Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

24-Isopropylcholestane

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Chemical compound

24-isopropyl cholestane is an organic molecule produced by specificsponges, protists[1] and marinealgae.[2] The identification of this molecule at high abundances inNeoproterozoic rocks has been interpreted to reflect the presence ofmulticellular life prior to the rapid diversification and radiation of life during theCambrian explosion.[3][4] In this transitional period at the start of thePhanerozoic, single-celled organismsevolved to produce many of the evolutionarylineages present on Earth today.[5] Interpreting 24-isopropyl cholestane in ancient rocks as indicating the presence ofsponges before this rapid diversification event alters the traditional understanding of the evolution ofmulticellular life and the coupling of biology to changes inend-Neoproterozoic climate. However, there are several arguments against causally linking 24-isopropyl cholestane tosponges based on considerations ofmarine algae and thepotential alteration of organic molecules over geologic time.[6] In particular the discovery of 24-isopropyl cholestane in rhizarian protists implies that this biomarker cannot be used on its own to trace sponges.[1] Interpreting the presence of 24-isopropyl cholestane in the context of changingglobal biogeochemical cycles at theProterozoic-Phanerozoic transition remains an area of active research.

24-isopropyl cholestane

[edit]

Chemical argument for Precambrian sponges

[edit]
Figure 1: 24-isopropyl cholestane (left) and 24-n-propyl cholestane (right), two organic molecules produced by sponges and marine algae relevant for studying the evolution of multicellular life in the Precambrian and Phanerozoic.

24-isopropyl cholestane (figure 1, left) is a C30sterane withchemical formula C30H54 andmolecular mass 414.76 g/mol. Themolecule has acholestane skeleton with anisopropyl moiety at C24 and is the geologically stable form of 24-isopropyl cholesterol.[3] A related and important molecule is 24-n-propyl cholestane (figure 1, right), also with the cholestane skeleton, but with ann-propyl moiety at C24.

24-isopropyl cholestane is produced copiously by a particular group ofsponges in the classDemospongiae within thephylumPorifera.[2][7] Like othermolecular fossils, the presence of 24-isopropyl cholestane in rocks may indicate whether demosponge were living in or near the rock'sdepositional environment. High abundances of 24-isopropyl cholestane are identified in thePrecambrian rocks from the Hufq supergroup inOman, suggesting the presence of sponges prior to theCambrian explosion.[3] However, sponges are not the only organisms that produce 24-isopropyl cholestane, so the identification of this biomarker is not uniquely linked to the presence of demosponge.

While marinepelagophyte algae predominantly produce 24-n-propylcholestane,[8] they also produce 24-isopropyl cholestane. The two possible sources of 24-isopropyl cholestane to rocks, the demosponge and the algae, can be decoupled by considering the ratio of 24-isopropyl cholestane to 24-n-propyl cholestane. In many rocks, this ratio is 0.2-0.3.[3] However, in rocks fromOman, the ratio of steranes is 0.52-16.1, with an average value of 1.51, which strongly suggests input of sponge organic matter.[3] Notably, these elevated values disappear during theCambrian, and the ratio of 24-isopropyl cholestane to 24-n-propyl cholestane is used an age-specific proxy for theProterozoic-Phanerozoic transition.[9]

Recent research in molecular clocks has argued that the ability to produce 24-isopropyl cholesterol evolved independently in both the demosponge and algae.[4] However, it appears that thebiosynthesis evolved earlier in the sponges, during theNeoproterozoic, and that the ability to perform thebiosynthesis was not present in algae until thePhanerozoic. If correct, these results would give scientists much more confidence in interpreting elevated levels of 24-isopropyl cholestane in ancient rocks as reflecting the presence of sponges.

Observations of Precambrian sponges

[edit]

Additional evidence for sponge evolution before theCambrian explosion is found inbioclasticpackstones fromSouth Australia.[10] Through repeated grinding andphotography, researchers constructed 3D models ofasymmetric structures with ~1 mm-diameter interconnected channels contained within this rock. The complex network of tunnels appears inconsistent withfungi oralgae, and the researchers tentatively suggested that they are primitive sponges. This interpretation is controversial because the structures pre-date the first appearance ofother sponge fossils and the structures are only known to occur within a singlesedimentary sequence.

Implications

[edit]

While Loveet al. (2009) argues for the presence of sponges in rocks below the Marinoan cap carbonate at ~635 Ma (millions of years ago),[3] Antcliffe (2013) estimates the age of the biomarker-bearing rock to be between 645 Ma and ~580 Ma.[6] Most recently, Goldet al. (2016) writes that the age of rocks containing 24-isoproylcholestane have an age between ~650 Ma and 540 Ma.[4] In all cases, estimates agree that the age of the rocks containing 24-isoproylcholestane pre-date theCambrian explosion at ~541 Ma.

