledge, and on the importance of geographical points without reference to the enemy's field army.[16]

From these reveries he was at length awakened by news which indicated that the consequences of Macdonald's defeat had been far more serious to the morale of that command than he had imagined. He immediately rode over to establish order, and his manner and violence were so improper that Caulaincourt had the greatest difficulty in concealing the scandal.[16]

Blücher, however, hearing of Napoleon's arrival, at once retreated and Napoleon followed, thus uncovering the passes over the Bohemian mountains, a fact of which Schwarzenberg was quick to take advantage. Learning of his approach, Napoleon again withdrew to Bautzen.[16]

Then hearing that the Austrians had counter-marched and were again moving towards Dresden, Napoleon hastened back there, concentrated as many men as could conveniently be handled, and advanced beyond Pirna and Königstein to meet him. But the Austrians had no intention of attacking him, for time was now working on their side and, leaving his men to starve in the exhausted district, Napoleon again returned to Dresden, where for the rest of the month he remained in an extraordinary state of vacillation. On 4 October he again drew up a review of the situation, in which he apparently contemplated giving up his communications with France and wintering in and around Dresden, though at the same time he is aware of the distress amongst his men for want of food.[16]

Leipzig campaign

[edit]

Meanwhile Blücher, Schwarzenberg, and Bernadotte were working round Napoleon's flanks. Ney, who had joined Oudinot after Grossbeeren, was defeated at theBattle of Dennewitz (6 September) by Bernadotte's Army of the North, with Prussian troops doing a majority of the fighting until the end of the battle when Swedish and Russian troops arrived and routed the French.[17][18] Suddenly Napoleon's plans were again reviewed and completely changed. Calling upSt Cyr, whom he had already warned to remain at Dresden with his command, he decided to fall back towards Erfurt, and go into winter quarters between that place and Magdeburg, pointing out that Dresden was of no use to him as a base and that if he were to have a battle, it was much better have St Cyr and his men with him than at Dresden.[16]

On 7 October Napoleon drew up a final plan, in which one again recognizes the old commander, and this he immediately proceeded to put into execution, for he was now quite aware of the danger threatening his line of retreat from both Blücher and Schwarzenberg and the North Army; yet only a few hours afterwards the portion of the order relating to St Cyr and Lobau was cancelled and the two were finally left behind at Dresden. From the 10 to 13 October Napoleon lay at Düben, again a prey to the most extraordinary irresolution, but on that day he thought he saw his opportunity. Blücher was reported near Wittenberg, and Schwarzenberg was moving slowly round to the south of Leipzig. The North Army under Bernadotte, unknown to Napoleon, lay on Blücher's left around Halle.[16]

Napoleon decided to throw the bulk of his force on Blücher, and, having routed him, turn south on Schwarzenberg and sever his communications with Bohemia. His concentration was effected with his usual sureness and celerity, but whilst the French moved on Wittenberg, Blücher was marching to his right, indifferent to his communications as all Prussia lay behind him.[16]

This move on 14 October brought him into touch with Bernadotte, and now a single march forward of all three armies would have absolutely isolated Napoleon from France; but Bernadotte's nerve failed him, for on hearing of Napoleon's threat against Wittenberg he decided to retreat northward, and not all the persuasions of Blücher and Gneisenau could move him. Thus if the French movement momentarily ended in a blow in the air, it was indirectly the cause of their ultimate salvation.[16]

Battle of the Nations

[edit]
Main article:Battle of Leipzig
The Battle of Leipzig, by A.I. Zauerweid

On the 15 October Napoleon concentrated his forces to the east of Leipzig, with only a weak detachment to the west, and in the evening the Coalition allies were prepared to attack him. Schwarzenberg had 180,000 men available at once and 60,000 on the following day; Blücher had about 60,000, but Bernadotte now could not arrive before 18 October.[16]

