Proof without words of the arithmetic progression formulas using a rotated copy of the blocks.
Anarithmetic progression orarithmetic sequence is asequence ofnumbers such that the difference from any succeeding term to its preceding term remains constant throughout the sequence. The constant difference is called common difference of that arithmetic progression. For instance, the sequence 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, . . . is an arithmetic progression with a common difference of 2.
If the initial term of an arithmetic progression is and the common difference of successive members is, then the-th term of the sequence () is given by
A finite portion of an arithmetic progression is called afinite arithmetic progression and sometimes just called an arithmetic progression. Thesum of a finite arithmetic progression is called anarithmetic series.
According to an anecdote of uncertain reliability,[1] in primary schoolCarl Friedrich Gauss reinvented the formula for summing the integers from 1 through, for the case, by grouping the numbers from both ends of the sequence into pairs summing to 101 and multiplying by the number of pairs. Regardless of the truth of this story, Gauss was not the first to discover this formula. Similar rules were known in antiquity toArchimedes,Hypsicles andDiophantus;[2] in China toZhang Qiujian; in India toAryabhata,Brahmagupta andBhaskara II;[3] and in medieval Europe toAlcuin,[4]Dicuil,[5]Fibonacci,[6]Sacrobosco,[7] and anonymous commentators ofTalmud known asTosafists.[8] Some find it likely that its origin goes back to thePythagoreans in the 5th century BC.[9]
Computation of the sum 2 + 5 + 8 + 11 + 14. When the sequence is reversed and added to itself term by term, the resulting sequence has a single repeated value in it, equal to the sum of the first and last numbers (2 + 14 = 16). Thus 16 × 5 = 80 is twice the sum.
Thesum of the members of a finite arithmetic progression is called anarithmetic series. For example, consider the sum:
This sum can be found quickly by taking the numbern of terms being added (here 5), multiplying by the sum of the first and last number in the progression (here 2 + 14 = 16), and dividing by 2:
In the case above, this gives the equation:
This formula works for any arithmetic progression of real numbers beginning with and ending with. For example,
Animated proof for the formula giving the sum of the first integers 1+2+...+n.
To derive the above formula, begin by expressing the arithmetic series in two different ways:
Rewriting the terms in reverse order:
Adding the corresponding terms of both sides of the two equations and halving both sides:
This formula can be simplified as:
Furthermore, the mean value of the series can be calculated via::
The formula is essentially the same as the formula for the mean of adiscrete uniform distribution, interpreting the arithmetic progression as a set of equally probable outcomes.
Theproduct of the members of a finite arithmetic progression with an initial elementa1, common differencesd, andn elements in total is determined in a closed expression
where denotes theGamma function. The formula is not valid when is negative or zero.
This is a generalization of the facts that the product of the progression is given by thefactorial and that the product
The standard deviation of any arithmetic progression is
where is the number of terms in the progression and is the common difference between terms. The formula is essentially the same as the formula for the standard deviation of adiscrete uniform distribution, interpreting the arithmetic progression as a set of equally probable outcomes.
Theintersection of any two doubly infinite arithmetic progressions is either empty or another arithmetic progression, which can be found using theChinese remainder theorem. If each pair of progressions in a family of doubly infinite arithmetic progressions have a non-empty intersection, then there exists a number common to all of them; that is, infinite arithmetic progressions form aHelly family.[10] However, the intersection of infinitely many infinite arithmetic progressions might be a single number rather than itself being an infinite progression.
Amount of arithmetic subsets of lengthk of the set {1,...,n}
^Problems to Sharpen the Young, John Hadley and David Singmaster,The Mathematical Gazette,76, #475 (March 1992), pp. 102–126.
^Ross, H.E. & Knott, B.I. (2019) Dicuil (9th century) on triangular and square numbers,British Journal for the History of Mathematics, 34:2, 79-94,https://doi.org/10.1080/26375451.2019.1598687
^Stern, M. (1990). 74.23 A Mediaeval Derivation of the Sum of an Arithmetic Progression. The Mathematical Gazette, 74(468), 157-159. doi:10.2307/3619368
^Høyrup, J. The "Unknown Heritage": trace of a forgotten locus of mathematical sophistication. Arch. Hist. Exact Sci. 62, 613–654 (2008).https://doi.org/10.1007/s00407-008-0025-y
^Duchet, Pierre (1995), "Hypergraphs", in Graham, R. L.;Grötschel, M.; Lovász, L. (eds.),Handbook of combinatorics, Vol. 1, 2, Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 381–432,MR1373663. See in particular Section 2.5, "Helly Property",pp. 393–394.