Adonor portrait orvotive portrait is a portrait in a larger painting or other work showing the person who commissioned and paid for the image, or a member of his, or (much more rarely) her, family.Donor portrait usually refers to the portrait or portraits of donors alone, as a section of a larger work, whereasvotive portrait may often refer to a whole work of art intended as anex-voto, including for example a Madonna, especially if the donor is very prominent. The terms are not used very consistently by art historians, as Angela Marisol Roberts points out,[1] and may also be used for smaller religious subjects that were probably made to be retained by the commissioner rather than donated to a church.
Donor portraits are very common in religious works of art, especially paintings, of theMiddle Ages andRenaissance, the donor usually shown kneeling to one side, in the foreground of the image. Often, even late into the Renaissance, the donor portraits, especially when of a whole family, will be at a much smaller scale than the principal figures, in defiance oflinear perspective. By the mid-15th century donors began to be shown integrated into the main scene, as bystanders and even participants.
The purpose of donor portraits was to memorialize the donor and his family, and especially to solicit prayers for them after their death.[2] Gifts to the church of buildings,altarpieces, or large areas ofstained glass were often accompanied by abequest or condition that masses for the donor be said in perpetuity, and portraits of the persons concerned were thought to encourage prayers on their behalf during these, and at other times. Displaying portraits in a public place was also an expression of social status; donor portraits overlapped withtomb monuments in churches, the other main way of achieving these ends, although donor portraits had the advantage that the donor could see them displayed in his own lifetime.
Furthermore, donor portraits inEarly Netherlandish painting suggest that their additional purpose was to serve as role models for the praying beholder during his own emotional meditation and prayer – not in order to be imitated as ideal persons like the painted Saints but to serve as a mirror for the recipient to reflect on himself and his sinful status, ideally leading him to a knowledge of himself and God.[4] To do so during prayer is in accord with late medieval concepts of prayer, fully developed by theModern Devotion. This process may be intensified if the praying beholder is the donor himself.[5]
When a whole building was financed, a sculpture of the patron might be included on the facade or elsewhere in the building.Jan van Eyck'sRolin Madonna is a small painting where the donorNicolas Rolin shares the painting space equally with the Madonna and Child, but Rolin had given great sums to his parish church, where it was hung, which is represented by the church above his praying hands in the townscape behind him.[6]
Sometimes, as in theGhent Altarpiece, the donors were shown on the closed view of an altarpiece with movable wings, or on both the side panels, as in thePortinari Altarpiece and the Memlings above, or just on one side, as in theMérode Altarpiece. If they are on different sides, the males are normally on the left for the viewer, the honorific right-hand placement within the picture space. In family groups the figures are usually divided by gender. Groups of members ofconfraternities, sometimes with their wives, are also found.[7] Additional family members, from births or marriages, might be added later, and deaths might be recorded by the addition of small crosses held in the clasped hands.[8]
At least in Northern Italy, as well as the grand altarpieces and frescos by leading masters that attract most art-historical attention, there was a more numerous group of small frescoes with a single saint and donor on side-walls, that were liable to be re-painted as soon as the number of candles lit before them fell off, or a wealthy donor needed the space for a large fresco-cycle, as portrayed in a 15th-century tale from Italy:[9]
And going around with the master mason, examining which figures to leave and which to destroy, the priest spotted a Saint Anthony and said: 'Save this one.' Then he found a figure ofSaint Sano and said: 'This one is to be gotten rid of, since as long as I have been the Priest here I have never seen anyone light a candle in front of it, nor has it ever seemed to me useful; therefore, mason, get rid of it.'
Donor portraits have a continuous history fromlate antiquity, and the portrait in the 6th-century manuscript theVienna Dioscurides may well reflect a long-established classical tradition, just as the author portraits found in the same manuscript are believed to do. A painting in theCatacombs of Commodilla of 528 shows a thronedVirgin and Child flanked by two saints, with Turtura, a female donor, in front of the left hand saint, who has his hand on her shoulder; very similar compositions were being produced a millennium later.[10] Another tradition which had pre-Christian precedent was royal or imperial images showing the ruler with a religious figure, usually Christ or the Virgin Mary in Christian examples, with the divine and royal figures shown communicating with each other in some way. Although none have survived, there is literary evidence of donor portraits in small chapels from theEarly Christian period,[11] probably continuing the traditions of pagan temples.
The 6th-centurymosaic panels in theBasilica of San Vitale inRavenna of the EmperorJustinian I andEmpress Theodora with courtiers are not of the type showing the ruler receiving divine approval, but each show one of the imperial couple standing confidently with a group of attendants, looking out at the viewer. Their scale and composition are alone among large-scale survivals. Also in Ravenna, there is a small mosaic of Justinian, possibly originally ofTheoderic the Great in theBasilica of Sant'Apollinare Nuovo. In theEarly Middle Ages, a group of mosaic portraits inRome of Popes who had commissioned the building or rebuilding of the churches containing them show standing figures holding models of the building, usually among a group of saints. Gradually these traditions worked their way down the social scale, especially inilluminated manuscripts, where they are often owner portraits, as the manuscripts were retained for use by the person commissioning them. For example, a chapel atMals inSouth Tyrol has twofresco donor figures from before 881, one lay and the other of atonsured cleric holding a model building.[12] In subsequent centuries bishops, abbots and other clergy were the donors most commonly shown, other than royalty, and they remained prominently represented in later periods.[13]
Donor portraits of noblemen and wealthy businessmen were becoming common in commissions by the 15th century, at the same time as the panel portrait was beginning to be commissioned by this class - though there are perhaps more donor portraits in larger works from churches surviving from before 1450 than panel portraits. A very common Netherlandish format from the mid-century was a smalldiptych with a Madonna and Child, usually on the left wing, and a "donor" on the right - the donor being here an owner, as these were normally intended to be kept in the subject's home. In these the portrait may adopt a praying pose,[14] or may pose more like the subject in a purely secular portrait.[15] TheWilton Diptych ofRichard II of England was a forerunner of these. In some of these diptychs the portrait of the original owner has been over-painted with that of a later one.[16]
A particular convention inilluminated manuscripts was the "presentation portrait", where the manuscript began with a figure, often kneeling, presenting the manuscript to its owner, or sometimes the owner commissioning the book. The person presenting might be a courtier making a gift to his prince, but is often the author or the scribe, in which cases the recipient had actually paid for the manuscript.[17]
.jpg)
During the Middle Ages the donor figures often were shown on a far smaller scale than the sacred figures; a change dated by Dirk Kocks to the 14th century, though earlier examples in manuscripts can be found.[18] A later convention was for figures at about three-quarters of the size of the main ones. From the 15th centuryEarly Netherlandish painters likeJan van Eyck integrated, with varying degrees of subtlety, donor portraits into the space of the main scene of altarpieces, at the same scale as the main figures.
