| AT4 | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Type | Disposableanti-tank launcher |
| Place of origin | Sweden United States |
| Service history | |
| In service | 1987–present |
| Used by | SeeOperators |
| Wars | SeeWars |
| Production history | |
| Designer | Förenade Fabriksverken |
| Manufacturer |
|
| Unit cost | US$1,480[1] |
| No. built | 600,000+[2] |
| Variants | SeeVariants |
| Specifications | |
| Mass | 6.7 kg (14.8lb) (AT4)[3] 8 kg (18 lb) (AT4-CS) |
| Length | 102 cm (40 in)[3] |
| Caliber | 84 mm |
| Muzzle velocity | 290 m/s (950 ft/s; 1,000 km/h), 220 m/s (720 ft/s; 790 km/h) (CS)[4] |
| Effective firing range | 300 m (point target)[3] |
| Maximum firing range | 500 m (area target) 2,100 m (maximum) |
| Sights | Iron sights, optionalAN/PVS-4night vision unit |
| Filling | Octol |
| Filling weight | 440 ghigh-explosive anti-tank (HEAT) round |
| External images | |
|---|---|
| Prototype AT4 Sweden tested 1981/82 | |
 Early AT4 with Swedish Soldier | |
| Early AT4 launcher and projectile |
TheAT4[a] is a Swedish 84 mm (3.31 in) unguided, man-portable, disposable,shoulder-fired recoillessanti-tank weapon manufactured bySaab Bofors Dynamics (formerly: FFV Ordance, later, Bofors Anti-Armour Systems).[5][unreliable source?] The AT4 is not arocket launcher strictly speaking, because the explosive warhead is not propelled by arocket motor. Rather, it is a smooth-bore recoilless gun (as opposed to arecoilless rifle, which has arifled barrel).[6]Saab has had considerable sales success with the AT4, making it one of the most common light anti-tank weapons in the world.[7][8] TheM136 AT4 andM136A1 AT4CS-RS are the variants used by theUnited States Army.[9]
The name AT4 is a word play on the 84 mmcaliber of the weapon, (84) 'eighty four' being ahomophone of 'A-T-4'.[10] The name also doubles as an alpha-phonetic word play on the weapon's role, due to "AT" being a common military abbreviation for "anti-tank".[11] The name was created for export purposes as the nickname "eighty-four" was already a common English nickname for theCarl Gustaf 8.4 cm recoilless rifle after its caliber.[10]
The AT4 is intended to giveinfantry units a means to destroy or disablearmoured fighting vehicles andfortifications, although it is generally ineffective against more modernmain battle tanks (MBTs), especially those withreactive armour, unless weaker sections of armour are exploited. The launcher and projectile are manufactured prepacked and issued as one unit of ammunition, with the launcher discarded after one use.
The AT4 is a development of the 74-mmPansarskott m/68[12] (Miniman) adopted by theSwedish Army in the late 1960s. Like the m/68, the AT4 was designed byFörsvarets Fabriksverk (FFV) and manufactured at their facility at Zakrisdal,Karlstad, Sweden.[5] FFV began research on a replacement for the m/68 in 1976, deliberately designing an individual anti-armour weapon that would not be able to defeat the heavy armour protection of MBTs (main battle tanks) in frontal engagements, believing that to be counterproductive. The AT4 was designed as a weapon to engage medium-to-light armoured vehicles from any direction or MBTs from the sides or rear, and as an assault weapon effective against buildings and fortifications. FFV's prime design goal was a weapon that was simple to use, rugged, and far more accurate against moving targets than previous individual antiarmour weapons. Another key requirement was that the AT4 not only be able to penetrate armour, but also exhibit devastatingbeyond-armour effect after penetration. FFV and the Swedish Army began the first evaluation firings of the prototype AT4s in the spring of 1981, with 100 tested by early 1982.[13]
Even before the AT4 had been adopted by Sweden, it was entered into aUnited States Army competition for a new anti-tank weapon mandated by Congress in 1982 when theFGR-17 Viper failed as a replacement for theM72 LAW. Six weapons were tested in 1983 by the US Army: the BritishLAW 80, the GermanArmbrust, the FrenchAPILAS, the Norwegian M72E4 (an upgraded M72 LAW), the US Viper (for baseline comparison purposes) and the Swedish AT4. The US Army reported to Congress in November 1983 that the FFV AT4 came the closest to meeting all the major requirements established to replace the M72 LAW,[14] with the Armbrust coming in second.[15]
Though very impressed with the simplicity and durability of the tested version of the AT4, the US Army saw some room for improvement, specifically the addition of rear and front bumpers on the launch tube and changes to the sights and slings. After these changes, the AT4 was adopted by the US Army as theLightweight Multipurpose Weapon M136.[16] The Swedish Army also recognized these improvements and subsequently adopted the Americanized version of the AT4 as thePansarskott m/86 (Pskott m/86), with the addition of a forward folding hand grip to help steady the AT4 when being aimed and fired. The forward folding grip is the only difference between the AT4 adopted by Sweden and the US Army version.
