National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation and General Workers Union of Canada | |
Travailleurs canadiens de l'automobile | |
 | |
| Abbreviation | CAW |
|---|---|
| Predecessor | United Auto Workers |
| Merged into | Unifor |
| Formation | 1985 (1985) |
| Dissolved | 2013 (2013) |
| Type | Trade union |
| Headquarters | Toronto,Ontario, Canada |
| Location |
|
| Membership | 190,000 |
Presidents | |
| Affiliations | |
TheNational Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation and General Workers Union of Canada, commonly known as theCanadian Auto Workers (CAW),[a] was one of Canada's largest labour unions. In 2013, it merged with theCommunications, Energy and Paperworkers Union of Canada, forming a new union,Unifor. While rooted inOntario's large auto plants ofWindsor,Brampton,Oakville,St. Catharines, andOshawa, the CAW has expanded and now incorporates workers in almost every sector of the economy. The presidents of the CAW wereBob White (1985–1992),Buzz Hargrove (1992–2008), andKen Lewenza (2008–2013).
 | This article needs to beupdated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information.(May 2010) |
The CAW began as the Canadian Region of theUnited Auto Workers (UAW).
The UAW was founded in August 1935, and the Canadian Region of the UAW was established in 1937 following the 1937 GM Oshawa strike atGeneral Motors's Oshawa,Ontario plant. The Canadian Region of the UAW unionized theFord Motor Company in 1945 aftera major strike which established theright of Canadian labour union members tounion dues checkoff.George Burt was the Canadian Director of the United Auto Workers (UAW) from 1939 to 1968. He is the longest-serving leader of the Canadian Union at 29 years. He pioneered many contractual issues that affected Canadian auto workers in the early years of the union movement.
The reasons for the CAW split from the UAW are complicated. Holmes and Rusonik (1990) contend that although the Canadian labour movement has been seen as traditionally more militant than its American counterpart, it was in fact the uneven geographical development of both management and labour led the Canadian auto-workers to develop a distinctly different set of collective bargaining objectives, which placed them in a far stronger bargaining position as compared to the UAW in the US, and, ultimately, brought about the events that led directly to the Split.Two of the main forces demanding the restructuring of management and Labour during this time were the rise of Japan as a major automotive force, and the general recession of the world economy in the late 1970s and early 1980s. Aided by theAuto Pact and the weakening Canadian dollar in relation to the United States dollar, a geographic difference developed which provided some relief to many Canadian auto-workers.
By December 1984, significant differences in the value of negotiated contracts, and divergent union objectives had set the stage for the creation of the CAW, a process documented in theGenie Award winning film,Final Offer. In 1984, the Canadian section of the UAW, under the leadership ofBob White and his assistants Buzz Hargrove and Bob Nickerson, broke from the UAW, led byOwen Bieber, because the American union was seen as giving away too much in the way of concessions duringcollective bargaining. Additionally, the UAW had been lobbying the US Congress to force the transfer of auto production from Canada to the US and the Canadian branch felt there was a lack of a representative voice during UAW's conventions. By 1985 the split from the American union was complete and Bob White was acclaimed as the first President of the CAW. He served three terms as president.[citation needed].
After separation, the CAW began to grow quickly in size and stature. It merged with a number of smaller unions to double in size and become the largestprivate sector union in the country. Most notable were the mergers with theFishermen, Food, and Allied Workers and the Canadian Brotherhood of Railway Transport and General Workers (seeCAW National Council 4000. The CAW also voiced strong opposition to the then-federal government ofPrime MinisterBrian Mulroney and such policies as theGoods and Services Tax andfree trade.
In the caseFullowka et al. v. Royal Oak Ventures Inc, held in the aftermath of an 18-month strike at Royal Oak Mines in Yellowknife, the CAW was originally held responsible for 22% of damages at trial, before CAW was successful on appeal. The trial judge found that the union breached its duty of care by doing nothing to stop illegal acts during the strike, paying fines and legal fees for striking miners, providing a person to assist the miners' union who prolonged the strike, and failing to bargain in good faith. At trial, the court ruled that the cumulative effect of these breaches of the duty of care were found to have materially contributed toRoger Warren's bombing of the mine, which killed nine strikebreaking workers. Warren, a union member who had been fired from Royal Oak, testified that he was only capable of the bombing because strike-breakers had been "dehumanized" by the union and was sentenced to life in prison. However, these findings of liability were overturned on appeal by the Northwest Territories Court of Appeal and a decision by theSupreme Court of Canada was dismissed.[1] Furthermore, CAW members Al Shearing and Tim Bettger were sentenced to two and a half and three years in prison, respectively. Both were convicted of painting anti-scab graffiti and setting an explosion in a ventilation shaft on June 29, 1992. Bettger was sentenced to an additional six months in prison for blowing a hole in a television satellite dish September 1 of that year. (The unioned miners were part of the Canadian Association of Smelter and Allied Workers union (CASAW) Local 4 at the time of the strike, and merged into the CAW in May 1994.)[2]
In 1998, the CAW was deeply involved in discussions withVolvo Canada Ltd. and theGovernment of Nova Scotia over the closure of theVolvo Halifax Assembly plant. In 2000, the CAW was expelled from theCanadian Labour Congress when several union locals left theSEIU and joined the CAW, prompting accusations ofunion raiding. A settlement was reached a year later that allowed the CAW to rejoin the national labour federation but relations with other unions such as theInternational Brotherhood of Teamsters, theUnited Steel Workers of America and SEIU remain strained and the CAW remains outside of theOntario Federation of Labour.