Napoleon prepared to throw the bulk of his force upon Schwarzenberg and massed his troops south-east of the town, whilst Schwarzenberg marched concentrically against him down the valley of theElster andPleisse, the mass of his troops on the right bank of the latter and a strong column underGiulay on the left working round to join Blücher on the north. The fighting which followed was most obstinate, but the Austrians failed to make any impression on the French positions, and indeed Giulay felt himself compelled to withdraw to his former position. On the other hand, Blücher carried the village of Möckern and came within a mile of the gates of the town. During the 17th there was only indecisive skirmishing, Schwarzenberg waiting for his reinforcements coming up by the Dresden road, Blücher for Bernadotte to come in on his left, and by some extraordinary oversight Giulay was brought closer in to the Austrian centre, thus opening for the French their line of retreat towards Erfurt, and no information of this movement appears to have been conveyed to Blücher. Napoleon when he became aware of the movement, sent the IV Corps to Lindenau to keep the road open.[16]

On the 18 October the fighting was resumed and by about noon Bernadotte came up and closed the gap to the north-east of the town between Blücher and the Austrians. At 14:00 the Saxons, who had remained faithful to Napoleon longer than his other German allies, went over to Bernadotte's Army of the North a week after the Crown Prince had issued a proclamation calling for the Saxons to rejoin their former commander (Bernadotte had commanded the Saxons during the Wagram Campaign).[19] All hope of saving the battle had now to be given up, but the French covered their retreat obstinately and by daybreak next morning one-half of the army was already filing out along the road to Erfurt which had so fortunately for the French been left for them.[16]

Retreat of the French and Battle of Hanau

[edit]
Main article:Battle of Hanau
The Battle of Hanau, byHorace Vernet, 1824

It took Blücher time to extricate his troops from the confusion into which the battle had thrown them, and the garrison of Leipzig and the troops left on the right bank of the Elster still resisted obstinately—hence no direct pursuit could be initiated and the French, still upwards of 100,000 strong, marching rapidly, soon gained distance enough to be reformed. Blücher followed by parallel and inferior roads on their northern flank, but Schwarzenberg knowing that the Bavarians also had forsaken Napoleon and were marching under the command of GeneralKarl Philipp von Wrede to intercept his retreat, followed in a most leisurely fashion. Blücher did not succeed in overtaking the French, but the latter, near Hanau, found their way barred by Wrede with 40,000 men and over 100 guns in a strong position.[16]

To this fresh emergency, Napoleon and his army responded in most sacrificial fashion. As at Krasnoi in 1812, Napoleon ordered his troops to go straight for the enemy and after a series of artillery movements, directed by General Drouot, they marched right over the enemy, practically destroying the whole force, yet taking heavy casualties in the process, depleting Napoleon's troops even further. Henceforward, their march was unmolested and the French reached Mainz on 5 November to prepare for the invasion of Eastern France.[16]

Aftermath

[edit]
The Wreath Maker – a painting byGeorg Friedrich Kersting symbolising the memory of the fallen, whose names are inscribed on the trunks of oak trees

When the last of the French troops crossed Rhine back into France, divided counsels made their appearance at the headquarters of the coalition. Every one was weary of the war, and many felt that it would be unwise to push Napoleon and the French nation to extremes. Hence a prolonged halt arose, utilized by the troops in renewing their equipment and so forth, but ultimately the Young German party, led by Blücher and the principal fighting men of the army, triumphed, and early in 1814 the coalition invaded France.[20]

At the same time, Field MarshalArthur Wellesley, the Duke of Wellingtoninvaded France over the Pyrenees. Leaving MarshalsJean-de-Dieu Soult andLouis-Gabriel Suchet to defend southwestern France, Napoleon fought and lost acampaign in northeastern France, that ended with the occupation of Paris, the abdication of Napoleon, his exile to Elba, and theBourbon Restoration under KingLouis XVIII.[citation needed]

