Adeaf-community orurban sign language is asign language that emerges whendeaf people who do not have a common language come together and form a community. This may be a formal situation, such as the establishment of a school for deaf students, or informal, such as migration to cities for employment and the subsequent gathering of deaf people for social purposes.[1] An example of the first isNicaraguan Sign Language, which emerged when deaf children inNicaragua were brought together for the first time, and received onlyoral education; of the latter,Bamako Sign Language, which emerged among the tea circles of the uneducated deaf in the capital ofMali. Nicaraguan SL is now a language of instruction and is recognized as the national sign language; Bamako SL is not, and is threatened by the use ofAmerican Sign Language in schools for the deaf.
Deaf-community sign languages contrast withvillage sign language in that they tend to be used only by the deaf, at least at first, and most communication is between deaf people. Village sign languages, on the other hand, develop in relatively isolated areas with high incidences ofcongenital deafness, where most hearing people have deaf family, so that most signers are hearing. These differences havelinguistic consequences. Urban deaf communities lack the common knowledge andsocial context that enables village signers to communicate without being verbally explicit. Deaf-community signers need to communicate with strangers, and therefore must be more explicit; it is thought this may have the effect of developing or at least speeding up the development of grammatical and other linguistic structures in the emerging language. For example, only deaf-community sign languages are known to make abstract and grammatical use ofsign space.[1] Both types of deaf sign language differ from speech-taboo languages such as the variousAboriginal Australian sign languages, which are developed by the hearing community and only used secondarily by the deaf, and are not independent languages.
Deaf-community languages may develop directly fromhome sign, or perhaps fromidioglossic sign (in families with more than one deaf child), as was the case with Nicaraguan SL, or they may develop from village sign languages, as appears to have been at least partially the case with American SL, which arose in a school for the deaf whereFrench Sign Language was the language of instruction, but seems to have derived largely from two or three village sign languages of the students.
Once a sign language is established, especially if it is a language of education, it may spread and spawn additional languages, such as in theFrench Sign Language family. The following are languages thought to have been established in new deaf communities, without the direct transmission of an existing sign language. There are presumably others; with many sign languages, we have no records of how they formed.[2]
Other locally developed sign languages which may have formed this way are:
