Bicycle-friendly policies and practices help some people feel more comfortable about traveling bybicycle with other traffic. The level of bicycle-friendliness of an environment can be influenced by many factors includingtown planning andcycling infrastructure decisions. A stigma towards people who ride bicycles and fear of cycling is a social construct that needs to be fully understood when promoting a bicycle friendly culture.[1]
Assuming people prefer to get to their destination quickly,urban planning andzoning may affect whether schools, shops, public transport interchanges and other destination are within a reasonable cycling distance of the areas where people live. If urban form influences these issues, then compact and circularsettlement patterns may promote cycling. In 1990, the Netherlands adopted the "ABC" guidelines, specifically limiting infrastructure developments that are major attractants to locations that are readily accessible by non-car users.[2]
The manner in which the public roads network is designed, built and managed can have a significant effect on the utility and safety ofcycling as transport. Settlements that provide a dense roads network consisting ofinterconnected streets will tend to encourage cycling.
In contrast, other communities may use acul-de-sac based,housing estate/housing subdivision model where minor roads are disconnected and only feed into astreet hierarchy of progressively more "arterial" type roads. Designs that propose to resolve the contradiction between the cul-de-sac and the traditional interconnected network, such as thefused grid, have been proposed and built with varying levels of success.[3]
In the UK, the principle of 'filtered permeability' has been proposed in some government guidance to maximise the ease of movement of cyclists and pedestrians, whilst constraining it for motor vehicles, seepermeability.
Cycling infrastructure includesbikeways, maps,signs,signals,protected intersections andbicycle parking.
A community's infrastructure can affect its citizens’ health, especially in regard toobesity andphysical activity.[4] Cities that incorporate bicycle routes have a higher percentage ofbicycle commuters.[5] Studies have shown that even moderate increases in physical activity can have a substantial effect on health. Bicycling to work has been shown to decrease mortality by as much as 40%.[6]
Bicycling is often used as an alternative to travel by car. Automobile travel provides the perception of increased mobility and convenience for travelers, but also has high costs associated with taxes, insurance, fuel, maintenance, road construction and repair, and contributes toair pollution. When infrastructure is built to allow consumers to choose between automobile and other forms of travel, it reduces a community'sautomobile dependency and allows for more efficient transport choices and land usage.[7]
In the U.S., theLeague of American Bicyclists has formally recognized some cities asbicycle-friendly communities for "providing safe accommodation and facilities for bicyclists and encouraging residents to bike for transportation and recreation."
TheBritish tourist board award holiday accommodation providers who are cycle friendly with a "Cycle Friendly" award.[8]
TheLeague of American Bicyclists designatedNew Orleans as a Bicycle Friendly City in 2011.[9]
| General and technical | |
|---|---|
| Utility and slow recreation | |
| Sports-related cycling and fast-paced recreation | |
| Health, safety and infrastructure |
|
| Other | |
| Lists | |