The presence ofsponges before ~540 Ma has profound implications for the evolution of multicellular life and the coupling of thebiosphere toNeoproterozoic climate. Climate change before theCambrian explosion and the subsequent diversification of life are intricately intertwined with understanding the causes ofSnowball Earth episodes,[11] the deposition ofBanded Iron Formations,[12] and the second step in therise of atmospheric oxygen.[13] In particular, the presence of sponges raises questions of the minimum dissolved O2 content of the oceans in the lateNeoproterozoic and the transition from aeuxinicCanfield ocean to the modern oxygenated deep-ocean. However, sponges appear to require very little O2 to survive, so their presence in thePrecambrian may not provide strong constraints onProterozoic O2 levels.[14]

Caveats

[edit]

There are several lines of logic against interpreting 24-isopropylcholestane as abiomarker fordemosponge:[6]

  1. Much of the argument forPrecambrian sponges is grounded in the observation thatpelagophyte algae produce organic matter with a low ratio of 24-isopropyl cholestane to 24-n-propyl cholestane, but that this ratio is high in ancient rocks. However, the observed change in thesterane ratio could also be explained ifalgae changed the relative abundances in which they producesteranes over the past 600 million years. In a similar line of argument, it is possible that anotherextinct organism from which the algae descended produced organic matter with a higher ratio of 24-isopropyl cholestane to 24-n-propyl cholestane. As argued above, recent evidence has suggested that the algae's synthesis pathway only arose during thePhanerozoic,[4] which tempers this argument. More generally, these concerns address the issue of insufficient specificity inmolecular fossils, which plagues manybiomarker studies.
  2. 24-isopropyl cholestane can be formed throughsedimentary diagenesis of otherorganic molecules, so the high ratio of 24-isopropyl cholestane to 24-n-propyl cholestane could simply reflect thepost-depositional transformation of organic matter. Some research has addressed this concern by showing a lack of alteration in other organic molecules,[3] such ashopanes, but subsequent analysis has questioned whether the molecules with minimal alteration could have been contamination from modernpetroleum-derived oil.[6]
  3. There may have been a group ofbacteria living symbiotically with the sponges that also produced 24-isopropyl cholestane.[15] If thesebacteria produced the biomarker throughoutgeologic time, its presence would not be strictly indicative ofdemosponge. However, as with the marine algae, analysis of the ratio of 24-isopropyl cholestane to 24-n-propyl cholestane may clarify the source of the compounds.
  4. It is strange to find spongebiomarkers before theCambrian explosion without accompanying spongefossils (although there is tentative evidence for sponge-like structures in the latest-Neoproterozoic[10]). Moreover, once fossils of sponges do appear during thePaleozoic, the ratio of 24-isopropyl cholestane to 24-n-propylcholestane returns to its background value. This is surprising because we might expect the ratio to stay elevated or even to increase asmetazoa diversified and sponges proliferated.

