The nominees for the 91st Academy Awards were announced on January 22, 2019, at 5:20 a.m. PST (13:20UTC), at the Academy headquarters in Beverly Hills, by actorsKumail Nanjiani andTracee Ellis Ross.[13]The Favourite andRoma tied for the most nominations with ten each.[14]
The winners were announced during the awards ceremony on February 24, 2019.[15] For the second time since the expansion of the Best Picture nominee roster at the82nd ceremony in 2010, every Best Picture nominee won at least one award.[16]Roma became the fifth film nominated simultaneously for Best Picture and Best Foreign Language Film in the same year.[17]Alfonso Cuarón was the first person to win Best Director and Best Cinematography for the same film.[18]Black Panther was the firstsuperhero film to be nominated for Best Picture.[19]
Best Actress nomineeYalitza Aparicio was the first Indigenous Mexican person nominated for an acting Oscar.[20] Best Supporting Actor winnerMahershala Ali became thesecond black performer to win multiple acting awards afterDenzel Washington, who won Best Supporting Actor for 1989'sGlory and Best Actor for 2001'sTraining Day.[21] With her nomination for Best Actress and win for Best Original Song for co-writing "Shallow" fromA Star Is Born,Lady Gaga was the second person to receive acting and songwriting nominations for the same film, afterMary J. Blige for 2017'sMudbound, and the first person to do so in a leading role and win in either or both categories.[22] Best Costume Design winnerRuth E. Carter and Best Production Design co-winnerHannah Beachler were the first Black winners in their respective categories and the first Black women to win in a non-acting category sinceIrene Cara, who won the category of Best Original Song for co-writing "Flashdance... What a Feeling" from 1983'sFlashdance.[23]
In October 2018, the Academy hired film producerDonna Gigliotti and television producerGlenn Weiss to oversee production of the 2019 ceremony.[32] "Donna and Glenn will infuse new energy and vision into this 91st awards presentation, and we are excited about a broad-based creative relationship with these two artists", Academy PresidentJohn Bailey said in a press release announcing the decision.[33] Furthermore, AMPAS CEODawn Hudson added, "We're thrilled to work with someone as passionate about the Academy as Donna Gigliotti — an Oscar winner and multiple nominee. She and the now-famous Glenn Weiss are committed to making the most of the innovations we've embraced for our 91st Oscars."[33] In response, co-producer Gigliotti expressed gratitude saying, "I'm grateful to the Academy and ABC for entrusting me with this very special opportunity. I'm sure it will prove to be a humbling, exhilarating and completely unique experience. Thankfully, I will have Glenn Weiss by my side every step of the way!"[32] Weiss also released a statement which read, "I'm so looking forward to being back to help celebrate and honor the film industry and all the talented people behind this year's movies. And I am 'co-excited' to be co-producing this year's show with Donna Gigliotti!"[32]
Two months later, Gigliotti and Weiss initially selected actor and comedianKevin Hart to host the ceremony.[34] However, he resigned from his position shortly after his selection after it was revealed that Hart made jokes that contained anti-gay slurs and language.[35][36] He also added he did not want to be a "distraction" to the ceremony in light of the controversy.[37] The following February, broadcasterABC Entertainment chief Karey Burke announced that the festivities would proceed without a host.[38] During an interview at theTelevision Critics Association press tour, Burke stated, "The main goal, which I was told, was the Academy promised ABC last year after a very lengthy telecast to keep the show to three hours. Producers wisely decided to not to have a host and to go back to having the presenters and movies be the stars, and that be the best way to keep the show at a brisk three hours."[39]
Other people participated in the production of the ceremony. Production designerDavid Korins designed a new stage for the show.[40] Randy Thomas served as announcer for the ceremony.[41] MusicianRickey Minor was hired as music director and conductor.[42]Queen + Adam Lambert performed a medley of the songs "We Will Rock You" and "We Are the Champions" as part of the program's opening number.[43]