Due to the urban combat conditions that US military forces faced regularly during theIraq War, the US Army Close Combat Systems manager in charge of purchases of the AT4 suspended orders for the standard version of the AT4; US military forces instead only ordered the AT4 CS (Confined Space) version.[17]
The AT4 may be considered a disposable, low-cost alternative to aCarl Gustaf 8.4 cm recoilless rifle. The AT4 took many of its design features from the Carl Gustaf, which operates on the principle of arecoilless weapon, where the forwardinertia of theprojectile is balanced by the inertia ofpropellant gases ejecting from the rear of the barrel. But unlike the Carl Gustaf, which uses a heavier and more expensive steel tube withrifling,[18] the disposable AT4 design greatly reduces manufacturing costs by using a reinforced smoothborefiberglass outer tube. Being a disposable gun also allows for lighter and cheaper construction. In a single-use disposable gun, the barrel only needs to be able to contain a single pressure spike when firing, when it can be disposed of, even if it is ruined, burnt-out and strained, unlike traditional guns which are required to survive many pressure spikes without failure and thus need to be strongly overbuilt and made of heat-proof materials. Pressures are also kept quite low compared to many traditional guns. This lightweight and thin barrel and low pressure, combined with the almost complete lack of recoil, means that relatively large projectiles (comparable to those found inmortars andartillery systems) can be utilised, which would otherwise be impossible in a man-portable weapon.
In the system originally developed by FFV for the Carl Gustaf, a plastic blowout plug is placed at the centre rear of the shell casing containing the projectile and propellant, which itself is enclosed in the AT4 outer tube. When the gases build up to the correct pressure level, the blowout plug disintegrates, allowing the proper amount of gases to be vented to the rear, balancing the propellant gases pushing the projectile forward.
The AT4 adopted a unique method developed earlier by FFV: the spring-loaded firing rod is located down the side of the outer tube, with thefiring pin at the rear of the tube. When released, the firing pin strikes a primer located in the side of the casing's rim.
The disadvantage of the recoilless design is that it creates a largeback blast area behind the weapon, which can cause severe burns andoverpressure injuries to friendly personnel in the vicinity of the user and sometimes even to the users themselves, especially in confined spaces. The back blast may also reveal the user's position to the enemy. The problem of back blast was solved with theAT4-CS (Confined Space) version, specially designed forurban warfare. This version uses a saltwater countermass in the rear of the launcher to absorb the back blast; the resulting spray captures and dramatically slows down the pressure wave, allowing troops to fire from enclosed areas. The AT4-CS version also reduced its muzzle velocity from the original 290 m/s to 220 m/s as part of its effort to be user-safe in a confined space, making the AT4-CS version more difficult to use as the drop is more pronounced. The effectiveness of the HEAT warhead is not dependent on speed.[19]
To fire, the gunner first removes the safety pin located at the rear of the tube, which unblocks the firing rod. They then take a firing position, ensuring that no one is present in the back blast area. If firing from theprone position, they must also place their legs well to the side to avoid burning themself. Then, the gunner moves back the front and rear sight covers, allowing the sights to pop up into their firing positions. The AT4 hasiron sights that were originally developed for the cancelledViper, and are similar in concept and use to those on assault rifles.[20] They then remove the first of twosafeties by moving the firing rod cocking lever (located on the left side) forward and then over the top to the right side. The gunner takes aim, while at the same time holding down the red safety lever located in front of the cocking lever, and then fires by pressing forward the red firing button with his right thumb. Both the red safety lever and the firing button must be pressed down at the same time to fire the AT4. The red firing button has a similar resistance to the trigger pull of a rifle, so the gunner does not have to jab at the firing button, which could throw their aim off.
After firing, the AT4 is discarded. Gunners are often trained to break off the sights after use, in order to prevent other soldiers from mistaking used launchers for unused ones. Unlike the heavier Carl Gustaf, the AT4 outer tube is built to take the stress of just one firing; it is not reusable and cannot be reloaded.
The AT4 can mount an opticalnight sight on a removable fixture. In US military use, the launcher can be fitted with the AN/PAQ-4C, AN/PEQ-2, or the AN/PAS-13 night sights.
The AT4 requires little training and is quite simple to use, making it suitable for general issue. However, as the cost of each launcher makes regular live-fire training very expensive, practice versions exist that are identical in operation but fire reloadable9×19mm or20mmtracer ammunition. Both practice cartridges are unique to their respective weapons, with their trajectory matched to that of the live round. The 20mm version also has arecoilless weapon effect with the same high noise and back blast as the AT4 firing and is favoured by the Swedish army because of the added realism of the back blast as compared to the "plonk" sound of the 9mm round (similar to the sound of a finger tapping on an empty can).
There are several different projectiles for the AT4. Because it is a one-shot weapon, projectiles are preloaded into the launcher tubes.[5]
High-explosive anti-tank (HEAT) – Can penetrate up to 45 centimetres (18 in) ofrolled homogeneous armour (RHA) withbeyond-armour effect.[22]
High-explosive dual purpose (HEDP) 502[5][23] – For use againstbunkers, buildings, enemy personnel in the open, and light armour. It can be set to detonate on impact or with a brief detonation delay. The heavier nose cap allows either to penetrate light walls or windows before exploding, or to be "skipped" off the ground for an air burst. For use against light armour, there is a smaller-cone HEAT warhead with 15 centimetres (5.9 in) penetration of RHA.
