Incalculus andreal analysis,absolute continuity is asmoothness property offunctions that is stronger thancontinuity anduniform continuity. The notion of absolute continuity allows one to obtain generalizations of the relationship between the two central operations ofcalculus—differentiation andintegration. This relationship is commonly characterized (by thefundamental theorem of calculus) in the framework ofRiemann integration, but with absolute continuity it may be formulated in terms ofLebesgue integration. For real-valued functions on thereal line, two interrelated notions appear:absolute continuity of functions andabsolute continuity of measures. These two notions are generalized in different directions. The usual derivative of a function is related to theRadon–Nikodym derivative, ordensity, of a measure. We have the following chains of inclusions for functionsover acompact subset of the real line:
A continuous function fails to be absolutely continuous if it fails to beuniformly continuous, which can happen if the domain of the function is not compact – examples are tan(x) over[0,π/2),x2 over the entire real line, and sin(1/x) over (0, 1]. But a continuous functionf can fail to be absolutely continuous even on a compact interval. It may not be "differentiable almost everywhere" (like theWeierstrass function, which is not differentiable anywhere). Or it may bedifferentiable almost everywhere and its derivativef′ may beLebesgue integrable, but the integral off′ differs from the increment off (how muchf changes over an interval). This happens for example with theCantor function.
Let be aninterval in thereal line. A function isabsolutely continuous on if for every positive number, there is a positive number such that whenever a finite sequence ofpairwise disjoint sub-intervals of with satisfies[1]
then
The collection of all absolutely continuous functions on is denoted.
The sum and difference of two absolutely continuous functions are also absolutely continuous. If the two functions are defined on a bounded closed interval, then their product is also absolutely continuous.[4]
If an absolutely continuous functionf is defined on a bounded closed interval and is nowhere zero then1/f is absolutely continuous.[5]
Iff: [a,b] →R is absolutely continuous, then it is ofbounded variation on [a,b].[7]
Iff: [a,b] →R is absolutely continuous, then it can be written as the difference of two monotonic nondecreasing absolutely continuous functions on [a,b].
Iff: [a,b] →R is absolutely continuous, then it has theLuzinN property (that is, for any such that, it holds that, where stands for theLebesgue measure onR).
f:I →R is absolutely continuous if and only if it is continuous, is of bounded variation and has the LuzinN property. This statement is also known as the Banach-Zareckiǐ theorem.[8]
Iff:I →R is absolutely continuous andg:R →R is globallyLipschitz-continuous, then the compositiong f is absolutely continuous. Conversely, for every functiong that is not globally Lipschitz continuous there exists an absolutely continuous functionf such thatg f is not absolutely continuous.[9]
Let (X,d) be ametric space and letI be aninterval in thereal lineR. A functionf:I →X isabsolutely continuous onI if for every positive number, there is a positive number such that whenever a finite sequence ofpairwise disjoint sub-intervals [xk,yk] ofI satisfies:
then:
The collection of all absolutely continuous functions fromI intoX is denoted AC(I;X).
A further generalization is the space ACp(I;X) of curvesf:I →X such that:[10]
Ameasure onBorel subsets of the real line is absolutely continuous with respect to theLebesgue measure if for every-measurable set implies. Equivalently, implies. This condition is written as We say isdominated by
In most applications, if a measure on the real line is simply said to be absolutely continuous — without specifying with respect to which other measure it is absolutely continuous — then absolute continuity with respect to the Lebesgue measure is meant.
The same principle holds for measures on Borel subsets of
Any other function satisfying (3) is equal to almost everywhere. Such a function is calledRadon–Nikodym derivative, or density, of the absolutely continuous measure
Equivalence between (1), (2) and (3) holds also in for all
Thus, the absolutely continuous measures on are precisely those that have densities; as a special case, the absolutely continuous probability measures are precisely the ones that haveprobability density functions.
If and are twomeasures on the samemeasurable space is said to beabsolutely continuous with respect to if for every set for which[13] This is written as "". That is:
If is asigned orcomplex measure, it is said that is absolutely continuous with respect to if its variation satisfies equivalently, if every set for which is-null.
TheRadon–Nikodym theorem[14] states that if is absolutely continuous with respect to and both measures areσ-finite, then has a density, or "Radon-Nikodym derivative", with respect to which means that there exists a-measurable function taking values in denoted by such that for any-measurable set we have:
ViaLebesgue's decomposition theorem,[15] every σ-finite measure can be decomposed into the sum of an absolutely continuous measure and a singular measure with respect to another σ-finite measure. Seesingular measure for examples of measures that are not absolutely continuous.
Relation between the two notions of absolute continuity
A finite measureμ onBorel subsets of the real line is absolutely continuous with respect toLebesgue measure if and only if the point function:
is an absolutely continuous real function. More generally, a function is locally (meaning on every bounded interval) absolutely continuous if and only if itsdistributional derivative is a measure that is absolutely continuous with respect to the Lebesgue measure.
If absolute continuity holds then the Radon–Nikodym derivative ofμ is equal almost everywhere to the derivative ofF.[16]
More generally, the measureμ is assumed to be locally finite (rather than finite) andF(x) is defined asμ((0,x]) forx > 0, 0 forx = 0, and −μ((x,0]) forx < 0. In this caseμ is theLebesgue–Stieltjes measure generated byF.[17] The relation between the two notions of absolute continuity still holds.[18]
^Royden 1988, Sect. 5.4, page 108;Nielsen 1997, Definition 15.6 on page 251;Athreya & Lahiri 2006, Definitions 4.4.1, 4.4.2 on pages 128,129. The interval is assumed to be bounded and closed in the former two books but not the latter book.
^Equivalence between (1) and (2) is a special case ofNielsen 1997, Proposition 15.5 on page 251 (fails for σ-finite measures); equivalence between (1) and (3) is a special case of theRadon–Nikodym theorem, seeNielsen 1997, Theorem 15.4 on page 251 orAthreya & Lahiri 2006, Item (ii) of Theorem 4.1.1 on page 115 (still holds for σ-finite measures).
Ambrosio, Luigi; Gigli, Nicola; Savaré, Giuseppe (2005),Gradient Flows in Metric Spaces and in the Space of Probability Measures, ETH Zürich, Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel,ISBN3-7643-2428-7
Athreya, Krishna B.; Lahiri, Soumendra N. (2006),Measure theory and probability theory, Springer,ISBN0-387-32903-X
Bruckner, A. M.; Bruckner, J. B.; Thomson, B. S. (1997),Real Analysis, Prentice Hall,ISBN0-134-58886-X