![]() | This article includes a list ofgeneral references, butit lacks sufficient correspondinginline citations. Please help toimprove this article byintroducing more precise citations.(April 2009) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Aesthetic emotions areemotions that are felt duringaesthetic activity or appreciation. These emotions may be of the everyday variety (such asfear,wonder orsympathy) or may be specific to aesthetic contexts. Examples of the latter include thesublime, thebeautiful, and thekitsch. In each of these respects, the emotion usually constitutes only a part of the overall aesthetic experience, but may play a more or less definitive function for that state.
The relation between aesthetic emotions and other emotions is traditionally said to rely on the disinterestedness of the aesthetic experience (seeKant[which?] especially). Aesthetic emotions do not motivate practical behaviours in the way that other emotions do (such as how fear motivates avoidance behaviours).
The capacity of artworks to arouse emotions such as fear is a subject of philosophical and psychological research.[1] It raises problems such as theparadox of fiction in which one responds with sometimes quite intense emotions to art, even whilst knowing that the scenario presented is fictional (see for instance the work ofKendall Walton). Another issue is the problem ofimaginative resistance, which considers why we are able to imagine many far-fetched fictional truths but experience comparative difficulty imagining that different moral standards hold in a fictional world. This problem was first raised byDavid Hume, and was revived in current discussion byRichard Moran,Kendall Walton andTamar Gendler (who introduced the term in its current usage in a 2000 article by the same name).[2] Some forms of artwork seem to be dedicated to the arousal of particular emotions. For instancehorror films seek to arouse feelings of fear or disgust;comedies seek to arouse amusement or happiness,tragedies seek to arouse sympathy or sadness, andmelodramas try to arouse pity and empathy.
In thephilosophy of music, scholars have argued whether instrumental music such as symphonies are simply abstract arrangements and patterns of musical pitches ("absolute music"), or whether instrumental music depicts emotional tableaux and moods ("program music"). Despite the assertions of philosophers advocating the "absolute music" argument, the typical symphony-goer does interpret the notes and chords of the orchestra emotionally; the opening of a Romantic-era symphony, in which minor chords thunder over low bass notes, is often interpreted by layman listeners as an expression of sadness in music.
Also called "abstract music", absolute music is music that is not explicitly "about" anything, non-representational or non-objective. Absolute music has no references to stories or images or any other kind of extramusical idea. The aesthetic ideas underlying the absolute music debate relate toKant's aesthetic disinterestedness from hisCritique of Aesthetic Judgment, and has led to numerous arguments, including a war of words betweenBrahms andWagner. In the 19th century, a group of early Romantics includingJohann Wolfgang von Goethe andE. T. A. Hoffmann gave rise to the idea of what can be labeled as spiritual absolutism. "Formalism" is the concept of ‘music for music’s sake’ and refers only to instrumental music without words. The 19th century music criticEduard Hanslick argued that music could be enjoyed as pure sound and form, that it needed no connotation of extra-musical elements to warrant its existence.