The CAW's relationship with other unions has also been strained due to its different political direction. The CAW is strongly left leaning and it has traditionally been a strong supporter of theNew Democratic Party (NDP) and theBloc Québécois. However, under former leaderBuzz Hargrove, it began lending its support to theLiberal Party in ridings which the NDP were unlikely to win in the recent federal elections.
The CAW has attempted several times, all unsuccessful, to organizeToyota Motor Manufacturing Canada.[3] TMMC Assistant General Manager and spokesman Greig Mordue stated "Our team members will decide whether or not a union best reflects their interest... At this point in time, we don't think they have anything to gain from a union", and described the defeat of the union drive saying "Our team members have recognized that a third party represents a complication they don't need."[4] Despite this, however, the CAW supported Mordue as the Liberal candidate in the 2006 federal election instead of endorsing the NDP's Zoe Kunschner.[5] Mordue attempted to take credit for bringing the new plant to Woodstock, but lost to Conservative incumbentDave MacKenzie.[6]
The2006 federal election saw the governing Liberals lose power, despite CAW support. Afterwards, the Ontario NDP voted to expel Hargrove for supporting the Liberals, which automatically suspended his membership in the federal party. The CAW retaliated by severing all union ties with the NDP, a move formalized at the CAW's 2006 convention.
Industry analyst Anthony Faria has criticized the labour contracts that Canadian Auto Workers then-presidentBuzz Hargrove negotiated with theBig Three US automobile manufacturers in 2007, predicting that thesubprime mortgage crisis and currency would hit Canadian auto production especially hard. Faria noted that UAW presidentRon Gettelfinger agreed to have the UAW's "all-in" wage, benefit and pension costs drop from a high of $75.86 per hour in 2007 to an average of about $51 per hour starting in 2010. By comparison, the CAW's cost per hour was $77 in 2007 and will rise to over $80 per hour by the end of the new contract. Faria said that Gettelfinger went into negotiations "with the right intention...Save jobs. The CAW strategy was to squeeze every dime out of them."[7] Hargrove was said to have "instilled backbone and an attitude that the union could always make the auto makers buckle at the bargaining table".[8]
Current union presidentKen Lewenza has argued that labour is not responsible for the bankruptcy crisis facing the Big Three automakers, saying that his members would not make concessions part of any taxpayer-funded bailout.[9] Lawenza argued that the CAW agreed in 2007 to make concessions that will save the Big Three $900 million over three years.[10]
A spokesman for theCanadian Taxpayers Federation has criticized the CAW's "no-concession" stance, saying that it only serves to strengthen the opposition to a taxpayer-funded bailout for the struggling Detroit Three automakers. The CTF further pointed out that "It is especially difficult to understand anyone asking for government help that refuses to do anything to help itself to begin with", since they "fail to realize they've existed at the substantial largesse of taxpayers for decades".[11] Kelly McParland, a columnist for theNational Post, has suggested that "if he won't give anything, he and his members are likely to lose everything." He also said that the problem facing the North American auto industry was borne equally by management and labour alike, criticizing labour for building up pay and benefits for themselves that was as unsustainable as it was enviable, while attacking management for its short-term strategy of selling gas-guzzling trucks and sales tactics (price cuts, rebates, free gas and cash-back schemes).[12]
The CTF has opposed the proposed CAD $3.5 billion bailout for Canadian subsidiaries of the Big Three, saying that it was an unfair financial burden on the average Canadian, as well as another excuse for the Detroit automakers to postpone much needed change. The CTF noted that federal and provincial governments spent $782-million in the past five years on the Big Three, saying "These have been a bottomless pit of requests for cash". Lewenza disagreed, saying that the bailout should be seen by Canadians as a loan that will be paid back when the country's economy is prosperous again.[13]
On December 20, the governments of Canada and Ontario offered $3.3 billion in loans to the auto industry. Under the plan GM was to receive $3 billion andChrysler was to receive the rest.Ford only asked for a line of credit but did not be participating in the bailout.[14]