The campaign ended theFrench period (Franzosenzeit) in Germany and fostered a new sense of German unity and nationalism. It also marked the exit of Sweden as a player in German affairs after 175 years, as Sweden cededSwedish Pomerania to Prussia for its recognition of theTreaty of Kiel (including the Union of Sweden and Norway) and £500,000.[21] TheGerman Confederation, formed at theCongress of Vienna in 1815, was a precursor to the modern German nation state, which was, however, only realized more than half a century later under Prussian leadership, with the exclusion of Austria, including Germans in the Sudetanlands of Bohemia. The popular image of the campaign in Germany was shaped by the cultural memory of its veterans, especially the many students who volunteered to fight in the Lützow Free Corps and other units who later rose to high positions in the military and political spheres. A new boom in remembrance of the war occurred in 1913, on the centenary of its outbreak.[citation needed]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^Dissolved followingBattle of Leipzig.[1]
  2. ^This is the total Casualties in 1813
  3. ^This is the total Casualties in 1813
  4. ^In the German states it became known as theBefreiungskriege (Wars of Liberation) orFreiheitskriege (Wars of Freedom) – both terms were used at the time, both by liberals and nationalists who hoped for a unified Germany and by conservatives after theBourbon Restoration to mean restauring the old aristocratic order and freeing Europe from Frenchhegemony and occupation. It is also known as theeuropäische Befreiungskriege (European Wars of Liberation), to distinguish it from the 1808 Spanish Uprising during thePeninsular War.
  5. ^Napoleon always gave them 300,000, but this number was never attained (Maude 1911, p. 229).
  1. ^Hans A. Schmitt.Germany Without Prussia: A Closer Look at the Confederation of the Rhine. German Studies Review 6, No. 4 (1983), pp 9-39.
  2. ^abcMaude 1908, p. 156.
  3. ^Maude 1908, p. 149.
  4. ^abMaude 1908, p. 148.
  5. ^abBodart 1916, p. 46.
  6. ^Maude 1911, pp. 228–229.
  7. ^abcdefghijMaude 1911, p. 229.
  8. ^Scott, Franklin D. (1935) Bernadotte and the Fall of Napoleon. Pp. 67–73. Harvard University Press, Boston.
  9. ^Maude 1911, p. 229–230.
  10. ^ Barton, Dunbar (1925). Bernadotte Prince and King. P. 74. John Murray, London.
  11. ^Leggiere, Michael V (2015). Pp. 52–55.
  12. ^ Barton D. Plunket (1925). Pp 76–77
  13. ^Leggiere, Michael V (2015). Pp. 52–53
  14. ^abcdeMaude 1911, p. 230.
  15. ^Maude 1911, pp. 230–231.
  16. ^abcdefghijklmnMaude 1911, p. 231.
  17. ^Leggiere, Michael (2002). Napoleon and Berlin. Pp. 204-205.
  18. ^Barton, Dunbar (1925). Bernadotte Prince and King. Pp. 92-94. John Murray, London.
  19. ^Barton, Dunbar (1925). Bernadotte Prince and King. Pp. 104-105. John Murray, London.
  20. ^Maude 1911, pp. 321–232.
  21. ^Barton, Dubar (1925). Bernadotte Prince and King. Pp. 138-139

References

[edit]
  • Barton, Sir Dunbar (1925).Bernadotte Prince and King. London: John Murray.
  • Bodart, G. (1916).Losses of Life in Modern Wars, Austria-Hungary; France. Creative Media Partners, LLC.ISBN 978-1371465520.{{cite book}}:ISBN / Date incompatibility (help)
  • Clodfelter, M. (2017).Warfare and Armed Conflicts: A Statistical Encyclopedia of Casualty and Other Figures, 1492-2015 (4th ed.). Jefferson, North Carolina: McFarland.ISBN 978-0786474707.
  • Leggiere, Michael (2002).Napoleon and Berlin. University of Oklahoma Press.ISBN 978-0-8061-4656-0.
  • Leggiere, Michael V. (2015).Napoleon and the Struggle for Germany Vol. II. Cambridge.ISBN 9781107080546.
  • Maude, Frederic Natusch (1908).The Leipzig Campaign, 1813. London: Swan Sonnenschein.
  •  This article incorporates text from a publication now in thepublic domainMaude, Frederic Natusch (1911). "Napoleonic Campaigns". InChisholm, Hugh (ed.).Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 19 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 212–236.
  • Scott, Franklin D. (1935).Bernadotte and the Fall of Napoleon. Harvard University Press.

