Movatterモバイル変換
[0]ホーム
[Python-Dev] Object customization
Ken Manheimerklm@digicool.com
Sun, 16 Apr 2000 18:21:59 -0400 (EDT)
On Sun, 16 Apr 2000, Skip Montanaro wrote:>> Ken> We haven't even seen a satisfactory approach to referring to the> Ken> function, itself, from within the function. Maybe it's not even> Ken> desirable to be able to do that - that's an interesting question.>> I hereby propose that within a function the special name __ refer to the> function. You could have>> def fact(n):> if n <= 1: return 1> return __(n-1) * n>> You could also refer to function attributes through __ (presuming Barry's> proposed patch gets adopted):At first i thought you were kidding about using '__' because '_' was taken- on lots of terminals that i use, there is no intervening whitespaceseparating the two '_'s, so it's pretty hard to tell the differencebetween it and '_'!Now, i wouldn't mind using '_' if it's available, but guido was prettydarned against using it in my initial designs for packages - i wanted touse it to refer to the package containing the current module, like unix'..'. I gathered that a serious part of the objection was in using acharacter to denote non-operation syntax - python just doesn't do that.I also like the idea of using a function instead of a magic variable -most of python's magic variables are in packages, like os.environ. Kenklm@digicool.com
[8]ページ先頭