Şahkulu rebellion | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Belligerents | |||||||
Qizilbash rebels | Ottoman Empire | ||||||
Commanders and leaders | |||||||
Şahkulu † | Karagöz Ahmet Pasha † Hadım Ali Pasha † Şehzade Ahmet | ||||||
Strength | |||||||
Unknown |
|
TheŞahkulu rebellion was a widespread pro-Shia and pro-Safavid uprising inAnatolia, directed against theOttoman Empire, in 1511. It began among theTurkmen tribes of theTaurus mountains, before spreading to a wide variety of disgruntled groups.[3] It is named after the leader of the rebels,Şahkulu. His death in battle also meant the end of the uprising.
TheSafavid dynasty was consolidated and founded byIsmail I in the early 16th century. Ismail, being a champion of theShia faith and partially aTurkmen, was also sympathetic to the Turkmen of the Ottoman Empire.
TheQizilbash, Anatolian adherents to theSafavid order, held a strong presence acrossAnatolia from the late 15th century to the mid-16th century and assumed a central role in the Şahkulu rebellion. In the decades preceding the events of the rebellion, due to the fluid religious character of the region, the primarilySunni Ottoman state demonstrated a notable tolerance towards Shia Islam. However, beginning in the early 16th century, this tolerance began to recede; according to official Ottoman terminology from the period, aQizilbash was a rebel heretic suspected of illicit relationships with the Safavids.[4] Some ascribe this receding tolerance to the decline of theAq Qoyunlu coupled with the emerging socio-political legitimacy of theSafavid empire.[4]
Though the revolt was incited by Şahkulu among the Qizilbash, numbered among the eventual participants were various non-Qizilbash groups, such as formersipahis, and dispossessedghazis, and otherTurkmen peoples.[5] This decrease in tolerance contributed in part to the malcontent of the Turkmen tribes in Anatolia towards the Ottoman State. Their refusal to pay state taxes, settle down, and accept Ottoman central control pushed these Turkmen tribes towards a more militant form of Shi’ism.[4] This same malcontent would lead to multiple uprisings in Eastern Anatolia headed by tribal leaders.
Being inspired by Safavid missionaries, the Turkmens living on Ottoman soil, "as far west asKonya", were mobilized in a "fervent messianic movement", led by Şahkulu.[6] Şahkulu and his followers tried to "replicate" the same type of revolt led by Ismail I several years earlier, "perhaps in anticipation of a union with the Safavids".[6] Ismail I's activities did not escape the attention of the Ottomans, but the Ottoman Empire was too preoccupied with the oncoming period of interregnum during the last years of the crippled sultanBayezid II. Thus Ismail was able to gain many supporters among Ottoman subjects. One such supporter wasŞahkulu (meaning"servant of theshah"), a member of the Turkmen Tekkelu tribe.[6]
During the early days of interregnum,Korkut, one of the princes (Turkish:Şehzade), was travelling from Antalya toManisa to be closer to the capital. Şahkulu raided his caravan and robbed the treasury. Then he began attacking the towns and killing the government officers in the towns. He also raidedAlaşehir to seize a part of the royal treasure. Only then, an Ottoman force under Karagöz Ahmet Pasha, thebeylerbey ofAnadolu, was sent to check his activities. But Şahkulu defeated the forces of Ahmet Pasha and executed him. This increased the fame and the prestige of Şahkulu. To his partisans, after raiding a royal caravan and killing a high-ranking Ottoman statesman, he was invincible. A second army was sent after him. The commanders of the army wereŞehzade Ahmet, one of the claimants to the throne, and the grand vizierHadım Ali Pasha. They were able to corner Şahkulu nearAltıntaş (in modernKütahya Province), but instead of fighting, Ahmet tried to win over thejanissaries for his cause. Failing to achieve this, he left the battlefield. Şahkulu saw his chance and escaped. Ali Pasha with a smaller force chased him, and clashed with him at Çubukova betweenKayseri andSivas.[7](according to some sourcesGökçay) The battle was a draw, but both Ali Pasha and Şahkulu were killed (July 1511).[8]
Şahkulu's partisans were not defeated, but they had lost their leader. Many scattered, but after a third army was sent by theOttoman Porte, the most devoted escaped to Persia. During their escape they raided a caravan, and accidentally killed a well-known Persian scholar. Consequently, instead of showing them hospitality, Ismail executed them. Meanwhile, in Ottoman lands, Prince Ahmet's behavior in the battle caused reaction among the soldiers. Moreover, the death of Hadım Ali, the chief partisan of Ahmet, provided an advantage to the youngest claimants to throne: the succession would ultimately fall toSelim I, under whose reign the Ottoman state saw spectacular victories and doubled in area. Selim was also a very devoted Sunni and effectively checked Shiite activities in Ottoman lands after defeating Ismail in theBattle of Chaldiran in 1514.
But the anxiety of the Ottomans, in relation to "losing much of their Asian possessions was not eased".[6] Nor did the hatred of the Ottomans for Ismail I cease to exist, even though Ismail apologized for the atrocities caused by the Turkmens and "disowned" Şahkulu.[6]
As the possibility existed of a "mass Turkmen exodus into the Safavid realm",Bayezid II sought to establish good relations with Ismail, "at least on the surface, and welcomed Ismail's gestures to establish good neighborly relations".[6] In letters sent to Ismail, Bayezid II addressed Ismail as "heir to the kingdom ofKaykhosrow – the legendary great king of theShahnameh – and to Dara (Darius) of theancient Persian Empire".[6]Abbas Amanat adds: "He further advised Ismail to behave royally, preserve his precious and strategically vital kingdom with justice and equanimity, end forced conversions, and leave in peace with his neighbors".[6]
The political environment which resulted from this revolt would lead the next Ottoman Sultan, Selim I, to take violent measures against the Qizilbash and declare war on Iran.[4] Counted among these violent measures was the decree from Selim I to kill more than 40,000 Qizilbash, children and elderly included, inRumelia and Anatolia prior to the Battle of Chaldiran in March 1514.[9] In undated letters from Selim I sent to Ismail I, estimated to have been written in 1514, Selim I wrote that "it has been heard repeatedly that you have subjected the upright community of Muhammad to your devious will" and expounded upon his plans to "crown the head of every gallows tree with a crown-wearing Sufi and clear the faction from the face of the earth".
Except for the Şahkulu rebellion happening in Teke city or the sanjak of Teke in 1511
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)