Further reading

[edit]
In English
  • Lüke, Martina (2009).Anti-Napoleonic Wars of Liberation (1813–1815). In: The International Encyclopedia of Revolution and Protest: 1500–present. Edited by Immanuel Ness. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 188–190.
  • V. Leggiere, Michael (2023) "The 1813 Campaign in Central Europe" inThe Cambridge History of the Napoleonic Wars: Volume 2: Fighting the Napoleonic Wars, edited by Mikaberidze, Alexander; Colson, Bruno. Cambridge University Press, pp. 471–491,
In German
  • Lars Beißwenger:Der Befreiungskrieg von 1813. In: Josef J. Schmid (Hrsg.):Waterloo – 18. Juni 1815. Vorgeschichte, Verlauf und Folgen einer europäischen Schlacht Verlag nova & vetera, Bonn 2008,ISBN 978-3-936741-55-1, (Studia academica historica 1), S. 85–142.
  • Christopher Clark:Preußen. Aufstieg und Niedergang. 1600 – 1947. 6. Auflage. DVA, München 2007,ISBN 978-3-421-05392-3.
  • Ewald Grothe:Befreiungskriege. In: Friedrich Jaeger (Hrsg.):Enzyklopädie der Neuzeit. Band 1:Abendland – Beleuchtung. Metzler, Stuttgart u. a. 2005,ISBN 3-476-01991-8, Sp. 1139–1146.
  • Karen Hagemann:„Mannlicher Muth und Teutsche Ehre“. Nation, Militär und Geschlecht zur Zeit der antinapoleonischen Kriege Preußens. Schöningh, Paderborn u. a. 2002,ISBN 3-506-74477-1, (Krieg in der Geschichte 8), (Zugleich: Berlin, Techn. Univ., Habilschrift, 2000).
  • Heinz Helmert, Hans-Jürgen Usczek:Europäische Befreiungskriege 1808-1814/15. Militärischer Verlauf. Militärverlag der Deutschen Demokratischen Republik, Belin 1976, (Kleine Militärgeschichte: Kriege).
  • Eckart Kleßmann (Hrsg.):Die Befreiungskriege in Augenzeugenberichten. Lizenzausgabe. Ungekürzte Ausgabe. Deutscher Taschenbuch-Verlag, München 1973,ISBN 3-423-00912-8, (dtv 912Augenzeugenberichte).
  • Horst Kohl:Blüchers Zug von Auerstedt bis Ratkau und Lübecks Schreckenstage (1806). Quellenberichte. Neuauflage der Erstausgabe von 1912. Bearbeitet von Carola Herbst. Godewind Verlag, Wismar 2006,ISBN 3-938347-16-3.
  • Märsche und Balladen aus den Freiheitskriegen 1813–1815. Studios Berlin-BRIO-Musikverlag, Berlin 2009, (CD).
  • Golo Mann:Die Geschichte des 19. und 20. Jahrhundert. Hamburg 1966.
  • Carl Mönckeberg:Hamburg unter dem Drucke der Franzosen 1806–1814. Historische Denkwürdigkeiten. Reprint der Ausgabe Hamburg, Nolte, 1864. Godewind Verlag, Wismar 2006,ISBN 3-938347-66-X.
  • Hermann Müller-Bohn:Die Deutschen Befreiungskriege 1806–1815. Erstes Buch: Unter französischem Joche. Veränderte Neuauflage. Bearbeitet von Hans J. Herbst. Godewind Verlag, Wismar 2006,ISBN 3-939198-77-3.
  • Ute Planert:Der Mythos vom Befreiungskrieg. Frankreichs Kriege und der deutsche Süden. Alltag – Wahrnehmung – Deutung 1792–1841. Schöningh, Paderborn u. a. 2007,ISBN 978-3-506-75662-6, (Krieg in der Geschichte 33), (Zugleich: Tübingen, Univ., Habilschrift, 2003/04).

External links

[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related toBefreiungskriege.
Belli-
gerents
France,
client states
and allies
Coalition
forces
Major
battles
Prelude
1805
1806
1807
1808
1809
1810
1811
1812
1813
1814
1815
Info
French and ally
military and
political leaders
Coalition
military and
political leaders
Related
conflicts
Treaties
Miscellaneous
Authority control databases: NationalEdit this at Wikidata

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=German_campaign_of_1813&oldid=1288452566"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp