| Part ofa series on |
| Spirituality |
|---|
| Outline |
Spiritual developmen |
| Influences |
Western General Antiquity Medieval Early modern Modern |
| Research |
Divinity (from Latindivinitas) refers to the quality, presence, or nature of that which isdivine—a term that, before the rise ofmonotheism, evoked a broad and dynamic field of sacred power. In theancient world, divinity was not limited to a singledeity or abstract ideal but was recognized in multiple forms: as aradiant attribute possessed by gods, as avital force pervadingnature, and even as a quality glimpsed in extraordinary humans, laws, or acts. The Latindivinitas and its Greek counterparts (theiotēs,theion) conveyed something both immanent and awe-inspiring: a presence that could be felt inthunder,justice,ecstasy,fate, orbeauty.
Among theGreeks andRomans, divinity was not confined to a rigid theological system. Gods, heroes, and even emperors might be described as partaking in divinity, just as natural forces orvirtue could be seen as expressions ofdivine essence. Philosophers such asPlato and theStoics used the term to refer to thesoul of the cosmos or therational order of the universe, while ritual and myth depicted the divine in vivid ways. To call something divine was not always to worship it as a god, but to acknowledge its participation in a higher, sacred order.
Early Christianity inherited this language but dramatically reshaped it. With the rise of theological monotheism, divinity came increasingly to denote the singular and absolute nature ofGod. The Christianization of the term narrowed its field: what had once described a quality diffused across nature, fate, andmultiple gods was now claimed exclusively for the creator God and, later, extended to Christ and theHoly Spirit through doctrines of theTrinity. Over time, this led to a sharper boundary between the divine and the human, the sacred and the profane.
In contemporary usage, divinity most commonly refers either to a deity (especially in monotheistic traditions) or to a transcendent power associated withsacredness,inspiration, or spiritual authority. The term may describe the essential nature of God, as well asreligious experiences, beings, or principles considered beyond ordinary human life. Outside formal religion, divinity is sometimes used in philosophical or metaphorical contexts, where it retains associations with elevated or ultimate significance.
The English worddivinity derives from the Latin termdivinitas, which itself stems fromdivinus, meaning "of a god" or "divine". The Latin root echoes similar concepts in Greek, notablytheiotēs (θειότης) andtheion (τὸ θεῖον), both of which convey a sense of sacred power, majesty, or godlike essence.[1]
In pre-ChristianGreco-Roman religion, divinity was widely understood as a diffuse and dynamic force rather than a fixed identity. The divine could manifest through natural phenomena—such as thunder, sunlight, or fertility—or through human actions exemplifying justice, courage, or beauty.[2] The worddivinitas might be used of a god, a spirit, a concept like fate, or even anEmperor, reflecting a worldview in which divine qualities permeated multiple layers of existence.[3]
This conceptual range extended into early philosophical usage.Plato describedtheion in relation to theForm of the Good, associating it with the source of truth and intelligibility.[4] For theStoics, the divine was understood as a rational and animating principle that pervaded the cosmos, often identified withlogos or nature itself.[5] In such traditions, divinity was not onlytranscendent but also deeplyimmanent, present in the order and structure of the world.
In classical antiquity, the divine was not conceived as wholly separate from the world but was instead embedded within it.Gods,heroes, natural forces,abstract concepts, and evenexemplary humans could all be considered partakers in or bearers of divinity. The termdivinitas in Latin and its Greek equivalents were applied not only to deities likeJupiter orAthena, but also to phenomena such asfate (moira) orjustice (dike).[6]
Public religion in bothAncient Greece andAncient Rome involved a complex interplay between civic life and sacred presence. Gods were not remote; they were part of thepolis, honored intemples, festivals, andrituals that affirmed their power and proximity.Emperors in Rome, for instance, could be described as havingnumen or evendivinitas, indicating a recognized form of divine power or sanction rather than fulldeification.[7]
Divinity also permeated thenatural world. Rivers, mountains, stars, and weather were thought to express divine will or presence. This fluid understanding allowed for multiple overlapping expressions of the divine across the physical and social world.[8] In this context,sacrifice,divination, andaugury were not merely symbolic acts but means of communication with divine forces that shaped the rhythms of life.[6]
Mystery cults and regional traditions added further dimensions to ancient understandings of divinity. Figures such asDionysus orIsis embodied divine realities experienced throughritual initiation,ecstasy, andspiritual transformation. These cults often emphasized personal encounters with the divine, in contrast to the more public and civic nature of traditionalstate religion.[2]
In addition to gods and natural forces, the Greeks also recognized a class of intermediate beings known asdaimones (δαίμονες), whose roles ranged from protective spirits to agents of fate. Originally understood as morally neutral or even benevolent, adaimōn could denote a divine presence or inspiration not fully personified as a god. Philosophers such asSocrates described their personaldaimōnion as a kind of guiding voice or spiritual influence.[9] AsE. R. Dodds noted, thedaimōn represented an "impersonal agency" often closer to fate or inward inspiration than to anthropomorphic deity. Only later, under Christian influence, diddaimōn become associated with malevolent demons—a reinterpretation that obscured its original connection to divinity.[10]
Ancient philosophy developed increasingly abstract conceptions of divinity, seeking to understand the nature of the divine beyond anthropomorphic gods. ForPlato, the divine was not confined to the traditional pantheon but was associated with the eternal and unchangingForm of the Good—the highest reality and source of truth, intelligibility, and order.[4] The divine, in this framework, was radically transcendent but also the ultimate cause and goal of all existence.
LaterMiddle Platonism andNeoplatonism extended this abstraction. In the writings ofPlotinus, the divine was identified with the ineffableOne, from which all reality emanates in hierarchical stages. Divinity, in this view, was not a person or force but the source of being itself. Below the One were successive layers of reality: theNous, theWorld Soul, and the material world. Each stage retained something of the divine, though to lesser degrees.[11]
The Stoics offered a contrasting, more immanent view. For them, the divine was not separate from nature but identical with it—expressed aslogos, the rational principle that ordered the cosmos. Every part of the universe, including the human soul, participated in this divine reason.[5] Stoic ethics were grounded in living according to this divine nature, aligning the individual will with the cosmic order.
These philosophical developments interacted with evolving religious traditions. InHellenistic religion, philosophical conceptions of the divine coexisted with traditional cultic practices and new forms of personal piety. Ideas about divine immanence, transcendence, andhierarchical being shaped howmystery religions,astrology, and theurgy were interpreted and practiced.[12]
InGnosticism, emerging in the same intellectual milieu as Middle Platonism and Neoplatonism, a radical reinterpretation of divinity developed. In many Gnostic systems, true divinity was wholly transcendent and unknowable—often called thePleroma orInvisible Spirit—while the visible world was the flawed creation of a lesser being, theDemiurge, ignorant of the higher realms. Thisdualism recast divine hierarchy not as a continuum of emanation but as a rupture between divine fullness and cosmic error. Gnostic texts such as theSecret Book of John describe the soul’s entrapment in materiality and its path of ascent through layers of hostilearchons, aided by inner revelation (gnosis) and the remembrance of itsdivine spark.[13] In this view, divinity was present as a spark within the human being, a fragment of the higher world seeking return.[14]
The elasticity of the concept also allowed for overlap between divine beings and metaphysical principles.Theurgy, as practiced byNeoplatonists likeIamblichus, emphasized ritual engagement with divine intelligences, asserting that divine powers could be invoked and experienced through specific acts.[15] Gnostic traditions likewise incorporated theurgical elements—especially in their use of invocations, names of power, and visionary ascent texts—to transcend the material realm and rejoin the divine source.[16] In such contexts, ritual was not merely symbolic but transformative. Through prescribed invocations, visualizations, and gestures, practitioners sought a form ofritual identification with divine powers, temporarily embodying aspects of the divine as a means of ascent or union.[15]
By late antiquity, such reflections had laid the groundwork for laterChristian theology,Islamic philosophy, andJewish mysticism, all of which engaged with and reinterpreted these classical philosophical insights into the nature of the divine.[17]
The Christian reconfiguration of divinity cannot be understood apart from the theological developments ofSecond Temple Judaism. During this period, Jewish thought increasingly emphasized the singular and transcendent nature ofGod, in contrast to thepolytheism of surrounding cultures. Although theHebrew Bible includes references to divine beings—such asangels, theElohim, and theheavenly hosts—Jewish philosophy came to insist that only the God of Israel was truly divine.[18]
At the same time, certain Jewish texts introduced intermediary figures such asWisdom (חָכְמָה,Ḥokhmāh), theLogos, and theSon of Man—portrayed in works like1 Enoch, theBook of Daniel, and theWisdom of Solomon. These figures served as vehicles for divine action and presence without threatening strictmonotheism. This layered view of divinity helped lay the groundwork for earlyChristian theology.[18]
The rise ofChristianity introduced a profound transformation in the concept of divinity. Drawing on both Second Temple Judaism and Greco-Roman philosophy, early Christian thinkers redefined the divine not as a plural or diffused power but as the singular and transcendent being ofGod. This theological shift placed greater emphasis on divine unity, omnipotence, and moral perfection.[19]
Central to this transformation was the assertion of thedivinity of Jesus. Early Christians believed that Jesus, though fully human, also shared in the divine nature. This radical claim provoked intense theological debate, especially over how divinity could be reconciled with humanity. In the fourth century, theCouncil of Nicaea (325 CE) affirmed that Christ washomoousios ("of the same substance") with the Father, a term drawn from Greek metaphysics to assert full equality within the Trinity.[20]
The doctrine of theTrinity—Father, Son, andHoly Spirit as three persons sharing one divine essence—emerged as a core feature of Christian theology, marking a significant departure from earlier polytheistic and philosophical models. Christian thinkers such asAthanasius,Gregory of Nyssa, andAugustine of Hippo worked to articulate a divine unity that preserved distinct personal identities without division.[21]
In this context, divinity came to denote not a quality diffused through nature or cosmos but the essential being of the Creator. The divine was no longer immanent in rivers, stars, or fate, but radically transcendent, revealed throughrevelation,incarnation, andsacrament.[22] At the same time,mystical theology and sacramental theology preserved a sense of divine presence operating within the world, particularly through theEucharist and theHoly Spirit.
The Christianization of the concept also reshaped language. The Greek termtheiotēs—used in earlier texts for divine quality—was absorbed into Christian scripture and doctrine, as inRomans 1:20, where it refers to God's "eternal power and divinity."[23] The Latindivinitas likewise narrowed in scope, now primarily describing the being of God and, derivatively, that of Christ and the Spirit.
In sum, early Christianity both inherited and redefined classical ideas of divinity, recasting them within a monotheistic and doctrinal framework that would shape theological discourse for centuries.
In both Christian and non-Christian traditions, divinity has often been understood not only as a theological proposition but as a reality encountered throughmysticism, vision, or ecstatic experience. These encounters are frequently described aspraeternatural—beyond ordinary nature but not necessarily supernatural in a transcendent or theistic sense.[24]
InChristian mysticism, figures such asHildegard of Bingen,Mechthild of Magdeburg,Meister Eckhart, andJulian of Norwich described divine presence in terms that transcend rational theology: as an ineffable union, a luminous darkness, a radiant harmony,[25] or what Eckhart called theGround of the Soul—a silent depth where divinity and the self are one.[26] Hildegard articulated her visionary theology through music and illuminations, describing the divine as "Living Light" and the world as shot through with divine vitality.[27]
.jpg)
Another voice was that of theBook of the 24 Philosophers, a 12th-century anonymous text offering cryptic, metaphysical definitions of divinity such as "God is an infinite sphere whose center is everywhere and circumference nowhere."[28] These definitions were meditated upon throughout the Middle Ages and Renaissance, influencingHermeticists andChristian humanists alike.
These currents of mystical theology culminate in texts like the 14th-centuryThe Cloud of Unknowing, which urges the contemplative to abandon all concepts and dwell in a "cloud" of forgetting and unknowing, through which love alone may reach God.[29] Such writings reflect a broader medieval tradition ofapophatic theology, or thevia negativa, where the divine is approached not through assertions but through negation, paradox, and silence.[30]
Meanwhile, more systematic theological reflections were offered by scholastic thinkers such asThomas Aquinas, who defined God asipsum esse subsistens—the very act of being itself. For Aquinas, God is both radically transcendent and immanently present, knowable through natural reason yet exceeding all conceptual grasp. Aquinas's synthesis of Aristotelian metaphysics and Christian doctrine represented a high point of medieval intellectual theology.[31]
Umberto Eco observed that medieval thought did not regard God as merely the conclusion of a logical system, but as the principle of harmony, proportion, and illumination that permeated all levels of reality—from grammar and rhetoric to cosmology.[32] For medieval thinkers, the divine was not just a theological abstraction but the very pattern by which the world was ordered and intelligible.
In modern philosophy and secular discourse, the concept of divinity has been reinterpreted, challenged, and, in some contexts, retained in metaphorical or symbolic form.Age of Enlightenment critiques oftheism andrevelation prompted many thinkers to redefine or discard traditional notions of divine agency. At the same time, the idea of “the divine” persisted as a way to speak about ultimate concerns,transcendence, or the horizon of meaning.[33]
Some modern philosophers, such asImmanuel Kant, relegated knowledge of the divine to the realm ofpractical reason, arguing that moral obligation points toward the postulation of God, though God cannot be known through speculative reason. Others, likeFriedrich Schleiermacher, emphasized religious feeling as a sense of the infinite, shifting the ground of divinity from doctrine to experience.[34]
Indepth psychology, particularly in the work ofCarl Gustav Jung, divinity is approached not as an external being but as a central archetype within thecollective unconscious. Jung interpreted the divine as a symbol of the Self—the totality of thepsyche—which often appears in dreams and visions as luminous,numinous figures. His model emphasized the psychological necessity of religious imagery, arguing that symbolic representations of divinity serve to mediate the integration of unconscious contents into consciousness.[35] This approach reframed traditional theological questions in terms of inner experience and individuation, influencing fields ranging from theology to comparative religion.