A comparable style can be found in Florentine painting from the same date, as inMasaccio'sHoly Trinity (1425–28) inSanta Maria Novella where, however, the donors are shown kneeling on a sill outside and below the main architectural setting.[19] This innovation, however, did not appear in Venetian painting until the turn of the next century.[20] Normally the main figures ignore the presence of the interlopers in narrative scenes, although bystanding saints may put a supportive hand on the shoulder in a side-panel. But in devotional subjects such as aMadonna and Child, which were more likely to have been intended for the donor's home, the main figures may look at or bless the donor, as in the Memling shown.
Before the 15th century a physical likeness may not have often been attempted, or achieved; the individuals depicted may in any case often not have been available to the artist, or even alive.[21] By the mid-15th century this was no longer the case, and donors of whom other likenesses survive can often be seen to be carefully portrayed, although, as in the Memling above, daughters in particular often appear as standardized beauties in the style of the day.[22]
In narrative scenes they began to be worked into the figures of the scene depicted, perhaps an innovation ofRogier van der Weyden, where they can often be distinguished by their expensive contemporary dress. In Florence, where there was already a tradition of including portraits of city notables in crowd scenes (mentioned byLeon Battista Alberti), theProcession of the Magi byBenozzo Gozzoli (1459–61), which admittedly was in the private chapel of thePalazzo Medici, is dominated by the glamorous procession containing more portraits of the Medici and their allies than can now be identified. By 1490, when the largeTornabuoni Chapel fresco cycle byDomenico Ghirlandaio was completed, family members and political allies of the Tornabuoni populate several scenes in considerable numbers, in addition to conventional kneeling portraits ofGiovanni Tornabuoni and his wife.[24] In an often-quoted passage,John Pope-Hennessy caricatured 16th-century Italian donors:[25]
the vogue of the collective portrait grew and grew ... status and portraiture became inextricably entwined, and there was almost nothing patrons would not do to intrude themselves in paintings; they would stone the women taken in adultery, they would clean up after martyrdoms, they would serve at the table at Emmaus or in the Pharisee's house. The elders in the story ofSuzannah were some of the few figures respectable Venetians were unwilling to impersonate. ... the only contingency they did not envisage was what actually occurred, that their faces would survive but their names go astray.
In Italy donors, or owners, were rarely depicted as the major religious figures, but in the courts of Northern Europe there are several examples of this in the late 15th and early 16th centuries, mostly in small panels not for public viewing.[8][26] The most notorious of these is the portrayal as theVirgin lactans (or just post-lactans) ofAgnès Sorel (died 1450), the mistress ofCharles VII of France, in a panel byJean Fouquet.[27]
Donor portraits in works for churches, and over-prominentheraldry, were disapproved of by clerical interpreters of the vague decrees on art of theCouncil of Trent, such as SaintCharles Borromeo,[28] but survived well into the Baroque period, and developed a secular equivalent inhistory painting, although here it was often the principal figures who were given the features of the commissioner. A very late example of the old Netherlandish format of the triptych with the donors on the wing panels isRubens'Rockox Triptych of 1613–15, once in a church over the tombstone of the donors and now in theRoyal Museum of Fine Arts, Antwerp. The central panel shows theIncredulity of Thomas ("Doubting Thomas") and the work as a whole is ambiguous as to whether the donors are represented as occupying the same space as the sacred scene, with different indications in both directions.[29]
A further secular development was theportrait historié, where groups of portrait sitters posed as historical or mythological figures. One of the most famous and striking groups of Baroque donor portraits are those of the male members of theCornaro family, who sit in boxes as if at the theatre to either side of the sculpted altarpiece ofGian Lorenzo Bernini'sEcstasy of St Theresa (1652). These were derived fromfrescoes byPellegrino Tibaldi a century early, which use the same conceit.[30]
Although donor portraits have been relatively little studied as a distinct genre, there has been more interest in recent years, and a debate over their relationship, in Italy, to the rise of individualism with the Early Renaissance, and also over the changes in their iconography after theBlack Death of the mid-14th century.[31]
.jpg)
![A prosperous glassmaker and his family, 1596. The five children holding crosses had died; the two in black-trimmed white garments apparently before the painting was done, on the others the crosses were probably added later.[32]](/mt/?noimg=&dark=on&url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.wikipedia.org%2fwiki%2fFile%3aGlasmacherfamilie_Familie_Friedrich_mit_Kreuz_1596.jpg)