Due to the declining viewership of the recent Academy Awards ceremonies, AMPAS sought new ideas to revamp the show while renewing interest with the nominated films. In August 2018, the organization announced plans to add a new category honoring achievement in "Popular Film".[44] The proposal was met with criticism because the award's implied focus onblockbuster suggested thatartistic films and other non-mainstream pictures were not "popular with audiences".[45][46][47] Furthermore, many viewed the creation of this new category to be a ploy to boost ratings and that it could hamper critically successful mainstream films from being nominated for Best Picture despite the insistence of AMPAS that such movies could be eligible for both categories.[45][48] In light of the backlash, the Academy announced the following month that it would postpone implementation of the new category in order to seek additional input.[49] AMPAS presidentJohn Bailey later admitted that the proposed category was intended to help improve viewership, and noted that the concept of a separate award for commercial film dates back to theinaugural awards ceremony, which had separate categories for "Outstanding Picture" and "Best Unique and Artistic Picture".[50]
In an effort to shorten the ceremony, it was reported that only two of the nominees forBest Original Song, "All the Stars" and "Shallow", would be performed live.[51] After a negative reaction from audiences and industry musicians, includingLin-Manuel Miranda and members of the music branch, the Academy backtracked and announced that all five Best Original Song nominees would be performed during the ceremony.[52][53] "All the Stars" would not be performed, however, withVariety reporting that there were "logistics and timing issues" with its performers.[54]
When the nominations were announced, seven of the eight films nominated for Best Picture had earned a combined gross of $1.26 billion at the American and Canadian box offices at the time.[60][61]Black Panther was the highest-grossing film among the Best Picture nominees with $700 million in domestic box office receipts.A Star is Born came in second with $204.8 million; this was followed byBohemian Rhapsody ($202.4 million),BlacKkKlansman ($48.5 million),Green Book ($42.3 million),Vice ($39.5 million), andThe Favourite ($23 million).[62] Box office figures forRoma were unavailable due to distributorNetflix's policy of refusing to release such figures.[60]
Some media outlets received the broadcast positively. Chuck Barney ofThe Mercury News commented, "After months of bad buzz and embarrassing missteps, the 91st Academy Awards appeared to be on their way to an epic fail." He also remarked, "The show, as usual, had some rocky moments, but overall it was a lively, well-paced and entertaining affair."[63] Television critic Matthew Gilbert ofThe Boston Globe wrote, "The hostless Oscar ceremony felt a little more streamlined and energetic than usual, as we were spared yet another predictable opening goof on the nominated movies, a monologue pretending to make fun of the stars, and short quips across the night that never quite land."[64]The Hollywood Reporter television critic Daniel Fienberg quipped, "Sunday's Oscars telecast definitely confirmed that under the right circumstances, a host isn't a necessity." In addition, he said, "The show was not overwhelmed by montages or stunts or tributes, and it also wasn't weighed down by elaborately prepared presenter schtick."[65]
Others were more critical of the show. Kelly Lawler ofUSA Today wrote, "The 2019 Oscar telecast lacked energy and comedy, and was treacherously dull. And maybe that could have been avoided if the Academy had done what it has (almost) always done, and procured a host." She also observed that the awards "were more like a press conference with movie clips in the middle".[66] Television criticHank Stuever ofThe Washington Post commented, "They kept all the speeches but lost any trace of the unpredictable magic. They opened withQueen (the actual band, fronted by their usualFreddie Mercury replacement,Adam Lambert) and a promise that 'We Will Rock You,' but we all know better. The Oscar telecast has never rocked anyone." He ended his review stating, "It's painful, year after year, to watch show business struggle to find a better way to put on a satisfying show."[67]
The American telecast on ABC drew in an average of 29.56 million people over its length, which was a 12% increase from the previous year's ceremony.[4] The show also earned higherNielsen ratings compared to the previous ceremony with 16.4% of households watching the ceremony.[5] In addition, it garnered a higher 18–49 demo rating with a 7.7 rating among viewers in that demographic.[68]
^Fleming, Mike; Utichi, Joe (February 24, 2019)."Deadline's Oscar Live Blog".Deadline Hollywood.Archived from the original on November 8, 2019. RetrievedNovember 5, 2019.