High penetration (HP) – Extra high penetration ability, up to 42–60 centimetres (17–24 in) of RHA.[24]
Anti-structure tandem-warheads (AST) – Designed for urban warfare where a projectile heavier than the HEDP AT4 is needed. This combines a shallow-coned HEAT warhead (resulting in low penetration but producing a wide hole) with atandem-charge and a follow-through high-blast warhead. It has two settings: either to destroy bunkers or tomouse-hole a building wall for combat entry.[25]
Extended range (ER) – Anti-armor version with HEAT warhead. Range is extended from 300 to 600 metres (980 to 1,970 ft), with increased penetration up to 46 centimetres (18 in) of RHA. These major improvements add only about 2 kilograms of mass, despite being CS models.[26][24]
High explosive (HE) – High explosive anti-personnel weapon that can be set for impact orair-burst detonation, with an effective range up to 1,000 metres (3,300 ft).[26]
M136 AT4 – American version with modified launch tube bumpers, sights, and slings.[27]
M136A1 AT4CS-RS – American variant with a uniquebi-metal warhead design, specially developed to maximizebehind-armor effects for higher kill probability. The weapon is capable of firing from confined spaces (CS) and features areduced sensitivity (RS) explosive, with an armor penetration of over 350 mm. Its effective range is 20–300 m.[28][29][9]
XM919 Individual Assault Weapon (also known as AT4CS TW) – American future variant, to enter service in 2025, and be delivered by 2029 for USD $500 million.[30]
Bunker-busting (AT8) – An AT4 version where the standard HEAT projectile is replaced with the bunker-busting warhead developed for theMk 153 Shoulder-Launched Multipurpose Assault Weapon (SMAW). No orders were ever placed.[31]
AT12-T – In the early 1990s, there were tests of atandem charge 120 mm version (Bofors AT 12-T). The 14 kg weapon had a claimed penetration of 90 centimetres (35 in) RHA,[32] and in 1994 was demonstrated to defeat two NATO Single Heavy targets inclined at 68 degrees from vertical with ERA,[33] for a line-of-sight penetration of 600 mm. However, the project was cancelled due to the dissolution of theSoviet Union and the subsequent cuts in Western defence budgets.[citation needed]
Argentina:Argentine Army[34] andArgentine Marines[35]
Bosnia and Herzegovina[5]
Brazil[36]
Canada:JTF2[5]
Chile:Chilean Marine Corps,Chilean Army[5]
Colombia[5]
Croatia[36]
Denmark: DesignatedPVV M/95 (PanserværnsvåbenModel 1995).[37]: 93 
Dominican Republic
Finland
France: DesignatedABL (AntiBlindéLourd) by theFrench Army.[38]
Georgia[36]
Greece: Used by Hellenic Navy Seals[5]
India: Order placed by theArmy andAir Force in January 2022.[39] Deliveries to Army completed by February 2025.[40]
Indonesia[41]
Iraq: TheIraqi Army was supplied with the AT4.[42][43]
Israel: Locally produced licensed AT4 CS AST
Kurdistan: ThePeshmerga had up to 1,000 AT-4s in 2016[44]
Ireland: Called theSRAAW (Short Range Anti Armour Weapon) by theIrish Defence Forces.[37]: 139 
Jaysh al-Islam (Captured from the Syrian Democratic Forces)[45]
Kurdistan Workers' Party[46][47]
Latvia[48]
Lebanon: Roughly 1,000 pieces purchased.[49]
Lithuania:Lithuanian Armed Forces[50]
Malaysia: In service with theGrup Gerak Khas[5]
Mexico
Netherlands[52] (Replaced byPzf-3)
Poland (limited use in Special Operations Forces and Air Mobile Forces)[53]
Sweden: DesignatedPansarskott m/86.[36]
Syrian Democratic Forces
Taiwan (Republic of China)[5]
United Kingdom: Small quantities of AT4 and HP projectiles purchased.[2][5]
Ukraine: 15,000 supplied by Sweden,[54][55] 6,000 supplied by the United States,[56] both in 2022.
United States: DesignatedM136 AT4 inUSMC andUnited States Army service, beginning in early 1987.[57] The AT4 was used in theUS invasion of Panama, theWar in Afghanistan, thePersian Gulf War, and theIraq War.[58] Over 300,000 have been built locally, under license byATK.[2][5]
Venezuela: The AT4 has been in the Venezuelan arsenal since the 1980s.[36][59] In 2009, it was reported that AT4s sold to Venezuela had been captured fromFARC insurgents in Colombia, leading Colombia to accuse Venezuela of selling the weapons to the insurgents, and Venezuela reporting that they were stolen by a rebel attack on a Venezuelan position in 1995,[60] thus heightening tensions between the two countries.[59][61]Made in Sweden by SAAB, the AT-4 is one of the most successful weapons in its category, with over a million sales.
Currently, the AT4 is one of the most popular and successful man-portable, disposable anti-tank weapon in the world.