References

[edit]
  1. ^abNettersheim, Benjamin J.; Brocks, Jochen J.; Schwelm, Arne; Hope, Janet M.; Not, Fabrice; Lomas, Michael; Schmidt, Christiane; Schiebel, Ralf; Nowack, Eva C. M.; De Deckker, Patrick; Pawlowski, Jan; Bowser, Samuel S.; Bobrovskiy, Ilya; Zonneveld, Karin; Kucera, Michal; Stuhr, Marleen; Hallmann, Christian (4 March 2019). "Putative sponge biomarkers in unicellular Rhizaria question an early rise of animals".Nature Ecology & Evolution.3 (4):577–581.Bibcode:2019NatEE...3..577N.doi:10.1038/s41559-019-0806-5.PMID 30833757.S2CID 256718560.
  2. ^abHofheinz, Werner; Oesterhelt, Gottfried (8 June 1979). "24-Isopropylcholesterol and 22-Dehydro-24-isopropylcholesterol, Novel Sterols from a Sponge".Helvetica Chimica Acta.62 (4):1307–1309.doi:10.1002/hlca.19790620443.
  3. ^abcdefgLove, Gordon D.; Grosjean, Emmanuelle; Stalvies, Charlotte; Fike, David A.; Grotzinger, John P.; Bradley, Alexander S.; Kelly, Amy E.; Bhatia, Maya; Meredith, William; Snape, Colin E.; Bowring, Samuel A.; Condon, Daniel J.; Summons, Roger E. (February 2009)."Fossil steroids record the appearance of Demospongiae during the Cryogenian period".Nature.457 (7230):718–721.Bibcode:2009Natur.457..718L.doi:10.1038/nature07673.PMID 19194449.S2CID 4314662.
  4. ^abcdGold, David A.; Grabenstatter, Jonathan; de Mendoza, Alex; Riesgo, Ana; Ruiz-Trillo, Iñaki; Summons, Roger E. (8 March 2016)."Sterol and genomic analyses validate the sponge biomarker hypothesis".Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.113 (10):2684–2689.Bibcode:2016PNAS..113.2684G.doi:10.1073/pnas.1512614113.PMC 4790988.PMID 26903629.
  5. ^Maloof, A. C.; Porter, S. M.; Moore, J. L.; Dudas, F. O.; Bowring, S. A.; Higgins, J. A.; Fike, D. A.; Eddy, M. P. (2010). "The earliest Cambrian record of animals and ocean geochemical change".Geological Society of America Bulletin.122 (11–12):1731–1774.Bibcode:2010GSAB..122.1731M.doi:10.1130/b30346.1.S2CID 6694681.
  6. ^abcdAntcliffe, Jonathan B. (March 2013). "Questioning the evidence of organic compounds called sponge biomarkers".Palaeontology.56 (5):917–925.Bibcode:2013Palgy..56..917A.doi:10.1111/pala.12030.S2CID 83812252.
  7. ^Bergquist, Patricia R.; Hofheinz, W.; Hofheinz, W.; Oesterhelt, G. (November 1980). "Sterol composition and the classification of the demospongiae".Biochemical Systematics and Ecology.8 (4):423–435.Bibcode:1980BioSE...8..423B.doi:10.1016/0305-1978(80)90045-9.
  8. ^Moldowan, J. Michael; Fago, Frederick J.; Lee, Cathy Y.; Jacobson, Stephen R.; Watt, David S.; Slougui, Nacer-Eddine; Jeganathan, Alwarsamy; Young, Donald C. (19 January 1990). "Sedimentary 12-n-Propylcholestanes, Molecular Fossils Diagnostic of Marine Algae".Science.247 (4940):309–312.Bibcode:1990Sci...247..309M.doi:10.1126/science.247.4940.309.JSTOR 2873627.PMID 17735849.S2CID 45171358.Gale A8352545ProQuest 213546466.
  9. ^Peters, K. E.; Walters, C. C.; Moldowan, J. M. (2004).The Biomarker Guide.doi:10.1017/CBO9781107326040.ISBN 978-0-521-83762-0.[page needed]
  10. ^abMaloof, Adam C.; Rose, Catherine V.; Beach, Robert; Samuels, Bradley M.; Calmet, Claire C.; Erwin, Douglas H.; Poirier, Gerald R.; Yao, Nan; Simons, Frederik J. (2010). "Possible animal-body fossils in pre-Marinoan limestones from South Australia".Nature Geoscience.3 (9):653–659.Bibcode:2010NatGe...3..653M.doi:10.1038/ngeo934.S2CID 13171894.
  11. ^Hoffman, Paul F.; Kaufman, Alan J.; Halverson, Galen P.; Schrag, Daniel P. (28 August 1998). "A Neoproterozoic Snowball Earth".Science.281 (5381):1342–1346.Bibcode:1998Sci...281.1342H.doi:10.1126/science.281.5381.1342.PMID 9721097.S2CID 13046760.
  12. ^Kappler, Andreas; Pasquero, Claudia; Konhauser, Kurt O.; Newman, Dianne K. (2005). "Deposition of banded iron formations by anoxygenic phototrophic Fe(II)-oxidizing bacteria".Geology.33 (11): 865.Bibcode:2005Geo....33..865K.doi:10.1130/g21658.1.S2CID 14104171.
  13. ^Lyons, Timothy W.; Reinhard, Christopher T.; Planavsky, Noah J. (2014). "The rise of oxygen in Earth's early ocean and atmosphere".Nature.506 (7488):307–315.Bibcode:2014Natur.506..307L.doi:10.1038/nature13068.PMID 24553238.S2CID 4443958.
  14. ^Mills, Daniel B.; Ward, Lewis M.; Jones, CarriAyne; Sweeten, Brittany; Forth, Michael; Treusch, Alexander H.; Canfield, Donald E. (18 March 2014)."Oxygen requirements of the earliest animals".Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.111 (11):4168–4172.Bibcode:2014PNAS..111.4168M.doi:10.1073/pnas.1400547111.PMC 3964089.PMID 24550467.
  15. ^Siegl, Alexander; Kamke, Janine; Hochmuth, Thomas; Piel, Jörn; Richter, Michael; Liang, Chunguang; Dandekar, Thomas; Hentschel, Ute (January 2011)."Single-cell genomics reveals the lifestyle of Poribacteria, a candidate phylum symbiotically associated with marine sponges".The ISME Journal.5 (1):61–70.Bibcode:2011ISMEJ...5...61S.doi:10.1038/ismej.2010.95.PMC 3105677.PMID 20613790.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=24-Isopropylcholestane&oldid=1209742644"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp