Basic unit distinguishing one sound from another in a language
This article is about linguistics. For other uses, seeFeature.
Inlinguistics, adistinctive feature is the most basic unit ofphonological structure that distinguishes onesound from another within alanguage. For example, the feature [+voice]distinguishes the twobilabial plosives: [p] and [b] (i.e., it makes the two plosivesdistinct from one another). There are many different ways of defining and arranging features intofeature systems: some deal with only one language while others are developed to apply to all languages.[1]
Distinctive features are grouped into categories according to thenatural classes ofsegments they describe: major class features, laryngeal features, manner features, and place features. These feature categories in turn are further specified on the basis of thephonetic properties of the segments in question.[2]
Since the inception of the phonological analysis of distinctive features in the 1950s, features traditionally have been specified by binary values to signify whether a segment is described by the feature; a positive value, [+], denotes the presence of a feature, while a negative value, [−], indicates its absence. In addition, a phoneme may beunmarked with respect to a feature. It is also possible for certainphonemes to have different features across languages. For example,[l] could be classified as a continuant or not in a given language depending on how it patterns with other consonants.[3] After the first distinctive feature theory was created by Russian linguistRoman Jakobson in 1941, it was assumed that the distinctive features are binary and this theory about distinctive features being binary was formally adopted in "Sound Pattern of English" byNoam Chomsky andMorris Halle in 1968. Jakobson saw the binary approach as the best way to make the phoneme inventory shorter and the phonological oppositions are naturally binary.[4]
In recent developments[when?] to the theory of distinctive features, phonologists have proposed the existence of single-valued features. These features, calledunivalent orprivative features, can only describe the classes of segments that are said to possess those features, and not the classes that are without them.[5]
Major class features: The features that represent the major classes of sounds.
[+/− syllabic][7] Syllabic segments may function as thenucleus of asyllable, while their counterparts, the [−syll] segments, may not. Except in the case ofsyllabic consonants, [+syllabic] designates allvowels, while [−syllabic] designates allconsonants (includingglides).
[+/− consonantal][8] Consonantal segments are produced with an audible constriction in thevocal tract, such asobstruents,nasals,liquids, andtrills. Vowels,glides and laryngeal segments are not consonantal.
[+/− sonorant][8] This feature describes the type of oral constriction that can occur in the vocal tract. [+son] designates thevowels andsonorantconsonants (namelyglides,liquids, andnasals) that are produced without an imbalance of air pressure in the vocal tract that might cause turbulence. [−son] describes theobstruents, articulated with a noticeable turbulence caused by an imbalance of air pressure in the vocal tract.
Laryngeal features: The features that specify the glottal states of sounds.
[+/− voice][7] This feature indicates whether vibration of thevocal folds occurs with the articulation of the segment.
[+/− spread glottis][7] Used to indicate theaspiration of a segment, this feature denotes the openness of the glottis. For [+sg], the vocal folds are spread apart widely enough for friction to occur; for [−sg], there is not the same friction-inducing spreading.
[+/− constricted glottis][7] The constricted glottis feature denotes the degree of closure of the glottis. [+cg] implies that the vocal folds are held closely together, enough so that air cannot pass through momentarily, while [−cg] implies the opposite. [+cg] sounds includeglottalized,ejective andimplosive consonants, as well as theglottal stop.
[+/−continuant][8] This feature describes the passage of air through the vocal tract. [+cont] segments are produced without any significant obstruction in the tract, allowing air to pass through in a continuous stream. [−cont] segments, on the other hand, have such an obstruction, and so occlude the air flow at some point of articulation.
[+/−nasal][8] This feature describes the position of thevelum. [+nas] segments are produced by lowering the velum so that air can pass through thenasal tract. [−nas] segments conversely are produced with a raised velum, blocking the passage of air from the nasal tract and shunting it to the oral tract.
[+/− strident][7] The strident feature applies to obstruents only and refers to a type of friction that is noisier than usual. This is caused by high energywhite noise.
[+/−lateral][7] This feature designates the shape and positioning of thetongue with respect to the oral tract. [+lat] segments are produced as the center of the tongue rises to contact the roof of the mouth, thereby blocking air from flowing centrally through the oral tract and instead forcing more lateral flow along the lowered side(s) of the tongue.
[+/− delayed release][7] This feature distinguishesstops fromaffricates. Affricates are designated [+del rel]
[+/− anterior]: Anterior segments are articulated with the tip or blade of the tongue at or in front of the alveolar ridge. Dental consonants are [+ant], postalveolar and retroflex ones are [−ant].
[+/− distributed]: For [+dist] segments the tongue is extended for some distance in the mouth. In other words, laminal dental and postalveolar consonants are marked as [+dist], while apical alveolar and retroflex consonants are [−dist].
[DORSAL ] Dorsal sounds are articulated by raising the dorsum of the tongue. All vowels are dorsal sounds. Dorsal consonants includepalatal,velar anduvular consonants.
[+/− high]: [+high] segments raise the dorsum close to thepalate. [−high] segments do not.
[+/− low]: [+low] segments bunch the dorsum to a position low in the mouth.
[+/− back]: [+back] segments are produced with the tongue dorsum bunched and retracted slightly to the back of the mouth. [−back] segments are bunched and extended slightly forward.
[+/− tense]: This feature (mainly) applies to the position of the root of the tongue when articulating vowels. [+tense] vowels have an advanced tongue root. In fact, this feature is often referred to asadvanced tongue root (ATR), although there is a debate on whether tense and ATR are the same or different features.
The concept of a distinctive feature matrix to distinguish similar elements is identified with phonology, but there have been at least two efforts to use a distinctive feature matrix in related fields. Close to phonology, and clearly acknowledging its debt to phonology, distinctive features have been used to describe and differentiate handshapes infingerspelling inAmerican Sign Language.[9] Distinctive features have also been used to distinguishproverbs from other types of language such asslogans,clichés, andaphorisms.[10]
Analogous feature systems are also used throughoutNatural Language Processing (NLP). For example,part-of-speech tagging divides words into categories. These include "major" categories such as Noun vs. Verb, but also other dimensions such as person and number, plurality, tense, and others. Some mnemonics for part-of-speech tags conjoin multiple features, such as "NN" for singular noun, vs. "NNS" for plural noun, vs. "NNS$" for plural possessive noun (seeBrown Corpus). Others provide more explicit separation of features, even formalizing them viamarkup such as theText Encoding Initiative's feature structures. Modern statistical NLP uses vectors of very many features, although many of those features are not formally "distinctive" in the sense described here.
^Godsave, Bruce. 1974. An investigation of the feasibility of using a particular distinctive feature matrix for recording and categorizing fingerspelling errors. University of Cincinnati, doctoral dissertation.
^p. 73. Norrick, Neal. 1985.How Proverbs Mean: Semantic Studies in English Proverbs. de Gruyter.
Jakobson, Roman;Fant, Gunnar;Halle, Morris (1952).Preliminaries to Speech Analysis: the Distinctive Features and their Correlates. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.