In the twentieth century, theologians such asPaul Tillich described God as the "ground of being" rather than a being among others, influencing post-theistic andexistential theology.[36] Philosophers such asCharles Taylor andMark Johnston have explored how secular modernity continues to be shaped by religious categories, even as explicit belief declines. In this view, divinity may refer less to a supernatural entity than to what commands awe, love, or ethical seriousness in a disenchanted world.[37]
In sum, modern and secular philosophies have neither wholly abandoned nor wholly retained ancient conceptions of divinity. Instead, they have recast the divine in terms of value, depth, and existential orientation—often preserving its affective and symbolic power while detaching it from metaphysical or doctrinal claims.
In contemporary usage, the termdivinity continues to serve multiple roles across religious, philosophical, and cultural contexts. In mainstreamChristianity,Islam, andJudaism, divinity is most often associated with the singular, transcendent being ofGod, understood as omnipotent, omniscient, and morally perfect. Intheology, it refers to God's essential nature or substance—especially in discussions ofTrinitarianism ordivine attributes.[38]
Beyond formal religion, the term is often used more broadly to describe a quality of sacredness, inspiration, or ultimate significance. In many forms ofspirituality, particularly within theNew Age andecospirituality movements, divinity may be conceived as immanent in the cosmos, nature, or the self. The phrase "the divine" can refer to a felt presence, a source of inner transformation, or a principle of harmony and connection.[39]
Modern pagan andWiccan views of divinity are often expressed throughduotheism, a theological structure that emphasizes a divine feminine (theGoddess) and a divine masculine (theHorned God), representing complementary cosmic forces. Scholars such asRonald Hutton andMargot Adler have noted that Wiccan theology often blendspolytheism,pantheism, andanimism, emphasizing direct religious experience and reverence forNature.[40]
In academic contexts,divinity remains a key term in disciplines such asphilosophy of religion,comparative religion, and theological studies. It is frequently examined in light of global religious diversity, cross-cultural mysticism, and changing understandings of transcendence. Universities and seminaries often use the term in institutional titles (e.g., "School of Divinity") to denoteprograms of study in theology, ministry, or sacred texts.[41]
Popular usage of "divine" or "divinity" also extends into literature, art, and everyday speech, where it can signal aesthetic admiration, moral approval, or emotional intensity. Though sometimes metaphorical, such uses often retain a sense of elevated or awe-inspiring significance.[34]
Across world religions, the concept of divinity encompasses a wide range of meanings, from personal gods to impersonal forces, from transcendent creators to immanent presences. In many traditions outside the Abrahamic lineage, divinity is not confined to a singular, all-powerful being but is encountered as multiple, interrelated aspects of reality.
InHinduism, divinity can be personal, as in the worship ofVishnu orShiva, or impersonal, as in the identification of the divine withBrahman, the ultimate, formless ground of being.Tantric traditions emphasize ritual embodiment and visualization as means of accessing divine power, often conceived in nondual terms.[42]
InBuddhism, although the tradition is non-theistic in its mainstream forms, certain schools—particularly inVajrayana andEast Asian traditions—describe states ofenlightenment using language of divine radiance,luminosity, or purity. TheDharmakaya or "truth body" of abuddha is sometimes compared to an all-pervasive divine principle, although without implying a creator god.[43]
InSufism, the mystical dimension ofIslam, divinity is often approached through the language of love, beauty, and yearning. The divine names and attributes are experienced as veils of the One, and the spiritual path involves remembrance (dhikr) and annihilation of the self (fana) in the divine.[44]
Manyindigenous religions andanimist traditions understand divinity as an immanent presence within the natural world—rivers, trees, animals, ancestors—each bearing a spark of sacred power. Rather than separating the divine from the mundane, such traditions often treat the cosmos itself as alive and communicative.[45]
Although theologies differ widely, a common thread across many traditions is the experience of the divine as something that both transcends and pervades reality, often described in symbolic or paradoxical language.Nondualism—the view that divinity and reality are ultimately not-two—is a recurring theme in both Eastern and Western mysticism, offering a shared framework for interpreting the sacred across cultural boundaries.[44]
Media related toDivinity at Wikimedia CommonsAuthority control databases: National |
|---|
