The most notable shared characteristic is the presence ofcortical (near the surface) alveoli (sacs). These are flattenedvesicles (sacs) arranged as a layer just under themembrane and supporting it, typically contributing to a flexible pellicle (thin skin). In armoreddinoflagellates they may contain stiff plates. Alveolates havemitochondria with tubular cristae (invaginations), and cells often have pore-like intrusions through the cell surface. The group contains free-living andparasitic organisms, predatoryflagellates, andphotosynthetic organisms.
Transmission electron micrograph of a thin section of the surface of the ciliateParamecium putrinum, showing the alveoli (red arrows) under the cell surface
Almost all sequenced mitochondrial genomes of ciliates and apicomplexa are linear.[5] The mitochondria almost all carrymtDNA of their own but with greatly reduced genome sizes. Exceptions areCryptosporidium which are left with only amitosome, the circular mitochondrial genomes ofAcavomonas andBabesia microti,[6][7] andToxoplasma's highly fragmented mitochondrial genome, consisting of 21 sequence blocks which recombine to produce longer segments.[8][9]
The relationship of apicomplexa, dinoflagellates and ciliates had been suggested during the 1980s, and this was confirmed in the early 1990s by comparisons of ribosomal RNA sequences, most notably by Gajadharet al.[10]Cavalier-Smith introduced the formal name Alveolata in 1991,[11] although at the time he considered the grouping to be aparaphyletic assemblage. Many biologists prefer the use of the colloquial name 'alveolate'.[12]
Alveolata include around nine major and minor groups. They are diverse in form, and are known to be related by various ultrastructural and genetic similarities:[13]
Ciliates – very common protozoa with many shortcilia arranged in rows, and two nuclei
Apicomplexa – parasitic and secondary non-photosynthetic protozoa that lackaxonemal locomotive structures except ingametes
The Acavomonidia and Colponemidia were previously grouped together as colponemids, a taxon now split because each has a distinctive organization orultrastructural identity. The Acavomonidia are closer to the dinoflagellate/perkinsid group than the Colponemidia are.[13] As such, the informal term "colponemids", as it stands currently, covers two non-sister groups within Alveolata: the Acavomonidia and the Colponemidia.[13]
The Apicomplexa and dinoflagellates may be more closely related to each other than to the ciliates. Both haveplastids, and most share a bundle or cone ofmicrotubules at the top of the cell. In apicomplexans this forms part of a complex used to enter host cells, while in some colorless dinoflagellates it forms a peduncle used to ingest prey. Various other genera are closely related to these two groups, mostly flagellates with a similar apical structure. These include free-living members inOxyrrhis andColponema, and parasites inPerkinsus,[14]Parvilucifera,Rastrimonas and theellobiopsids. In 2001, direct amplification of therRNA gene in marinepicoplankton samples revealed the presence of two novel alveolate lineages, called group I and II.[15][16] Group I has no cultivated relatives, while group II is related to the dinoflagellate parasiteAmoebophrya, which was classified until now in theSyndiniales dinoflagellate order.
Some studies suggested thehaplosporids, mostly parasites of marine invertebrates, might belong here, but they lack alveoli and are now placed among theCercozoa.
The ellobiopsids are of uncertain relation within the alveolates. Silberman et al 2004 establish that theThalassomyces genus of ellobiopsids are alveolates usingphylogenetic analysis, however as of 2016[update] no more certainty exists on their place.[17][18]
The development of plastids among the alveolates is intriguing. Cavalier-Smith proposed the alveolates developed from a chloroplast-containing ancestor, which also gave rise to theChromista (thechromalveolate hypothesis). Other researchers have speculated that the alveolates originally lacked plastids and possibly the dinoflagellates and Apicomplexa acquired them separately. However, it now appears that the alveolates, the dinoflagellates, the Chromerida and theheterokont algae acquired their plastids from a red alga with evidence of a common origin of this organelle in all these four clades.[20]
A Bayesian estimate places the evolution of the alveolate group at ~850 million years ago.[21] The Alveolata consist ofMyzozoa,Ciliates, and Colponemids. In other words, the term Myzozoa, meaning "to siphon the contents from prey", may be applied informally to the common ancestor of the subset of alveolates that are neither ciliates nor colponemids. Predation upon algae is an important driver in alveolate evolution, as it can provide sources for endosymbiosis of novel plastids. The term Myzozoa is therefore a handy concept for tracking the history of the alveolate phylum.
The ancestors of the alveolate group may have been photosynthetic.[22] The ancestral alveolate probably possessed aplastid. Chromerids, apicomplexans, and peridinin dinoflagellates have retained thisorganelle.[23] Going one step even further back, the chromerids, the peridinin dinoflagellates and theheterokont algae have been argued to possess a monophyletic plastid lineage in common, i.e. acquired their plastids from ared alga,[20] and so it seems likely that the common ancestor of alveolates and heterokonts was also photosynthetic.
In one school of thought the common ancestor of thedinoflagellates,apicomplexans,Colpodella,Chromerida, andVoromonas was a myzocytotic predator with two heterodynamicflagella,micropores,trichocysts,rhoptries,micronemes, a polar ring and a coiled open sidedconoid.[24] While the common ancestor of alveolates may also have possessed some of these characteristics, it has been argued that Myzocytosis was not one of these characteristics, as ciliates ingest prey by a different mechanism.[13]
An ongoing debate concerns the number of membranes surrounding the plastid across apicomplexans and certain dinoflagellates, and the origin of these membranes. This ultrastructural character can be used to group organisms and if the character is in common, it can imply that phyla had a common photosynthetic ancestor. On the basis that apicomplexans possess a plastid surrounded by four membranes, and that peridinin dinoflagellates possess a plastid surrounded by three membranes, Petersen et al.[25] have been unable to rule out that the shared stramenopile-alveolate plastid could have been recycled multiple times in the alveolate phylum, the source being stramenopile-alveolate donors, through the mechanism of ingestion andendosymbiosis.
Ciliates are a model alveolate, having been genetically studied in great depth over the longest period of any alveolate lineage. They are unusual among eukaryotes in that reproduction involves amicronucleus and amacronucleus. Their reproduction is easily studied in the lab, and made them a model eukaryote historically. Being entirely predatory and lacking any remnant plastid, their development as a phylum illustrates how predation and autotrophy[22] are in dynamic balance and that the balance can swing one way or other at the point of origin of a new phylum from mixotrophic ancestors, causing one ability to be lost.
^Gajadhar, A. A., et al. (1991). "Ribosomal RNA sequences ofSarcocystis muris,Theilera annulata, andCrypthecodinium cohnii reveal evolutionary relationships among apicomplexans, dinoflagellates, and ciliates".Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology.45 (1):147–153.doi:10.1016/0166-6851(91)90036-6.PMID1904987..
^Moore RB, Oborník M, Janouskovec J, Chrudimský T, Vancová M, Green DH, Wright SW, Davies NW, Bolch CJ, Heimann K, Slapeta J, Hoegh-Guldberg O, Logsdon JM, Carter DA (2008). "A photosynthetic alveolate closely related to apicomplexan parasites".Nature.451 (7181):959–963.Bibcode:2008Natur.451..959M.doi:10.1038/nature06635.PMID18288187.S2CID28005870.