The CAW negotiated a cost-cutting deal with General Motors Canada on March 8, 2009. The deal would extend the current contract for an additional year to September 2012, and preserves the current average assembly-worker base pay of about $34 an hour. It would eliminate a $1,700 annual "special bonus," and reduce special paid absences or "SPA days" from two weeks to one week a year, while maintaining vacation entitlements which range up to six weeks a year for high-seniority workers. The deal also introduced payments by members toward their health benefits - $30 monthly per family for workers and $15 a month for pensioners. Lewenza said it also would trim by 35 per cent company contributions to union-provided programs such as child care and wellness programs. Lewenza called the package a "major sacrifice." However, observers noted that the deal did not go far enough;Dominion Bond Rating Service analyst Kam Hon described it as "not material." Automotive industry consultantDennis DesRosiers said that General Motors had missed the chance to slash labour costs,[15] pointing out that bankruptcy was a looming threat, Ottawa and Queen's Park demanded cuts to the labour bill as a condition of the bailout, and that the deficit to the pension fund would prevent the CAW from striking.[8] He estimated the total hourly cost of a GM Canada worker, including benefits, is $75 to $78, and saying that "they [GM] got six or seven." when it should have been cut by $20. DesRosiers also said giving up cost-of-living increases is not significant when inflation is nearly non-existent and added that the 40-hour reduction inpaid time off merely means "five fewer spa days."University of Toronto professor Joe D'Cruz calculated that it would save $148 million a year, though GM is seeking $6 billion in Canadian government support.[10][16] CAW autoworkers with seniority were able to maintain 10 weeks of vacation with full pay, while not contributing to their pension fund, relying instead on taxpayers (including these without pensions) to help make up their unfunded liabilities.[17]
The agreement is contingent on Canada being allocated 20% of GM's North American, and getting billions of dollars in federal and provincial taxpayer support, which Lewenza stressed will be loans. However, some suggested that this would not be the final time that automakers would request a bailout.[18]Dennis DesRosiers estimated that GM will go through its government loans in a couple of quarters, long before any recovery in the market. Furthermore, GM Canada president Arturo Elias had admitted to MPFrank Valeriote that GM had pledged all its assets worldwide to the US government in order to secure the first tranche of a US$30 billion loan, leaving no assets to collateralize the $6 billion loan from theCanadian government. The Canadian Taxpayers' Federation noted that between 1982 and 2005, Ottawa handed out over $18.2 billion to corporations, of which only $7.1 billion was repayable, and only $1.3 billion was ever repaid.[17]
Chrysler vice-chairman and presidentThomas W. LaSorda (himself the son of a CAW official) and Ford's chief of manufacturing Joe Hinrichs said that the GM-CAW deal was insufficient, suggesting that they would break the CAW's negotiating pattern set by GM. LaSorda told theHouse of Commons of Canada finance committee that he would demand an hourly wage cut of $20, suggested that Chrysler may withdraw from Canada if it fails to achieve more substantial cost savings from the CAW.[19][20][21]
On March 31, 2009, the Canadian federal and Ontario governments jointly rejected the restructuring plans submitted by GM and Chrysler. This came a day after US PresidentBarack Obama had rejected the plans of their parent companies. Both federal Industry MinisterTony Clement and Ontario PremierDalton McGuinty suggested the CAW's initial deal was insufficient in cutting costs and the union had to return to the bargaining table to make further concessions. Both governments maintained that these were needed to make the business viable in order justify the use of taxpayers' money.[22]Fiat CEOSergio Marchionne has asked that CAW wages be reduced to the levels of non-unionized workers from Honda and Toyota operating in Canada, or else they would walk away from theproposed alliance with Chrysler[broken anchor], resulting in the latter being forced into bankruptcy.[23]Following its emergence from Chapter 11, Chrysler returned to profitability, repaying some of its government loans.
The Canadian Auto Workers voted in October 2012 to merge with theCommunications, Energy and Paperworkers Union of Canada.[24] The new merged union,Unifor, held its founding convention in August 2013.
Canadian Directors of the UAW
Presidents of the Canadian Auto Workers
CAW PresidentBob White plays a major role in the 1985 documentary film:Final Offer by Sturla Gunnarsson & Robert Collision. It follows the 1984 contract negotiations with General Motors that saw the CAW's birth, and split with the UAW. It's an interesting look at life on the shop floor of a car factory, along with the art of business negotiation.
The CAW Local 200 donated over $4 million towards the renovation of theUniversity of Windsor's student union building, which was renamed theCAW Student Centre in 1991 as recognition of the gift.
Canadian History.
| International | |
|---|---|
| National | |
